Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates
Seems good to me On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:57 AM Hemraj, Deepthi via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Regression testing is done and below are the results: > *after update: * > fail - 427 > pass -14368 > xpass - 18 > xfail - 48 > unsupported - 670 > > *before update* > fail - 428 > pass - 14367 > xpass -18 > xfail - 48 > unsupported - 670 > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#200036): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/200036 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106383371/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates
Regression testing is done and below are the results: *after update:* fail - 427 pass - 14368 xpass - 18 xfail - 48 unsupported - 670 *before update* fail - 428 pass - 14367 xpass - 18 xfail - 48 unsupported - 670 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#200027): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/200027 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106383371/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates
From: Deepthi Hemraj Below commit on glibc-2.35 stable branch is updated. 72abffe225 Force DT_RPATH for --enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests Signed-off-by: Deepthi Hemraj --- meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc index 1a8d51ef63..a5903bc5f4 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.35/master" PV = "2.35" -SRCREV_glibc ?= "54a666dc5c94897dab63856ba264ab2c53503303" +SRCREV_glibc ?= "72abffe225485d10ea76adde963c13157bf3b310" SRCREV_localedef ?= "794da69788cbf9bf57b59a852f9f11307663fa87" GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git" -- 2.43.0 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#200013): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/200013 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106383371/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates
Thanks LGTM On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 4:19 AM Sanjana V wrote: > > Below commits on glibc-2.35 stable branch are updated. > > 561e9dadc0 x86: Fix incorrect scope of setting `shared_per_thread` > 1c3ecf5858 x86: Use `3/4*sizeof(per-thread-L3)` as low bound for NT threshold. > 47c7d2eb03 x86: Fix slight bug in `shared_per_thread` cache size calculation. > d1b1da26ea x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` > e19af583b4 elf: _dl_find_object may return 1 during early startup. > > Signed-off-by: Sanjana > --- > meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc > b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc > index 01b1abef7d..f23ceb5a25 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.35/master" > PV = "2.35" > -SRCREV_glibc ?= "cbceb903c4d770acc7e4ba5641036516830ed69b" > +SRCREV_glibc ?= "561e9dadc02f46a7ba2190c0a04259583479f6c9" > SRCREV_localedef ?= "794da69788cbf9bf57b59a852f9f11307663fa87" > > GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git" > -- > 2.34.1 > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#187620): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/187620 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101334533/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates
Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. Test summary after glibc updates: PASS : 4773 FAIL : 139 XPASS : 6 XFAIL : 16 UNSUPPORTED : 235 Test summary before glibc updates: PASS : 4770 FAIL : 142 XPASS : 6 XFAIL : 16 UNSUPPORTED : 235 Diff: +3 PASS 0 FAIL 0 XPASS 0 XFAIL 0 UNSUPPORTED -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#187584): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/187584 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101334533/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates
Below commits on glibc-2.35 stable branch are updated. 561e9dadc0 x86: Fix incorrect scope of setting `shared_per_thread` 1c3ecf5858 x86: Use `3/4*sizeof(per-thread-L3)` as low bound for NT threshold. 47c7d2eb03 x86: Fix slight bug in `shared_per_thread` cache size calculation. d1b1da26ea x86: Increase `non_temporal_threshold` to roughly `sizeof_L3 / 4` e19af583b4 elf: _dl_find_object may return 1 during early startup. Signed-off-by: Sanjana --- meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc index 01b1abef7d..f23ceb5a25 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.35/master" PV = "2.35" -SRCREV_glibc ?= "cbceb903c4d770acc7e4ba5641036516830ed69b" +SRCREV_glibc ?= "561e9dadc02f46a7ba2190c0a04259583479f6c9" SRCREV_localedef ?= "794da69788cbf9bf57b59a852f9f11307663fa87" GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git" -- 2.34.1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#187583): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/187583 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101334533/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 12:14 AM Hemraj, Deepthi < deepthi.hem...