[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.5
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 741142c50..8c49b4674 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
-PV = "3.4"
+SRCREV = "3b9eef2259a70f412ab02fbe6b3a4d313d09c38a"
+PV = "3.5"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
--
2.20.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
Hi,
anyone had time to look into this? Is the patch ok now?
Thanks,
Paolo
> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 15:21, Paolo Valente
> ha scritto:
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
> ---
> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> index 706a55e11..741142c50 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>
> -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
> -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
> +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
> +PV = "3.4"
> SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>
> S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> --
> 2.20.1
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 14:20, Adrian Bunk ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 02:15:21PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 13:14, Adrian Bunk ha
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:25:39PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>>>> ---
>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> index 706a55e11..db1945dd0 100644
>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>>>
>>>> -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
>>>> -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
>>>> +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
>>>> +PV = "3.4+git${SRCPV}"
>>>> SRC_URI =
>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> The problem was already there before, but the upgrade gives the
>>> opportunity to get rid of the +git${SRCPV}, which is incorrect
>>> when exactly the release is packaged.
>>>
>>
>> Sorry,
>> you pointed this out already, but then I thought I had solved it. Now
>> I also understand why the previous push-up to 3.3 was not it.
>>
>> And now, I'm sorry, but I think I'd better to ask for your help
>> explicitly: how should I fix this exactly?
>
> Just remove the +git${SRCPV} from the PV line:
>
> -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
> -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
> +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
> +PV = "3.4"
>
Ok, making and sending a V2.
Thank you,
Paolo
>> Thanks for your patience,
>> Paolo
>
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
> --
>
> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 706a55e11..741142c50 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
-PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
+SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
+PV = "3.4"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
--
2.20.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
> Il giorno 30 mag 2019, alle ore 13:14, Adrian Bunk ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:25:39PM +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>> ---
>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> index 706a55e11..db1945dd0 100644
>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>
>> -SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
>> -PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
>> +SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
>> +PV = "3.4+git${SRCPV}"
>> SRC_URI =
>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>> ...
>
> The problem was already there before, but the upgrade gives the
> opportunity to get rid of the +git${SRCPV}, which is incorrect
> when exactly the release is packaged.
>
Sorry,
you pointed this out already, but then I thought I had solved it. Now
I also understand why the previous push-up to 3.3 was not it.
And now, I'm sorry, but I think I'd better to ask for your help
explicitly: how should I fix this exactly?
Thanks for your patience,
Paolo
> cu
> Adrian
>
> --
>
> "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
> "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
> Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.4
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 706a55e11..db1945dd0 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
-PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
+SRCREV = "8d22ab8a4cc1484622c47ac9c5944fb9a61a5c0f"
+PV = "3.4+git${SRCPV}"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
--
2.20.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.2
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 47d21d36c..706a55e11 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6"
-PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
+SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
+PV = "3.2+git${SRCPV}"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
--
2.20.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.2
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 47d21d36c..78d299e3b 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6"
+SRCREV = "262227ec9de4be1ab41d9918d32ceb773089f1dd"
PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
--
2.20.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.1
Hi,
have you guys had time to look into this?
Thanks,
Paolo
> Il giorno 28 mar 2019, alle ore 23:04, Paolo Valente
> ha scritto:
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
> ---
> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> index 8bd0afc49..47d21d36c 100644
> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>
> -SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
> +SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6"
> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
> SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.1
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 8bd0afc49..47d21d36c 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
+SRCREV = "d05006865f68829fa7603bdb92bd51649f5ba1b6"
PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
--
2.20.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
Yep, sorry. I've just sent a V2 which should hopefully work.
Thanks for your patience,
Paolo
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 22:33, Khem Raj ha
> scritto:
>
> btw. it fails on mips/musl
> http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/211648/
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:59 PM Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:13 AM Paolo Valente
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:24, Khem Raj ha
>>>> scritto:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:20 AM Paolo Valente
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:18, Khem Raj ha
>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Paolo Valente
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj
>>>>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj
>>>>>>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++--
>>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644
>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for
>>>>>>>>>>> storage I/O"
>>>>>>>>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>>>>>>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>>>>>>>>>>> "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
>>>>>>>>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
>>>>>>>>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
>>>>>>>>>>> SRC_URI =
>>>>>>>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() {
>>>>>>>>>>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio
>>>>>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat"
>>>>>>>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio
>>>>>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat \
>>>>>>>>>>> + psmisc git"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> why these new rdeps
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think busybox provides killall too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, I'll remove this dep.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the
>>>>>>>>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall
>>>>>>>>> or git.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such
>>>>>>> benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this
>>>>>>> dep too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> they are fine. We just need to understand that they are well meaning
>>>>>> changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, is the patch ok, or shall I remove the psmisc dep?
