Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-12 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Wednesday 12 August 2015 10:45:29 Otavio Salvador wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com 
wrote:
  On 08/11/2015 08:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
  
  wrote:
  The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
  from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.
  
  Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
  
  It seems your commit log is incomplete or so as I couldn't understand
  why this is need.
  
  Also as Andre says, we ought to not break existing layer without a
  very strong reason and if needed, changing documentation.conf instead
  of this seems more adequate.
  
  The code in base.bbclass is: (no remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc])
  
  pkgconfigflags = d.getVarFlags(PACKAGECONFIG) or {}
  
  if pkgconfigflags:
 foo
  
  And documentation.conf:
  PACKAGECONFIG[doc] = This variable provides a means of enabling or
  disabling features of a recipe on a per-recipe basis.
  
  This will make if pkgconfigflags: always be true and cause many unneeded
  loops since there is always PACKAGECONFIG[doc].
  
  Remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc] or comment it sounds good to me.
 
 So documentation.conf needs change.

I'm not sure I'm particularly happy with this. Whilst its actual practical use 
is relatively recent (i.e. Toaster), documentation.conf and the doc varflag 
predate PACKAGECONFIG by quite some time. The fact that one layer has gone and 
used it is unfortunate but not unfixable.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
 On Wednesday 12 August 2015 10:45:29 Otavio Salvador wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
 wrote:
  On 08/11/2015 08:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
  On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
 
  wrote:
  The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
  from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.
 
  Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
 
  It seems your commit log is incomplete or so as I couldn't understand
  why this is need.
 
  Also as Andre says, we ought to not break existing layer without a
  very strong reason and if needed, changing documentation.conf instead
  of this seems more adequate.
 
  The code in base.bbclass is: (no remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc])
 
  pkgconfigflags = d.getVarFlags(PACKAGECONFIG) or {}
 
  if pkgconfigflags:
 foo
 
  And documentation.conf:
  PACKAGECONFIG[doc] = This variable provides a means of enabling or
  disabling features of a recipe on a per-recipe basis.
 
  This will make if pkgconfigflags: always be true and cause many unneeded
  loops since there is always PACKAGECONFIG[doc].
 
  Remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc] or comment it sounds good to me.

 So documentation.conf needs change.

 I'm not sure I'm particularly happy with this. Whilst its actual practical use
 is relatively recent (i.e. Toaster), documentation.conf and the doc varflag
 predate PACKAGECONFIG by quite some time. The fact that one layer has gone and
 used it is unfortunate but not unfixable.

I understand but this kind of magic keyword is misleading and
confusing for users.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-12 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote:


 On 08/11/2015 08:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:

 On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
 wrote:

 The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
 from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.

 Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com


 It seems your commit log is incomplete or so as I couldn't understand
 why this is need.

 Also as Andre says, we ought to not break existing layer without a
 very strong reason and if needed, changing documentation.conf instead
 of this seems more adequate.


 The code in base.bbclass is: (no remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc])

 pkgconfigflags = d.getVarFlags(PACKAGECONFIG) or {}
 if pkgconfigflags:
foo

 And documentation.conf:
 PACKAGECONFIG[doc] = This variable provides a means of enabling or
 disabling features of a recipe on a per-recipe basis.

 This will make if pkgconfigflags: always be true and cause many unneeded
 loops since there is always PACKAGECONFIG[doc].

 Remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc] or comment it sounds good to me.

So documentation.conf needs change.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-11 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote:
 The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
 from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.

 Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com

It seems your commit log is incomplete or so as I couldn't understand
why this is need.

Also as Andre says, we ought to not break existing layer without a
very strong reason and if needed, changing documentation.conf instead
of this seems more adequate.

-- 
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.brhttp://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-11 Thread Burton, Ross
On 11 August 2015 at 03:17, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote:

 I'm afraid that there isn't any other way to fix the issue (many
 unneeded loops caused by PACKAGECONFIG[doc] which is set by
 documentation.conf), maybe you can change 'doc' to such as 'docs' in
 other layers ?


Otavio is right - the commit doesn't explain what the problem is, and
forcibly deleting PACKAGECONFIG[doc] options is very aggressive without
good reason.

Ross
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-11 Thread Robert Yang



On 08/11/2015 08:45 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote:

The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com


It seems your commit log is incomplete or so as I couldn't understand
why this is need.

Also as Andre says, we ought to not break existing layer without a
very strong reason and if needed, changing documentation.conf instead
of this seems more adequate.



The code in base.bbclass is: (no remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc])

pkgconfigflags = d.getVarFlags(PACKAGECONFIG) or {}
if pkgconfigflags:
   foo

And documentation.conf:
PACKAGECONFIG[doc] = This variable provides a means of enabling or disabling 
features of a recipe on a per-recipe basis.


This will make if pkgconfigflags: always be true and cause many unneeded
loops since there is always PACKAGECONFIG[doc].

Remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc] or comment it sounds good to me.

// Robert
--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-10 Thread Andre McCurdy
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote:
 The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
 from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.

 Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
 ---
  meta/classes/base.bbclass  |2 ++
  meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass |2 ++
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

 diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
 index b7e22ad..9e33f44 100644
 --- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
 +++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
 @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ python () {
  # PACKAGECONFIG ??= default options
  # PACKAGECONFIG[foo] = 
 --enable-foo,--disable-foo,foo_depends,foo_runtime_depends
  pkgconfigflags = d.getVarFlags(PACKAGECONFIG) or {}
 +# Remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc]
 +pkgconfigflags.pop('doc', None)

This change breaks recipes which try to use 'doc' as a PACKAGECONFIG
option. Nothing in oe-core tries to do that, but there are recipes in
other layers which do (e.g. efl in meta-oe and lxc in
meta-virtualization).

Could this change we reworked somehow to allow 'doc' to continue to be
used as a PACKAGECONFIG option (as it is in fido)?


  if pkgconfigflags:
  pkgconfig = (d.getVar('PACKAGECONFIG', True) or ).split()
  pn = d.getVar(PN, True)
 diff --git a/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass b/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass
 index a0141a8..39b3f82 100644
 --- a/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass
 +++ b/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass
 @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ python blacklist_multilib_eventhandler() {
  prefixes.append(eext[1])

  blacklists = e.data.getVarFlags('PNBLACKLIST') or {}
 +# Remove PNBLACKLIST[doc]
 +blacklists.pop('doc', None)
  for pkg, reason in blacklists.items():
  if pkg.endswith((-native, -crosssdk)) or 
 pkg.startswith((nativesdk-, virtual/nativesdk-)) or 'cross-canadian' in 
 pkg:
  continue
 --
 1.7.9.5

 --
 ___
 Openembedded-core mailing list
 Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
 http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
-- 
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core


Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] base.bbclass/blacklist.bbclass: remove doc item when d.getVarFlags()

2015-08-10 Thread Robert Yang

On 08/11/2015 10:00 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote:

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote:

The FOO[doc] is set in meta/conf/documentation.conf, we need remove it
from d.getVarFlags()'s return dict when it causes many loops.

Signed-off-by: Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com
---
  meta/classes/base.bbclass  |2 ++
  meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass |2 ++
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
index b7e22ad..9e33f44 100644
--- a/meta/classes/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/base.bbclass
@@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ python () {
  # PACKAGECONFIG ??= default options
  # PACKAGECONFIG[foo] = 
--enable-foo,--disable-foo,foo_depends,foo_runtime_depends
  pkgconfigflags = d.getVarFlags(PACKAGECONFIG) or {}
+# Remove PACKAGECONFIG[doc]
+pkgconfigflags.pop('doc', None)


This change breaks recipes which try to use 'doc' as a PACKAGECONFIG
option. Nothing in oe-core tries to do that, but there are recipes in
other layers which do (e.g. efl in meta-oe and lxc in
meta-virtualization).

Could this change we reworked somehow to allow 'doc' to continue to be
used as a PACKAGECONFIG option (as it is in fido)?


Hi Andre,

I'm afraid that there isn't any other way to fix the issue (many
unneeded loops caused by PACKAGECONFIG[doc] which is set by
documentation.conf), maybe you can change 'doc' to such as 'docs' in
other layers ?

// Robert





  if pkgconfigflags:
  pkgconfig = (d.getVar('PACKAGECONFIG', True) or ).split()
  pn = d.getVar(PN, True)
diff --git a/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass b/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass
index a0141a8..39b3f82 100644
--- a/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/blacklist.bbclass
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ python blacklist_multilib_eventhandler() {
  prefixes.append(eext[1])

  blacklists = e.data.getVarFlags('PNBLACKLIST') or {}
+# Remove PNBLACKLIST[doc]
+blacklists.pop('doc', None)
  for pkg, reason in blacklists.items():
  if pkg.endswith((-native, -crosssdk)) or pkg.startswith((nativesdk-, 
virtual/nativesdk-)) or 'cross-canadian' in pkg:
  continue
--
1.7.9.5

--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core




--
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core