This recipe doesn't actually produce any non-empty packages, but since
it's pretending to be a Linux kernel it might as well pretend to have
the same license, if for no other reason than to avoid producing a
warning since the previous value ("GPL") isn't acceptable.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>
---
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb
b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb
index 3b898f8..acf07e1 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-dummy.bb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
SECTION = "kernel"
SUMMARY = "Dummy Linux kernel"
-LICENSE = "GPL"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://${WORKDIR}/COPYING.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe"
--
1.8.1.2
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
