Re: JavaFX graphic performance slow on Mac? Clock app
Hi Jim, that’s very interesting. BTW: Where do I get the ES2 implementation for Windows? I will remove all extern dependencies in the the project. Best regards, Tobi Am 10.07.2015 um 02:19 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: I was able to verify the CPU usage on my retina MBP and further show that ES2 on Windows also consumes a similar amount of CPU: Mac (using ES2): 20-25% Windows (using D3D): 3% Windows (using ES2): 20% so this is definitely related to our use of OpenGL and not a Mac platform issue (though it did have a couple percent more overhead than the ES2 pipe on Windows, the bulk of the performance was ES2 vs OGL). Can you remove the external dependencies on the date formatter from your test case and then submit a bug so we can track this issue? ...jim On 7/8/15 7:57 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi Jim, please checkout the small app on Github: https://github.com/tobium/JavaFXPerformanceTest Mac OS X: 10.10.4 Mac Book Pro Retina (Late 2012), Intel HD Graphics 4000 1024 MB, 8 GB RAM, i7 2,6Ghz Java FX 1.8.0_60 FPS: Mac and Windows: 60 FPS CPU usage: Mac: 25-80%, Windows: 0-3% Best regards, Tobi Am 07.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: Hi Tobi, Can you share your small clock app? Perhaps file a bug and attach the source? Also, what version of MacOS are you running on what hardware? (And compared to what version of Windows on what hardware?) ...jim On 7/7/15 4:32 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi, currently our experiences with JavaFX on Mac are very disappointing. While JavaFX on Windows runs very good with low cpu usage, JavaFX on Mac via Java 8 doesn’t perform well. I created a little clock app which uses between 25% and 80% cpu usage. But what’s the reason for? I though JavaFX rendering pipeline works on the graphic device? So why there is such a traffic on the CPU? Best regards, Tobi
Re: JavaFX graphic performance slow on Mac? Clock app
Hi Jörg, Java Swing performs much better on Windows using D3D than on Mac using OpenGL/Quartz…. so I suppose the OpenGL implementation on Mac isn’t very good….maybe that’s the reason for the new Metal rendering API on Mac 10.11? Best regards, Tobi Am 10.07.2015 um 00:21 schrieb Jörg Wille joerg.wi...@gmail.com: Hi Tobi, I have ran your clock app on an old MacBook Pro (15 Zoll, Late 2008) (2,4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M 256 MB Mac OS X 10.10.4 JDK 1.8.0_45-b14 using: java -Dprism.verbose=true -jar javafx-performance-test-1.0.0.jar which shows that the GPU pipeline is used. Loading ES2 native library ... prism_es2 succeeded. Graphics Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M OpenGL Engine Version: 2.1 NVIDIA-10.0.31 310.90.10.05b12 I also measured a cpu load of about 30 to 40%, after 60 to 80% in the first couple of seconds. @oracle-staff: Does JavaFX graphic perform better on D3D than on OpenGL in general? And if so, are there plans to speed up gl pipeline or has D3D higher priority? Best regards, Joerg
Re: JavaFX graphic performance slow on Mac? Clock app
Hi, I recently updated the project on github (https://github.com/tobium/JavaFXPerformanceTest). I removed the dependencies and added several new tests, e.g. JavaFX using Canvas and Swing tests. All of these tests perform well (1% CPU) on Windows, all of these tests doesn’t perform well on Mac OS X (30%-50% CPU). I will try running the swing tests via Apples JDK6 and quartz renderer. Best regards, Tobi Am 10.07.2015 um 02:19 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: I was able to verify the CPU usage on my retina MBP and further show that ES2 on Windows also consumes a similar amount of CPU: Mac (using ES2): 20-25% Windows (using D3D): 3% Windows (using ES2): 20% so this is definitely related to our use of OpenGL and not a Mac platform issue (though it did have a couple percent more overhead than the ES2 pipe on Windows, the bulk of the performance was ES2 vs OGL). Can you remove the external dependencies on the date formatter from your test case and then submit a bug so we can track this issue? ...jim On 7/8/15 7:57 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi Jim, please checkout the small app on Github: https://github.com/tobium/JavaFXPerformanceTest Mac OS X: 10.10.4 Mac Book Pro Retina (Late 2012), Intel HD Graphics 4000 1024 MB, 8 GB RAM, i7 2,6Ghz Java FX 1.8.0_60 FPS: Mac and Windows: 60 FPS CPU usage: Mac: 25-80%, Windows: 0-3% Best regards, Tobi Am 07.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: Hi Tobi, Can you share your small clock app? Perhaps file a bug and attach the source? Also, what version of MacOS are you running on what hardware? (And compared to what version of Windows on what hardware?) ...jim On 7/7/15 4:32 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi, currently our experiences with JavaFX on Mac are very disappointing. While JavaFX on Windows runs very good with low cpu usage, JavaFX on Mac via Java 8 doesn’t perform well. I created a little clock app which uses between 25% and 80% cpu usage. But what’s the reason for? I though JavaFX rendering pipeline works on the graphic device? So why there is such a traffic on the CPU? Best regards, Tobi
Re: JavaFX graphic performance slow on Mac? Clock app
I just tried this app on my MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2015) The framerate was always 60fps. The higher performance AMD graphics processor was active - as it is for all Java programs :-(. The CPU usage reported for the process by Activity Monitor varied between 18 and 30%, and settled at just under 20%. The interesting thing I saw though was that the CPU reported via jvisualvm was only 2%, and the total CPU usage of the system was only 10%… so I don’t quite understand how to read those numbers! It seemed like threads running in parallel were added together to make the total CPU for the process seem higher. I’ve attached screen shots of the measurements. Perhaps someone can interpret the discrepancy. Scott On Jul 9, 2015, at 8:19 PM, Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com wrote: I was able to verify the CPU usage on my retina MBP and further show that ES2 on Windows also consumes a similar amount of CPU: Mac (using ES2): 20-25% Windows (using D3D): 3% Windows (using ES2): 20% so this is definitely related to our use of OpenGL and not a Mac platform issue (though it did have a couple percent more overhead than the ES2 pipe on Windows, the bulk of the performance was ES2 vs OGL). Can you remove the external dependencies on the date formatter from your test case and then submit a bug so we can track this issue? ...jim On 7/8/15 7:57 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi Jim, please checkout the small app on Github: https://github.com/tobium/JavaFXPerformanceTest Mac OS X: 10.10.4 Mac Book Pro Retina (Late 2012), Intel HD Graphics 4000 1024 MB, 8 GB RAM, i7 2,6Ghz Java FX 1.8.0_60 FPS: Mac and Windows: 60 FPS CPU usage: Mac: 25-80%, Windows: 0-3% Best regards, Tobi Am 07.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: Hi Tobi, Can you share your small clock app? Perhaps file a bug and attach the source? Also, what version of MacOS are you running on what hardware? (And compared to what version of Windows on what hardware?) ...jim On 7/7/15 4:32 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi, currently our experiences with JavaFX on Mac are very disappointing. While JavaFX on Windows runs very good with low cpu usage, JavaFX on Mac via Java 8 doesn’t perform well. I created a little clock app which uses between 25% and 80% cpu usage. But what’s the reason for? I though JavaFX rendering pipeline works on the graphic device? So why there is such a traffic on the CPU? Best regards, Tobi
JavaFX graphic performance slow on Mac? Clock app
Hi, currently our experiences with JavaFX on Mac are very disappointing. While JavaFX on Windows runs very good with low cpu usage, JavaFX on Mac via Java 8 doesn’t perform well. I created a little clock app which uses between 25% and 80% cpu usage. But what’s the reason for? I though JavaFX rendering pipeline works on the graphic device? So why there is such a traffic on the CPU? Best regards, Tobi
Re: JavaFX graphic performance slow on Mac? Clock app
You will need to build OpenJFX from source to get the windows implementation of the ES2 pipeline. We strip it out of jfxrt.jar before shipping it. -- Kevin Tobias Bley wrote: Hi Jim, that’s very interesting. BTW: Where do I get the ES2 implementation for Windows? I will remove all extern dependencies in the the project. Best regards, Tobi Am 10.07.2015 um 02:19 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: I was able to verify the CPU usage on my retina MBP and further show that ES2 on Windows also consumes a similar amount of CPU: Mac (using ES2): 20-25% Windows (using D3D): 3% Windows (using ES2): 20% so this is definitely related to our use of OpenGL and not a Mac platform issue (though it did have a couple percent more overhead than the ES2 pipe on Windows, the bulk of the performance was ES2 vs OGL). Can you remove the external dependencies on the date formatter from your test case and then submit a bug so we can track this issue? ...jim On 7/8/15 7:57 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi Jim, please checkout the small app on Github: https://github.com/tobium/JavaFXPerformanceTest Mac OS X: 10.10.4 Mac Book Pro Retina (Late 2012), Intel HD Graphics 4000 1024 MB, 8 GB RAM, i7 2,6Ghz Java FX 1.8.0_60 FPS: Mac and Windows: 60 FPS CPU usage: Mac: 25-80%, Windows: 0-3% Best regards, Tobi Am 07.07.2015 um 21:23 schrieb Jim Graham james.gra...@oracle.com: Hi Tobi, Can you share your small clock app? Perhaps file a bug and attach the source? Also, what version of MacOS are you running on what hardware? (And compared to what version of Windows on what hardware?) ...jim On 7/7/15 4:32 AM, Tobias Bley wrote: Hi, currently our experiences with JavaFX on Mac are very disappointing. While JavaFX on Windows runs very good with low cpu usage, JavaFX on Mac via Java 8 doesn’t perform well. I created a little clock app which uses between 25% and 80% cpu usage. But what’s the reason for? I though JavaFX rendering pipeline works on the graphic device? So why there is such a traffic on the CPU? Best regards, Tobi
Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value
Steve, Please find my update here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090098 Regards, Anton. On 10.07.2015 18:21, Hruda, Steve wrote: I saw it on the mailing list and I'll give it a try next week. Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer / VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Steuer-Nummer: 264/4807 This E-Mail has been sent on behalf of the company Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Authorised Managing Directors: Maximilian Weber Registered office and Austrian headquarters: Margaretenstr. 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Austria, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 The company is recorded at the commercial court of Vienna under the company register number FN 116859 b VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Austrian Tax ID: 264/4807 Diese E-Mail (mit zugehörigen Dateien) enthält möglicherweise Informationen, die vertraulich sind, dem Urheberrecht unterliegen oder ein Geschäftsgeheimnis darstellen. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend, indem Sie eine Antwort senden, und löschen Sie bitte diese E-Mail und Ihre Antwort darauf. Sämtliche aufgeführten Ansichten oder Meinungen sind ausschließlich diejenigen des Autors und entsprechen nicht notwendigerweise denen des Unternehmens Intergraph. This E-Mail (and any attachments) may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this E-Mail and your reply from your system. All the views and opinions published here are solely based on the author's own opinion and should not be considered necessarily as reflecting the opinion of Intergraph. -Original Message- From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 6:19 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Thank you, I did =) Btw, now you can build and explore your fixes as well with the webview deps released. Regards, Anton. On 10.07.2015 19:16, Hruda, Steve wrote: Hi Anton, Welcome back! I hope you enjoyed your vacation. Thanks for the update ;-) Regards, Steve Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer / VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Steuer-Nummer: 264/4807 This E-Mail has been sent on behalf of the company Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Authorised Managing Directors: Maximilian Weber Registered office and Austrian headquarters: Margaretenstr. 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Austria, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 The company is recorded at the commercial court of Vienna under the company register number FN 116859 b VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Austrian Tax ID: 264/4807 Diese E-Mail (mit zugehörigen Dateien) enthält möglicherweise Informationen, die vertraulich sind, dem Urheberrecht unterliegen oder ein Geschäftsgeheimnis darstellen. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend, indem Sie eine Antwort senden, und löschen Sie bitte diese E-Mail und Ihre Antwort darauf. Sämtliche aufgeführten Ansichten oder Meinungen sind ausschließlich diejenigen des Autors und entsprechen nicht notwendigerweise denen des Unternehmens Intergraph. This E-Mail (and any attachments) may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this E-Mail and your reply from your system. All the views and opinions published here are solely based on the author's own opinion and should not be considered necessarily as reflecting the opinion of Intergraph. -Original Message- From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 6:11 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Hi Steve, I was on a short vacation. The testing is in progress yet. I'll update the issue when it's done. Regards, Anton. On 08.07.2015 14:57, Hruda, Steve wrote: Hi Anton, The issue was last updated on Thursday. Have you found any additional LayoutTest issues? Or does everything work? Regards, Steve Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien,
Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value
Hi Steve, I was on a short vacation. The testing is in progress yet. I'll update the issue when it's done. Regards, Anton. On 08.07.2015 14:57, Hruda, Steve wrote: Hi Anton, The issue was last updated on Thursday. Have you found any additional LayoutTest issues? Or does everything work? Regards, Steve Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer / VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Steuer-Nummer: 264/4807 This E-Mail has been sent on behalf of the company Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Authorised Managing Directors: Maximilian Weber Registered office and Austrian headquarters: Margaretenstr. 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Austria, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 The company is recorded at the commercial court of Vienna under the company register number FN 116859 b VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Austrian Tax ID: 264/4807 Diese E-Mail (mit zugehörigen Dateien) enthält möglicherweise Informationen, die vertraulich sind, dem Urheberrecht unterliegen oder ein Geschäftsgeheimnis darstellen. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend, indem Sie eine Antwort senden, und löschen Sie bitte diese E-Mail und Ihre Antwort darauf. Sämtliche aufgeführten Ansichten oder Meinungen sind ausschließlich diejenigen des Autors und entsprechen nicht notwendigerweise denen des Unternehmens Intergraph. This E-Mail (and any attachments) may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this E-Mail and your reply from your system. All the views and opinions published here are solely based on the author's own opinion and should not be considered necessarily as reflecting the opinion of Intergraph. -Original Message- From: openjfx-dev [mailto:openjfx-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Hruda, Steve Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 4:46 PM To: Anton V. Tarasov Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: RE: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Very cool! Thanks for your efforts! From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 4:44 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: Kevin Rushforth; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value The test passes with this only change. And the original bug is not reproducible. Ok, I'll need to test it with other date LayoutTests again. Will update in JIRA. Regards, Anton. On 02.07.2015 15:31, Hruda, Steve wrote: Yes! ;-) From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 3:26 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: Kevin Rushforth; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.netmailto:openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Ok, got it. You suggest trying the only 2-line change? Anton. On 02.07.2015 15:54, Hruda, Steve wrote: HI Anton, The diff fix must be there. if (diff0) diff += secondsPerDay; … but the following fixes are unnecessary, for the midnight bug. I think one of these fixes could be the problem. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ant/JDK-8090098/webrev.0/http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eant/JDK-8090098/webrev.0/ which contains the following fixed issues: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/174377 http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/175078 http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/181360 Regards, Steve From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:50 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: Kevin Rushforth; openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.netmailto:openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Hi Steve, Actually, I already checked that removing if (diff0) diff += secondsPerDay; didn't help. Regards, Anton. On 02.07.2015 13:09, Hruda, Steve wrote: Hi Anton, I saw your comments on https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090098. We’ve opened the test page which you have mentioned in our own compiled WebKit version - clean build latest version. Used Timezone: Vienna CEST – current Offset UTC+2:00 Without our Fix: Only the first and latest test pass. With our Fix: The same – only the first and latest test pass. It seems that one changeset regress this behavior, but not the our latest “if –fix” if (diff0) diff += secondsPerDay; I’m not able to build openjfx because of the missing dependencies (1.3). Please can you try what happens if you only apply the diff fix and not the previous patch, which includes all other date
RE: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value
I saw it on the mailing list and I'll give it a try next week. Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer / VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Steuer-Nummer: 264/4807 This E-Mail has been sent on behalf of the company Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Authorised Managing Directors: Maximilian Weber Registered office and Austrian headquarters: Margaretenstr. 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Austria, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 The company is recorded at the commercial court of Vienna under the company register number FN 116859 b VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Austrian Tax ID: 264/4807 Diese E-Mail (mit zugehörigen Dateien) enthält möglicherweise Informationen, die vertraulich sind, dem Urheberrecht unterliegen oder ein Geschäftsgeheimnis darstellen. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend, indem Sie eine Antwort senden, und löschen Sie bitte diese E-Mail und Ihre Antwort darauf. Sämtliche aufgeführten Ansichten oder Meinungen sind ausschließlich diejenigen des Autors und entsprechen nicht notwendigerweise denen des Unternehmens Intergraph. This E-Mail (and any attachments) may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this E-Mail and your reply from your system. All the views and opinions published here are solely based on the author's own opinion and should not be considered necessarily as reflecting the opinion of Intergraph. -Original Message- From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 6:19 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Thank you, I did =) Btw, now you can build and explore your fixes as well with the webview deps released. Regards, Anton. On 10.07.2015 19:16, Hruda, Steve wrote: Hi Anton, Welcome back! I hope you enjoyed your vacation. Thanks for the update ;-) Regards, Steve Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer / VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Steuer-Nummer: 264/4807 This E-Mail has been sent on behalf of the company Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Authorised Managing Directors: Maximilian Weber Registered office and Austrian headquarters: Margaretenstr. 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Austria, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 The company is recorded at the commercial court of Vienna under the company register number FN 116859 b VAT-ID: ATU15138401, Austrian Tax ID: 264/4807 Diese E-Mail (mit zugehörigen Dateien) enthält möglicherweise Informationen, die vertraulich sind, dem Urheberrecht unterliegen oder ein Geschäftsgeheimnis darstellen. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlicherweise erhalten haben, benachrichtigen Sie uns bitte umgehend, indem Sie eine Antwort senden, und löschen Sie bitte diese E-Mail und Ihre Antwort darauf. Sämtliche aufgeführten Ansichten oder Meinungen sind ausschließlich diejenigen des Autors und entsprechen nicht notwendigerweise denen des Unternehmens Intergraph. This E-Mail (and any attachments) may be confidential and protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by replying to the sender and delete this E-Mail and your reply from your system. All the views and opinions published here are solely based on the author's own opinion and should not be considered necessarily as reflecting the opinion of Intergraph. -Original Message- From: Anton V. Tarasov [mailto:anton.tara...@oracle.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 6:11 PM To: Hruda, Steve Cc: openjfx-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Patch for JDK-8090098 - [regression] Webview - getTimezoneOffset() of a ISO strings returns a wrong value Hi Steve, I was on a short vacation. The testing is in progress yet. I'll update the issue when it's done. Regards, Anton. On 08.07.2015 14:57, Hruda, Steve wrote: Hi Anton, The issue was last updated on Thursday. Have you found any additional LayoutTest issues? Or does everything work? Regards, Steve Diese E-Mail wurde versandt im Auftrag des Unternehmens Intergraph Ges.m.b.H. Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Maximilian Weber Sitz der Gesellschaft: Margaretenstraße 70/I/1, 1050 Wien, Österreich, Tel. +43 (1) 9610567-0 Eingetragen beim Handelsgericht Wien, Firmenbuch-Nr.: FN 116859 b
In(Sanity) Testing Mondays
Reminder, Monday is our weekly sanity testing. You can find your testing assignment at: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Sanity+Testing Also please remember that the repo will be locked from 1am PDT until 1pm PDT. Happy testing! Thanks, Vadim
webview-deps 1.3 released!
Hi all, I'm pleased to announce that webview-deps 1.3 are eventually released to Maven Central! http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/webkit/webview-deps/1.3/ Enjoy building WebView! =) http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/9-dev/rt Regards, Anton.