>>>>
>>>> I think it will be good to understand why killall went missing without
>>>> ps-misc package. As such patch is ok. Since I think killall should always
>>>> be there, either from ps-misc or a backfill from busybox.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I created a lot of confusion.
>>>
>>> 1) killall *was not* missing in any of the oe rootfs that I tested
>>> (rootfs made by Anders, in CC). killall was missing on a non-oe
>>> remote machine, made available for my tests by a company. So, I added
>>> that dependency (in my S suite) to make it work on that machine. For
>>> this reason, I thought of adding this dependency to this recipe. But,
>>> if it is not needed, I'll remove it.
>>
>> ok lets remove it
>>
>>>
>>> 2) git is needed only if you want to run kernel-development tests.
>>>
>>
>> lets keep it.
>>
>>> That said, just tell me whether the patch is ok, or tell me what
>>> dependencies to remove, and I'll make a V2.
>>
>> yes please.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Paolo
>>>
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH V2] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
Changes v1 -> v2:
- Removed useless psmisc dep
- Fixed stale install commands
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 77d172814..8bd0afc49 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
+SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
@@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ do_install() {
install -m0755 -p ${S}/$(basename $i)/* ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i)
done
+install -m0755 ${S}/def_config.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
install -m0755 ${S}/config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
-install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
+install -m0755 ${S}/process_config.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
}
-RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat"
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat
\
+ git"
FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/"
--
2.16.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:24, Khem Raj ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:20 AM Paolo Valente
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:18, Khem Raj ha
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Paolo Valente
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj ha
>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha
>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++--
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage
>>>>>>>> I/O"
>>>>>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>>>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
>>>>>>>> "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
>>>>>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
>>>>>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
>>>>>>>> SRC_URI =
>>>>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() {
>>>>>>>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio
>>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat"
>>>>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio
>>>>>>>> libaio-dev sysstat \
>>>>>>>> + psmisc git"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> why these new rdeps
>>>>>>
>>>>>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I think busybox provides killall too.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I'll remove this dep.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the
>>>>>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall
>>>>>> or git.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default in
>>>>> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ?
>>>>>
>>>>> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ?
>>>>>
>>>> In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such
>>>> benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this
>>>> dep too.
>>>
>>> they are fine. We just need to understand that they are well meaning
>>> changes.
>>>
>>
>> So, is the patch ok, or shall I remove the psmisc dep?
>
> I think it will be good to understand why killall went missing without
> ps-misc package. As such patch is ok. Since I think killall should always
> be there, either from ps-misc or a backfill from busybox.
>
Sorry, I created a lot of confusion.
1) killall *was not* missing in any of the oe rootfs that I tested
(rootfs made by Anders, in CC). killall was missing on a non-oe
remote machine, made available for my tests by a company. So, I added
that dependency (in my S suite) to make it work on that machine. For
this reason, I thought of adding this dependency to this recipe. But,
if it is not needed, I'll remove it.
2) git is needed only if you want to run kernel-development tests.
That said, just tell me whether the patch is ok, or tell me what
dependencies to remove, and I'll make a V2.
Thanks,
Paolo
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paolo
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:18, Khem Raj ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:16 AM Paolo Valente
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj ha
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha
>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage
>>>>>> I/O"
>>>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
>>>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
>>>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
>>>>>> SRC_URI =
>>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() {
>>>>>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>>>>>> sysstat"
>>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>>>>>> sysstat \
>>>>>> + psmisc git"
>>>>>
>>>>> why these new rdeps
>>>>
>>>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :)
>>>
>>> I think busybox provides killall too.
>>
>> Ok, I'll remove this dep.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the
>>>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall
>>>> or git.
>>>
>>> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default in
>>> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ?
>>>
>>> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ?
