MarlinFX upgrade 0.7.5

2017-04-19 Thread Laurent Bourgès
Hi,

Please review this MarlinFX upgrade to Marlin 0.7.5:

JBS: no bug yet for OpenJFX 10
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lbourges/marlinFX/marlinFX-075.0/

Changes:
- Renderers: fixed block processing
- dead code & few comment removals in Strokers
- fixed all floating-point number literals to be x.0f or x.0d to simplify
the conversion between float & double variants

PS: I plan to run later FindBugs, Netbeans & IntelliJ code analysis tools
to fix any warning

Cheers,
Laurent


[10] Code Review Request For 8178837: Potential performance drawback due to type mismatch

2017-04-19 Thread Chien Yang

Hi Kevin,

Please review the proposed fix.

JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178837
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8178837/webrev.00/

Thanks,
- Chien



[9] Review request: 8091730: Enable -Xdoclint:all to treat all javadoc warnings as errors

2017-04-19 Thread Kevin Rushforth
Please review the following to enable building the FX docs with "javadoc 
-Xdoclint:all".


https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8091730
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8091730/webrev.00/

This will allow to catch doc warnings early before delivering them to 
the JDK 9 build, and will allow the unified JDK javadoc build to use 
-Xdoclint for javafx.* modules.


-- Kevin



[9] Code Review Request For 8178804: Excessive memory consumption in TriangleMesh/MeshView

2017-04-19 Thread Chien Yang

Hi Kevin,

Please review the proposed fix.

JIRA: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178804
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ckyang/JDK-8178804/webrev.00/

Thanks,
- Chien


Re: Review: Remove Lens code (finally)

2017-04-19 Thread Kevin Rushforth
As a note, once the review is completed this will only go into OpenJFX 
10. It will not be backported to 9 or 8.


-- Kevin


Chris Newland wrote:

Thanks for the heads-up David.

I've checked my chriswhocodes.com web server logs and around 90 unique IPs
per week are still downloading the ARM OpenJFX overlay builds so before
this patch is merged I'll take a snapshot of the last working ARM build
and keep that available.

Kind regards,

Chris

On Tue, April 18, 2017 21:47, David Hill wrote:
  

  

Here is the change to remove the Lens code.


caviots:
There were some minor gradle fixes required to cross build.


I removed all of the arm*gradle files except for armv6hf. Arm is not a
supported platform anymore and by reducing to the most likely to be used
(because of the Pi), I can concentrate what few resources I can to
checking that platform still builds.

Armv6hf builds cleanly. I don't have a working Pi configuration to test
it, and need to figure out building the JDK for ARM before I really can
test it even then.

We have not been using Lens for JDK 8,9 so this should be safe.


https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090969
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddhill/8090969


--
David Hill
Java Embedded Development


"A man's feet should be planted in his country, but his eyes should
survey the world." -- George Santayana (1863 - 1952)






  


Re: Review: Remove Lens code (finally)

2017-04-19 Thread Chris Newland
Thanks for the heads-up David.

I've checked my chriswhocodes.com web server logs and around 90 unique IPs
per week are still downloading the ARM OpenJFX overlay builds so before
this patch is merged I'll take a snapshot of the last working ARM build
and keep that available.

Kind regards,

Chris

On Tue, April 18, 2017 21:47, David Hill wrote:
>

> Here is the change to remove the Lens code.
>
>
> caviots:
> There were some minor gradle fixes required to cross build.
>
>
> I removed all of the arm*gradle files except for armv6hf. Arm is not a
> supported platform anymore and by reducing to the most likely to be used
> (because of the Pi), I can concentrate what few resources I can to
> checking that platform still builds.
>
> Armv6hf builds cleanly. I don't have a working Pi configuration to test
> it, and need to figure out building the JDK for ARM before I really can
> test it even then.
>
> We have not been using Lens for JDK 8,9 so this should be safe.
>
>
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8090969
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddhill/8090969
>
>
> --
> David Hill
> Java Embedded Development
>
>
> "A man's feet should be planted in his country, but his eyes should
> survey the world." -- George Santayana (1863 - 1952)
>
>
>