[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] xterm: port the recipe from OE and upgrade to v278
The recipe is ported from OE:
http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/recipes/xorg-app/xterm_266.bb
I upgraded it from v266 to v278.
I added LICENSE, LIC_FILES_CHKSUM and updated SRC_URI checksums.
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_278.bb | 25 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_278.bb
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_278.bb
b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_278.bb
new file mode 100644
index 000..64c8866
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_278.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+require xorg-app-common.inc
+DESCRIPTION = xterm is the standard terminal emulator for the X Window
System.
+DEPENDS = libxaw xproto xextproto libxext libxau libxpm ncurses
+PR = ${INC_PR}.0
+
+SRC_URI = ftp://invisible-island.net/xterm/${PN}-${PV}.tgz;
+
+LICENSE = MIT MIT-style
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://package/debian/copyright;md5=d1415419990d510a698de36fb386f797
+
+SRC_URI[md5sum] = 3eeddfe35cb0a2db1924cfe0c20be443
+SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
1372f9afe07bc35bfd47482db146c649223dadd0b472da31f8c337ab37f90585
+
+EXTRA_OECONF = --x-includes=${STAGING_INCDIR} \
+ --x-libraries=${STAGING_LIBDIR} \
+ FREETYPE_CONFIG=${STAGING_BINDIR_CROSS}/freetype-config \
+ --disable-imake \
+ --disable-setuid
+
+do_configure() {
+sed -e s%/usr/contrib/X11R6%${STAGING_LIBDIR}%g -i configure
+oe_runconf
+}
+
+FILES_${PN} += /usr/lib/X11
--
1.7.6
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] xterm: port the recipe from OE and upgrade to v278
On Friday 06 April 2012 00:10:12 Dexuan Cui wrote: The recipe is ported from OE: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/recipes/xorg-app/xterm_266.bb I upgraded it from v266 to v278. I added LICENSE, LIC_FILES_CHKSUM and updated SRC_URI checksums. I think it's unfortunate we have to pull in xterm just for the sake of showing the qemu output - can we not use matchbox-terminal for this? If we have to have it, Dexuan can you please compare this to the meta-oe xterm recipe as that is likely to be more up-to-date than the one in OE-Classic? Thanks, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] xterm: port the recipe from OE and upgrade to v278
Paul Eggleton wrote on 2012-04-06: On Friday 06 April 2012 00:10:12 Dexuan Cui wrote: The recipe is ported from OE: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/recipes/xorg-app/xterm_2 66.bb I upgraded it from v266 to v278. I added LICENSE, LIC_FILES_CHKSUM and updated SRC_URI checksums. I think it's unfortunate we have to pull in xterm just for the sake of showing the qemu output - can we not use matchbox-terminal for this? Thanks for the suggestion! I suppose we could, but we need to fix bitbake as it uses /usr/bin/xterm by hardcode... If we have to have it, Dexuan can you please compare this to the meta-oe xterm recipe as that is likely to be more up-to-date than the one in OE-Classic? Ok, I'll investigate this. Thanks, -- Dexuan ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] xterm: port the recipe from OE and upgrade to v278
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 06 April 2012 00:10:12 Dexuan Cui wrote: The recipe is ported from OE: http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/recipes/xorg-app/xterm_266.bb I upgraded it from v266 to v278. I added LICENSE, LIC_FILES_CHKSUM and updated SRC_URI checksums. I think it's unfortunate we have to pull in xterm just for the sake of showing the qemu output - can we not use matchbox-terminal for this? If we have to have it, Dexuan can you please compare this to the meta-oe xterm recipe as that is likely to be more up-to-date than the one in OE-Classic? yes it is.. meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-app/xterm_277.bb and already with LICENSE from xorg-app-common.inc and LIC_FILES_CHKSUM using xterm.h instead of package/debian/copyright Cheers, Thanks, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
