Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Cui, Dexuan wrote on 2012-03-31: Cui, Dexuan wrote on 2012-03-31: Paul Eggleton wrote on 2012-03-30: On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote: Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. Sau! The following changes since commit 644b7503c37fd73730dd3d7841463b158b8934ed: guile: Deal with hardcoded path issues (2012-03-27 00:28:41 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/self http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log / ?h =sgw/ self So these patches have been merged now; I updated to latest master and re-ran bitbake self-hosted-image; unfortunately the output doesn't appear to be usable. I don't know what has gone wrong but during boot there are complaints that the filesystem is corrupt: SYSLINUX 4.03 2010-10-22 EDD Copyright (C) 1994-2010 H. Peter Anvin et al EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 581713 EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 610383 Kernel panic - not syncing: no init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Running e2fsck -fn on the rootfs.ext3 file shows quite a number of errors. There were no unusual errors in the log.do_rootfs. Hi Paul, I can reproduce the same I issue, too... I'll try to look into this, but at the first glance, I don't know what has gone wrong, either... Can we make a conclusion the current genext2fs is buggy here when creating a big image(e.g., 4GB)? Hi Paul, I believe this is true: genext2fs-1.4.1 can create a corrupt file system when the size of the file system exceeds some limit. e.g., when I create an image of 2.8GB, the image can be mounted properly, but when I create an image of about 4.5GB(yes, I found genext2fs-1.4.1 is actually able to create an image of 4.5GB; I also found it's unable to create an image of about 5.5GB, always reporting couldn't allocate a block (no free space)), the generated image can show something like this when it's booted: EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced... However, with Corey's patches (from the genext2fs's mailing list) applied, I can't see the issues. You can try the patch too to see if this would also works for you: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/commit/?h=dcui/masterid=c76f9db84c2eabe0bf704b253a957f695f421936 Thanks, -- Dexuan ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
On Sunday 01 April 2012 10:28:35 Cui, Dexuan wrote: Hi Paul, I believe this is true: genext2fs-1.4.1 can create a corrupt file system when the size of the file system exceeds some limit. e.g., when I create an image of 2.8GB, the image can be mounted properly, but when I create an image of about 4.5GB(yes, I found genext2fs-1.4.1 is actually able to create an image of 4.5GB; I also found it's unable to create an image of about 5.5GB, always reporting couldn't allocate a block (no free space)), the generated image can show something like this when it's booted: EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced... However, with Corey's patches (from the genext2fs's mailing list) applied, I can't see the issues. I can confirm this. With these patches applied I also compared (a) using genext2fs to create a 30GB rootfs, and (b) letting genext2fs create a filesystem with just enough space and then resizing it to 30GB with resize2fs. There was no benefit in the latter - it took 5 minutes longer. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote: Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. Sau! The following changes since commit 644b7503c37fd73730dd3d7841463b158b8934ed: guile: Deal with hardcoded path issues (2012-03-27 00:28:41 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/self http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/ self So these patches have been merged now; I updated to latest master and re-ran bitbake self-hosted-image; unfortunately the output doesn't appear to be usable. I don't know what has gone wrong but during boot there are complaints that the filesystem is corrupt: SYSLINUX 4.03 2010-10-22 EDD Copyright (C) 1994-2010 H. Peter Anvin et al EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 581713 EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 610383 Kernel panic - not syncing: no init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Running e2fsck -fn on the rootfs.ext3 file shows quite a number of errors. There were no unusual errors in the log.do_rootfs. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Paul Eggleton wrote on 2012-03-30: On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote: Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. Sau! The following changes since commit 644b7503c37fd73730dd3d7841463b158b8934ed: guile: Deal with hardcoded path issues (2012-03-27 00:28:41 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/self http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/ ?h =sgw/ self So these patches have been merged now; I updated to latest master and re-ran bitbake self-hosted-image; unfortunately the output doesn't appear to be usable. I don't know what has gone wrong but during boot there are complaints that the filesystem is corrupt: SYSLINUX 4.03 2010-10-22 EDD Copyright (C) 1994-2010 H. Peter Anvin et al EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 581713 EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 610383 Kernel panic - not syncing: no init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Running e2fsck -fn on the rootfs.ext3 file shows quite a number of errors. There were no unusual errors in the log.do_rootfs. Hi Paul, I can reproduce the same I issue, too... I'll try to look into this, but at the first glance, I don't know what has gone wrong, either... Thanks, -- Dexuan ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Cui, Dexuan wrote on 2012-03-31: Paul Eggleton wrote on 2012-03-30: On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote: Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. Sau! The following changes since commit 644b7503c37fd73730dd3d7841463b158b8934ed: guile: Deal with hardcoded path issues (2012-03-27 00:28:41 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/self http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log / ?h =sgw/ self So these patches have been merged now; I updated to latest master and re-ran bitbake self-hosted-image; unfortunately the output doesn't appear to be usable. I don't know what has gone wrong but during boot there are complaints that the filesystem is corrupt: SYSLINUX 4.03 2010-10-22 EDD Copyright (C) 1994-2010 H. Peter Anvin et al EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 581713 EXT3-fs error (device hda2): ext3_lookup: deleted inode referenced: 610383 Kernel panic - not syncing: no