Re: [oe] [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Mike Looijmans 

On 06-04-16 19:14, Joe MacDonald wrote:

Hi Mike,

[Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt] On 
16.04.05 (Tue 08:17) Mike Looijmans wrote:


Just a reminder that currently "waf" is broken and still won't work on
mipsel platforms without this bugfix.


I merged this for you and pushed it a few minutes ago.  I don't have any
MIPS hardware to test this on but I'm trusting that since you're
reporting it's a build failure that validating for the Edgerouter is a
valid test case.  Is that true?


Don't know that particular box, but if it failed to build (because it's mipsel 
and reports a missing file) before this patch, then yes, that's okay as a test.


M.







On 02-04-16 10:22, Mike Looijmans wrote:

Apparently something was wrong in the patch "waf-cross-answers:
Add cross-answers-mipsel.txt". and it created a dead symlink.
Solve it by just copying the cross-answers-mips.txt instead of
linking it.

Fixes: 0898fb01ccea229cb0c64796b62f20a7c596ac0b

Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans 
---
  .../waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt | 40 +-
  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  mode change 12 => 100644 
meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt

diff --git a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt 
b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
deleted file mode 12
index 59b4337..000
--- a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-cross-answers-mips.txt
diff --git a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt 
b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..18bfa02
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+Checking uname sysname type: "Linux"
+Checking uname version type: "# Wed May 20 10:34:39 UTC 2015"
+Checking simple C program: "hello world"
+rpath library support: OK
+-Wl,--version-script support: OK
+Checking getconf LFS_CFLAGS: NO
+Checking correct behavior of strtoll: NO
+Checking for working strptime: OK
+Checking for C99 vsnprintf: "1"
+Checking for HAVE_SHARED_MMAP: OK
+Checking for HAVE_MREMAP: OK
+Checking for HAVE_SECURE_MKSTEMP: OK
+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_GETIFADDRS: NO
+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFCONF: NO
+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFREQ: NO
+Checking for large file support without additional flags: NO
+Checking for -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64: OK
+Checking for HAVE_INCOHERENT_MMAP: NO
+Checking value of NSIG: "128"
+Checking value of _NSIG: "128"
+Checking value of SIGRTMAX: "127"
+Checking value of SIGRTMIN: "34"
+Checking whether the WRFILE -keytab is supported: OK
+Checking for kernel change notify support: OK
+Checking for Linux kernel oplocks: OK
+Checking for kernel share modes: OK
+Checking whether POSIX capabilities are available: OK
+Checking if can we convert from CP850 to UCS-2LE: OK
+Checking if can we convert from UTF-8 to UCS-2LE: OK
+vfs_fileid checking for statfs() and struct statfs.f_fsid: OK
+Checking whether we can use Linux thread-specific credentials: OK
+Checking whether fcntl locking is available: OK
+Checking for the maximum value of the 'time_t' type: NO
+Checking whether the realpath function allows a NULL argument: OK
+Checking for ftruncate extend: OK
+getcwd takes a NULL argument: OK
+Checking for small off_t: NO
+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 32 bit: NO
+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 64 bit: OK





Kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert

TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail











Kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert

TOPIC Embedded Products
Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: [oe] [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Joe MacDonald 
[Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt] On 
16.04.11 (Mon 15:33) Mike Looijmans wrote:

> On 06-04-16 19:14, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> >Hi Mike,
> >
> >[Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt] On 
> >16.04.05 (Tue 08:17) Mike Looijmans wrote:
> >
> >>Just a reminder that currently "waf" is broken and still won't work on
> >>mipsel platforms without this bugfix.
> >
> >I merged this for you and pushed it a few minutes ago.  I don't have any
> >MIPS hardware to test this on but I'm trusting that since you're
> >reporting it's a build failure that validating for the Edgerouter is a
> >valid test case.  Is that true?
> 
> Don't know that particular box,

It's the only MIPS machine I could find in meta-yocto-bsp.  I don't know
anything about it either.

> but if it failed to build (because it's mipsel and reports a missing
> file) before this patch, then yes, that's okay as a test.

Okay, let me know if something still seems busted and we'll try to turn
it around quickly for you.

-J.

> 
> M.
> 
> 
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>On 02-04-16 10:22, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> >>>Apparently something was wrong in the patch "waf-cross-answers:
> >>>Add cross-answers-mipsel.txt". and it created a dead symlink.
> >>>Solve it by just copying the cross-answers-mips.txt instead of
> >>>linking it.
> >>>
> >>>Fixes: 0898fb01ccea229cb0c64796b62f20a7c596ac0b
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans 
> >>>---
> >>>  .../waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt | 40 
> >>> +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>  mode change 12 => 100644 
> >>> meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>
> >>>diff --git 
> >>>a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt 
> >>>b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>deleted file mode 12
> >>>index 59b4337..000
> >>>--- a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>+++ /dev/null
> >>>@@ -1 +0,0 @@
> >>>-cross-answers-mips.txt
> >>>diff --git 
> >>>a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt 
> >>>b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>new file mode 100644
> >>>index 000..18bfa02
> >>>--- /dev/null
> >>>+++ b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >>>@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> >>>+Checking uname sysname type: "Linux"
> >>>+Checking uname version type: "# Wed May 20 10:34:39 UTC 2015"
> >>>+Checking simple C program: "hello world"
> >>>+rpath library support: OK
> >>>+-Wl,--version-script support: OK
> >>>+Checking getconf LFS_CFLAGS: NO
> >>>+Checking correct behavior of strtoll: NO
> >>>+Checking for working strptime: OK
> >>>+Checking for C99 vsnprintf: "1"
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_SHARED_MMAP: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_MREMAP: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_SECURE_MKSTEMP: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_GETIFADDRS: NO
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFCONF: NO
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFREQ: NO
> >>>+Checking for large file support without additional flags: NO
> >>>+Checking for -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64: OK
> >>>+Checking for HAVE_INCOHERENT_MMAP: NO
> >>>+Checking value of NSIG: "128"
> >>>+Checking value of _NSIG: "128"
> >>>+Checking value of SIGRTMAX: "127"
> >>>+Checking value of SIGRTMIN: "34"
> >>>+Checking whether the WRFILE -keytab is supported: OK
> >>>+Checking for kernel change notify support: OK
> >>>+Checking for Linux kernel oplocks: OK
> >>>+Checking for kernel share modes: OK
> >>>+Checking whether POSIX capabilities are available: OK
> >>>+Checking if can we convert from CP850 to UCS-2LE: OK
> >>>+Checking if can we convert from UTF-8 to UCS-2LE: OK
> >>>+vfs_fileid checking for statfs() and struct statfs.f_fsid: OK
> >>>+Checking whether we can use Linux thread-specific credentials: OK
> >>>+Checking whether fcntl locking is available: OK
> >>>+Checking for the maximum value of the 'time_t' type: NO
> >>>+Checking whether the realpath function allows a NULL argument: OK
> >>>+Checking for ftruncate extend: OK
> >>>+getcwd takes a NULL argument: OK
> >>>+Checking for small off_t: NO
> >>>+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 32 bit: NO
> >>>+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 64 bit: OK
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Kind regards,
> >>
> >>Mike Looijmans
> >>System Expert
> >>
> >>TOPIC Embedded Products
> >>Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> >>Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> >>Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> >>E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
> >>Website: www.topicproducts.com
> >>
> >>Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
> 
> TOPIC Embedded Products
> Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
> Website: www.topicproducts.com
> 
> Please consider the

Re: [oe] [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt

2016-04-06 Thread Joe MacDonald 
Hi Mike,

[Re: [PATCH] waf-cross-answers: Fix faulty link cross-answers-mipsel.txt] On 
16.04.05 (Tue 08:17) Mike Looijmans wrote:

> Just a reminder that currently "waf" is broken and still won't work on
> mipsel platforms without this bugfix.

I merged this for you and pushed it a few minutes ago.  I don't have any
MIPS hardware to test this on but I'm trusting that since you're
reporting it's a build failure that validating for the Edgerouter is a
valid test case.  Is that true?

-J.

> 
> 
> On 02-04-16 10:22, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> >Apparently something was wrong in the patch "waf-cross-answers:
> >Add cross-answers-mipsel.txt". and it created a dead symlink.
> >Solve it by just copying the cross-answers-mips.txt instead of
> >linking it.
> >
> >Fixes: 0898fb01ccea229cb0c64796b62f20a7c596ac0b
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans 
> >---
> >  .../waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt | 40 
> > +-
> >  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  mode change 12 => 100644 
> > meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >
> >diff --git 
> >a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt 
> >b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >deleted file mode 12
> >index 59b4337..000
> >--- a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >+++ /dev/null
> >@@ -1 +0,0 @@
> >-cross-answers-mips.txt
> >diff --git 
> >a/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt 
> >b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 000..18bfa02
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/meta-networking/files/waf-cross-answers/cross-answers-mipsel.txt
> >@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> >+Checking uname sysname type: "Linux"
> >+Checking uname version type: "# Wed May 20 10:34:39 UTC 2015"
> >+Checking simple C program: "hello world"
> >+rpath library support: OK
> >+-Wl,--version-script support: OK
> >+Checking getconf LFS_CFLAGS: NO
> >+Checking correct behavior of strtoll: NO
> >+Checking for working strptime: OK
> >+Checking for C99 vsnprintf: "1"
> >+Checking for HAVE_SHARED_MMAP: OK
> >+Checking for HAVE_MREMAP: OK
> >+Checking for HAVE_SECURE_MKSTEMP: OK
> >+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_GETIFADDRS: NO
> >+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFCONF: NO
> >+Checking for HAVE_IFACE_IFREQ: NO
> >+Checking for large file support without additional flags: NO
> >+Checking for -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64: OK
> >+Checking for HAVE_INCOHERENT_MMAP: NO
> >+Checking value of NSIG: "128"
> >+Checking value of _NSIG: "128"
> >+Checking value of SIGRTMAX: "127"
> >+Checking value of SIGRTMIN: "34"
> >+Checking whether the WRFILE -keytab is supported: OK
> >+Checking for kernel change notify support: OK
> >+Checking for Linux kernel oplocks: OK
> >+Checking for kernel share modes: OK
> >+Checking whether POSIX capabilities are available: OK
> >+Checking if can we convert from CP850 to UCS-2LE: OK
> >+Checking if can we convert from UTF-8 to UCS-2LE: OK
> >+vfs_fileid checking for statfs() and struct statfs.f_fsid: OK
> >+Checking whether we can use Linux thread-specific credentials: OK
> >+Checking whether fcntl locking is available: OK
> >+Checking for the maximum value of the 'time_t' type: NO
> >+Checking whether the realpath function allows a NULL argument: OK
> >+Checking for ftruncate extend: OK
> >+getcwd takes a NULL argument: OK
> >+Checking for small off_t: NO
> >+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 32 bit: NO
> >+Checking whether blkcnt_t is 64 bit: OK
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
> 
> TOPIC Embedded Products
> Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best
> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> E-mail: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
> Website: www.topicproducts.com
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel