Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Nitin Hande
Tom Duffy wrote:
 On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 15:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
Author: halr
Date: 2004-11-09 15:23:07 -0800 (Tue, 09 Nov 2004)
New Revision: 1186

Modified:
   gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core/agent.c
Log:
Fix agent_mad_send PCI mapping and gather address and length
 
 
 Please revert this change.  It seems to break x86_64 as well, at least
 in my setup.
certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert back to
working set of bits please ?

Thanks
Nitin

 
 -tduffy
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 openib-general mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
 
 To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


___
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Roland Dreier
Nitin certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert
Nitin back to working set of bits please ?

It's actually not an architecture issue -- it's an issue if your node
is more than one hop from the SM.  You should be able to use the patch
I just posted to get things working again.  Let's give Hal a chance to
fix things up properly.

 - R.
___
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general


Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Tom Duffy
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 16:01 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
 Nitin certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert
 Nitin back to working set of bits please ?
 
 It's actually not an architecture issue -- it's an issue if your node
 is more than one hop from the SM.  You should be able to use the patch
 I just posted to get things working again.  Let's give Hal a chance to
 fix things up properly.

OK, your patch got rid of the ib_mad: Invalid directed route message
anyways.  And my port is going to ACTIVE now.

Thanks,

-tduffy


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Re: [openib-general] Re: [openib-commits] r1186 - gen2/trunk/src/linux-kernel/infiniband/core

2004-11-09 Thread Nitin Hande
Roland Dreier wrote:
 Nitin certainly it does break my x86_64 setup too. Can we revert
 Nitin back to working set of bits please ?
 
 It's actually not an architecture issue -- it's an issue if your node
 is more than one hop from the SM.  You should be able to use the patch
 I just posted to get things working again.  Let's give Hal a chance to
 fix things up properly.
 
  - R.
Applying your patch, I do not see the redirect message anymore. But I
cannot ping the peer interface yet. I am on x86_64 arch btw.
Unfortunately I gotta run, will debug more later tonight.

Thanks
Nitin


___
openib-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general