We've been seeing occasional test failures on the autobuilder where
we don't see the expected events. It turns out this is due to
run_command being helpful and eating them if the server is fast and
the client slow. Adding a sleep into the run_command code makes the
failure consistent.
Use a new "handle_events" argument to allow us to handle all the
events which is what this test requires.
[YOCTO #14585]
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
index 63ceddf118a..6f26af23d54 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/tinfoil.py
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ class TinfoilTests(OESelftestTestCase):
pass
pattern = 'conf'
- res = tinfoil.run_command('testCookerCommandEvent', pattern)
+ res = tinfoil.run_command('testCookerCommandEvent', pattern,
handle_events=False)
self.assertTrue(res)
eventreceived = False
--
2.32.0
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#163620):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/163620
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90004953/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
