Re: [devel] [PATCH 0/3] Review Request for imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]

2018-11-28 Thread mohan
 Hi Hans, Vu,
Polite remainder for review.

 
  Thanks
Mohan
High Availability Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
www.hasolutions.in

 
 
- Original Message - Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] Review Request 
for imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]
From: mo...@hasolutions.in
Date: 11/15/18 5:39 pm
To: vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au, hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Mohan Kanakam" 

  Hi Hans, Vu,
Polite remainder for review.

 
Thanks
Mohan
High Availability Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
www.hasolutions.in

 
 
- Original Message - Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Review Request for 
imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]
From: "Mohan Kanakam" 
Date: 11/1/18 1:57 pm
To: vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au, hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Mohan Kanakam" 

Summary: imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest 
[#2951]
 Review request for Ticket(s): 2951
 Peer Reviewer(s): vu.m.nguyen, Hans Nordebck 
 Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
 Affected branch(es): develop
 Development branch: ticket-2951
 Base revision: 39928c976dfce75f69892f717df3ea128ef835aa
 Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/mohan-hasoln/review
 
 
 Impacted area Impact y/n
 
 Docs n
 Build system n
 RPM/packaging n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF services n
 OpenSAF services n
 Core libraries n
 Samples n
 Tests y
 Other n
 
 NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers
 
 Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
 -
 *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***
 
 revision c911b14077deab58eda68f7f5786bd030b2687fb
 Author: Mohan Kanakam 
 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:41:50 +0530
 
 imm: add new test case of API saImmOmFinalize() of apitest [#2951]
 
 
 
 revision edae9e76d7f286fa400de1cd4c51a0ccc225de8c
 Author: Mohan Kanakam 
 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:32:04 +0530
 
 imm: add new test case of API saImmOmDispatch() of apitest [#2951]
 
 
 
 revision 1fceef2f35a08c2490c11c9329725b58a6377e79
 Author: Mohan Kanakam 
 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:15:40 +0530
 
 imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest [#2951]
 
 
 
 Complete diffstat:
 --
 src/imm/apitest/management/test_saImmOmDispatch.c | 72 ++
 src/imm/apitest/management/test_saImmOmFinalize.c | 15 +
 .../apitest/management/test_saImmOmInitialize.c | 51 +++
 .../management/test_saImmOmSelectionObjectGet.c | 15 +
 4 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
 
 
 Testing Commands:
 -
 ./immomtest 1
 
 Testing, Expected Results:
 --
 14 PASSED saImmOmSelectionObjectGet - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitlized 
handle
 15 PASSED saImmOmSelectionObjectGet - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle
 20 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ONE
 21 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ONE
 22 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_OK SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 23 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - invalid handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
 24 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
 25 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
 26 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - invalid handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 27 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 28 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 31 PASSED saImmOmFinalize - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle
 32 PASSED saImmOmFinalize - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitlized handle
 
 Conditions of Submission:
 -
 Ack from maintainers
 
 Arch Built Started Linux distro
 ---
 mips n n
 mips64 n n
 x86 n n
 x86_64 y y
 powerpc n n
 powerpc64 n n
 
 
 Reviewer Checklist:
 ---
 [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
 
 
 Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
 
 ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
 that need proper data filled in.
 
 ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
 
 ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
 
 ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
 
 ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
 
 ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
 
 ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
 (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
 
 ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
 Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
 
 ___ You 

Re: [devel] [PATCH 0/3] Review Request for imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]

2018-11-15 Thread mohan
 Hi Hans, Vu,
Polite remainder for review.

