Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] tiff: Refresh patch

2019-11-21 Thread Ross Burton

On 21/11/2019 08:44, Zheng Ruoqin wrote:

Refresh CVE-2019-7663.patch as it can't be applyed when using PATCHTOOL = 
"patch".


FWIW this file is removed in current master-next.

Ross
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


[OE-core] [PATCH] tiff: Refresh patch

2019-11-20 Thread Zheng Ruoqin
Refresh CVE-2019-7663.patch as it can't be applyed when using PATCHTOOL = 
"patch".

Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin 
---
 .../libtiff/tiff/CVE-2019-7663.patch   | 71 --
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/CVE-2019-7663.patch 
b/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/CVE-2019-7663.patch
index f244fb2..94e4e33 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/CVE-2019-7663.patch
+++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/libtiff/tiff/CVE-2019-7663.patch
@@ -1,22 +1,37 @@
-CVE: CVE-2019-7663
-Upstream-Status: Backport
-Signed-off-by: Ross Burton 
+CVE: CVE-2019-7663 
+Upstream-Status: Backport 
+Signed-off-by:
+Ross Burton 
 
 From c6fc6c1fa895024c86285c58efd6424cf8078f32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Thomas Bernard 
 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:05:33 +0100
 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] check that (Tile Width)*(Samples/Pixel) do no overflow
 
-fixes bug 2833
+From da6454aa80b9bb3154dfab4e8b21637de47531e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Thomas Bernard 
+Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:42:03 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tiffcp.c: use INT_MAX
+
+Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin 
+Refresh this patch as it can't be applyed when using PATCHTOOL = "patch".
 ---
- tools/tiffcp.c | 8 +++-
- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+ tools/tiffcp.c | 9 -
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/tools/tiffcp.c b/tools/tiffcp.c
-index 2f406e2d..f0ee2c02 100644
+index 2f406e2..8c81aa4 100644
 --- a/tools/tiffcp.c
 +++ b/tools/tiffcp.c
-@@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ DECLAREreadFunc(readSeparateTilesIntoBuffer)
+@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
+ #include 
+ #include 
+ #include 
++#include 
+ 
+ #include 
+ 
+@@ -1408,7 +1409,7 @@ DECLAREreadFunc(readSeparateTilesIntoBuffer)
int status = 1;
uint32 imagew = TIFFRasterScanlineSize(in);
uint32 tilew = TIFFTileRowSize(in);
@@ -25,11 +40,11 @@ index 2f406e2d..f0ee2c02 100644
tsize_t tilesize = TIFFTileSize(in);
tdata_t tilebuf;
uint8* bufp = (uint8*) buf;
-@@ -1416,6 +1416,12 @@ DECLAREreadFunc(readSeparateTilesIntoBuffer)
+@@ -1416,6 +1417,12 @@ DECLAREreadFunc(readSeparateTilesIntoBuffer)
uint32 row;
uint16 bps = 0, bytes_per_sample;
  
-+  if (spp > (0x7fff / tilew))
++  if (spp > (INT_MAX / tilew))
 +  {
 +  TIFFError(TIFFFileName(in), "Error, cannot handle that much 
samples per tile row (Tile Width * Samples/Pixel)");
 +  return 0;
@@ -39,39 +54,5 @@ index 2f406e2d..f0ee2c02 100644
if (tilebuf == 0)
return 0;
 -- 
-2.20.1
-
-
-From da6454aa80b9bb3154dfab4e8b21637de47531e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Thomas Bernard 
-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:42:03 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tiffcp.c: use INT_MAX
-

- tools/tiffcp.c | 3 ++-
- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/tools/tiffcp.c b/tools/tiffcp.c
-index f0ee2c02..8c81aa4f 100644
 a/tools/tiffcp.c
-+++ b/tools/tiffcp.c
-@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
- #include 
- #include 
- #include 
-+#include 
- 
- #include 
- 
-@@ -1416,7 +1417,7 @@ DECLAREreadFunc(readSeparateTilesIntoBuffer)
-   uint32 row;
-   uint16 bps = 0, bytes_per_sample;
- 
--  if (spp > (0x7fff / tilew))
-+  if (spp > (INT_MAX / tilew))
-   {
-   TIFFError(TIFFFileName(in), "Error, cannot handle that much 
samples per tile row (Tile Width * Samples/Pixel)");
-   return 0;
--- 
-2.20.1
+2.7.4
 
-- 
2.7.4



-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core