Release 1.0.1 candidate XML-schemas now published.

[Andrew Patterson]

 a schema for the VERSION and related classes, enabling VERSIONs to be
 represented as XML inside EHR Extracts (the Extract specification itself
 will be published soon)
 a schema for the Archetype Object Model (AOM) This work has been done by Dr
 Sam Heard at Ocean Informatics.

Would it be possible to get some example instances that
conform to these schema published at the same
location? It would be good to have some sample archetypes,
and then some sample XML instances that conform to those
archetypes.. (maybe in the openehr_archetypes SVN
repository?)

Andrew
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical

Archetype blood_pressure: Data - State - Protocol - correlation

[Christoph Rinner]

Hi,

I am writing my diploma thesis at the Vienna Medical University. I have  
two questions concerning the openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.blood_pressure.v1  
Archetype (Date 22/03/2006) and would be very thankful if someone could  
answer them briefly.

1st:
I read in the The openEHR Reference Model - EHR Information Model  
(openehr_ehr_im.pdf Revision: 5.1.0) in chapter 8.2.3.4 Two ways of  
Recording State that there are two ways to record States inside a History.
In this Blood pressure measurement Archetype they have chosen the way  
where the state is recorded outside data History.
Isn?t it necessary to correlate a blood pressure measurement [at0003] to a  
position [at0008] (Systolic: 120, Diastolic: 80, Position: Standing)?
What is the medical reason for modelling it like that? Even if it is made  
the other way the problem still occurs with the protocol. When we try to  
match an Instrument [at0012] (from Protocol) to a certain blood pressure  
measurement (Systolic: 120, Diastolic: 80, Instrument: XYZ) we don?t know  
which instrument belongs to which blood pressure. Am I wrong? Is there a  
way to correlate them? Is there no need to correlate them?

2nd:
Why does the state begin with an ITEM_LIST[at0007] and not with a  
History? In the documentation it looks as if state and data have the  
same structure.
(http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0/Printable/Printable.html#_9_0_76d0249_1109066126764_414607_2244)

Thanks a lot in advance.

Christoph Rinner
___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical