Re: Fix to R package

2007-07-12 Thread David Fetter
I noticed that gcc-4.2.0 was updated as of yesterday, so I rebuilt it
then tried to rebuild the R package again but unfortunately it still
fails to build.  I noticed during the compilation that the -fPIC option
seems to be included with some of the gcc compiling but when it starts
to compile the libgfortran I don't see the -fPIC option anymore.  It
seems that perhaps the compilation excludes the -fPIC option when
building libgfortran which seems to be related with R not building.  I
don't really know much more than this because as I'm sure you can tell,
I am no C programmer.  Any help with this is appreciated.  Thanks.

On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 12:19 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> It seems that the problem with building the R package on an amd64 bit
> platform may be a gcc4 problem.  See here:
> "http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=3#doc_chap5";.
>   I'm working on testing this theory out, but ultimately, it seems that a 
> flag to add -fPic explicitly for amd64 archs might be needed.
> 
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:00 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > Ah, shoot!  I was hoping the patches would fix our 64-bit problem with R
> > not compiling.  :-(  I'm getting the following error when I try to
> > compile it:
> > 
> > /usr/local/bin/cc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../../../src/include
> > -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -fpic
> > -fPIC -c Lapack.c -o Lapack.o
> > /usr/local/bin/cc -std=gnu99 -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o lapack.so
> > Lapack.o   -L../../../lib -lRlapack -L../../../lib -lRblas -lgfortran
> > -lm /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortranbegin.a 
> > /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortran.a
> > /usr/local/bin/ld: skipping
> > incompatible 
> > /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortran.a when 
> > searching for -lgfortran
> > /usr/local/bin/ld: 
> > /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a(pow_i4_i4.o):
> >  relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when 
> > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> > /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a:
> >  could not read symbols: Bad value
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[4]: *** [lapack.so] Error 1
> > make[3]: *** [R] Error 2
> > make[2]: *** [R] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [R] Error 1
> > make: *** [R] Error 1
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 20:07 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I just uploaded a modified spec file for the R statistical package.
> > > >
> > > > The fix is to patch *both* R scripts, and to patch not just R_HOME_DIR,
> > > > but also R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR. This is necessary to
> > > > allow packages to be installed.
> > > 
> > > Now fixed in the latest "r" package of OpenPKG CURRENT -- together with
> > > another packaging bug. Thanks for your feedback and support.
> > > 
> > >Ralf S. Engelschall
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >www.engelschall.com
> > > 
> > > __
> > > OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
> > > Developer Communication List   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
> > > 
-- 
David Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds
discuss people." ~Eleanor Roosevelt


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Fix to R package

2007-06-28 Thread David Fetter
It seems that the problem with building the R package on an amd64 bit
platform may be a gcc4 problem.  See here:
"http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/howtos/index.xml?part=1&chap=3#doc_chap5";.
  I'm working on testing this theory out, but ultimately, it seems that a flag 
to add -fPic explicitly for amd64 archs might be needed.

On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 13:00 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Ah, shoot!  I was hoping the patches would fix our 64-bit problem with R
> not compiling.  :-(  I'm getting the following error when I try to
> compile it:
> 
> /usr/local/bin/cc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../../../src/include
> -I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -fpic
> -fPIC -c Lapack.c -o Lapack.o
> /usr/local/bin/cc -std=gnu99 -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o lapack.so
> Lapack.o   -L../../../lib -lRlapack -L../../../lib -lRblas -lgfortran
> -lm /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortranbegin.a 
> /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortran.a
> /usr/local/bin/ld: skipping
> incompatible /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortran.a 
> when searching for -lgfortran
> /usr/local/bin/ld: 
> /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a(pow_i4_i4.o):
>  relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making 
> a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a:
>  could not read symbols: Bad value
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[4]: *** [lapack.so] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [R] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [R] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [R] Error 1
> make: *** [R] Error 1
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 20:07 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
> > 
> > > I just uploaded a modified spec file for the R statistical package.
> > >
> > > The fix is to patch *both* R scripts, and to patch not just R_HOME_DIR,
> > > but also R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR. This is necessary to
> > > allow packages to be installed.
> > 
> > Now fixed in the latest "r" package of OpenPKG CURRENT -- together with
> > another packaging bug. Thanks for your feedback and support.
> > 
> >Ralf S. Engelschall
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >www.engelschall.com
> > 
> > __
> > OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
> > Developer Communication List   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
> > 
-- 
David M. Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." ~Einstein


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Fix to R package

2007-06-27 Thread David Fetter
Ah, shoot!  I was hoping the patches would fix our 64-bit problem with R
not compiling.  :-(  I'm getting the following error when I try to
compile it:

/usr/local/bin/cc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../../../src/include
-I../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H   -fpic
-fPIC -c Lapack.c -o Lapack.o
/usr/local/bin/cc -std=gnu99 -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o lapack.so
Lapack.o   -L../../../lib -lRlapack -L../../../lib -lRblas -lgfortran
-lm /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortranbegin.a 
/usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortran.a
/usr/local/bin/ld: skipping
incompatible /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libgfortran.a 
when searching for -lgfortran
/usr/local/bin/ld: 
/usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a(pow_i4_i4.o):
 relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a 
shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../lib64/libgfortran.a:
 could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [lapack.so] Error 1
make[3]: *** [R] Error 2
make[2]: *** [R] Error 1
make[1]: *** [R] Error 1
make: *** [R] Error 1


On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 20:07 +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007, Dennis McRitchie wrote:
> 
> > I just uploaded a modified spec file for the R statistical package.
> >
> > The fix is to patch *both* R scripts, and to patch not just R_HOME_DIR,
> > but also R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR. This is necessary to
> > allow packages to be installed.
> 
> Now fixed in the latest "r" package of OpenPKG CURRENT -- together with
> another packaging bug. Thanks for your feedback and support.
> 
>Ralf S. Engelschall
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>www.engelschall.com
> 
> __
> OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
> Developer Communication List   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org
> 
-- 
David M. Fetter - Portland State University - UNIX Systems Administrator
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." ~Einstein


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Fix to R package

2007-06-27 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007, Dennis McRitchie wrote:

> I just uploaded a modified spec file for the R statistical package.
>
> The fix is to patch *both* R scripts, and to patch not just R_HOME_DIR,
> but also R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR. This is necessary to
> allow packages to be installed.

Now fixed in the latest "r" package of OpenPKG CURRENT -- together with
another packaging bug. Thanks for your feedback and support.

   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com

__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
Developer Communication List   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org


Fix to R package

2007-06-27 Thread Dennis McRitchie
I just uploaded a modified spec file for the R statistical package.

The fix is to patch *both* R scripts, and to patch not just R_HOME_DIR,
but also R_SHARE_DIR, R_INCLUDE_DIR, and R_DOC_DIR. This is necessary to
allow packages to be installed.

Dennis

Dennis McRitchie
Computational Science and Engineering Support (CSES)
Academic Services Department
Office of Information Technology
Princeton University
__
OpenPKG http://openpkg.org
Developer Communication List   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org