Re: [OE-core] OE-Core status with gcc9
Probably is not an issue for ie-core but gcc-9 is also breaking all the openjdk8 build on meta-java Can this be postponed a bit? Thanks Nicola Lunghi On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 09:11, Yu, Mingli wrote: > > > > On 2019年05月27日 15:53, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj wrote: > >>> > >>> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > with gcc 9: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > I will try to reproduce it as well > > >>> > >>> I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on > >>> qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler > >>> so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try > >>> it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access > >>> to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can > >>> provide the asm file which crashes assembler > >>> > >> got some more time to narrow it down. > >> works with musl+gcc-9 > >> works with glibc+clang-8 > >> works with musl+Clang-8 > >> > >> so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue > >> > > > > I have sent a workaound for this which we can try out. > > https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/161674/ > > Failed to build llvm with gcc9 for qemuppc as below: > | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation > fault], core dumped > > Thanks, > > > > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > > -- > ___ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] OE-Core status with gcc9
On 2019年05月27日 15:53, Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Khem Raj wrote: On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie wrote: I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue with gcc 9: https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). I wonder if its a common case or specific here? I will try to reproduce it as well I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can provide the asm file which crashes assembler got some more time to narrow it down. works with musl+gcc-9 works with glibc+clang-8 works with musl+Clang-8 so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue I have sent a workaound for this which we can try out. https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/161674/ Failed to build llvm with gcc9 for qemuppc as below: | collect2: fatal error: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault], core dumped Thanks, which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! Cheers, Richard -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] OE-Core status with gcc9
On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 10:17 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > > > with gcc 9: > > > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > > > > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > > > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > > > > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > > > I will try to reproduce it as well > > > > > > > I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on > > qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler > > so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try > > it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access > > to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can > > provide the asm file which crashes assembler > > > got some more time to narrow it down. > works with musl+gcc-9 > works with glibc+clang-8 > works with musl+Clang-8 > > so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue > I have sent a workaound for this which we can try out. https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/161674/ > > > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] OE-Core status with gcc9
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 8:39 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > > with gcc 9: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > > I will try to reproduce it as well > > > > I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on > qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler > so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try > it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access > to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can > provide the asm file which crashes assembler > got some more time to narrow it down. works with musl+gcc-9 works with glibc+clang-8 works with musl+Clang-8 so only glibc+gcc-9 combo is one which exhibits the issue > > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Richard > > > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] OE-Core status with gcc9
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 1:14 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > > with gcc 9: > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > > > > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). > > I wonder if its a common case or specific here? > I will try to reproduce it as well > I am able to get a .s file which crashes assembler on qemu. Same file assembles ok with mips cross assembler so next I want to get hold of a mips hardware and try it on the real h/w, meanwhile if someone has easy access to mips and can load core-image-sato-sdk on it then I can provide the asm file which crashes assembler > > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Richard > > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
Re: [OE-core] OE-Core status with gcc9
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:21 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > I've run some tests and think we're now down to one remaining issue > with gcc 9: > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/60/builds/579 > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/55/builds/145 > Assembler is not liking what gcc9 is generating HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccnMW5be.s: Internal error (Segmentation fault). I wonder if its a common case or specific here? I will try to reproduce it as well > which is a kernel "make scripts" segfaulting on target on mips and > hence failing to build kernel modules. If we can get that one fixed > we're good from an OE-Core perspective to move to gcc 9. > > I have to recognise the work Khem has put in getting us this close! > > Cheers, > > Richard > -- ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
