Dear All

 

As an involved clinician I have been thinking about advantages of using
inheritance to relate DATA_STRUCTURES and CLUSTER. This arises from two
things we have learned in clinical modelling:

1)      At almost every point where a DATA_STRUCTURE is currently specified
in the RM it would probably be inappropriate to model any structure other
than a ITEM_TREE. This is because any change to this will invalidate
existing data and we have learned that information models get more complex
with time. So the construct of DATA_STRUCTURE at the moment offers no real
value in return for the complexity it introduces as it stands at the moment.

2)      A ITEM_TABLE or ITEM_LIST 'constraint' can more usefully appear at
any point in the data - even forcing a ITEM_TREE is useful if you can see
that specialisation should always allow hierarchical structures.

 

I am suggesting that we change the model to have ITEM_STRUCTURE inherit from
CLUSTER. This would mean that ITEM_STRUCTUREs always behaved as clusters
(paths etc) but had added features. A ITEM_LIST then becomes a constraint on
a CLUSTER to only allow ELEMENTS. And ITEM_TABLE could now appear anywhere
in the data.

 

For backward compatibility it would mean that ITEM_SINGLE and its 'item'
attribute would have to be made obsolete. In fact an ITEM_LIST with
cardinality of 1 offers the same constraint capability. At the moment
ITEM_STRUCTURE and HISTORY inherit from DATA_STRUCTURE but I am not sure if
that confers any benefit as I do not think that DATA_STRUCTURE is present
anywhere in the model. Thomas may want to elucidate this aspect. It may mean
that we need a new interface with multiple inheritance in Eiffel if that is
important.

 

This does mean that openEHR is more closely aligned with CEN as well - that
is to say all data would be clusters with more attributes where ITEM_TABLE
was used and more features in software.

 

I am interested in the Techo's response to this idea.

 

Cheers, Sam

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100512/219697b8/attachment.html>

Reply via email to