Improvement suggestion to CKM Search
Hi Pablo, Thanks for the suggestion. We actually used Levensthein in CKM's predessor tool (the Archeype Finder). It required some finetuning to find good matches, but then worked quite nicely. Completely different technology now, but it may indeed be worth enabling something like this again. It may be possible to get some suggestions on possible matches (Did you mean Glasgow?) I need to check out the technical constraints a bit, but thank you again for your suggestion Cheers Sebastian On 03.01.2013 22:34, pablo pazos wrote: Hi all, A couple of minutes ago I found the search in the CKM does an exact string matching search. I would suggest to make a search based on match weight using something like Levenshtein distance that is more typo proof. (I typed Glasg*l*ow instead of Glasgow :) -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- *Dr. Sebastian Garde* /Dr. sc. hum., Dipl.-Inform. Med, FACHI/ Senior Developer Ocean Informatics Skype: gardeseb -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130105/04462ffb/attachment.html
Improvement suggestion to CKM Search
Hi Sebastian, Search suggestions are indeed a great feature for enhancing user experience!I'm glad to help :) -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 11:12:39 +0100 From: sebastian.ga...@oceaninformatics.com To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: Improvement suggestion to CKM Search Hi Pablo, Thanks for the suggestion. We actually used Levensthein in CKM's predessor tool (the Archeype Finder). It required some finetuning to find good matches, but then worked quite nicely. Completely different technology now, but it may indeed be worth enabling something like this again. It may be possible to get some suggestions on possible matches (Did you mean Glasgow?) I need to check out the technical constraints a bit, but thank you again for your suggestion Cheers Sebastian On 03.01.2013 22:34, pablo pazos wrote: Hi all, A couple of minutes ago I found the search in the CKM does an exact string matching search. I would suggest to make a search based on match weight using something like Levenshtein distance that is more typo proof. (I typed Glasglow instead of Glasgow :) -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- Dr. Sebastian Garde Dr. sc. hum., Dipl.-Inform. Med, FACHI Senior Developer Ocean Informatics Skype: gardeseb ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130105/bd379f15/attachment.html
Improvement to specify more than one archetype on ACTIVITY.arction_archetype_id [Archetype Editor]
Hi all, When editing an INSTRUCTION archetype, setting the action_archetype_id attribute of an ACTIVITY, the AE only gives the possibility of selecting one archetype, but this should support more than one archetype using regexes as said on the specs (ehr_im.pdf setion 8.3.7). A solution could be to support the selection of more than one action archetype (using the [...] button, see screen capture here: https://plus.google.com/109540968085207927247/posts/f33Hs2rHoto) and creating a regex from the selected archetypes like archid1|archid2|archid3 What do you think? -- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130105/11f7c850/attachment.html
