New EHRServer v0.5 and roadmap

[pablo pazos]

Hi all!
I'm very excited to share the good news with all my openEHR friends here.
We have released EHRServer v0.5! This version is what we could call "feature 
complete", so it includes all the minimum features of a real openEHR server, 
the latest ones related to securing the API, and before that, supporting 
multi-tenancy.
I'll release user documentation and a full REST API documentation in the next 
couple of days, and will record a demo in English on YouTube via Hangout. I 
made a demo in Spanish not so long ago: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84YiNfkLGMA
Also, we have a staging server to test the EHRServer*, you are very welcome to 
try it and give us some feedback to continue improving the tool: 
https://cabolabs-ehrserver.rhcloud.com/ehr
* You can create an account and start using it.
Note: the server is not so fast, but is usable.

I'm working hard on v0.6 right now, hopefully we'll have a release before 
February. This version will include fixes to the UI, REST API, and security 
checks, more testing, testable REST API docs, among other things. The focus 
will be on robustness, security, and consistency more than adding new features. 
We can call the EHRServer v0.6 a "production ready" system.
I started to meet with some friends and colleagues interested on using the 
EHRServer as an open-source openEHR backend. My next focus will be on building 
pilot projects with some companies, to let them try the EHRServer and see if it 
fits their needs and gathering information to improve it. If anyone is 
interested, please give me a ring or ping my by email!

-- 
Kind regards,
Eng. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
http://cabolabs.com   ___
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

RE: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

[Bakke, Silje Ljosland]

Thanks again Ian! ☺

Could anyone from Slovenia provide links to documents mandating or recommending 
openEHR, and procurement documents referring to it? It doesn’t matter if 
they’re in Slovenian, the main point is that they can be proven to exist.

Regards,
Silje

From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Ian McNicoll
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:41 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions 
Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

I have added some links. many of the questions seem inappropriate, not 
applicable, or virtually impossible to answer within the health domain.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: i...@freshehr.com
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

[https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0BzLo3mNUvbAjT2R5Sm1DdFZYTU0=download]
Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation 
ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL

On 6 January 2016 at 08:00, Bakke, Silje Ljosland 
>
 wrote:
Thanks Ian!

It’s good to see there are so many “yes”-es! However, we’ll need some more 
info, for instance links to where the “relevant documentation of the 
development and approval process of the specification is archived and 
identified”.

We’ll handle the spreadsheet bit. ☺

Regards,
Silje

From: openEHR-technical 
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org]
 On Behalf Of Ian McNicoll
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:37 AM
To: For openEHR technical discussions

Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR

My first go now at CAMSS wiki 
page,

There appears to be a major snafu with the CAMMS spreadsheet that auto-sets 
'not applicable' to most of the rows if 'open specification' is set as the 
standard type. This makes some sense for a proprietary specification but none 
whatsoever for an open specification. @Silje - you may want to seek 
clarification from the CAMMS authors.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: i...@freshehr.com
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

[https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0BzLo3mNUvbAjT2R5Sm1DdFZYTU0=download]
Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation 
ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL

On 5 January 2016 at 08:52, Bakke, Silje Ljosland 
>
 wrote:
I’ve added the CAMSS assessment table to the page. Would appreciate any help in 
populating the pink cells. ☺

Regards,
Silje

From: openEHR-technical 
[mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org]
 On Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:08 PM
To: 
openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR


I have set up a CAMSS wiki 
page,
 Silje if you can copy the relevant CAMSS boilerplate in (assessment table etc) 
and make it look vaguely presentable (make child pages if you need) then I am 
sure the community can get it populated quickly for you, since it's clearly of 
general benefit.

- thomas
On 04/01/2016 14:24, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
Hi Thomas, thanks for your reply!

I don’t have any say in which assessment criteria are used, unfortunately. I’ve 
seen your criteria, and agree they’re more specifically applicable to e-health 
standards.

I’ll probably need a lot of help answering and justifying the CAMSS questions, 
especially those regarding the governance of the specifications. I hope it’s 
okay if I pose specific questions to this list.

Regards,
Silje

From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2016 2:57 PM
To: 
openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR


Hi Silje,

I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is using CAMSS much, 
if we believe this page, which contains CAMSS 
assessments,
 none of which are health related. On this page 
 there is a 
much larger list of 'recommended' standards which are all generic (PDF, GIF and 
so on) - I don't know what use this is.

This