>>>
>> In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such
>> benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this
>> dep too.
>
> they are fine. We just need to understand that they are well meaning changes.
>
So, is the patch ok, or shall I remove the psmisc dep?
Thanks,
Paolo
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 18:11, Khem Raj ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:33 AM Paolo Valente
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha
>>> scritto:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>>>> ---
>>>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644
>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
>>>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>>>
>>>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
>>>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
>>>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
>>>> SRC_URI =
>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() {
>>>>install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>>>> sysstat"
>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>>>> sysstat \
>>>> + psmisc git"
>>>
>>> why these new rdeps
>>
>> psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :)
>
> I think busybox provides killall too.
Ok, I'll remove this dep.
>>
>> Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the
>> automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall
>> or git.
>
> OK. so I wonder if we dont have killall enabled in oe-core by default in
> busybox ? or does it need ps-misc one specifically ?
>
> git is interesting, does it clone some sources during executing tests ?
>
In kernel-task benchmarks a mainline Linux is cloned. But maybe such
benchmarks do not make sense in oe. Let me know, and I'll remove this
dep too.
Thanks,
Paolo
>>
>> If these dependencies are certainly useless for oe, then I'll remove them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paolo
>>
>>>>
>>>> FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/"
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.16.1
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ___
>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
> Il giorno 13 dic 2018, alle ore 16:27, Khem Raj ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 7:16 AM Paolo Valente
> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
>> ---
>> meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644
>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
>> LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>
>> -SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
>> +SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
>> PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
>> SRC_URI =
>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>
>> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() {
>> install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>> }
>>
>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>> sysstat"
>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>> sysstat \
>> + psmisc git"
>
> why these new rdeps
psmisc is for killall, git is for ... git :)
Some weeks ago, I bumped into this missing dependencies that made the
automatic execution of a test fail on a system without either killall
or git.
If these dependencies are certainly useless for oe, then I'll remove them.
Thanks,
Paolo
>>
>> FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/"
>>
>> --
>> 2.16.1
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] s-suite: push SRCREV to version 3.0
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
index 77d172814..166f3000a 100644
--- a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
-SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
+SRCREV = "e2727f70ed79b5461689c062a4a66a87f1adb4ce"
PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
SRC_URI = "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ do_install() {
install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
}
-RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat"
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev sysstat
\
+ psmisc git"
FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/"
--
2.16.1
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] add a storage I/O benchmark test suite
> Il giorno 25 ott 2018, alle ore 20:17, Randy MacLeod
> ha scritto:
>
> On 10/25/18 1:46 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> [RESENDING: FIRST ATTEMPT REJECTED BECAUSE I WAS NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE LIST]
>>> Il giorno 23 ott 2018, alle ore 15:33, Anders Roxell
>>> ha scritto:
>>>
>>> CCing in the package maintainer.
>>>
>> Thanks Anders, hi everybody,
>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 17:10, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 AM Randy MacLeod
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/19/18 10:54 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> .../recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 30 +++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>>>>> create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index ..77d172814065
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>>>>>> +SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
>>>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2"
>>>>>> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
>>>>>> +PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
>>>>>> +SRC_URI =
>>>>>> "git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +# installing in /opt/S-suite since the package has
>>>>>> +# dependencies to the directory structure.
>>>>>> +do_install() {
>>>>>> +install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>>>> +for i in $(find ${S}/* -type d); do
>>>>>> +install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i)
>>>>>> +install -m0755 -p ${S}/$(basename $i)/*
>>>>>> ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i)
>>>>>> +done
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +install -m0755 ${S}/config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>>>> +install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
>>>>>> sysstat"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +# added to INSANE_SKIP since s-suite have an runtime
>>>>>> +# dependency (RDEPENDS) on libaio-dev.
>>>>>> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-deps"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the submission but from:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/Algodev-github/S
>>>>>
>>>>> "These benchmarks have been written just for internal use,
>>>>>and are more a yard than a well-finished work."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That doesn't lead to a lot of confidence that these suite will
>>>>> be maintained for years.
>> Gosh. I put that disclaimer in the README when I first wrote it more
>> than 10 years ago. After then, thousands of changes have been made by
>> me and many other contributors. Unfortunately, I put the suite on
>> GitHub only recently. But as you can see from the log, there have
>> been 448 commits in (less than) the last five months.
>> In addition, the S suite is now used in a new Phoronix benchmark and
>> in a new mmtests benchmark.
>
> Ah, good to know.
>
>> So, believe me, the S suite ATM is definitely in good shape, and seems
>> to be here to stay.
>> I'll remove that line, right after finishing a non-trivial new commit
>> I'm working on.
>>>>> What's the value to meta-oe users to add
>>>>> this recipe compared to something that has been around for years
>>>>> if not decades such as Bonnie++:
>>>>> https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/864/
>&
Re: [oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] add a storage I/O benchmark test suite
[RESENDING: FIRST ATTEMPT REJECTED BECAUSE I WAS NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE LIST]
> Il giorno 23 ott 2018, alle ore 15:33, Anders Roxell
> ha scritto:
>
> CCing in the package maintainer.
>
Thanks Anders, hi everybody,
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 at 17:10, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:29 AM Randy MacLeod
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/19/18 10:54 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
---
.../recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb | 30 +++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
new file mode 100644
index ..77d172814065
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-benchmark/s-suite/s-suite_git.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+SUMMARY = "Small collection of benchmarks for storage I/O"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2"
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b529aaa6a0c50f15d29f89609b5c22f3"
+
+SRCREV = "79698f645bfb28d0d966484ddad3a1efb562246d"
+PV = "0.0+git${SRCPV}"
+SRC_URI =
"git://github.com/Algodev-github/S.git;protocol=https;branch=master"
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
+
+# installing in /opt/S-suite since the package has
+# dependencies to the directory structure.
+do_install() {
+install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite
+for i in $(find ${S}/* -type d); do
+install -d ${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i)
+install -m0755 -p ${S}/$(basename $i)/*
${D}/opt/S-suite/$(basename $i)
+done
+
+install -m0755 ${S}/config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
+install -m0755 ${S}/def_config_params.sh ${D}/opt/S-suite
+}
+
+RDEPENDS_${PN} = "bash bc coreutils gawk g++ gcc fio libaio libaio-dev
sysstat"
+
+FILES_${PN} = "/opt/S-suite/"
+
+# added to INSANE_SKIP since s-suite have an runtime
+# dependency (RDEPENDS) on libaio-dev.
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-deps"
>>>
>>> Thanks for the submission but from:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/Algodev-github/S
>>>
>>> "These benchmarks have been written just for internal use,
>>>and are more a yard than a well-finished work."
>>>
>>>
>>> That doesn't lead to a lot of confidence that these suite will
>>> be maintained for years.
Gosh. I put that disclaimer in the README when I first wrote it more
than 10 years ago. After then, thousands of changes have been made by
me and many other contributors. Unfortunately, I put the suite on
GitHub only recently. But as you can see from the log, there have
been 448 commits in (less than) the last five months.
In addition, the S suite is now used in a new Phoronix benchmark and
in a new mmtests benchmark.
So, believe me, the S suite ATM is definitely in good shape, and seems
to be here to stay.
I'll remove that line, right after finishing a non-trivial new commit
I'm working on.
>>> What's the value to meta-oe users to add
>>> this recipe compared to something that has been around for years
>>> if not decades such as Bonnie++:
>>> https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/864/
>>>
>>
The added value is that bonnie++ does not perform *any* of the benchmarks in
the S suite, apart from that on throughput. I have made the S suite, many years
ago, because I needed to run benchmarks that no suite provided. Here are some
examples:
- start-up times of real applications under real background workloads
- playback quality (drop rate) of video and audio under real background
workloads
- speed of code-development tasks (make, git checkout, git merge, git
grep) under real background workloads, plus measurement of system
responsiveness while one of these dev tasks is executed
- minimum per-client bandwidth guaranteed to a set of clients doing
any possible type of I/O
- maximum per-client latency guaranteed to a set of clients doing any
possible type of I/O
For any doubt, here I am.
Thanks,
Paolo
>> how I read this is that they have not made proper installation
>> targets and its dependencies or letting user know of the dependencies
>> which actually is not a problem with OE since both
>> of these would be taken care of in the recipe with
>> do_install and DEPENDS
>
> Do you mean DEPENDS or RDEPENDS?
>
> Cheers,
> Anders
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