 
Thanks
Mohan
High Availability Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
www.hasolutions.in

 
 
- Original Message - Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Review Request for 
imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]
From: "Mohan Kanakam" 
Date: 11/1/18 1:57 pm
To: vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au, hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Mohan Kanakam" 

Summary: imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest 
[#2951]
 Review request for Ticket(s): 2951
 Peer Reviewer(s): vu.m.nguyen, Hans Nordebck 
 Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
 Affected branch(es): develop
 Development branch: ticket-2951
 Base revision: 39928c976dfce75f69892f717df3ea128ef835aa
 Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/mohan-hasoln/review
 
 
 Impacted area Impact y/n
 
 Docs n
 Build system n
 RPM/packaging n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF services n
 OpenSAF services n
 Core libraries n
 Samples n
 Tests y
 Other n
 
 NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers
 
 Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
 -
 *** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***
 
 revision c911b14077deab58eda68f7f5786bd030b2687fb
 Author: Mohan Kanakam 
 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:41:50 +0530
 
 imm: add new test case of API saImmOmFinalize() of apitest [#2951]
 
 
 
 revision edae9e76d7f286fa400de1cd4c51a0ccc225de8c
 Author: Mohan Kanakam 
 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:32:04 +0530
 
 imm: add new test case of API saImmOmDispatch() of apitest [#2951]
 
 
 
 revision 1fceef2f35a08c2490c11c9329725b58a6377e79
 Author: Mohan Kanakam 
 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:15:40 +0530
 
 imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest [#2951]
 
 
 
 Complete diffstat:
 --
 src/imm/apitest/management/test_saImmOmDispatch.c | 72 ++
 src/imm/apitest/management/test_saImmOmFinalize.c | 15 +
 .../apitest/management/test_saImmOmInitialize.c | 51 +++
 .../management/test_saImmOmSelectionObjectGet.c | 15 +
 4 files changed, 153 insertions(+)
 
 
 Testing Commands:
 -
 ./immomtest 1
 
 Testing, Expected Results:
 --
 14 PASSED saImmOmSelectionObjectGet - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitlized 
handle
 15 PASSED saImmOmSelectionObjectGet - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle
 20 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ONE
 21 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ONE
 22 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_OK SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 23 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - invalid handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
 24 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
 25 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
 26 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - invalid handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 27 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 28 PASSED saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
 31 PASSED saImmOmFinalize - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle
 32 PASSED saImmOmFinalize - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitlized handle
 
 Conditions of Submission:
 -
 Ack from maintainers
 
 Arch Built Started Linux distro
 ---
 mips n n
 mips64 n n
 x86 n n
 x86_64 y y
 powerpc n n
 powerpc64 n n
 
 
 Reviewer Checklist:
 ---
 [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
 
 
 Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
 
 ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
 that need proper data filled in.
 
 ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
 
 ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
 
 ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
 
 ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
 
 ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
 
 ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
 (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
 
 ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
 Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
 
 ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
 
 ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
 like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
 
 ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
 cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
 
 ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
 too much content 

[devel] [PATCH 0/3] Review Request for imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]

2018-11-02 Thread Mohan Kanakam
Summary: imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmClassCreate_2() of apitest 
[#2951]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2951_1
Peer Reviewer(s):vu.m.nguyen, Hans Nordeb??ck 
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2951_1
Base revision: 39928c976dfce75f69892f717df3ea128ef835aa
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/mohan-hasoln/review


Impacted area   Impact y/n

 Docsn
 Build systemn
 RPM/packaging   n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF servicesn
 OpenSAF servicesn
 Core libraries  n
 Samples n
 Tests   y
 Other   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision e758cddffa03f863a6d17d9b407d3bc28a2763c1
Author: Mohan Kanakam 
Date:   Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:25:49 +0530

imm: add new test case of API saImmOmClassDelete() of apitest [#2951]



revision 6602336dcfeabaa66ef06c223aa9fe9d6c19b55e
Author: Mohan Kanakam 
Date:   Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:15:52 +0530

imm: add new test case of API saImmOmClassDescriptionGet_2() of apitest [#2951]



revision daf9d096912e822044cbe82a65704ebed4fe8afc
Author: Mohan Kanakam 
Date:   Fri, 2 Nov 2018 12:03:23 +0530

imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmClassCreate_2() of apitest [#2951]



Complete diffstat:
--
 .../apitest/management/test_saImmOmClassCreate_2.c | 92 ++
 .../apitest/management/test_saImmOmClassDelete.c   | 19 +
 .../management/test_saImmOmClassDescriptionGet_2.c | 25 ++
 3 files changed, 136 insertions(+)


Testing Commands:
-
./immomtest 2

Testing, Expected Results:
--
19  PASSED   saImmOmClassCreate_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE CONFIG CLASS
20  PASSED   saImmOmClassCreate_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE CONFIG CLASS 
UNINITLIZED HANDLE
21  PASSED   saImmOmClassCreate_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE RUNTIME CLASS 
UNINTILIZED HANDLE
22  PASSED   saImmOmClassCreate_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE CONFIG CLASS 
FINALIZED HANDLE
23  PASSED   saImmOmClassCreate_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE RUNTIME CLASS 
FINALLIZED HANDLE
31  PASSED   saImmOmClassDescriptionGet_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM
39  PASSED   saImmOmClassDelete_2 - SA_AIS_ERR_NOT_EXIST

Conditions of Submission:
-
Ack from maintainers

Arch  Built StartedLinux distro
---
mipsn  n
mips64  n  n
x86 n  n
x86_64  y  y
powerpc n  n
powerpc64   n  n


Reviewer Checklist:
---
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.

___ Your 

[devel] [PATCH 0/3] Review Request for imm: add new test cases of apitest [#2951]

2018-11-01 Thread Mohan Kanakam
Summary: imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest 
[#2951]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2951
Peer Reviewer(s): vu.m.nguyen, Hans Nordeb??ck 
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2951
Base revision: 39928c976dfce75f69892f717df3ea128ef835aa
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/mohan-hasoln/review


Impacted area   Impact y/n

 Docsn
 Build systemn
 RPM/packaging   n
 Configuration files n
 Startup scripts n
 SAF servicesn
 OpenSAF servicesn
 Core libraries  n
 Samples n
 Tests   y
 Other   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision c911b14077deab58eda68f7f5786bd030b2687fb
Author: Mohan Kanakam 
Date:   Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:41:50 +0530

imm: add new test case of API saImmOmFinalize() of apitest [#2951]



revision edae9e76d7f286fa400de1cd4c51a0ccc225de8c
Author: Mohan Kanakam 
Date:   Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:32:04 +0530

imm: add new test case of API saImmOmDispatch() of apitest [#2951]



revision 1fceef2f35a08c2490c11c9329725b58a6377e79
Author: Mohan Kanakam 
Date:   Thu, 1 Nov 2018 13:15:40 +0530

imm: add new test cases of API saImmOmSelectionObjectGet() of apitest [#2951]



Complete diffstat:
--
 src/imm/apitest/management/test_saImmOmDispatch.c  | 72 ++
 src/imm/apitest/management/test_saImmOmFinalize.c  | 15 +
 .../apitest/management/test_saImmOmInitialize.c| 51 +++
 .../management/test_saImmOmSelectionObjectGet.c| 15 +
 4 files changed, 153 insertions(+)


Testing Commands:
-
./immomtest 1

Testing, Expected Results:
--
14  PASSED   saImmOmSelectionObjectGet - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitlized 
handle
15  PASSED   saImmOmSelectionObjectGet - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized 
handle
20  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ONE
21  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ONE
22  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_OK SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
23  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - invalid handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
24  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
25  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_ALL
26  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - invalid handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
27  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitilized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
28  PASSED   saImmOmDispatch - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle 
SA_DISPATCH_BLOCKING
31  PASSED   saImmOmFinalize - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - finalized handle
32  PASSED   saImmOmFinalize - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - uninitlized handle

Conditions of Submission:
-
Ack from maintainers

Arch  Built StartedLinux distro
---
mipsn  n
mips64  n  n
x86 n  n
x86_64  y  y
powerpc n  n
powerpc64   n  n


Reviewer Checklist:
---
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public