Re: [oe] [meta-systemd] connman: follow oe-core to 1.20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Müller schreef op 13-12-13 11:45:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com ---
.../connman/{connman_1.19.bbappend = connman_1.20.bbappend}
| 0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename
meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/connman/{connman_1.19.bbappend
= connman_1.20.bbappend} (100%)
diff --git
a/meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_1.19.bbappend
b/meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_1.20.bbappend
similarity index 100%
rename from
meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_1.19.bbappend
rename to
meta-systemd/oe-core/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_1.20.bbappend
Do we actually still need those appends? I know we did 2 releases ago, be we
shouldn't need them anymore, right?
regards,
Koen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iD8DBQFSuZqrMkyGM64RGpERAua8AJ996vZ7700j9DOMkR5ej0/KsYJcnQCffMI9
2LggTo/r9y41XLrP++Dwi2Q=
=e1x2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-systemd] connman: follow oe-core to 1.20
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 13 December 2013 10:45, Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../connman/{connman_1.19.bbappend = connman_1.20.bbappend} | 0
For trivial appends like this you might want to start using bitbake's
support for wildcards in bbappends.
http://cgit.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=31bc9af9cd56e7b318924869970e850993fafc5f
Its a good feature but for beginning
I would keep it this manual seeing amount of layers we use in
angstrom, I like explicit errors there are so many bbappends
in play, it can easily bite us back.
Ross
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-systemd] connman: follow oe-core to 1.20
On 13 December 2013 10:45, Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../connman/{connman_1.19.bbappend = connman_1.20.bbappend} | 0
For trivial appends like this you might want to start using bitbake's
support for wildcards in bbappends.
http://cgit.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=31bc9af9cd56e7b318924869970e850993fafc5f
Ross
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-systemd] connman: follow oe-core to 1.20
On 2013-12-13 04:14, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 13 December 2013 10:45, Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../connman/{connman_1.19.bbappend = connman_1.20.bbappend} | 0
For trivial appends like this you might want to start using bitbake's
support for wildcards in bbappends.
http://cgit.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=31bc9af9cd56e7b318924869970e850993fafc5f
Very nice - too bad this (and I'm sure many other innovations) was
not announced (or even discussed as far as I can see), so those of
us on the outside have no clue that they are there...
--
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates |Embedded world
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
Re: [oe] [meta-systemd] connman: follow oe-core to 1.20
On 13/12/13 13:45, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2013-12-13 04:14, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 13 December 2013 10:45, Andreas Müller
schnitzelt...@googlemail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andreas Müller schnitzelt...@googlemail.com
---
.../connman/{connman_1.19.bbappend =
connman_1.20.bbappend} | 0
For trivial appends like this you might want to start using bitbake's
support for wildcards in bbappends.
http://cgit.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=31bc9af9cd56e7b318924869970e850993fafc5f
Very nice - too bad this (and I'm sure many other innovations) was
not announced (or even discussed as far as I can see), so those of
us on the outside have no clue that they are there...
This one went to the bitbake devel list, if you follow that list then
you can keep an eye on bitbake improvements.
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/62171/
--
Jack Mitchell (j...@embed.me.uk)
Embedded Systems Engineer
Cambridgeshire, UK
http://www.embed.me.uk
--
___
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
