[osol-discuss] Regarding implementation of MSI-X interrupts In Solaris 10 8/07
Hi, I have a 10gig network driver , iam trying to implement MSI-X interrupts in this one and facing some problems. Though my network card supports MSI-x /MSI but if i try to use ddi_intr_get_supported_types , it is always returning one (1 for FIXED interrupts) . If i continue to use DDI_INTR_TYPE_MSIX it fails immediately (that's expected as ddi_intr_get_supported_types returned 1). Iam using PCI-E slot only. This MSI-x is working very well in linux counter part. Is this MSI-x supported in 10 8/07 lspci also shows MSI-x is supported lspci -v Capabilities: [f8] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [e4] MSI-X: Enable- Mask- TabSize=32 Capabilities: [d0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 uname -a SunOS unknown 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc cat /etc/release Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86 Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 16 August 2007 Note : echo ::interrupts | mdb -k -- also doesn't show any of MSI-X Type devices ( May be there are no MSI-X supported devices attached) Pradeep This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Congratulations. We're 3.
Hello Jim, Monday, June 16, 2008, 12:24:36 PM, you wrote: JG hey, guys, Happy Birthday. :) We became three on Saturday. Time flies, JG eh? A very special thank you to everyone for putting in so much time and JG effort to make OpenSolaris a success. We may have had a challenging JG year, but we came through on a nice upswing. I'm certainly looking JG forward to year four. Hope you are, too. Three? Already? Ehhh Of course big thanks to you as you put a lot of energy into OS. -- Best regards, Robert Milkowskimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Opengrok seach based on filetype
Hi All, I have customized opengork as per my requirement. I have created different projects in that it is working fine. Now i have one other requirement that search should be based on filetype or file extension. like user wants to search java,c,cbl files only... but i dont know how to filter it in configuration files. please help me on that... Thanks in Advace... - Atul Chavan This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [ufs-discuss] PANIC! mounting cdrom slice on b78
Scott Rotondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joerg Schilling wrote: Juergen Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, in usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c function hs_mountfs(), whenever we use one of the first three |goto cleanup|, the local variables |svp| and |jvp| are uninitialized. That should corrupt the kernel heap when we kmem_free() with an unitialized stack lock pointer in the cleanup section ... struct hs_volume *svp; /* Supplemental VD for ISO-9660:1999 */ struct hs_volume *jvp; /* Joliet VD */ I have to admit that I am responsible for the uninitialized Joliet VD pointer. Duplicating code is simple and in this case even passed 4 code reviews. Does it help to intialize the pointers to NULL? Sure. This code 943 if (fsp) 944 kmem_free(fsp, sizeof (*fsp)); 945 if (svp) 946 kmem_free(svp, sizeof (*svp)); 947 if (jvp) 948 kmem_free(jvp, sizeof (*jvp)); will behave very differently if those pointers are NULL rather than uninitialized. I was interested in a useful reply for the OP case Did you run a test with the original filesystem, or what do you like to tell us here? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Does solaris 10 08/07 Support MSI-x
Hi, I dont know whether is repeated in the forum.( I didn't find exact answer) Speaking of PCI-e stuff, does stock solaris 10 as shipped from Sun support MSI interrupts? If yes what is version in which this is supported Pradeep This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris as a File-share server in a home setting
Kjell-Edmund wrote: Hi! Since I can be a tad long-winded, the below text gives the background for, and asks -- THE QUESTION: Is it possible to set up a server running opensolaris with ZFS as its file-system and have Windows computers share/access files on the server over a local area network (wired and wireless). Here's an opensolaris based solution if you want some management: http://www.nexenta.com/corp/ http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=blogsectionid=4Itemid=67 http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=18Itemid=75 Check it out and see if it meets your needs ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
Thanks Nico! I didn't know you were involved with this. More below... Nicolas Williams wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote: The part I'm fuzzy on are the nameservies interoperation. I know the CIFS server required a bunch of work to deal with windows user and groups for file ownership and access control. What is new in Solaris though for shareing usernames and passwords (and other account information) between Windows and Solaris? For example, is it possible for a Solaris machine to participate in a Windows Active Driectory Domain as a client? Yes. Cool. as a Domain Controller? No. That's OK. But (liking Solaris as much as I do,) it seems a shame to leave Windows as the only system that can be the authoritative source for this stuff. :) Another question, is if/when Windows users login on Solaris, where/how is the UID/GID assigned? See the ID mapping portion of the CIFS guide. Thanks, I'll go look for that now. The reason I ask is that I'm really looking for a solution that will let me set both linux and Solaris to share usernames and passwords with Windows, while Linux and Solaris share files through NFS. The solution we use works for Solaris. We made no changes to Linux. You can still interop with Linux and use Windows identities provided that you have a Unix name service with users and groups that are the equivalents of Windows ones. SFU will do as a such a name services. Is SFU the only option right now? Is MS still developing/supporting SFU? I thought it was either dead or at least on life support only now? What are my choices if the people who run the AD and Windos infrastructure refuse to install SFU? So how does Solaris handle this (if it does?) If it does it in simliar way to WinBind, is it too much to hope that it uses the same algorithm for SID--UID as WinBind? I mean I can deal with a 1 time chown, but to It's not the same algorithm, except for name-based mapping, where it's close enough. I'm not sure I get this statement, but maybe I'll get after I read all the other blogs and docs you pointed me to. Thanks! do what I need on the Unix/NFS side I really need Solaris and Linux to agree on UIDs and GIDs. Is there someway that Solaris can export it's tranlation to linux through an AD-NIS converter? No, but if you can use SFU (i.e., assign UIDs and GIDs in AD itself) then you're fine. We're considering adding more ID mapping options too. What types of things are you considering? (If you can talk about them?) Where's the best place to read up more on this? Try the CIFS guide. There's also plenty of blogs linked to from the storage blog: http://blogs.sun.com/storage/en_US/entry/what_we_re_reading_alan http://blogs.sun.com/storage/en_US/entry/more_on_cifs Thanks! -Kyle Nico ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cdrw bash: cdrw: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo $PATH /usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sfw/bin Why is this not working? Also I tried the graphical interface but received an error back when burning would start. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Emmanuel De Paepe wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cdrw
bash: cdrw: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo $PATH
/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sfw/bin
Why is this not working?
$ pkginfo -l SUNWcdrw
PKGINST: SUNWcdrw
NAME: utility for writing to CD-R/RW and DVD{+-}R/RW disks
CATEGORY: system
ARCH: i386
VERSION: 11.11,REV=2008.03.22.10.56
BASEDIR: /
VENDOR: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
DESC: utility for writing to CD-R/RW and DVD{+-}R/RW disks
PSTAMP: elpaso20080322110021
INSTDATE: Mar 31 2008 04:48
HOTLINE: Please contact your local service provider
STATUS: completely installed
FILES:9 installed pathnames
7 shared pathnames
7 directories
1 executables
1 setuid/setgid executables
151 blocks used (approx)
If you don't have that then it's simply not installed (and therefore not
in your path).
FrankH.
Also I tried the graphical interface but received an error back when burning
would start.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
No good can come from selling your freedom, not for all the gold in the world,
for the value of this heavenly gift far exceeds that of any fortune on earth.
--
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
Emmanuel De Paepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cdrw bash: cdrw: command not found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo $PATH /usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sfw/bin Why is this not working? Also I tried the graphical interface but received an error back when burning would start. Since when is there a GUI for cdrw? AFAIK, CD/DVD burning GUIs are based on cdrecord. Did you try cdrecord? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
use cdrecord, works ok This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to replicate http://pkg.opensolaris.org to a local repositary ser
I am first of all not sure if the command what I am using is correct to retrieve the packages: -bash-3.2# pkgrecv -s http://pkg.opensolaris.org pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.90:20080604T152105Z pkgrecv: Unable to download manifest [EMAIL PROTECTED] from http://pkg.opensolaris.org Then I set the http_proxy variable: -bash-3.2# http_proxy=http://myproxy.mycompany.com:8080;export http_proxy -bash-3.2# pkgrecv -s http://pkg.opensolaris.org pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.90:20080604T152105Z pkgrecv: Unable to download files from: http://pkg.opensolaris.org But I am sure the proxy works fine... -bash-3.2# wget http://pkg.opensolaris.org/status --18:18:06-- http://pkg.opensolaris.org/status = `status' Resolving myproxy.mycompany.com... xxx.xxx.71.xx Connecting to myproxy.mycompany.com|xxx.xxx.71.xx|:8080... connected. Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: unspecified [text/html] [ = ] 355,560 164.43K/s 18:18:10 (163.92 KB/s) - `status' saved [355560] -bash-3.2# -Karthik S S This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Sun Secure Global Desktop Installation with OpenSolaris
Hi At least the ttc client works, you just need to copy some motif libraries over form Solaris 10. For the server component, haven't tried myself yet. Might work if you copy the libraries over. As motif is not opensourced it's therefore not included in OpenSolaris 05.2008. Cheers Mika This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to replicate http://pkg.opensolaris.org to a local repositary server?
2008/6/18 Karthik S S [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is there a way to replicate all the packages available under http://pkg.opensolaris.org/ to a local repository server? I could not find much information on this site except for adding custom packages: Greetings, Mirroring supporting is not currently available and no mechanisms are currently in place to directly support copying pkg.opensolaris.org. However, if you look at the pkg-discuss mailing list archives, you may find scripts others have provided that are of use. -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Wine opengl problems(nvidia)
Hello, i have some troubles compiling wine This happens when wine checks for opengl: configure:10881: checking for up-to-date OpenGL version configure:10907: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c 5 configure:10913: $? = 0 configure:10928: result: yes configure:10933: checking for -lGL configure:10968: gcc -o conftest -g -O2conftest.c -lGL -lXext -lX11 -lm -lsocket -lnsl 5 /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /usr/lib/libGL.so: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status and this configure:10999: checking for -lGL configure:11034: gcc -o conftest -g -O2conftest.c -lGL -lXext -lX11 -lm -lsocket -lnsl -dylib_file /System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib:/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib 5 gcc: /System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib:/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/Libraries/libGL.dylib: No such file or directory cc1: warning: unrecognized gcc debugging option: _ cc1: warning: unrecognized gcc debugging option: e System information: $ glxinfo | grep direct direct rendering: Yes $ uname -a SunOS sol 5.11 snv_86 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris $ Also glxgears shows rotating wheels I installed nvidia driver from nvidia.com, so i have nvidia in my xorf.cong file What should i do to correct this error? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Sun Secure Global Desktop Installation with OpenSolaris
Hi At least the ttc client works, you just need to copy some motif libraries over form Solaris 10. For the server component, haven't tried myself yet. Might work if you copy the libraries over. As motif is not opensourced it's therefore not included in OpenSolaris 05.2008. Cheers Mika If http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/license/ isn't good enough (in terms of the license), what about http://www.lesstif.org/ (in terms of the compatibility)? And then there's http://www.marutan.net/cde/ which has me wondering how much $$ would solve their cash crunch enough to fully open Motif (not to mention that I'd really like to see CDE get opened)... This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Cron Job!!!
I programming to execute a start up of one process with the cron job, but this process is not executed, which may be the problem??? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Cron Job!!!
Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 07:24:56AM -0700, Joel Gonzalez wrote: I programming to execute a start up of one process with the cron job, but this process is not executed, which may be the problem??? This is really vague question, so you can definitely expect storm of additoinal question/possible answers. Please, try to precise the question to let us help you.. /j. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris as a File-share server in a home setting
Kjell-Edmund wrote: Hi! Since I can be a tad long-winded, the below text gives the background for, and asks -- THE QUESTION: Is it possible to set up a server running opensolaris with ZFS as its file-system and have Windows computers share/access files on the server over a local area network (wired and wireless). I would suggest starting with some of the blog posts and guides that are readily available. My suggestions would be: * http://blogs.sun.com/icedawn/entry/bondin Setting Up an OpenSolaris NAS Box: Father-Son Bonding http://blogs.sun.com/icedawn/entry/bondin * A Home Fileserver using ZFS http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ * Getting Started With the Solaris CIFS Service http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Getting_Started_With_the_Solaris_CIFS_Service Most importantly check out the CIFS server project page http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/cifs-server/ and the related discussion forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=214. There is a great deal of useful information and helpful folks there. --jc --- Jeff Cheeney | OpenSolaris Storage Community | http://opensolaris.org/os/storage | http://blogs.sun.com/icedawn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Cron Job!!!
I need to executed a binary process. This is my entrie in crontab for root 53 9 * * * txalarm -f /var/scp/nms/txalarm.log /var/scp/nms/cron.log #Txalarm The txalarm is a monitor process to write in a specified file log. This is the /var/cron/log entrie CMD: txalarm -f /var/scp/nms/txalarm.log /var/scp/nms/cron.log #Txalarm root 8472 c mié jun 18 09:53:00 2008 root 8472 c mié jun 18 09:53:00 2008 rc=1 But the process is not executed, How i do see which is the error? Thanks!! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Cron Job!!!
Joel Gonzalez writes: I need to executed a binary process. This is my entrie in crontab for root 53 9 * * * txalarm -f /var/scp/nms/txalarm.log /var/scp/nms/cron.log #Txalarm Unless txalarm happens to be in the /usr/sbin or /usr/bin directory, that won't work. This entry should use the explicit path of the executable to run. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Cron Job!!!
Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:03:45AM -0700, Joel Gonzalez wrote: I need to executed a binary process. This is my entrie in crontab for root 53 9 * * * txalarm -f /var/scp/nms/txalarm.log /var/scp/nms/cron.log #Txalarm Starting binaries via cron without specifying full path might be the issue, I think. Cron knows nothing about your PATH environment variable. Check also the (execution) rights of `txalarm`. If it is script, check the correct path to interpretter defined on the first line. There might be other issues stem from the `txalarm` code itself. OT: you might also benefit from redirecting stderr to the log file, since cron wont inform you (root) about the failures during `txalarm` execution unless it finishes (once a day?). /j. The txalarm is a monitor process to write in a specified file log. This is the /var/cron/log entrie CMD: txalarm -f /var/scp/nms/txalarm.log /var/scp/nms/cron.log #Txalarm root 8472 c mié jun 18 09:53:00 2008 root 8472 c mié jun 18 09:53:00 2008 rc=1 But the process is not executed, How i do see which is the error? Thanks!! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org /Jan Friedel jf (at) Sun.com ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia 780a drivers
I have logged details as requested and details. Was unclear of where to attach files outputs of each command, so I added in section for additional info. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:53:08AM -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote: as a Domain Controller? No. That's OK. But (liking Solaris as much as I do,) it seems a shame to leave Windows as the only system that can be the authoritative source for this stuff. :) Well, Sun should have made a large investment in directories and network authentication when it became obviouw that MSFT was doing the same. Or even immediately post-win2k. The solution we use works for Solaris. We made no changes to Linux. You can still interop with Linux and use Windows identities provided that you have a Unix name service with users and groups that are the equivalents of Windows ones. SFU will do as a such a name services. Is SFU the only option right now? If you want NFSv3 interop with Linux, yes. Other options: interop with Linux via CIFS. Is MS still developing/supporting SFU? Yes, but it's not a separate product anymore -- it's fully bundled now. I thought it was either dead or at least on life support only now? Nope. What are my choices if the people who run the AD and Windos infrastructure refuse to install SFU? No interop with Linux with NFSv3. Try using CIFS. It's not the same algorithm, except for name-based mapping, where it's close enough. I'm not sure I get this statement, but maybe I'll get after I read all the other blogs and docs you pointed me to. Thanks! idmapd supports just these ID mapping methods: - directory-based name mapping - rule-based name mapping - ephemeral ID mapping - local SID mapping The first one works by adding attributes to your AD or native LDAP schema to name an entity's equivalent entity on the other side. The second works by providing local rules that tell you how to map an entity on one side to one on the other. These rules also work with names. Ephemeral ID mapping dynamically allocates UIDs and GIDs to Windows entities on demand. The pool of UIDs and GIDs used for this is the 2^31 to 2^31-2 range of UID/GID values. We took pains to make sure that the system does not store these anywhere permanently, and we restart the allocations on reboot. ZFS stores SIDs now. Local SID mapping is used to map non-ephemeral UIDs/GIDs to RIDs relative to the local SID when there's no other way to map them. We're considering adding more ID mapping options too. What types of things are you considering? (If you can talk about them?) Direct support for SFU (right now you have to configure either DS-based name mapping or local name rules + nss_ldap with schema mapping to get SFU support). Also, perhaps we might want to add some algorithmic ID mapping schemes. Thanks! NP. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
No I haven't tried cdrecord yet. To clearify with GUI I mean the CD-writer which is available in OpenSolaris, created the error. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] boot fail after use of IPS
After removing some driver(no needed one?) and adding some pkg over ips and then my system hang at boot with krtld fail on depences of 'unix'. What went wrong? Is this an acceptable behavior for the future? This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
2008/6/18 Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Emmanuel De Paepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No I haven't tried cdrecord yet. To clearify with GUI I mean the CD-writer which is available in OpenSolaris, created the error. Please tell me the exact name of the binary, I don't know this program. How do you call it? He's probably talking about the nautilus CD burner. -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PANIC: VirtualBox on os2008-05 installing os2008-05