init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. Running e2fsck -fn on the rootfs.ext3 file shows quite a number of errors. There were no unusual errors in the log.do_rootfs. Hi Paul, I can reproduce the same I issue, too... I'll try to look into this, but at the first glance, I don't know what has gone wrong, either... Can we make a conclusion the current genext2fs is buggy here when creating a big image(e.g., 4GB)? Thanks, -- Dexuan ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Hi joaohf, Thank for the hint! I have got the patches from genext2fs-devel mailing list and did some tests: I can successfully create a .ext2 file of 8.5GB with genext2fs now! I’ll send an update to the genext2fs recipe later. Thanks, -- Dexuan From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Jo?o Henrique Freitas Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 4:46 AM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk Hi, I guess we can just put that in the docs for now. For future improvement though I wonder if we can trick the fetcher into just pulling across the current files into the rootfs. I'll put that on my todo list for later. The following thread suggest a patch to fix it: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1307458172.10974.64.camel%40skunkforum_name=genext2fs-devel Thanks. -- --- João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.comhttp://joaohf_at_gmail.com Campinas-SP-Brasil BSD051283 LPI 1 http://www.joaohfreitas.eti.br ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote: Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. I tried this series on my build machine, but do_rootfs failed with genext2fs: not enough memory for filesystem. The machine has 6GB RAM and 8GB swap. The rootfs directory is 15GB. I guess this might have something to do with my DL_DIR not being clean beforehand (since it seems to be copying it into the rootfs in its entirety). Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
On 03/27/2012 07:37 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 26 March 2012 22:42:54 Saul Wold wrote: Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. I tried this series on my build machine, but do_rootfs failed with genext2fs: not enough memory for filesystem. Yes, there is an issue with genext2fs needing memory to build the filesystem first. I noted in another email thread that the Debian build system had so resort to dd, mkfs.ext3, mounting and copying. The issue with that is that it requires root privileges which is forbidden with bitbake. genext2fs combines the making and copying of the fs into one process, if there is a way to populate the filesystem image with the bits without root privs that's what we need to look towards. This is turning into a non-trivial problem. I am beginning to think that we might have to have 2 vmdk images for the build appliance to work correctly. 1 for the rootfs and the second for the build space (10G-20G) with DL_DIR populated. The machine has 6GB RAM and 8GB swap. The rootfs directory is 15GB. I guess this might have something to do with my DL_DIR not being clean beforehand (since it seems to be copying it into the rootfs in its entirety). I have created a clean DL_DIR to work with by doing a world fetch and then using that DL_DIR to build into the image. Cheers, Paul ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 11:16:10 Saul Wold wrote: Yes, there is an issue with genext2fs needing memory to build the filesystem first. I noted in another email thread that the Debian build system had so resort to dd, mkfs.ext3, mounting and copying. The issue with that is that it requires root privileges which is forbidden with bitbake. genext2fs combines the making and copying of the fs into one process, if there is a way to populate the filesystem image with the bits without root privs that's what we need to look towards. Yes, the mount alternative won't work for us. virt-make-fs from the libguestfs tools might be a possibility but its large set of dependencies could be an issue unless we can pare them down somehow. This is turning into a non-trivial problem. Indeed :/ I am beginning to think that we might have to have 2 vmdk images for the build appliance to work correctly. 1 for the rootfs and the second for the build space (10G-20G) with DL_DIR populated. That might mitigate the problem, yes. If genext2fs requires the same amount of RAM as the target filesystem then maybe we need to do an available RAM check first and bail out if there isn't enough. I guess this might have something to do with my DL_DIR not being clean beforehand (since it seems to be copying it into the rootfs in its entirety). I have created a clean DL_DIR to work with by doing a world fetch and then using that DL_DIR to build into the image. I guess we can just put that in the docs for now. For future improvement though I wonder if we can trick the fetcher into just pulling across the current files into the rootfs. I'll put that on my todo list for later. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Hi, I guess we can just put that in the docs for now. For future improvement though I wonder if we can trick the fetcher into just pulling across the current files into the rootfs. I'll put that on my todo list for later. The following thread suggest a patch to fix it: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1307458172.10974.64.camel%40skunkforum_name=genext2fs-devel Thanks. -- --- João Henrique Freitas - joaohf_at_gmail.com Campinas-SP-Brasil BSD051283 LPI 1 http://www.joaohfreitas.eti.br ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
[OE-core] [PATCH 0/6] Setup for VMDK to use Direct Disk
Updated comments per Darren's request, added cleanup to image-types to only use one -i (inode-count) parameter. Sau! The following changes since commit 644b7503c37fd73730dd3d7841463b158b8934ed: guile: Deal with hardcoded path issues (2012-03-27 00:28:41 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib sgw/self http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=sgw/self Dexuan Cui (1): self-hosted-image: pre-populate the builder user with poky source Saul Wold (5): image-vmdk: Add symbolic link for a short named vmdk image boot-directdisk: Fix Block Calcuation vmdk: Update for direstdisk builder: Enable auto starting of Hob image_types: remove duplicate setting of -i for inode count meta/classes/boot-directdisk.bbclass | 19 ++--- meta/classes/image-vmdk.bbclass| 17 +++- meta/classes/image_types.bbclass |5 +- meta/recipes-core/images/self-hosted-image.bb | 41 +++- meta/recipes-graphics/builder/builder_0.1.bb |2 +- .../builder/files/builder_hob_start.sh | 10 +++- 6 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 1.7.7.6 ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core