@windriver.com> wrote: > Hello khem, > > > > There are no new failures, the test nptl/tst-cancel22 which was failed > before update is passed with after update. I updated the test results > summary accordingly. > > I see. Somehow I read it other way around thanks > Test summary files are attached. > > > > Thanks, > > Deepthi H > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From: *Khem Raj > *Sent: *Monday, June 12, 2023 8:38 PM > *To: *Hemraj, Deepthi > *Cc: *openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > *Subject: *Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch > updates. > > > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > > > Can you share details of the 1 new failure > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 2:58 AM wrote: > > > > Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. > > Test summary after glibc updates: > > > > 153 FAIL > > > >4408 PASS > > > > 41 UNSUPPORTED > > > > 12 XFAIL > > > > 6 XPASS > > > > Test summary after glibc updates: > > > > 154 FAIL > > > >4405 PASS > > > > 41 UNSUPPORTED > > > > 12 XFAIL > > > > 6 XPASS > > > > Diff: > > 1 FAIL > > 3 PASS > > > > 0 UNSUPPORTED > > 0 XFAIL > > 0 XPASS > > > > > > > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#182716): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182716 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99479400/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
[Edited Message Follows] Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. Test summary after glibc updates: 153 FAIL 4408 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Test summary before glibc updates: 154 FAIL 4405 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Diff: 0 FAIL 3 PASS 0 UNSUPPORTED 0 XFAIL 0 XPASS -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#182661): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182661 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99479400/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
[Edited Message Follows] Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. Test summary after glibc updates: 153 FAIL 4408 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Test summary before glibc updates: 154 FAIL 4405 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Diff: 1 FAIL 3 PASS 0 UNSUPPORTED 0 XFAIL 0 XPASS -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#182661): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182661 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99479400/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
Can you share details of the 1 new failure On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 2:58 AM wrote: > > Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. > Test summary after glibc updates: > > 153 FAIL > >4408 PASS > > 41 UNSUPPORTED > > 12 XFAIL > > 6 XPASS > > Test summary after glibc updates: > > 154 FAIL > >4405 PASS > > 41 UNSUPPORTED > > 12 XFAIL > > 6 XPASS > > Diff: > 1 FAIL > 3 PASS > > 0 UNSUPPORTED > 0 XFAIL > 0 XPASS > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#182673): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182673 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99479400/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
[Edited Message Follows] Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. Test summary after glibc updates: 153 FAIL 4408 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Test summary after glibc updates: 154 FAIL 4405 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Diff: 1 FAIL 3 PASS 0 UNSUPPORTED 0 XFAIL 0 XPASS -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#182661): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182661 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99479400/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. Test summary after glibc updates: 153 FAIL 4408 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Test summary after glibc updates: 154 FAIL 4405 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Diff: 1 FAIL 3 PASS 0 UNSUPPORTED 0 XFAIL 0 XPASS -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#182661): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182661 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99479400/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
Below commits on glibc-2.35 stable branch are updated. cbceb903c4 (HEAD -> release/2.35/master, origin/release/2.35/master) io: Fix F_GETLK, F_SETLK, and F_SETLKW for powerpc64 0967fb5861 io: Fix record locking contants on 32 bit arch with 64 bit default time_t 739de21d30 Document BZ #20975 fix 2b9906f9a0 __check_pf: Add a cancellation cleanup handler 7035f2174f gmon: Revert addition of tunables to preserve GLIBC_PRIVATE ABI e698e8bd8e gmon: fix memory corruption issues 9f81b8fa65 gmon: improve mcount overflow handling f2820e478c gmon: Fix allocated buffer overflow 413af1eb02 posix: Fix system blocks SIGCHLD erroneously CVE-2023-0687.patch is dropped Signed-off-by: Deepthi Hemraj --- meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +- .../glibc/glibc/CVE-2023-0687.patch | 82 --- meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.35.bb | 1 - 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 84 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2023-0687.patch diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc index 4d8d96cefb..01b1abef7d 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.35/master" PV = "2.35" -SRCREV_glibc ?= "1c7f51c75ae300fe52ccb636e71b8e28cb20824c" +SRCREV_glibc ?= "cbceb903c4d770acc7e4ba5641036516830ed69b" SRCREV_localedef ?= "794da69788cbf9bf57b59a852f9f11307663fa87" GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git" diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2023-0687.patch b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2023-0687.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 10c7e5666d..00 --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/CVE-2023-0687.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,82 +0,0 @@ -From 952aff5c00ad7c6b83c3f310f2643939538827f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=9B=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B4=20=D0=AE=D1=80=D1=8C?= - =?UTF-8?q?=D0=B5=D0=B2=20=28Leonid=20Yuriev=29?= -Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:41:38 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH] gmon: Fix allocated buffer overflow (bug 29444) -MIME-Version: 1.0 -Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 -Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - -The `__monstartup()` allocates a buffer used to store all the data -accumulated by the monitor. - -The size of this buffer depends on the size of the internal structures -used and the address range for which the monitor is activated, as well -as on the maximum density of call instructions and/or callable functions -that could be potentially on a segment of executable code. - -In particular a hash table of arcs is placed at the end of this buffer. -The size of this hash table is calculated in bytes as - p->fromssize = p->textsize / HASHFRACTION; - -but actually should be - p->fromssize = ROUNDUP(p->textsize / HASHFRACTION, sizeof(*p->froms)); - -This results in writing beyond the end of the allocated buffer when an -added arc corresponds to a call near from the end of the monitored -address range, since `_mcount()` check the incoming caller address for -monitored range but not the intermediate result hash-like index that -uses to write into the table. - -It should be noted that when the results are output to `gmon.out`, the -table is read to the last element calculated from the allocated size in -bytes, so the arcs stored outside the buffer boundary did not fall into -`gprof` for analysis. Thus this "feature" help me to found this bug -during working with https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29438 - -Just in case, I will explicitly note that the problem breaks the -`make test t=gmon/tst-gmon-dso` added for Bug 29438. -There, the arc of the `f3()` call disappears from the output, since in -the DSO case, the call to `f3` is located close to the end of the -monitored range. - -Signed-off-by: Леонид Юрьев (Leonid Yuriev) - -Another minor error seems a related typo in the calculation of -`kcountsize`, but since kcounts are smaller than froms, this is -actually to align the p->froms data. - -Co-authored-by: DJ Delorie -Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell - -Upstream-Status: Backport [https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=801af9fafd4689337ebf27260aa115335a0cb2bc] -CVE: CVE-2023-0687 -Signed-off-by: Shubham Kulkarni - gmon/gmon.c | 4 +++- - 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) - -diff --git a/gmon/gmon.c b/gmon/gmon.c -index dee6480..bf76358 100644 a/gmon/gmon.c -+++ b/gmon/gmon.c -@@ -132,6 +132,8 @@ __monstartup (u_long lowpc, u_long highpc) - p->lowpc = ROUNDDOWN(lowpc, HISTFRACTION * sizeof(HISTCOUNTER)); - p->highpc = ROUNDUP(highpc, HISTFRACTION * sizeof(HISTCOUNTER)); - p->textsize = p->highpc - p->lowpc; -+ /* This looks like a typo, but it's here to align the p->froms -+ section. */ - p->kcountsize = ROUNDUP(p->textsize / HISTFRACTION, sizeof(*p->froms)); - p->hashfraction = HASHFRACTION; - p->log_hashfraction = -1; -@@ -142,7 +144,7 @@ __monstartup (u_long lowpc, u_long highpc) -
Re: [OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
Regression tests are performed and below is test summary. Test summary after glibc updates: 185 FAIL 4413 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Test summary before glibc updates: 185 FAIL 4408 PASS 41 UNSUPPORTED 12 XFAIL 6 XPASS Diff: 0 FAIL +5 PASS 0 UNSUPPORTED 0 XFAIL 0 XPASS -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#180511): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/180511 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98554410/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[OE-core] [kirkstone][PATCH] glibc: stable 2.35 branch updates.
Below commits on glibc-2.35 stable branch are updated. 1c7f51c75a x86_64: Fix asm constraints in feraiseexcept (bug 30305) 8d07e65d15 gshadow: Matching sgetsgent, sgetsgent_r ERANGE handling (bug 30151) b7cc55a24e x86: Check minimum/maximum of non_temporal_threshold [BZ #29953] 3f63f9dfe1 stdlib: Undo post review change to 16adc58e73f3 [BZ #27749] 757d9a6306 elf: Smoke-test ldconfig -p against system /etc/ld.so.cache 416bd20b3f Use 64-bit time_t interfaces in strftime and strptime (bug 30053) ae045ed16b cdefs: Limit definition of fortification macros 6bcd5d8e36 x86: Prevent SIGSEGV in memcmp-sse2 when data is concurrently modified [BZ #29863] 82663d3c03 time: Set daylight to 1 for matching DST/offset change (bug 29951) d9923235f0 elf/tst-tlsopt-powerpc fails when compiled with -mcpu=power10 (BZ# 29776) Signed-off-by: Deepthi Hemraj --- meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc index d36da0ce3f..4d8d96cefb 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-version.inc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ SRCBRANCH ?= "release/2.35/master" PV = "2.35" -SRCREV_glibc ?= "293211b6fddf60fc407d21fcba0326dd2148f76b" +SRCREV_glibc ?= "1c7f51c75ae300fe52ccb636e71b8e28cb20824c" SRCREV_localedef ?= "794da69788cbf9bf57b59a852f9f11307663fa87" GLIBC_GIT_URI ?= "git://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git" -- 2.34.1 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#180510): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/180510 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98554410/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