Glenn Brunette wrote: Perhaps I am getting too nested in virtualization technologies, and if so please let me know, but here is what I have: Mac OS X (10.5.3) running Parallels Desktop for Mac 3.0 (Build 5608 / June 9, 2008) running OpenSolaris 2008-05 (Updated to Build 90) running VirtualBox 1.6.2 and trying to install either: * OpenSolaris 2008-05 or * Nevada Build 91 In either case, the system boots and you get the OS (uname banner). Shortly after, you see WARNING: init(1M) exited on fatal signal 12: restarting automatically followed by a repeated listing of the form: WARNING: init(1M) exited on fatal signal 11: restarting automatically after that it panic's: panic[cpu0]/thread=d4fd9a00: BAD TRAP: type=7 (#nm Device not available) rp=d50edec4 addr=0 I have attached a screen capture of the entire message. I am running with a kernel debugger and have the system available if more data is needed. Is this a bug? Is this not a supported configuration? You're virtualizing inside a virtualized environment. I've never seen that work in any combination and I'm pretty sure it can't work and thus is not supported. Why not install VirtualBox for Mac and install inside that? Having Parallels, VirtualBox and VMWare Fusion all installed at the same time works fine. Running all of them concurrently however is another matter ;-) Cheers, -- Glenn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PANIC: VirtualBox on os2008-05 installing os2008-05
Joerg Schilling wrote: Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're virtualizing inside a virtualized environment. I've never seen that work in any combination and I'm pretty sure it can't work and thus is not supported. Why should it not work? See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacron-3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welt_am_Draht I fail to see what these entries about science fiction have to do with the topic at hand. The problem with something like Virtualbox is that it needs to know where privilged op codes are located and need to be patched to illegal instructions. Sure, anything is 'possible'. But in reality, none of the virtualization systems I've used (Xen, Vmware, VirtualBox, Parallels) actually support/work being run in a virtualized environment. I've certainly never gotten any sort of thing to work (and to be quite honest, I wouldn't expect it to work or work well). Could they be made to work? Possibly, I suppose. But the facts as they stand today are that they don't. At least in my experience. -- Glenn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PANIC: VirtualBox on os2008-05 installing os2008-05
Glenn Lagasse writes: Sure, anything is 'possible'. But in reality, none of the virtualization systems I've used (Xen, Vmware, VirtualBox, Parallels) actually support/work being run in a virtualized environment. I've certainly never gotten any sort of thing to work (and to be quite honest, I wouldn't expect it to work or work well). Could they be made to work? Possibly, I suppose. But the facts as they stand today are that they don't. At least in my experience. The counter-example would probably be VM/CP, which can (if I recall correctly) host itself. It's a good proof that you've got all of the virtual details right, and can be useful in debug, but you're right that the usual PC-type environments just don't bother going that far ... and probably need not do so. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PANIC: VirtualBox on os2008-05 installing os2008-05
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulacron-3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welt_am_Draht I fail to see what these entries about science fiction have to do with the topic at hand. It's about nested simulation/virtualization The problem with something like Virtualbox is that it needs to know where privilged op codes are located and need to be patched to illegal instructions. Sure, anything is 'possible'. But in reality, none of the virtualization systems I've used (Xen, Vmware, VirtualBox, Parallels) If the virtualization is 100% correct and complete it will work. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Requirements gathering meeting
Just a reminder that this meeting will be happening tomorrow, June 19th, from 2-5pm PT. Hope to see you there, or to contribute your requirements on the wiki. Tim Tim Cramer wrote: All (apologies in advance for cross-posting), I'd like to have a requirements gathering session with all of you and OGB, first to go through some of the progress and shortcomings of the current OpenSolaris 2008.05 release, and then to start gathering requirements to help me prioritize the Sun engineering resources appropriately as well as to work together on prioritizing what we can accomplish with the next release of the OpenSolaris distribution, which will be in the November timeframe.I'd like to have this session on Thursday, June 19th, from 2-5pm PT, and we will have this recorded and slides posted so we can get continuous feedback afterward (I realize that any time I pick won't work for a lot of the community around the world). Note that I can still get feedback after this meeting (and prior to), but I wanted to quickly set up a time as its that time of year at Sun where some of the planning is occuring and I want to make sure that I have as much input from the community as possible (the Summit was a big help as well). We'll also make sure to have an IRC channel open, and we'll have some better phone #'s available so our non-US based community can more economically participate (the current #'s are a placeholder). Current agenda will be a preso from me on what some of the high level focus items we're considering, a report on IPS (progress and direction), and Install (progress and direction). I'd like some discussion in the form of lightning talks either from what the community wants to discuss or what you want to hear about that wouldn't be covered with the 3 topics above, and then a time for QA/Clarification. The Wiki for the event is here: http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Indiana#OpenSolaris_Community_Strategy_Planning_Meeting Depending on interest I'll have the meeting run over :^) Hope to see you there. Tim ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
I guess so. The one which is not working when writing should start is accessed by clicking: Places - CD/DVD creator. I remember using this tool successfully on my other computer at home. However I'm not sure this was on OpenSolaris or SXDE. On Solaris 10, I've always used cdrw. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PANIC: VirtualBox on os2008-05 installing os2008-05
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:00:12PM -0700, Glenn Lagasse wrote: Sure, anything is 'possible'. But in reality, none of the virtualization systems I've used (Xen, Vmware, VirtualBox, Parallels) actually support/work being run in a virtualized environment. I've certainly never gotten any sort of thing to work (and to be quite honest, I wouldn't expect it to work or work well). Could they be made to work? Possibly, I suppose. But the facts as they stand today are that they don't. At least in my experience. I'm no expert on most virtualisation s/w but I know with vmware, it has code in place to specifically stop you trying to run vmware inside vmware. This is presumably because the vmware guys know it isn't going to work and it shouldn't be tried. I know this doesn't help the conversation much but it's just my 2c :) Matt pgpBaQoNkvHR4.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
Emmanuel De Paepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess so. The one which is not working when writing should start is accessed by clicking: Places - CD/DVD creator. I remember using this tool successfully on my other computer at home. However I'm not sure this was on OpenSolaris or SXDE. On Solaris 10, I've always used cdrw. If you are on Inidana, it may be that the installation is incomplete and misses cdrecord. As mkisofs is mandatory to create a bootarchive, I would however expect that the sdoftware is available. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED](uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
Nicolas Williams wrote: The solution we use works for Solaris. We made no changes to Linux. You can still interop with Linux and use Windows identities provided that you have a Unix name service with users and groups that are the equivalents of Windows ones. SFU will do as a such a name services. Is SFU the only option right now? If you want NFSv3 interop with Linux, yes. Other options: interop with Linux via CIFS. Is SFU required to use only NFSv3 between Solaris Machines? Is NFSv4 required for any of this? What are my choices if the people who run the AD and Windos infrastructure refuse to install SFU? No interop with Linux with NFSv3. Try using CIFS. But Linux SMB mounts are done as a single UserID right? If IT will allo me to run my own AD sub domain, can I run SFU only there, and pass the parent domain User/Passord info through to Solaris and Linux? That's not exactly ideal, but might ork better than getting them to run SFU the way I'd need them to. I'm guessing SFU basically adds a AD-NIS proxy to the AD server? Does it appear as a NIS server to the Linux and Solaris clients? or something else? NIS+? Any idea if a Solaris NIS server can be a slave to the SFU one (assuming my guess above is correct?) It's not the same algorithm, except for name-based mapping, where it's close enough. I'm not sure I get this statement, but maybe I'll get after I read all the other blogs and docs you pointed me to. Thanks! idmapd supports just these ID mapping methods: - directory-based name mapping - rule-based name mapping - ephemeral ID mapping - local SID mapping The first one works by adding attributes to your AD or native LDAP schema to name an entity's equivalent entity on the other side. That sounds the most striaght forward, but that's the one Linux doesn't support yet right? The second works by providing local rules that tell you how to map an entity on one side to one on the other. These rules also work with names. Even that sounds good to me. Ephemeral ID mapping dynamically allocates UIDs and GIDs to Windows entities on demand. The pool of UIDs and GIDs used for this is the 2^31 to 2^31-2 range of UID/GID values. We took pains to make sure that the system does not store these anywhere permanently, and we restart the allocations on reboot. ZFS stores SIDs now. That sounds like it might be great in some situations, but I don't think it'll ork for me... Than again after I read everything I might change my mind. Local SID mapping is used to map non-ephemeral UIDs/GIDs to RIDs relative to the local SID when there's no other way to map them. By local, you mean local to the local machine? or can these mappings be stored in NIS or NIS+? and shared beteen machines? For that matter can the Rule Mapping mentioned above be distributed in NIS, NIS+, or someother (non-AD) LDAP? Either way I bet Linux doesn't have anything that matches up. We're considering adding more ID mapping options too. What types of things are you considering? (If you can talk about them?) Direct support for SFU (right now you have to configure either DS-based name mapping or local name rules + nss_ldap with schema mapping to get SFU support). I guess I need to go read up on SFU too. It looks like I've put this off way too long. Also, perhaps we might want to add some algorithmic ID mapping schemes. Cool, I'll keep my eyes open. Any chance any of this will be prted to linux anytime soon? Note to Sun: I'd be wiilling to install (and buy!) Sun Software on all my linux machines, in order to make this all place nice together! -Kyle ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:39:52PM -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote: Is SFU required to use only NFSv3 between Solaris Machines? No. A Unix name service is strongly implied. That could be SFU. No interop with Linux with NFSv3. Try using CIFS. But Linux SMB mounts are done as a single UserID right? I don't know. I haven't tried (and don't have a Linux system to try with). If IT will allo me to run my own AD sub domain, can I run SFU only there, and pass the parent domain User/Passord info through to Solaris and Linux? We run an AD domain. So do others. I'm not sure what you mean by pass the parent domain User/Passord info through to Solaris and Linux. In AD you don't use passwords -- you use NTLM and Kerberos V credentials. Yes, those are generally obtained via passwords (ignore PKINIT for now), but once acquired you don't use your password. idmapd supports just these ID mapping methods: - directory-based name mapping - rule-based name mapping - ephemeral ID mapping - local SID mapping The first one works by adding attributes to your AD or native LDAP schema to name an entity's equivalent entity on the other side. That sounds the most striaght forward, but that's the one Linux doesn't support yet right? Samba supports name-based mapping rules. I don't recall if it supports anything like directory-based name mapping. The second works by providing local rules that tell you how to map an entity on one side to one on the other. These rules also work with names. Even that sounds good to me. It's easy! Ephemeral ID mapping dynamically allocates UIDs and GIDs to Windows entities on demand. The pool of UIDs and GIDs used for this is the 2^31 to 2^31-2 range of UID/GID values. We took pains to make sure that the system does not store these anywhere permanently, and we restart the allocations on reboot. ZFS stores SIDs now. That sounds like it might be great in some situations, but I don't think it'll ork for me... Than again after I read everything I might change my mind. It's great if you're building file servers. If you're building clients then you need nss_ad (ongoing project) and even then that doesn't help you with NFSv3. Local SID mapping is used to map non-ephemeral UIDs/GIDs to RIDs relative to the local SID when there's no other way to map them. By local, you mean local to the local machine? or can these mappings be Yes. stored in NIS or NIS+? and shared beteen machines? No, they cannot. For that matter can the Rule Mapping mentioned above be distributed in NIS, NIS+, or someother (non-AD) LDAP? No. If you need to distribute your name mappings, use directory-based name mapping. Either way I bet Linux doesn't have anything that matches up. Just rules. I guess I need to go read up on SFU too. It looks like I've put this off way too long. So, what are you trying to do? Any chance any of this will be prted to linux anytime soon? By us? Not a chance. We're busy enough as it is! But the code *is* CDDLed, and mostly user-land code. The kernel parts you can write from scratch if you like -- it's not hard. You'd have to use an IPC other than doors, of course. Oh, one more thing: there's no range of UIDs/GIDs in Linux that can be stolen for ephemeral ID mapping, the way we did for Solaris, because Linux used unsigned ints for uid_t/gid_t from the get go. Note to Sun: I'd be wiilling to install (and buy!) Sun Software on all my linux machines, in order to make this all place nice together! Solaris is Sun SW... :) :) Nico -- ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
BTW, for more information on how to use AD SFU as a Unix LDAP nameservice see: http://blogs.sun.com/baban/entry/solaris_10_and_active_directory ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia 780a drivers
Hi, Please , we are afire with curiosity here, did you get the NIC to work ? Did you find the PCI-Id code for the Nic ? Which drivers did you test ? Regards Lars This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
On 18 Jun 2008, at 21:39, Kyle McDonald wrote: Note to Sun: I'd be wiilling to install (and buy!) Sun Software on all my linux machines, in order to make this all place nice together! In that case (willing to spend money to get this working) you might also want to take a look at (in alphabetical order): http://www.centrify.com/directcontrol/overview.asp http://www.likewisesoftware.com/ http://www.quest.com/Vintela-Authentication-Services/ http://www.symark.com/products/padoverview.html - mo smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
Nicolas Williams wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:39:52PM -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote: Is SFU required to use only NFSv3 between Solaris Machines? No. A Unix name service is strongly implied. That could be SFU. Could be SFU? I thought if you want Windows, Linux and Solaris, it had to be SFU? No interop with Linux with NFSv3. Try using CIFS. But Linux SMB mounts are done as a single UserID right? I don't know. I haven't tried (and don't have a Linux system to try with). I'm pretty sure you put the Username (and password!!) as options to mount in the /etc/fstab. But there could be something newer now. If IT will allo me to run my own AD sub domain, can I run SFU only there, and pass the parent domain User/Passord info through to Solaris and Linux? We run an AD domain. So do others. I'm not sure what you mean by pass the parent domain User/Passord info through to Solaris and Linux. I meant, I'm not looking to manage accounts. I was thinking that if I had a PDC (or whatever AD calls it) for a subdomain, that I could run and manage SFU, while passing through the parent domains user accoutn DB... I think older NT domains called this 'Trusting'... I kno enough to kno it's different ith AD, but not *how* it's different. In AD you don't use passwords -- you use NTLM and Kerberos V credentials. Yes, those are generally obtained via passwords (ignore PKINIT for now), but once acquired you don't use your password. KerberosThat's my next project... :) Does that make the Solaris Windows integration easier or harder? idmapd supports just these ID mapping methods: - directory-based name mapping - rule-based name mapping - ephemeral ID mapping - local SID mapping The first one works by adding attributes to your AD or native LDAP schema to name an entity's equivalent entity on the other side. That sounds the most striaght forward, but that's the one Linux doesn't support yet right? Samba supports name-based mapping rules. I don't recall if it supports anything like directory-based name mapping. Samba won't help as I don't plan on serving any files to indows from Linux.. Thought there may cases in the future where I can't avoid it. The second works by providing local rules that tell you how to map an entity on one side to one on the other. These rules also work with names. Even that sounds good to me. It's easy! But it needs to be distributed to each client identically. Then again the DS based mapping is hat needs SFU right? and I bet SFU needs to run on the AD server that has all the other info about the accounts right? I mean it's not like the AD on a subdomain could have a sparse AD LDAP database that adds the mapping info but refers requests for the rest through to the IT Corp AD Domain LDAP database? Ephemeral ID mapping dynamically allocates UIDs and GIDs to Windows entities on demand. The pool of UIDs and GIDs used for this is the 2^31 to 2^31-2 range of UID/GID values. We took pains to make sure that the system does not store these anywhere permanently, and we restart the allocations on reboot. ZFS stores SIDs now. That sounds like it might be great in some situations, but I don't think it'll work for me... Than again after I read everything I might change my mind. It's great if you're building file servers. file servers that only serve windows (or at least SMB) clients right? If you're building clients then you need nss_ad (ongoing project) and even then that doesn't help you with NFSv3. What is nss_ad going to allow? For that matter can the Rule Mapping mentioned above be distributed in NIS, NIS+, or someother (non-AD) LDAP? No. If you need to distribute your name mappings, use directory-based name mapping. Or there's always Rsync, or Scp. ;) Either way I bet Linux doesn't have anything that matches up. Just rules. Local Rules... Similiar to Solaris's? I mean even if the file format to specify them is different, is it possible to setup the same local rules mapping on both Solaris and Linux? I guess I need to go read up on SFU too. It looks like I've put this off way too long. So, what are you trying to do? I need to setup a new farm of software build servers. They'll consist of all different versions of Linux (multiple versions of RHEL, and SLES) and a few S10 for building our software. I also need to setup a bunch of NFS fileservers to support this build Farm. The Developers all have indows desktops that are clients of the IT 'CORP' AD domain, and they'll also want access to the files on the servers through CIFS, so I really want to setup sNV servers ith ZFS and CIFS. So for the most part, it's Solaris to Windows with CIFS, and Solaris to Solaris and Linux with NFS. There might be a fe Linux
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
Kyle McDonald wrote: Nicolas Williams wrote: The solution we use works for Solaris. We made no changes to Linux. You can still interop with Linux and use Windows identities provided that you have a Unix name service with users and groups that are the equivalents of Windows ones. SFU will do as a such a name services. Is SFU the only option right now? If you want NFSv3 interop with Linux, yes. Other options: interop with Linux via CIFS. Is SFU required to use only NFSv3 between Solaris Machines? Is NFSv4 required for any of this? What are my choices if the people who run the AD and Windos infrastructure refuse to install SFU? No interop with Linux with NFSv3. Try using CIFS. But Linux SMB mounts are done as a single UserID right? If IT will allo me to run my own AD sub domain, can I run SFU only there, and pass the parent domain User/Passord info through to Solaris and Linux? That's not exactly ideal, but might ork better than getting them to run SFU the way I'd need them to. I'm guessing SFU basically adds a AD-NIS proxy to the AD server? Does it appear as a NIS server to the Linux and Solaris clients? or something else? NIS+? Any idea if a Solaris NIS server can be a slave to the SFU one (assuming my guess above is correct?) It's not the same algorithm, except for name-based mapping, where it's close enough. I'm not sure I get this statement, but maybe I'll get after I read all the other blogs and docs you pointed me to. Thanks! idmapd supports just these ID mapping methods: - directory-based name mapping - rule-based name mapping - ephemeral ID mapping - local SID mapping The first one works by adding attributes to your AD or native LDAP schema to name an entity's equivalent entity on the other side. That sounds the most striaght forward, but that's the one Linux doesn't support yet right? The second works by providing local rules that tell you how to map an entity on one side to one on the other. These rules also work with names. Even that sounds good to me. Ephemeral ID mapping dynamically allocates UIDs and GIDs to Windows entities on demand. The pool of UIDs and GIDs used for this is the 2^31 to 2^31-2 range of UID/GID values. We took pains to make sure that the system does not store these anywhere permanently, and we restart the allocations on reboot. ZFS stores SIDs now. That sounds like it might be great in some situations, but I don't think it'll ork for me... Than again after I read everything I might change my mind. Local SID mapping is used to map non-ephemeral UIDs/GIDs to RIDs relative to the local SID when there's no other way to map them. By local, you mean local to the local machine? or can these mappings be stored in NIS or NIS+? and shared beteen machines? For that matter can the Rule Mapping mentioned above be distributed in NIS, NIS+, or someother (non-AD) LDAP? Either way I bet Linux doesn't have anything that matches up. Just in case you haven't seen this http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [cifs-discuss] Windows-Solaris Name Service Cooperation?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 06:40:05PM -0400, Kyle McDonald wrote: So, what are you trying to do? I need to setup a new farm of software build servers. They'll consist of all different versions of Linux (multiple versions of RHEL, and SLES) and a few S10 for building our software. I also need to setup a bunch of NFS fileservers to support this build Farm. The Developers all have indows desktops that are clients of the IT 'CORP' AD domain, and they'll also want access to the files on the servers through CIFS, so I really want to setup sNV servers ith ZFS and CIFS. So for the most part, it's Solaris to Windows with CIFS, and Solaris to Solaris and Linux with NFS. There might be a fe Linux machines that end up with filesystem to share via NFS and/or SAMBA, but I think those will be 'nice to haves' that I can work around if it can't be made to work. I'm glad I asked :) OK then the prescription is: - setup a Unix nameservice for the Solaris and Linux systems - AD SFU *will* do if you can get Linux's nss_ldap to use it (I'm sure you can). And AD SFU *will* make admistration easier for you. - setup either directory-based name mapping or name-based mapping rules for the Solaris file servers. - Make sure that for every Windows user and group that will be referenced by the Windows clients (when talking CIFS to the Solaris servers) there exists a user and group in the Unix nameservice and corresponding mappings. - Keep in mind that Windows groups can own files, so you may need to ensure that each Windows group (and even users) maps to a Unix user and a Unix group. I just don't want to be in the bussiness of creating and managing user accounts. Today, the IT dept has several separate user databases, that they create accounts for new employees in when they join the company. As long as you intend to use NFSv3 you have little choice. Changin passords is a problem, and is rare. Currently one of the places they create an account (in addition to AD) is a linux NIS server (with only passwd and group maps) they run - Basically this is the only UNIX machine in the company they've agreed to setup, manage and support. Make sure that your Linux and Solaris clients can use Kerberos to authenticate users via AD. If you can make sure that AD usernames can be used as Unix usernames (keep them short and free of funny characters) then this is trivial. Currently most of the linux machines either use no Name service (most of them are like this) or a few join that NIS domain. That's going to have to change. Thus, I'd be willing to pay money to install a sun nss_something, or pam_something modules, plus any other software needed to get a compatible mapping mechanism on linux as you have on Nevada. There are third party offerings out there. Also, Samba has solutions in this space too. Nico -- ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia 780a drivers
Sorry not yet the ID looks like 0760 for the device. I did a reboot -- -rfor a reconfigure but I get a panic and cant catch details happens to fast. But I also added two other items at the sametime so have removed this but still can't get reconfigure to run. But did get successfully get back into the os through normal boot, and now say nge is there but fails. I may do a re-install and try a reconfigure just by itself just to check, as the other items may have caused futher issues. will Keep posted. I have also included scanpci output with comments around devices I could identify through windows once captured the scanpci output. sorry about large output but I tried to attach files seperatly in this forum but unable to edit error cam up. ___pci bus 0x cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0754 nVidia Corporation Device unknown pci bus 0x cardnum 0x01 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x075d nVidia Corporation Device unknown ## PCI standard ISA Bridge pci bus 0x cardnum 0x01 function 0x01: vendor 0x10de device 0x0752 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ## nforce PCI System Management pci bus 0x cardnum 0x01 function 0x02: vendor 0x10de device 0x0751 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI Ram Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x01 function 0x03: vendor 0x10de device 0x0753 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### Nforce System Management Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x01 function 0x04: vendor 0x10de device 0x0568 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI Ram controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x02 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x077b nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### OpenHCD USB host controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x02 function 0x01: vendor 0x10de device 0x077c nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI to USB Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x04 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x077d nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### OpenHCD USB host controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x04 function 0x01: vendor 0x10de device 0x077e nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI to USB Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x06 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0759 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### IDE Dual Channel Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x07 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0774 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### HD Audio controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x08 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x075a nVidia Corporation Device unknown pci bus 0x cardnum 0x09 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0ad4 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### Nforce Sata Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x0a function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0760 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ## 760 is the Nvidia Network Card. pci bus 0x cardnum 0x10 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0778 nVidia Corporation Device unknown pci bus 0x cardnum 0x13 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x077a nVidia Corporation Device unknown pci bus 0x cardnum 0x14 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x077a nVidia Corporation Device unknown pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x00: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1200 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] HyperTransport Configuration pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x01: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1201 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Address Map pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x02: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1202 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] DRAM Controller pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x03: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1203 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Miscellaneous Control pci bus 0x cardnum 0x18 function 0x04: vendor 0x1022 device 0x1204 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h [Opteron, Athlon64, Sempron] Link Control pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x0a function 0x00: vendor 0x11c1 device 0x5811 Agere Systems FW323 ### IEEE 1394 Host Controller pci bus 0x0002 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x05b1 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI to PCI Bridge pci bus 0x0003 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x05b1 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI to PCI Bridge pci bus 0x0003 cardnum 0x02 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x05b1 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ### PCI to PCI Bridge pci bus 0x0004 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0622 nVidia Corporation Device unknown ## NVIDIA GeForce 9600GT pci bus 0x0007 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x11ab device 0x6121 Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE6121 SATA II Controller __- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cdrw command burning CD
On 19/06/2008, at 8:24 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: Emmanuel De Paepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess so. The one which is not working when writing should start is accessed by clicking: Places - CD/DVD creator. I remember using this tool successfully on my other computer at home. However I'm not sure this was on OpenSolaris or SXDE. On Solaris 10, I've always used cdrw. If you are on Inidana, it may be that the installation is incomplete and misses cdrecord. As mkisofs is mandatory to create a bootarchive, I would however expect that the sdoftware is available. Both exist on a stock install of 2008.05 - there may be bugs obviously. Emmanuel, it would be great to detail your findings in a bug report. Sign in for an account at http://defect.opensolaris.org, and report what issues you had under Distribution OpenSolaris Desktop. thanks! Glynn ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris 2008.05 (LiveCD) updated to build 90 - lots of problems!
Yes, I followed this procedure exactly and I still have the problems described. In addition, Evolution doesn't work either, it crashes whilst starting up, no screens get shown before it bails out. I have no problems with Nevada build 90 though. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Wine opengl problems(nvidia)
Don't bother compiling manually. pkgbuild.sourceforge.net/spec-files-extra/ It has wine and tons of other package spec files. Install as per instructions and after syncing with svn do something like this $ CC=gcc CXX=g++ pkgtool --download --autodeps build SFEwine It will build (hopefully) a nice solaris package in ~/packages/PKGS. Add it using # pkgadd -d /export/home/you/packages/PKGS SFEwine This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Open Source SNAP Graphics/Audio Drivers for Open Solaris?
Hi Kendall Looks like great work. Can you give a synopsis of drivers and other 'stuff' you are considering to open ? Some specifics might catch attention of a bright spark somewhere. I looked at the site, but couldn't find any specific information on what hardware the driver bundle is for. Also, were the drivers created using docs under NDA etc ? If so, then there might be legal issues surrounding open sourcing the stuff that you might want to double-check. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Performance issues ZFS / CIFS on home file server
I'm setting up a home file server on opensolaris b86 My system is running with AMD Athlon 4400+, 1GB ram, rge 100Mb/s ethernet I'm able to create the CIFS shares and able to access the data from my windows laptop. Now, when i try to stream some HD video the performace is pretty bad, to the extent that the video is not watchable. I tried to set the ZFS arc max setting to 50MB but that did not help. I do see that my available physical memory becomes very low ~40MB. can any one help? Thanks in advance. Vijay This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nvidia 780a drivers
Further to comments earlier I reinstalled and did a touch /reconfigure and changed only the driver_aliases for the nge interface. All starts OK but can't communicate out, and the interface in /var/adm/messages goes up and down see some extracts below. This card does work at 1000Mbs/Full Duplex when same pc boots into windows. Can ping myself, but no where else. There must be some differences here, let me know if there is anything else I can add or discover extract from messages file : Jun 19 14:40:48 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:40:50 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:41:30 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:41:32 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:42:17 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:42:19 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:43:02 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:43:04 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:43:44 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:43:46 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:44:26 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:44:29 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:45:13 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:45:17 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:46:00 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:46:02 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:46:42 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:46:45 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:47:25 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:47:29 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:48:09 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:48:11 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex Jun 19 14:48:51 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 486395 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link down Jun 19 14:48:53 dbsol-1 mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: nge0 link up, 1000 Mbps, full duplex This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Western Digital SATA drives and Pioneer Blu-ray SATA do not register in b90
I have 6 sata drives in machine and only 2 are being recognised by opensolaris. I am running the MBD in AHCI mode not ide. The two drives that are recognised within b90 are seagate drives. Has anyone had similar experiences, and workarounds ? maybe /etc/systems parameters etc etc. Also I am using a new ASUS M3N-HT deluxe MBD which many of the devices are not recoginised as yet. The pioneer drive Blu-ray also is not recognised This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Performance issues ZFS / CIFS on home file server
Hi, On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:01:39PM -0700, vijay Rajah wrote: I'm setting up a home file server on opensolaris b86 My system is running with AMD Athlon 4400+, 1GB ram, rge 100Mb/s ethernet I'm able to create the CIFS shares and able to access the data from my windows laptop. Now, when i try to stream some HD video the performace is pretty bad, to the extent that the video is not watchable. I tried to set the ZFS arc max setting to 50MB but that did not help. I do see that my available physical memory becomes very low ~40MB. can any one help? Maybe off topic, but did you try to investigate the network layer between both CIFS and your player (netstat -i,..)? Is it CIFS/ZFS issue(?), I mean did you try to download files via ftp for instance and checked performance(?), or did you try to configure CIFS/UFS and do the same thing? Thanks, /j. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
