libftdi itself is licensed under LGPLv2, with some parts (eeprom programmer) is licensed under GPLv2. There doesn't seem to be any part licensed under a GPLv2-RLE variation of GPLv2, and so we should use GPLv2 instead of GPLv2-RLE.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ertsaas <mert...@cisco.com> --- meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb index 2dba3f4..d3d6dcf 100644 --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/libftdi/libftdi_0.19.bb @@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ including the popular bitbang mode." HOMEPAGE = "http://www.intra2net.com/en/developer/libftdi/" SECTION = "libs" -LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 GPLv2-RLE" +PR = "r1" + +LICENSE = "LGPLv2.1 GPLv2" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM= "file://COPYING.GPL;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe \ file://COPYING.LIB;md5=db979804f025cf55aabec7129cb671ed \ " -- 1.7.8.6 _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel