Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Gnome and the future

2012-10-31 Thread Magnus Hedemark
I never suggested stopping DE development. I merely suggested that thinking of 
OI as an enterprise desktop OS is trying to sell an idea that enterprises 
aren't going to buy. I'm actually going to switch from Mac to OI laptop after 
the holidays (getting crazier with age).

Sent from my typewriter

On Oct 31, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Maxim Kondratovich maxim@gmail.com wrote:

 So why OI has DE at all? Leading to your logic community has to cut off DE 
 from distribution at all... And what we will have? Another one illumos based 
 server distribution?!
 
 I see OI as OS for general purposes, so stopping development in DE will 
 decrease value of OI. Yes, community is to small but we have to find 
 compromise and community will grow up.
 
 P.S. I'm not an active OI developer, but I help with testing and I'm going to 
 contribute as developer at future.
 
 - Maxim
 
 
 Julius Roberts wrote:
 On 1 November 2012 02:33,  mag...@yonderway.com wrote:
 This is based on the false premise that OpenIndiana is an enterprise
 desktop operating system.
 +1.  There are alot of very useful desktop operating systems already,
 so i see no point in OI trying to compete with them.  In business
 speak OI has a sustainable competitive advantage with ZFS, zones,
 dtrace, etc etc and those alone are why most people will be attracted
 to OI.  Our OI servers sit in various computer rooms and we talk to
 them exclusively over ssh, if it didn't feature a GUI we wouldn't
 notice or care.  I wonder how many other OI users feel similarly?
 
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana?

2012-04-21 Thread Magnus Hedemark
Postfix.

Sent from my typewriter

On Apr 21, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Hans J. Albertsson 
hans.j.alberts...@branneriet.se wrote:

 What MTA would you suggest?
 
 On 2012-04-20 14:40, openindiana-discuss-requ...@openindiana.org wrote:
 Message: 8 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:00:03 +0800 From: Christopher Chan 
 christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk To: openindiana-discuss@openindiana.org 
 Subject: Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] Qmail-to-go on openindiana? Message-ID: 
 4f90b513.9080...@bradbury.edu.hk Content-Type: text/plain; 
 charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi Hans, May I ask why you would want to 
 use qmail? It has pretty weak anti-spam facilities, if at all, and so would 
 not really be an mta you want for incoming use. If you only want to use it 
 for outgoing then I can understand. Christopher On Friday, April 20, 2012 
 03:40 AM, Hans J. Albertsson wrote:
   I'm considering setting up qmail rather than sendmail or postfix on my
   openindiana 151-a3 systems.
 
   Is there a ready-made package available for openindiana or must I
   compile it from scratch?
 
   Will Qmail integrate well with Webmin, or even at all?
 
   ___
   OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
   OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
   http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
 
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] ? Additional info ?

2011-07-26 Thread Magnus Hedemark
Relax, Steve. It will all be ok.

This mailing list works pretty well actually. There is also an irc channel, 
#OpenIndiana, which I have found to be both friendly and helpful.

OpenIndiana is not Indiana, nor is it OpenSolaris. You will find more of a tie 
to Illumos than anything. Go to Illumos.org and you will see a link to a forum 
there if that is what you are after.

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 26, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Steve strange_st...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Uh, new to OpenIndiana (O.I.) and kind of dismayed to see the lack of any 
 community forum anywhere - with the exception to this mailing list... which 
 is hardly the ideal way to resolve an issue, or seek guidance IMHO. I was 
 able to find something at OpenSolaris.org but the Indiana category appears 
 to be 'closed' - is there a forum aside from IRC and this listserv that 
 exists -to address targeted facets and innards of O.I.?
 
 Secondly - the O.I. FAQ fails to answer the question if Gnome (or the lack 
 there of) and if this GUI is the only differenced between the 148 server 
 and the desktop  installation binaries.
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss


Re: [OpenIndiana-discuss] oracle removes 32bit x86 cpu support for solaris 11 will OI do same?

2011-06-22 Thread Magnus Hedemark
Closer to twenty. And my Ultra 1 is doing fine.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Gary Driggs gdri...@gmail.com wrote:

 FWIW, Mac OS X Lion will only support x64 as well. IMHO, this is a good move 
 for modern operating systems since there are always going to be alternatives 
 for those still using i386 architecture. How long has Solaris/SPARC been 
 64-bit? At least ten years if not more...
 
 -Gary
 ___
 OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
 OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
 http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss

___
OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list
OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss