[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for ntf: handle error code TRY_AGAIN of saClmInitialize() [#2191] V2
Summary: ntf: handle error code TRY_AGAIN of saClmInitialize() [#2191] Review request for Trac Ticket(s):2191 Peer Reviewer(s): NTF devs Pull request to: <> Affected branch(es): All Development branch: 5.0 Impacted area Impact y/n Docsn Build systemn RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF servicesy OpenSAF servicesn Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): - <> changeset 50277610a0242470f56edbb84d08d47e578fbb4c Author: Vu Minh NguyenDate: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:10:24 +0700 ntf: handle error code TRY_AGAIN of saClmInitialize() [#2191] NTF did not deal with TRY_AGAIN error code of `saClmInitialize()`, NTF would exit, and cause node reboot if getting TRY_AGAIN. The patch adds a while loop to do retry when getting TRY_AGAIN. Complete diffstat: -- osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/ntfs_clm.c | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Testing Commands: - <> Testing, Expected Results: -- <> Conditions of Submission: - <> Arch Built StartedLinux distro --- mipsn n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: --- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. -- ___ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
[devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for ntf: handle error code TRY_AGAIN of saClmInitialize() [#2191]
Summary: ntf: handle error code TRY_AGAIN of saClmInitialize() [#2191] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2191 Peer Reviewer(s): NTF devs Pull request to: <> Affected branch(es): all Development branch: default Impacted area Impact y/n Docsn Build systemn RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF servicesy OpenSAF servicesn Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): - <> changeset 3eff9becd264da624cf0524422109615d7bd4383 Author: Vu Minh NguyenDate: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:10:24 +0700 ntf: handle error code TRY_AGAIN of saClmInitialize() [#2191] NTF did not deal with TRY_AGAIN error code of `saClmInitialize()`, NTF would exit, and cause node reboot if getting TRY_AGAIN. The patch adds a while loop to do retry when getting TRY_AGAIN. Complete diffstat: -- osaf/services/saf/ntfsv/ntfs/ntfs_clm.c | 14 +- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Testing Commands: - <> Testing, Expected Results: -- <> Conditions of Submission: - <> Arch Built StartedLinux distro --- mipsn n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: --- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. -- ___ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel