Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Python 3.7 and 3.9
> > 1) Migrate away from 3.5 to 3.7 as the default Python implementation. > First steps of the week, the following modules were updated and support for Python 3.7 and 3.9 was added: argcomplete atomicwrites attrs chardet coverage funcsigs hypothesis idna importlib-metadata incremental ipaddress mock more-itertools packaging pathlib2 pluggy ptyprocess py pycodestyle pytest rapidjson requests scandir setuptools setuptools_scm six sortedcontainers urllib3 zipp zope.interface Updated to use Python 3.9: ninja meson Deprecation: pytest-27 -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
Thanks, with your previous help I did export CFLAGS=-m64 export LDFLAGS=-m64 and rerun ./autogen.sh after doing a make distclean. I got the 64 bit driver now, got X to load it, but I hit a segfault. Enough for today, let's see if I can figure out what to do with that tomorrow Pf On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:53 PM Aurélien Larcher wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:49 PM Pierfrancesco Caci > wrote: > > > I'm not yet arrived at the point where I'm confident that I can modify > the > > components tree. I'm trying to compile from the git source of this > module. > > Let me see if I can pass those CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to ./configure somehow. > > > > To help you, that were the flags are defined: > > > https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/make-rules/shared-macros.mk#L1193 > > and where they are passed to configure: > > > https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/make-rules/configure.mk#L87 > > > > > brb > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:45 PM Aurélien Larcher < > > aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, > instead > > of > > > > 64. > > > > > > > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > > > > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB > dynamic > > > lib > > > > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > > > > > > > > > > Also all GCC <= 8 default to generating 32-bit binaries for historical > > > reasons (32-bit was the lowest common denominator to the i86pc arch). > > > > > > GCC 9 and 10 default to 64-bit as i386 is not relevant anymore. > > > > > > Build recipes for X11 components are at: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/tree/oi/hipster/components/x11/ > > > > > > The build system sets required flags to generate 64-bit (e.g. > > CFLAGS=-m64, > > > LDFLAGS=-m64). > > > > > > For simplicity you can add a new component in this tree based on > existing > > > recipes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for comparison: > > > > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > > > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit > LSB > > > > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no > > > debugging > > > > information available > > > > > > > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > > > > > > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > > > > > > > ## - ## > > > > ## Platform. ## > > > > ## - ## > > > > > > > > hostname = openindiana > > > > uname -m = i86pc > > > > uname -r = 5.11 > > > > uname -s = SunOS > > > > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > > > > > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > > > > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > > > > Node = openindiana > > > > Release = 5.11 > > > > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > > Machine = i86pc > > > > BusType = > > > > Serial = > > > > Users = > > > > OEM# = 0 > > > > Origin# = 1 > > > > NumCPU = 6 > > > > > > > > /bin/arch = i86pc > > > > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > > > > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > > > > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > > > > /bin/machine = unknown > > > > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > > > > /bin/universe = unknown > > > > [etc] > > > > > > > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > > > > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in > uname? > > > > > > > > Pf > > > > -- > > > > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > > > > ___ > > > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > --- > > > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > > > ___ > > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > > > > > -- > > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > > ___ > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > -- > --- > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:49 PM Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: > I'm not yet arrived at the point where I'm confident that I can modify the > components tree. I'm trying to compile from the git source of this module. > Let me see if I can pass those CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to ./configure somehow. > To help you, that were the flags are defined: https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/make-rules/shared-macros.mk#L1193 and where they are passed to configure: https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/blob/oi/hipster/make-rules/configure.mk#L87 > brb > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:45 PM Aurélien Larcher < > aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead > of > > > 64. > > > > > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > > > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic > > lib > > > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > > > > > > > Also all GCC <= 8 default to generating 32-bit binaries for historical > > reasons (32-bit was the lowest common denominator to the i86pc arch). > > > > GCC 9 and 10 default to 64-bit as i386 is not relevant anymore. > > > > Build recipes for X11 components are at: > > > > > https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/tree/oi/hipster/components/x11/ > > > > The build system sets required flags to generate 64-bit (e.g. > CFLAGS=-m64, > > LDFLAGS=-m64). > > > > For simplicity you can add a new component in this tree based on existing > > recipes. > > > > > > > > > > > for comparison: > > > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB > > > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no > > debugging > > > information available > > > > > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > > > > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > > > > > ## - ## > > > ## Platform. ## > > > ## - ## > > > > > > hostname = openindiana > > > uname -m = i86pc > > > uname -r = 5.11 > > > uname -s = SunOS > > > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > > > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > > > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > > > Node = openindiana > > > Release = 5.11 > > > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > Machine = i86pc > > > BusType = > > > Serial = > > > Users = > > > OEM# = 0 > > > Origin# = 1 > > > NumCPU = 6 > > > > > > /bin/arch = i86pc > > > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > > > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > > > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > > > /bin/machine = unknown > > > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > > > /bin/universe = unknown > > > [etc] > > > > > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > > > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? > > > > > > Pf > > > -- > > > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > > > ___ > > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > > > > > -- > > --- > > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > > ___ > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > -- > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:46 PM Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: > understood. How do I tell ./configure to compile for 64 bit then? It is > basically using the wrong test to decide the architecture, but I don't know > how to change it. > Passing -m64 is enough. > I can see that config.guess has this portion: > > >i86pc:SunOS:5.*:* | i86xen:SunOS:5.*:*) > set_cc_for_build > SUN_ARCH=i386 > # If there is a compiler, see if it is configured for 64-bit > objects. > # Note that the Sun cc does not turn __LP64__ into 1 like gcc does. > # This test works for both compilers. > if test "$CC_FOR_BUILD" != no_compiler_found; then > if (echo '#ifdef __amd64'; echo IS_64BIT_ARCH; echo '#endif') | > \ > (CCOPTS="" $CC_FOR_BUILD -E - 2>/dev/null) | \ > grep IS_64BIT_ARCH >/dev/null > then > SUN_ARCH=x86_64 > fi > fi > > not sure if it is relevant though. > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:36 PM Aurélien Larcher < > aurelien.larc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead > of > > > 64. > > > > > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > > > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic > > lib > > > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > > > > > > for comparison: > > > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB > > > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no > > debugging > > > information available > > > > > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > > > > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > > > > > ## - ## > > > ## Platform. ## > > > ## - ## > > > > > > hostname = openindiana > > > uname -m = i86pc > > > uname -r = 5.11 > > > uname -s = SunOS > > > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > > > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > > > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > > > Node = openindiana > > > Release = 5.11 > > > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > Machine = i86pc > > > BusType = > > > Serial = > > > Users = > > > OEM# = 0 > > > Origin# = 1 > > > NumCPU = 6 > > > > > > /bin/arch = i86pc > > > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > > > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > > > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > > > /bin/machine = unknown > > > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > > > /bin/universe = unknown > > > [etc] > > > > > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > > > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? > > > > > > > On Solaris/illumos i86pc denotes the architecture encompassing x86 and > > x86_64, here called i386 and amd64 respectively. > > > > The command 'isainfo' returns the supported Instruction Set Architectures > > (ISA) for the machine while 'isalist' returns all the extensions. > > > > narval> isainfo > > amd64 i386 > > narval> isalist > > amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86 > > > > > > > Pf > > > -- > > > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > > > ___ > > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > > > > > -- > > --- > > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > > ___ > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > -- > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
I'm not yet arrived at the point where I'm confident that I can modify the components tree. I'm trying to compile from the git source of this module. Let me see if I can pass those CFLAGS and LDFLAGS to ./configure somehow. brb On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:45 PM Aurélien Larcher wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci > wrote: > > > Hello, > > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead of > > 64. > > > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic > lib > > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > > > > Also all GCC <= 8 default to generating 32-bit binaries for historical > reasons (32-bit was the lowest common denominator to the i86pc arch). > > GCC 9 and 10 default to 64-bit as i386 is not relevant anymore. > > Build recipes for X11 components are at: > > https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/tree/oi/hipster/components/x11/ > > The build system sets required flags to generate 64-bit (e.g. CFLAGS=-m64, > LDFLAGS=-m64). > > For simplicity you can add a new component in this tree based on existing > recipes. > > > > > > for comparison: > > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB > > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no > debugging > > information available > > > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > > > ## - ## > > ## Platform. ## > > ## - ## > > > > hostname = openindiana > > uname -m = i86pc > > uname -r = 5.11 > > uname -s = SunOS > > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > > Node = openindiana > > Release = 5.11 > > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > > Machine = i86pc > > BusType = > > Serial = > > Users = > > OEM# = 0 > > Origin# = 1 > > NumCPU = 6 > > > > /bin/arch = i86pc > > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > > /bin/machine = unknown > > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > > /bin/universe = unknown > > [etc] > > > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? > > > > Pf > > -- > > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > > ___ > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > -- > --- > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
understood. How do I tell ./configure to compile for 64 bit then? It is basically using the wrong test to decide the architecture, but I don't know how to change it. I can see that config.guess has this portion: i86pc:SunOS:5.*:* | i86xen:SunOS:5.*:*) set_cc_for_build SUN_ARCH=i386 # If there is a compiler, see if it is configured for 64-bit objects. # Note that the Sun cc does not turn __LP64__ into 1 like gcc does. # This test works for both compilers. if test "$CC_FOR_BUILD" != no_compiler_found; then if (echo '#ifdef __amd64'; echo IS_64BIT_ARCH; echo '#endif') | \ (CCOPTS="" $CC_FOR_BUILD -E - 2>/dev/null) | \ grep IS_64BIT_ARCH >/dev/null then SUN_ARCH=x86_64 fi fi not sure if it is relevant though. On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:36 PM Aurélien Larcher wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci > wrote: > > > Hello, > > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead of > > 64. > > > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic > lib > > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > > > > for comparison: > > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB > > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no > debugging > > information available > > > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > > > ## - ## > > ## Platform. ## > > ## - ## > > > > hostname = openindiana > > uname -m = i86pc > > uname -r = 5.11 > > uname -s = SunOS > > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > > Node = openindiana > > Release = 5.11 > > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > > Machine = i86pc > > BusType = > > Serial = > > Users = > > OEM# = 0 > > Origin# = 1 > > NumCPU = 6 > > > > /bin/arch = i86pc > > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > > /bin/machine = unknown > > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > > /bin/universe = unknown > > [etc] > > > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? > > > > On Solaris/illumos i86pc denotes the architecture encompassing x86 and > x86_64, here called i386 and amd64 respectively. > > The command 'isainfo' returns the supported Instruction Set Architectures > (ISA) for the machine while 'isalist' returns all the extensions. > > narval> isainfo > amd64 i386 > narval> isalist > amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86 > > > > Pf > > -- > > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > > ___ > > openindiana-discuss mailing list > > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > > > > > -- > --- > Praise the Caffeine embeddings > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead of > 64. > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > Also all GCC <= 8 default to generating 32-bit binaries for historical reasons (32-bit was the lowest common denominator to the i86pc arch). GCC 9 and 10 default to 64-bit as i386 is not relevant anymore. Build recipes for X11 components are at: https://github.com/OpenIndiana/oi-userland/tree/oi/hipster/components/x11/ The build system sets required flags to generate 64-bit (e.g. CFLAGS=-m64, LDFLAGS=-m64). For simplicity you can add a new component in this tree based on existing recipes. > for comparison: > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging > information available > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > ## - ## > ## Platform. ## > ## - ## > > hostname = openindiana > uname -m = i86pc > uname -r = 5.11 > uname -s = SunOS > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > Node = openindiana > Release = 5.11 > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > Machine = i86pc > BusType = > Serial = > Users = > OEM# = 0 > Origin# = 1 > NumCPU = 6 > > /bin/arch = i86pc > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > /bin/machine = unknown > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > /bin/universe = unknown > [etc] > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? > > Pf > -- > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 9:12 PM Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: > Hello, > I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead of > 64. > > $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so > /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib > 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped > > for comparison: > $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so > /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB > dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging > information available > > I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: > > $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror > > ## - ## > ## Platform. ## > ## - ## > > hostname = openindiana > uname -m = i86pc > uname -r = 5.11 > uname -s = SunOS > uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 > > /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 > /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS > Node = openindiana > Release = 5.11 > KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 > Machine = i86pc > BusType = > Serial = > Users = > OEM# = 0 > Origin# = 1 > NumCPU = 6 > > /bin/arch = i86pc > /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc > /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown > /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown > /bin/machine = unknown > /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown > /bin/universe = unknown > [etc] > > I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. > So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? > On Solaris/illumos i86pc denotes the architecture encompassing x86 and x86_64, here called i386 and amd64 respectively. The command 'isainfo' returns the supported Instruction Set Architectures (ISA) for the machine while 'isalist' returns all the extensions. narval> isainfo amd64 i386 narval> isalist amd64 pentium_pro+mmx pentium_pro pentium+mmx pentium i486 i386 i86 > Pf > -- > Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx > ___ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] shouldn't uname report 64 bit arch?
Hello, I'm trying to compile xf86-video-qxl. It comes out as 32 bits, instead of 64. $ file /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/qxl_drv.so: ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped for comparison: $ file /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/amd64/vesa_drv.so:ELF 64-bit LSB dynamic lib AMD64 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped, no debugging information available I checked configure.log and it clearly gets the 32 bit info here: $ ./configure --disable-selective-werror ## - ## ## Platform. ## ## - ## hostname = openindiana uname -m = i86pc uname -r = 5.11 uname -s = SunOS uname -v = illumos-dea3b85466 /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 /bin/uname -X = System = SunOS Node = openindiana Release = 5.11 KernelID = illumos-dea3b85466 Machine = i86pc BusType = Serial = Users = OEM# = 0 Origin# = 1 NumCPU = 6 /bin/arch = i86pc /usr/bin/arch -k = i86pc /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown /usr/bin/hostinfo = unknown /bin/machine = unknown /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown /bin/universe = unknown [etc] I checked also the OmniOS VM and that also reports i86pc. So, am I misunderstanding something, or did I just find a bug in uname? Pf -- Pierfrancesco Caci, ik5pvx ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] [oi-dev] OpenIndiana Developer Edition
Hello, out or curiosity, what exactly is the point and added of your proposed fork? Those packages can be easily installed any time after installing OI. I am not sure which exact changes were rejected, but if your raise a discussion and explain clearly why they are needed, OI developers are more than happy to accept. So, instead of forking and creating a “new distribution”, further fragmenting the illumos distribution market, cooperate and help us improve the existing project. There are lot of gaps where improvements are needed and extra manpower is more than welcome. At the end, I can’t tell you want to do, but can try and nicely ask you to collaborate. Please, collaborate with OI team to improve the current experience, more people will benefit from it! P.S: Keeping python-27 around is quite dangerous as the upstream ended any kind of support of Python 2.x and without proper experience you are just put potential users in danger. Thanks for understanding, Adam > On 16 Jan 2021, at 11:02, Hung Nguyen Gia via oi-dev > wrote: > > Someone on this list challenged me of forking OpenIndiana in order for my > changes to be accepted. This is exactly what I'm going to do now. But I will > do it moderately, according to my skills. > > I wanted to build something like in the title. > > It's the normal desktop OI plus the following packages: > > build-essential > cmake > ninja > meson > yasm > autoconf-213 > header-audio > sunpro > motif > python-27 > > More packages would be included in the future, if needed. > > My computer power doesn't allow me to build everything myself, so I think I > will just pull the packages from OI repo. > > The goal is to have a live ISO/USB images contain these additional packages. > > I have come across this wiki: > > http://docs.openindiana.org/dev/distribution-constructor/ > > But it's still not very clear to me. Any help would be appreciated. > > ___ > oi-dev mailing list > oi-...@openindiana.org > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
[OpenIndiana-discuss] OpenIndiana Developer Edition
Someone on this list challenged me of forking OpenIndiana in order for my changes to be accepted. This is exactly what I'm going to do now. But I will do it moderately, according to my skills. I wanted to build something like in the title. It's the normal desktop OI plus the following packages: build-essential cmake ninja meson yasm autoconf-213 header-audio sunpro motif python-27 More packages would be included in the future, if needed. My computer power doesn't allow me to build everything myself, so I think I will just pull the packages from OI repo. The goal is to have a live ISO/USB images contain these additional packages. I have come across this wiki: http://docs.openindiana.org/dev/distribution-constructor/ But it's still not very clear to me. Any help would be appreciated. ___ openindiana-discuss mailing list openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
