Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread Milan Jurik
Hi,

SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
time to look at it yet.

Best regards,

Milan

On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining it, I 
 don't think I should butt in. (?)
 
 I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device 
 drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly 
 from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance process. 
  If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be more 
 inclined to do some package work for OI.  I can't really take that on right 
 now, though.  At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, though!
 
 I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?
 
 I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that 
 hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that 
 route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.  
 
 
 
 On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
 
  I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, 
  too.
  
  Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your 
  own installation updated from sources.
  
  Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not 
  terribly difficult even that.
  
  If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable 
  from somewhere,
  and those are possibly a little easier to produce.
  
  Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call 
  on me, and I could try to help out.
  
  
  
  On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
  How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?
  
  service/network/imap/dovecot   2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z
  
  It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly 
  enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on 
  the sfe repository.
  
  ---
  v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
  
 - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O
   and memory than necessary.
  ---
  
  I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in 
  the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I 
  end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly 
  up to date.  I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe 
  repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the 
  sources.
  
  
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
  
  
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
  
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread dormitionsk...@hotmail.com
Great!  Do you normally keep dovecot reasonably up to date?

And, thanks for your contributions to OpenIndiana.



On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:

 Hi,
 
 SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
 at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
 to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
 time to look at it yet.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Milan
 
 On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining it, I 
 don't think I should butt in. (?)
 
 I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device 
 drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly 
 from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance 
 process.  If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be 
 more inclined to do some package work for OI.  I can't really take that on 
 right now, though.  At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, 
 though!
 
 I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?
 
 I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that 
 hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that 
 route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.  
 
 
 
 On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
 
 I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, 
 too.
 
 Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your 
 own installation updated from sources.
 
 Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not 
 terribly difficult even that.
 
 If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable 
 from somewhere,
 and those are possibly a little easier to produce.
 
 Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call 
 on me, and I could try to help out.
 
 
 
 On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?
 
 service/network/imap/dovecot   2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z
 
 It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly 
 enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on 
 the sfe repository.
 
 ---
 v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
 
- v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O
  and memory than necessary.
 ---
 
 I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in 
 the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I 
 end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly 
 up to date.  I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe 
 repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the 
 sources.
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread dormitionsk...@hotmail.com
PS - Do you have any plans to package Dovecot's Pigeionhole Sieve?

http://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/index.html


On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:

 Hi,
 
 SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
 at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
 to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
 time to look at it yet.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Milan
 
 On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining it, I 
 don't think I should butt in. (?)
 
 I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device 
 drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly 
 from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance 
 process.  If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be 
 more inclined to do some package work for OI.  I can't really take that on 
 right now, though.  At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, 
 though!
 
 I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?
 
 I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that 
 hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that 
 route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.  
 
 
 
 On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
 
 I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, 
 too.
 
 Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your 
 own installation updated from sources.
 
 Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not 
 terribly difficult even that.
 
 If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable 
 from somewhere,
 and those are possibly a little easier to produce.
 
 Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call 
 on me, and I could try to help out.
 
 
 
 On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?
 
 service/network/imap/dovecot   2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z
 
 It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly 
 enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on 
 the sfe repository.
 
 ---
 v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
 
- v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O
  and memory than necessary.
 ---
 
 I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in 
 the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I 
 end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly 
 up to date.  I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe 
 repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the 
 sources.
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread Hans J. Albertsson

So I take it you're the lead on doing SFE for OI??

Can you comment on what is the most accurate instruction for how to 
build OI SFE packages???


Looking at the tree under http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/SFE I see links 
that are no longer working and several other minor oddities.


Also, there's a tantalising reference to more modern methods that 
will be commented here.


I've asked about this before, but noone answered precisely this question:

Where is the correct documentation on how to do OI SFE repository 
packages at home?


AND, pehaps a more interesting question:

How to get involved as a maintainer of some particular package or set of 
packages???



On 2013-03-22 07:09, Milan Jurik wrote:

Hi,

SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
time to look at it yet.

Best regards,

Milan

On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:

Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining it, I don't 
think I should butt in. (?)

I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device drivers 
for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly from if I can 
figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance process.  If I give up 
on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be more inclined to do some 
package work for OI.  I can't really take that on right now, though.  At a 
later time, I might take you up on that offer, though!

I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?

I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be that 
hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going that route, 
but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.



On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:


I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others are, too.

Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your own 
installation updated from sources.

Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not terribly 
difficult even that.

If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and downloadable from 
somewhere,
and those are possibly a little easier to produce.

Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, call on 
me, and I could try to help out.



On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:

How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?

service/network/imap/dovecot2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z

It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and interestingly 
enough, the current version came out the same day as this was posted on the sfe 
repository.

---
v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi

- v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O
  and memory than necessary.
---

I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in the 
world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I end up 
using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it fairly up to date.  
I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe repository, or write my own 
update script to keep it updated from the sources.


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Multiple devices appearing as one behind SAS expander

2013-03-22 Thread Guenther Alka

This is a not too rare problem with current SSDs
(The manufacturers haven't recognised the importance of individual WWNs)

Even my distributor (winkom) specialized in enterprise SSD listed SSD with
individual WWN only after my request.

What you can do:
disable multipath

What you should do:
do not use them together with controllers that identify disks based on WWN
(ex. LSI SAS2 controller in IT mode)  or you may not be able to identify 
in case of problems.



Gea
napp-it.org



neat problem.
generally the wwn is stamped on the drive. are they all marked with the same 
wwn?

who makes the drives? ocz? sandisk?

Sent from Jasons' hand held

On Mar 21, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Schweiss, Chip c...@innovates.com wrote:


I have four 480GB SSDs I'm trying to re-add to my pool as L2ARC.   They
were all connected internally on the server, but now I have a dedicated SAS
JBOD for the 2 1/2 SSDs in the system.   The JBOD is a SuperMicro 2U with
LSI SAS2X36 expander.

The SSDs are are all showing up as a single device: c11t1200d0s0

They are incorrectly identified as the same device by the multipathadm:

mutipathadm list lu:

/dev/rdsk/c11t1200d0s2
Total Path Count: 4
Operational Path Count: 4

Not sure where napp-it gets its information for it's controller view but
this is how it reports them:

c14::w5003048001d91b4e,0   connected   configured   unknown   Client
Device: /dev/dsk/c11t1200d0s0(sd75) disk-path n /devices/pci@0
,0/pci8086,340e@7/pci1000,30d0@0/iport@f000:scsi::w5003048001d91b4e,0
c14::w5003048001d91b4f,0   connected   configured   unknown   Client
Device: /dev/dsk/c11t1200d0s0(sd75) disk-path n /devices/pci@0
,0/pci8086,340e@7/pci1000,30d0@0/iport@f000:scsi::w5003048001d91b4f,0
c14::w5003048001d91b5a,0   connected   configured   unknown   Client
Device: /dev/dsk/c11t1200d0s0(sd75) disk-path n /devices/pci@0
,0/pci8086,340e@7/pci1000,30d0@0/iport@f000:scsi::w5003048001d91b5a,0
c14::w5003048001d91b5b,0   connected   configured   unknown   Client
Device: /dev/dsk/c11t1200d0s0(sd75) disk-path n /devices/pci@0
,0/pci8086,340e@7/pci1000,30d0@0/iport@f000:scsi::w5003048001d91b5b,0

How do I break this and get OI to see these as 4 independent devices?

Thank you,
-Chip
___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss




___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Out of interest...

2013-03-22 Thread James Relph
Hi all,

I just wondered if anyone knew why a COMSTAR iSCSI re-share would show up as 
Drive type unknown using the format command, whereas other luns (from 
different hosts) are unaffected (show up as COMSTAR OI)?  It doesn't seem to be 
causing any problems, I just thought it was odd!

Thanks,

James.

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


[OpenIndiana-discuss] Fwd: Re: How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread Hans J. Albertsson

Forwarded this for Dormition Skete.

OpenCSW has a more recent Dovecot as an SVr4 package, and 
pkgbuild.sourceforge.net seems a likely way in to being able to set up 
one's own SFE repository of Fine Software for the Discerning Client, and 
even publish one's efforts thru OI-SFE as IPS pkg-s.


I think.

hmm.

The problem of getting involved in maintaining parts of OI SFE or OI 
itself is NOT the practical methods, it's just the lack of clear docs.


Like, you have to step in to the pkgbuild Wiki to get an inkling of the 
fact that it actually enables you to produce IPS packages.
The front page at pkgbuild.sourceforge.net is adamant that it's SVr4 
packages only. Not as obvious at it could have been.
























































Hello,

Use this one for more features:
http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWdovecot/

FAQS about SFE-extras (how to join, build setup, etc):
http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/


~ Ken Mays



*From:* Hans J. Albertsson hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se
*To:* Discussion list for OpenIndiana openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org
*Sent:* Friday, March 22, 2013 3:06 AM
*Subject:* Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

So I take it you're the lead on doing SFE for OI??

Can you comment on what is the most accurate instruction for how to
build OI SFE packages???

Looking at the tree under http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/SFE I see links
that are no longer working and several other minor oddities.

Also, there's a tantalising reference to more modern methods that
will be commented here.

I've asked about this before, but noone answered precisely this question:

Where is the correct documentation on how to do OI SFE repository
packages at home?

AND, pehaps a more interesting question:

How to get involved as a maintainer of some particular package or set of
packages???


On 2013-03-22 07:09, Milan Jurik wrote:
 Hi,

 SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
 at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
 to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
 time to look at it yet.

 Best regards,

 Milan

 On c(t, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com 
mailto:dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining 
it, I don't think I should butt in. (?)


 I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card 
device drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit 
greatly from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole 
acceptance process.  If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very 
easily -- I'd be more inclined to do some package work for OI.  I can't 
really take that on right now, though.  At a later time, I might take 
you up on that offer, though!


 I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?

 I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would 
be that hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up 
going that route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.




 On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:

 I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several 
others are, too.


 Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than 
keeping your own installation updated from sources.


 Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but 
not terribly difficult even that.


 If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and 
downloadable from somewhere,

 and those are possibly a little easier to produce.

 Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this 
road, call on me, and I could try to help out.




 On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com 
mailto:dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:

 How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?

 service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z

 It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and 
interestingly enough, the current version came out the same day as this 
was posted on the sfe repository.


 ---
 v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi mailto:t...@iki.fi

 - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more 
disk I/O

   and memory than necessary.
 ---

 I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out 
what in the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email 
situation.If I end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd 
like to keep it fairly up to date.  I'm trying to decide whether I want 
to use the sfe repository, or write my own update script to keep it 
updated from the sources.



 

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread Milan Jurik
Hi,

On pá, 2013-03-22 at 08:06 +0100, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
 So I take it you're the lead on doing SFE for OI??
 

if you call me in such way as I am the only one publishing to official
SFE OI repo.

 Can you comment on what is the most accurate instruction for how to 
 build OI SFE packages???
 
 Looking at the tree under http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/SFE I see links 
 that are no longer working and several other minor oddities.
 
 Also, there's a tantalising reference to more modern methods that 
 will be commented here.
 
 I've asked about this before, but noone answered precisely this question:
 
 Where is the correct documentation on how to do OI SFE repository 
 packages at home?
 
 AND, pehaps a more interesting question:
 
 How to get involved as a maintainer of some particular package or set of 
 packages???
 

Both start on http://pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ as you
discovered already. Try to build your first SVR4 package, then the next
step is easy, just create your local publisher with pkgrepo and export
PKGBUILD_IPS_SERVER (as URL) for pkgtool and it will publish IPS package
to that repo.

To be maintainer of some package, you have to prepare your CBE and
submit some updated spec for review to SFE mailing list. See the URL
above.

Best regards,

Milan

 
 On 2013-03-22 07:09, Milan Jurik wrote:
  Hi,
 
  SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
  at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
  to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
  time to look at it yet.
 
  Best regards,
 
  Milan
 
  On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
  Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining it, I 
  don't think I should butt in. (?)
 
  I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device 
  drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly 
  from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance 
  process.  If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be 
  more inclined to do some package work for OI.  I can't really take that on 
  right now, though.  At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, 
  though!
 
  I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?
 
  I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be 
  that hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going 
  that route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.
 
 
 
  On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
 
  I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others 
  are, too.
 
  Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your 
  own installation updated from sources.
 
  Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not 
  terribly difficult even that.
 
  If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and 
  downloadable from somewhere,
  and those are possibly a little easier to produce.
 
  Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, 
  call on me, and I could try to help out.
 
 
 
  On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
  How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?
 
  service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z
 
  It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and 
  interestingly enough, the current version came out the same day as this 
  was posted on the sfe repository.
 
  ---
  v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
 
   - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O
 and memory than necessary.
  ---
 
  I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in 
  the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I 
  end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it 
  fairly up to date.  I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe 
  repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the 
  sources.
 
 
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 

Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] How often is sfe Dovecot updated?

2013-03-22 Thread Milan Jurik
On pá, 2013-03-22 at 01:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Great!  Do you normally keep dovecot reasonably up to date?
 

SFE has active dovecot maintainer. The problem is build system now, I
hope it will be solved soon.

Best regards,

Milan

 And, thanks for your contributions to OpenIndiana.
 
 
 
 On Mar 22, 2013, at 12:09 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  SFE dovecot has active maintainer these days. The problem is on my side,
  at least partially, because I am building SFE packages and pushing them
  to the repo. SFE build zone is down for last 2 weeks and admins had no
  time to look at it yet.
  
  Best regards,
  
  Milan
  
  On čt, 2013-03-21 at 15:00 -0600, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
  Who maintains the SFE package?  If somebody is already maintaining it, I 
  don't think I should butt in. (?)
  
  I kind of have my hands full trying to get a grip on video card device 
  drivers for Illumos, which I think OI desktop users would benefit greatly 
  from if I can figure it out, and get it through the whole acceptance 
  process.  If I give up on it -- and I don't give up very easily -- I'd be 
  more inclined to do some package work for OI.  I can't really take that on 
  right now, though.  At a later time, I might take you up on that offer, 
  though!
  
  I'm just wondering how often dovecot SFE gets updated?
  
  I don't think building a script to update dovecot from sources would be 
  that hard, and I wouldn't mind sharing it with others if I end up going 
  that route, but I find the whole thought of that a bit ugly.  
  
  
  
  On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
  
  I'm in exactly the same situation re dovecot. No doubt several others 
  are, too.
  
  Keeping an SFE package updated is probably no more work than keeping your 
  own installation updated from sources.
  
  Different, and a little bit of a learning curve to traverse, but not 
  terribly difficult even that.
  
  If that seems daunting, SVr4 packages can be kept updated and 
  downloadable from somewhere,
  and those are possibly a little easier to produce.
  
  Either way, others would benefit. If you decide to go down this road, 
  call on me, and I could try to help out.
  
  
  
  On 2013-03-21 19:36, dormitionsk...@hotmail.com wrote:
  How often are the dovecot packages in sfe updated?
  
  service/network/imap/dovecot 2.1.14,5.11-0.151.1.7:20130208T203706Z
  
  It's one update behind from what's on the dovecot site, and 
  interestingly enough, the current version came out the same day as this 
  was posted on the sfe repository.
  
  ---
  v2.1.15 2013-02-08  Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
  
   - v2.1.14: dovecot.index.cache fixes caused it to use more disk I/O
 and memory than necessary.
  ---
  
  I'm at that dreaded time where I'm starting to try to figure out what in 
  the world I'm going to do to try to improve our email situation.If I 
  end up using dovecot - which I probably will - I'd like to keep it 
  fairly up to date.  I'm trying to decide whether I want to use the sfe 
  repository, or write my own update script to keep it updated from the 
  sources.
  
  
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
  
  
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
  
  
  
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
  
  
  
  ___
  OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
  OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
  http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss



___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] pkgrepo error

2013-03-22 Thread Serge Fonville
After some trying, it seems that when I run refresh/rebuild with --no-index
option it exits normally, unfortunately I still can't search the repo

Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet,

Serge Fonville

http://www.sergefonville.nl

Convince Microsoft!
They need to add TRUNCATE PARTITION in SQL Server
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/417926/truncate-partition-of-partitioned-table


2013/3/17 Serge Fonville serge.fonvi...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 I have been running an IPS Server for a while now, without serious issues
 Since some time I am getting errors when using it.
 When I run *pkgrepo refresh -s /export/repo/ *I get a stack trace

 Initiating repository refresh.
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/pkgrepo, line 1226, in handle_errors
 __ret = func(*args, **kwargs)
   File /usr/bin/pkgrepo, line 1202, in main_func
 return func(conf, pargs)
   File /usr/bin/pkgrepo, line 984, in subcmd_refresh
 do_refresh(xport, xpub)
   File /usr/bin/pkgrepo, line 969, in do_refresh
 xport.publish_refresh(xpub)
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/transport/transport.py,
 line 432, in wrapper
 return f(instance, *fargs, **f_kwargs)
   File
 /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/transport/transport.py,
 line 2568, in publish_refresh
 d.publish_refresh(header=header, pub=pub)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/client/transport/repo.py,
 line 1584, in publish_refresh
 refresh_index=True)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/server/repository.py,
 line 2703, in add_content
 rstore.add_content(refresh_index=refresh_index)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/server/repository.py,
 line 1067, in add_content
 build_index=refresh_index, incremental=True)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/server/repository.py,
 line 676, in __rebuild
 self.__refresh_index()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/server/repository.py,
 line 695, in __refresh_index
 return self.__run_update_index()
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/server/repository.py,
 line 1655, in __run_update_index
 self.__update_searchdb_unlocked(fmris_to_index)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/server/repository.py,
 line 1011, in __update_searchdb_unlocked
 index_inst.server_update_index(fmris)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py, line 774, in
 server_update_index
 tmp_index_dir)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py, line 726, in
 _generic_update_index
 self._update_index(dicts, tmp_index_dir)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/pkg/indexer.py, line 601, in
 _update_index
 assert len(next_new_tok)  0
 AssertionError

 pkgrepo: This is an internal error in pkg(5) version 35e1caa63de2.
  Please log a
 Service Request about this issue including the information above and this
 message.

 When I run pkg search I get an error

 pkg: Some repositories failed to respond appropriately:
 sergefonville.nl:
 http protocol error: code: 503 reason: Service Unavailable
 URL: '
 http://192.168.1.11/sergefonville.nl/search/1/False_2_None_None_%3A%3A%3Aphp
 '.

 What do I need to do to fix this?

 Thanks in advance.

 Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet,

 Serge Fonville

 http://www.sergefonville.nl

 Convince Microsoft!
 They need to add TRUNCATE PARTITION in SQL Server

 https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/417926/truncate-partition-of-partitioned-table

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss