Re: [OpenAFS] 1.7.8 UNC path issues

2012-03-31 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 3/31/2012 4:37 PM, Thomas Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're in the process of deploying the 1.7.8 client (with IFS) to all of our 
> workstations, some are upgrades from 1.5.x and some are new installs. We've 
> noticed a problem with using UNC paths on both Windows XP Pro and Windows 7 
> Pro. This problem presents itself in slightly different ways between the two 
> Windows version but is consistent and occurs on every single machine. Here's 
> description of the problem...
> 
> Windows XP Pro
> Users are seeing delays when browsing AFS via UNC paths--that is, they browse 
> to AFS and it will take, typically, 5 to 10 seconds before they can click on 
> anything in a given directory or change to another directory or open a file, 
> etc.
> 
> Windows 7 Pro
> When right-clicking in Windows Explorer, when viewing the AFS file space via 
> UNC, to, for example, create a new folder, there's about a 10 second delay 
> before the menu comes up to allow selecting the option to create a folder or 
> file.
> 
> When performing both of these operations on a network drive mapped to an AFS 
> cell, the problems are not present--everything works as expected.
> 
> Might this be something with our configuration or is this possibly a bug in 
> 1.7.8? Please let me know if I can provide any additional information and I 
> will.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> ~ Tom_

If you Wireshark you will find Windows performing a network browse for
the "AFS" netbios name.  The fact that Explorer is triggering this
search when the "AFS" name is registered with the Multiple UNC Provider
is a bug in Windows.   It doesn't happen in all environments and I don't
have a workaround.

Someone with a support contract with Microsoft and a willingness to pay
the root cause investigation expenses is welcome to open a support
incident with them.

Jeffrey Altman



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[OpenAFS] 1.7.8 UNC path issues

2012-03-31 Thread Thomas Smith
Hi,

We're in the process of deploying the 1.7.8 client (with IFS) to all of our 
workstations, some are upgrades from 1.5.x and some are new installs. We've 
noticed a problem with using UNC paths on both Windows XP Pro and Windows 7 
Pro. This problem presents itself in slightly different ways between the two 
Windows version but is consistent and occurs on every single machine. Here's 
description of the problem...

Windows XP Pro
Users are seeing delays when browsing AFS via UNC paths--that is, they browse 
to AFS and it will take, typically, 5 to 10 seconds before they can click on 
anything in a given directory or change to another directory or open a file, 
etc.

Windows 7 Pro
When right-clicking in Windows Explorer, when viewing the AFS file space via 
UNC, to, for example, create a new folder, there's about a 10 second delay 
before the menu comes up to allow selecting the option to create a folder or 
file.

When performing both of these operations on a network drive mapped to an AFS 
cell, the problems are not present--everything works as expected.

Might this be something with our configuration or is this possibly a bug in 
1.7.8? Please let me know if I can provide any additional information and I 
will.

Thank you,

~ Tom___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info


Re: [OpenAFS] HowTo setup OpenAFS cell PDF, german

2012-03-31 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am 28.03.2012 18:32, schrieb Lars Schimmer:

> The workshop at the Chemnitz Linux Tag 2012 is done and today I
> changed some parts in the script of that workshop. It is now
> available, I just link here the Chemnitz Linux Tag pages, and it is
> still in german. But if you follow the commands, you should be able
> to setup a new cell on your own.

I think I've spotted a small error. The AFS keyfile is named
"afs.keyfile" in your text, but on my (Debian) server it's named
"Keyfile". Is this one of these anoying little Ubuntu/Debian
differences or really a mistake in the text?

Oh, and I think the afs3 enctype is not needed anymore nowadays, or am
I wrong here?

Otherwise great description!

Bye...

Dirk
___
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info