Re: [devel] [PATCH 1/1] amfd: set failover_state on standby [#3072]

2019-08-21 Thread Minh Hon CHAU

Hi, Ack, review only.

Quoting Gary Lee :


Otherwise, after two controller failovers, unexpected
reboot of previously rebooted payloads may occur.
---
 src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc  
b/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc

index efe2085..d38f79e 100644
--- a/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc
+++ b/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc
@@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ void NodeStateMachine::SetState(uint32_t state) {
 LOG_NO("New state '%u'", state);
   }

+  // this is needed for cold sync, in case this node (currently standby)
+  // becomes active later
+  AVD_AVND *node = avd_node_find_nodeid(node_id_);
+  osafassert(node != nullptr);
+  node->failover_state = state;
+
   switch (state) {
 case NodeState::kStart:
   state_ = std::make_shared(this);
--
2.7.4





___
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel


[devel] [PATCH 1/1] amfd: set failover_state on standby [#3072]

2019-08-21 Thread Gary Lee
Otherwise, after two controller failovers, unexpected
reboot of previously rebooted payloads may occur.
---
 src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc 
b/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc
index efe2085..d38f79e 100644
--- a/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc
+++ b/src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc
@@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ void NodeStateMachine::SetState(uint32_t state) {
 LOG_NO("New state '%u'", state);
   }
 
+  // this is needed for cold sync, in case this node (currently standby)
+  // becomes active later
+  AVD_AVND *node = avd_node_find_nodeid(node_id_);
+  osafassert(node != nullptr);
+  node->failover_state = state;
+
   switch (state) {
 case NodeState::kStart:
   state_ = std::make_shared(this);
-- 
2.7.4



___
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel


[devel] [PATCH 0/1] Review Request for amfd: set failover_state on standby [#3072]

2019-08-21 Thread Gary Lee
Summary: amfd: set failover_state on standby [#3072]
Review request for Ticket(s): 3072
Peer Reviewer(s): Minh, Hans
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-3072
Base revision: 729f71fbfff0eea6d4a6a394780142b87a9fb472
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/userid-2226215/review


Impacted area   Impact y/n

 Docsn
 Build systemn
 RPM/packaging   n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF servicesy
 OpenSAF servicesn 
 Core libraries  n
 Samples n
 Tests   n
 Other   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-

revision 252c36529095306e57a859177f9a74f47809b50d
Author: Gary Lee 
Date:   Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:08:39 +1000

amfd: set failover_state on standby [#3072]

Otherwise, after two controller failovers, unexpected
reboot of previously rebooted payloads may occur.



Complete diffstat:
--
 src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)


Testing Commands:
-
1) set failover delay to 5s, node wait timeout to 15s
2) reboot PL-3
3) reboot active SC
4) reboot active SC again

Testing, Expected Results:
--
Ensure PL-3 does not get rebooted 15s after step 4 above.

Conditions of Submission:
-
ack from anyone

Arch  Built StartedLinux distro
---
mipsn  n
mips64  n  n
x86 n  n
x86_64  y  y
powerpc n  n
powerpc64   n  n


Reviewer Checklist:
---
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.



___
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel