I agree with the new MMFF95s default, most of our common cases are modeled well
with
planar aromatic nitrogens.
About the dielectric, I don't have strong opinions.
Depending on the scenario, I would consider either vacuo (1) or water (80) to
be good
choices, but 4 is a 'close enough approximation' of 1.
S
On 9/22/19 5:11 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
> While it's possible to change the force field with the -gen3d option, most
> people don't.
>
> I think for 3.0 it might be nice to:
> - Use MMFF94s (i.e., the one with planar aromatic nitrogens)
> - Use a default dielectric constant of ~4.0
>
> In my testing #1 helps a bit - and #2 at least doesn't hurt when comparing to
> experimental crystal structures.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Geoff
>
> ___
> OpenBabel-Devel mailing list
> openbabel-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
>
--
Stefano Forli, PhD
Assistant Professor
Center for Computational Structural Biology
Dept. of Integrative Structural
and Computational Biology, MB-112A
The Scripps Research Institute
10550 North Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla, CA 92037-1000, USA.
tel: +1 (858)784-2055
fax: +1 (858)784-2860
email: fo...@scripps.edu
http://www.scripps.edu/~forli/
___
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss