Summary: pyosaf: High level python interfaces for CLM V3[#2602]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2602
Peer Reviewer(s): Hans Nordeback, Anders Widell, Srinivas Mangipudy
Pull request to: Hans Nordeback, Anders Widell
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2602
Base revision: 48340ca7a3c45c1bd12fe37d7c05e026abd55531
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/xlobung/review
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services n
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other y
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
revision c21fbe69db47f33f88464a969d9434a1476105eb
Author: Long H Buu Nguyen <long.hb.ngu...@dektech.com.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:29:20 +0700
pyosaf: High level python interfaces for CLM [#2602]
- Add more error handling
- Refactor clm code
- Keep raising exceptions for existing python methods
Complete diffstat:
------------------
python/pyosaf/utils/__init__.py | 267 ++++++++++++++---
python/pyosaf/utils/clm/__init__.py | 581 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 717 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
Write a new clm demo or modify clm-tool to test.
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Can track CLM cluster node changes suscessfully.
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
ACK from one of the reviewers.
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 y y
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
