Re: [osol-discuss] How to install OpenSolaris in USB harddisk?

2009-03-11 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
 I would like to install OpenSolaris in a USB hard
 disk. I like this way of installation so that I can
 run OpenSolaris on different computers just by
 bringing my USB hard disk around.
 I tried booting up from the Live CD and during the
 installation, choose the attached USB hard disk. It
 went through the whole process completely. When I
 pressed the reboot button it did not reboot from the
 USB hard disk even though I had set it up in my CMOS
 boot option setup. The computer tries to boot up but
 gives a message that this does not have a boot sector.

There was a bug b/t builds 93 and 104 which forbids you from booting from a USB 
memory stick.  However, I have never had problem booting from a USB hard disk.

Actually I have not installed OpenSolaris into any of my primary laptops yet 
(always boot from one of the several USB hard disks that are shared among those 
laptops).

I have a habit of plugging the USB hard disk into the same USB slot.  Someone 
was mentioning that it may not boot if you use a different slot.  You may want  
to make sure that this is not the possible cause of the problem.

Before you dig any further, I suggest you probably should try to do the 
installation again.  I am sure you have verified the USB hard disk before 
hitting the enter key for installation.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Patch repository for customer access

2009-03-11 Thread Ivan . Peccolo

Hi

Is there an opensolaris patch repository for customer access somewhere?

Most sincerely

Ivan

PS: Please respond to me directly as I'm not on this alias.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] SXCE 109 python 2.6 curses support borken ?

2009-03-11 Thread Laszlo (Laca) Peter

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:54 +0200, Cyril Plisko wrote:
 /usr/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload/_curses_panel.so
 -rwxr-xr-x   1 root bin78324 Feb 18 05:03
 /usr/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload/_curses_failed.so
 -rwxr-xr-x   1 root bin13736 Feb 18 05:03
 /usr/lib/python2.6/lib-dynload/_curses_panel_failed.so
 
 Was it done on purpose ? Can someone elaborate more on that ?

The python build scripts rename the modules to *_failed if
they were built but could not be loaded for some reason.
In this case:

ld.so.1: python: fatal: relocation error: file
build/lib.solaris-2.11-i86pc-2.6/_curses.so: symbol wchgat: referenced
symbol not found

Thanks for the report, I'll fix this.

Laca


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] ext4 bug zfs handling of the very same situation

2009-03-11 Thread Thomas Maier-Komor
Hi,

there was recently a bug reported against EXT4 that gets triggered by
KDE: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781

Now I'd like to verify that my understanding of ZFS behavior and
implementations is correct, and ZFS is unaffected from this kind of
issue. Maybe somebody would like to comment on this.

The underlying problem with ext4 is that some kde executables do
something like this:
1a) open and read data from file x, close file x
1b) open and truncate file x
1c) write data to file x
1d) close file x

or

2a) open and read data from file x, close file x
2b) open and truncate file x.new
2c) write data to file x.new
2d) close file x.new
2e) rename file x.new to file x

Concerning case 1) I think ZFS may lose data if power is lost right
after 1b) and open(xxx,O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC|O_CREAT) is issued in a
transaction group separately from the one containing 1c/1d.

Concerning case 2) I cannot see ZFS losing any data, because of
copy-on-write and transaction grouping.

Theodore Ts'o (ext4 developer) commented that both cases are flawed and
cannot be supported correctly, because of a lacking fsync() before
close. Is this correct? His comment is over here:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781/comments/54

Any thoughts or comments?

TIA,
Thomas
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] [zfs-discuss] ext4 bug zfs handling of the very same situation

2009-03-11 Thread Casper . Dik


The underlying problem with ext4 is that some kde executables do
something like this:
1a) open and read data from file x, close file x
1b) open and truncate file x
1c) write data to file x
1d) close file x

or

2a) open and read data from file x, close file x
2b) open and truncate file x.new
2c) write data to file x.new
2d) close file x.new
2e) rename file x.new to file x

Concerning case 1) I think ZFS may lose data if power is lost right
after 1b) and open(xxx,O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC|O_CREAT) is issued in a
transaction group separately from the one containing 1c/1d.

Yes, I would assume that is possible but the change for it happening is
small.  Other filesystems prefer to write the meta data prompt, but
ZFS will easily wait until the file is completely written.

And UFS has the extra problem that it can change the file size and reading
will show garbage in the file.  (It changes the inode, possibly because 
it's in the log, but it hasn't written the data).   We've seen that problem
with UFS and the /etc/*_* driver files.  Precisely because we didn't
flush/fsync.  (And in some cases we used fsync(fileno(file)), but the
new content was still in the stdio buffer)

Only versioned filesystems can make the first sequence work.

Concerning case 2) I cannot see ZFS losing any data, because of
copy-on-write and transaction grouping.

Theodore Ts'o (ext4 developer) commented that both cases are flawed and
cannot be supported correctly, because of a lacking fsync() before
close. Is this correct? His comment is over here:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781/comments/54

Perhaps we should Theodore Ts'o that ZFS gets this right :-)

I'm assuming that all transactions in group N all happened before
group N+1 at least when it comes to the partial order in which the
transactions happen.

Casper

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Patch repository for customer access

2009-03-11 Thread Ché Kristo
my understanding is that when on sun support the repo is 
https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/support
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Patch repository for customer access

2009-03-11 Thread Ché Kristo
my understanding is that when on sun support the repo is 
https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/support
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] ext4 bug zfs handling of the very same situation

2009-03-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Thomas Maier-Komor tho...@maier-komor.de wrote:

 there was recently a bug reported against EXT4 that gets triggered by
 KDE: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781

 Now I'd like to verify that my understanding of ZFS behavior and
 implementations is correct, and ZFS is unaffected from this kind of
 issue. Maybe somebody would like to comment on this.

 The underlying problem with ext4 is that some kde executables do
 something like this:
 1a) open and read data from file x, close file x
 1b) open and truncate file x
 1c) write data to file x
 1d) close file x

 or

 2a) open and read data from file x, close file x
 2b) open and truncate file x.new
 2c) write data to file x.new
 2d) close file x.new
 2e) rename file x.new to file x

 Concerning case 1) I think ZFS may lose data if power is lost right
 after 1b) and open(xxx,O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC|O_CREAT) is issued in a
 transaction group separately from the one containing 1c/1d.

It depends on what you call loses data.

If you truncate an existing file, the content of the file is expected 
to be lost if the file system behaves correctly.

 Concerning case 2) I cannot see ZFS losing any data, because of
 copy-on-write and transaction grouping.

 Theodore Ts'o (ext4 developer) commented that both cases are flawed and
 cannot be supported correctly, because of a lacking fsync() before
 close. Is this correct? His comment is over here:
 https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781/comments/54

An application cannot be sure on whether the data has been written to disk
if there was no fsync() call. Star for this reason by default calls fsync() 
before closing a file in order to be able to include information about problems
in the star exit code.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Gino
Just happened.  Any ideas?
gino

Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice] 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 ^Mpanic[cpu1]/thread=ff001fb94c60: 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 335743 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page 
fault) rp=ff001fb94870 addr=0 occurred in module ip due 
to a NULL pointer dereference
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 839527 kern.notice] sched: 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 753105 kern.notice] #pf Page fault
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 532287 kern.notice] Bad kernel fault at addr=0x0
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 243837 kern.notice] pid=0, pc=0xf7cb0cfa, 
sp=0xff001fb94960, eflags=0x10286
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 211416 kern.notice] cr0: 
8005003bpg,wp,ne,et,ts,mp,pe cr4: 6f8xmme,fxsr,pge,mce,pae,pse,de
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 624947 kern.notice] cr2: 0
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 625075 kern.notice] cr3: c80
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 625715 kern.notice] cr8: c
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   rdi: ff04e379ba78 
rsi:0 rdx: ff04dc34d068
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   rcx:0  
r8: ff04e1e17000  r9:0
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   rax:2 
rbx: 69e455c3 rbp: ff001fb94a00
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   r10: ff04e4b37580 
r11:0 r12: ff04e1697000
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   r13: ff04dc34d068 
r14: ff052e7db408 r15:0
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   fsb:0 
gsb: ff04e2f6b580  ds:   4b
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]es:   4b  
fs:0  gs:  1c3
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]   trp:e 
err:0 rip: f7cb0cfa
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 592667 kern.notice]cs:   30 
rfl:10286 rsp: ff001fb94960
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 266532 kern.notice]ss:   38
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94750 
unix:die+dd ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94860 
unix:trap+1752 ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94870 
unix:cmntrap+e9 ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94a00 
ip:ip_tcp_input+6a ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94bb0 
ip:ip_accept_tcp+7cf ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94c40 
ip:squeue_polling_thread+13f ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94c50 
unix:thread_start+8 ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 672855 kern.notice] syncing file systems...
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Durrant

Gino wrote:

Just happened.  Any ideas?


Looks like a NULL pointer dereference. It would probably be useful if 
you could run mdb on the core and post the output of $c.


  Paul

--
===
Paul Durrant
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pdurrant
===
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Gino
Hi Paul,


# mdb -k unix.0 vmcore.0
Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic 
cpu_ms.AuthenticAMD.15 uppc pcplusmp scsi_vhci zfs sd mpt fcp fctl qlc sockfs 
ip hook neti sctp arp usba stmf idm md cpc random crypto smbsrv nfs nca fcip 
lofs logindmux ptm nsctl sdbc ufs sv ii sppp nsmb rdc ]
 $c
ip_tcp_input+0x6a(0, 0, ff04dc34d068, 0, ff052e7db408, 0)
ip_accept_tcp+0x7cf(ff04dc34d068, ff04e9519088, ff04e2cddc40, 
ff04e80a3bc0, ff001fb94be8, ff001fb94be4)
squeue_polling_thread+0x13f(ff04e2cddc40)
thread_start+8()
 

gino
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Durrant

Gino wrote:


# mdb -k unix.0 vmcore.0
Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic 
cpu_ms.AuthenticAMD.15 uppc pcplusmp scsi_vhci zfs sd mpt fcp fctl qlc sockfs 
ip hook neti sctp arp usba stmf idm md cpc random crypto smbsrv nfs nca fcip 
lofs logindmux ptm nsctl sdbc ufs sv ii sppp nsmb rdc ]

$c

ip_tcp_input+0x6a(0, 0, ff04dc34d068, 0, ff052e7db408, 0)
ip_accept_tcp+0x7cf(ff04dc34d068, ff04e9519088, ff04e2cddc40, 
ff04e80a3bc0, ff001fb94be8, ff001fb94be4)
squeue_polling_thread+0x13f(ff04e2cddc40)
thread_start+8()



It looks like ip_tcp_input() has been called with a NULL mblk and ipha. 
cc-ing network discuss to see if this looks familiar to anyone. As a 
matter of interest, what network driver are you using?


  Paul

--
===
Paul Durrant
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pdurrant
===
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Gino
 Gino wrote:
  
  # mdb -k unix.0 vmcore.0
  Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac
 cpu.generic cpu_ms.AuthenticAMD.15 uppc pcplusmp
 scsi_vhci zfs sd mpt fcp fctl qlc sockfs ip hook neti
 sctp arp usba stmf idm md cpc random crypto smbsrv
 nfs nca fcip lofs logindmux ptm nsctl sdbc ufs sv ii
 sppp nsmb rdc ]
  $c
  ip_tcp_input+0x6a(0, 0, ff04dc34d068, 0,
 ff052e7db408, 0)
  ip_accept_tcp+0x7cf(ff04dc34d068,
 ff04e9519088, ff04e2cddc40, ff04e80a3bc0,
 ff001fb94be8, ff001fb94be4)
  squeue_polling_thread+0x13f(ff04e2cddc40)
  thread_start+8()
  
 
 It looks like ip_tcp_input() has been called with a
 NULL mblk and ipha. 
 cc-ing network discuss to see if this looks familiar
 to anyone. As a 
 matter of interest, what network driver are you
 using?

e1000 on Sun X4100

gino
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris Bible: Buy it!

2009-03-11 Thread Simon Phipps
If people in the USA use the OpenSolaris Lending Project store[1] to  
buy it (or use the Project's Amazon link[2]), the Project[3] will get  
credit from Amazon that can then be applied at Kiva[4].


[1] http://astore.amazon.com/opensolaris-20
[2] http://www.amazon.com/?tag=opensolaris-20
[3] http://opensolaris.org/os/project/lending/
[4] http://www.kiva.org/team/opensolaris

On Mar 4, 2009, at 13:17, Luke L wrote:


This isn't spam, this is a legitimate recommendation from a real user.

ISBN 13: 978-0470385487

I think it is important enough for me to say on the ML that this is a
great book for anyone who is new to Opensolaris. Whether you know Unix
systems or not, this will be a very useful book for you to have if you
are getting to learn Opensolaris. It has both breadth and depth,
extensive topic cross-referencing, and very little technical error.

It doesn't cover every conceivable topic. It is a great primary
resource, backed by the official Sun docs and the #opensolaris
Freenode channel. With these three sources of info, along with the
INTERNET, you can pick up on Opensolaris quickly.

To go through everything I like about this book would be exhausting.
Protip: At least go to Amazon and look up the table of contents, and
see what it covers. Also, I think opensolaris.{org|com} has a link to
samples from several chapters. Check it out.

Now to see if Apress' book coming in April can even TOUCH this...
Apress is a hit-or-miss; I have pretty high respect for Wiley right
now.

--
Luke L.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] emacs keys

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Howard Yeh hay...@gmail.com writes:

 On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:45 PM, stephen bond sten...@go.com wrote:
 I have OSolaris 11 with emacs from the IPS.
 setting mark by C-space does not work and I have to use C-@ which is very 
 inconvenient.
 Please, help with getting C-space to do its usual job.
 thank you
 S.

 are you using the gnome desktop?

 when i was setting up, i had to disable some of the gnome keyboard shortcuts.

 or maybe we are talking about different things...

How did you disable those shortcuts?  I see no opportunity to do so in
keyboard shortcut dialog.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Solaris 10 printer manager query

2009-03-11 Thread russell aspinwall
Hi,

After upgrading to Solaris 10 5/08 the Solaris Printer Manager changed so that 
it offered the following options when adding New Attached Printer dialogue box

Printer Name :
Description :
Printer Port:
Printer Type:
File Contents:
Fault Notification:
Options:
Banner:

After applying patch 138628-06 the New Attached Printer dialogue box reverted 
to its previous correct configuration

Printer Name:
Description:
Printer Port:
Printer Make:
Printer Model:
Printer Driver:
Fault Notification:
Banner:

A friend is running Solaris 10 10/08 but despite applying 138628-06 it is not 
showing the extended Printer Manager functions of  Make, Model and Driver. How 
can he enable the extended functionality.

TIA
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris Bible: Buy it!

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Ché Kristo ch...@internode.on.net writes:

 I am wondering if the book can be purchased as a PDF, as I am always
 where the book is not when I need to reference it :-(

You probably know this already but 2 full chapters are available at
opensolaris sites.  There is probably a link at opensolaris.org but I
know for sure there is an obvious link on the left side at
opensolaris.com. 

Chapter:  3  Crash course
Chapter:  8  zfs

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] emacs keys

2009-03-11 Thread Randall Q. Huxley III
Yeah unfortunately something about the desktop seems to be grabbing certain key 
input that should go to Emacs. For now I run it in a terminal. emacs -nw
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 printer manager query

2009-03-11 Thread Peter Sear

Hi Russell

Could it be just that printmgr needs restarting?

btw this discussion list is for OpenSolaris not Solaris 10.
You should be able to get help for this type of question through your normal 
support channels.
FYI there is a printing-disc...@opensolaris.org list for questions that do 
relate to OpenSolaris printing.


Rgds

Peter

russell aspinwall wrote:

Hi,

After upgrading to Solaris 10 5/08 the Solaris Printer Manager changed so that 
it offered the following options when adding New Attached Printer dialogue box

Printer Name :
Description :
Printer Port:
Printer Type:
File Contents:
Fault Notification:
Options:
Banner:

After applying patch 138628-06 the New Attached Printer dialogue box reverted 
to its previous correct configuration

Printer Name:
Description:
Printer Port:
Printer Make:
Printer Model:
Printer Driver:
Fault Notification:
Banner:

A friend is running Solaris 10 10/08 but despite applying 138628-06 it is not 
showing the extended Printer Manager functions of  Make, Model and Driver. How 
can he enable the extended functionality.

TIA

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] emacs keys

2009-03-11 Thread Howard Yeh
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:54 AM,  sten...@go.com wrote:
 Yes,

 Osol has GNOME desktop and CDE only. Please, tell me how to do it. There are
 no issues with the keyboard at all. I looked at xev.
 left Alt sends Alt-L but in emacs it is mapped to Alt-A. I discovered that
 the Windows key is assigned as Meta, so that's OK, but not having C-space is
 bad.

Just go to keyboard shortcuts from the gnome menu.

It's in the same menu as other gnome settings (resolution, etc.).



 On Mar 11, 2009, hay...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:45 PM, stephen bond sten...@go.com wrote:
 I have OSolaris 11 with emacs from the IPS.
 setting mark by C-space does not work and I have to use C-@ which is very
 inconvenient.
 Please, help with getting C-space to do its usual job.
 thank you
 S.

 are you using the gnome desktop?

 when i was setting up, i had to disable some of the gnome keyboard
 shortcuts.

 or maybe we are talking about different things...

 --
 This message posted from opensolaris.org
 ___
 opensolaris-discuss mailing list
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Mike DeMarco
I am attempting to download a package from blastwave and keep getting
Option -n selected, stopping here.

I have checked the config file and -n is not set for wgetopts.

Anyone know what in the wide wide world of sports is going on here?

THanks
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Dennis Clarke

 I am attempting to download a package from blastwave and keep getting
 Option -n selected, stopping here.

What rev of Solaris or OpenSolaris or what-ever are you on ?

 I have checked the config file and -n is not set for wgetopts.

Which wget are you using ?  /usr/sfw/bin/wget ?  /opt/csw/bin/wget ?

Is there a $HOME/.wgetrc ?

 Anyone know what in the wide wide world of sports is going on here?

I probably do :-)

-- 
Dennis

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Copying files and folders

2009-03-11 Thread Hanma
Hello
Sorry, but I have one problem. I wanted to install Opera for OpenSolaris 
2008.11. I've downloaded file *.tar.gz and extracted it. There was folders 
lib, 
etc and other. I don't know how to install applications in OpenSolaris, but I 
thought to copy folders and files to \. But copy command was blocked in 
context menu. I don't know what to do. Can someone help me?
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Mike DeMarco
 
  I am attempting to download a package from
 blastwave and keep getting
  Option -n selected, stopping here.
 
 What rev of Solaris or OpenSolaris or what-ever are
 you on ?

OpenSolaris b81
 
  I have checked the config file and -n is not set
 for wgetopts.
 
 Which wget are you using ?  /usr/sfw/bin/wget ?
  /opt/csw/bin/wget ?

using /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil which I would assume calls /opt/csw/bin/wget

 Is there a $HOME/.wgetrc ?

No .wgetrc in home directory.
 
  Anyone know what in the wide wide world of sports
 is going on here?
 
 I probably do :-)
 
 -- 
 Dennis
 
 ___
 opensolaris-discuss mailing list
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Dennis Clarke


  I am attempting to download a package from
 blastwave and keep getting
  Option -n selected, stopping here.

 What rev of Solaris or OpenSolaris or what-ever are
 you on ?

 OpenSolaris b81

should work fine


  I have checked the config file and -n is not set
 for wgetopts.

 Which wget are you using ?  /usr/sfw/bin/wget ?
  /opt/csw/bin/wget ?

 using /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil which I would assume calls /opt/csw/bin/wget

no, actually it loosk all over the place to find wget, smart litle script
that it is. Even if you have no wget anywhere it installed its own little
wget thus :

bash-3.2# ldd /opt/csw/libexec/pkgutil/wget
libmd5.so.1 =   /lib/libmd5.so.1
libsocket.so.1 =/lib/libsocket.so.1
libnsl.so.1 =   /lib/libnsl.so.1
libc.so.1 = /lib/libc.so.1
libmp.so.2 =/lib/libmp.so.2
libmd.so.1 =/lib/libmd.so.1
libscf.so.1 =   /lib/libscf.so.1
libdoor.so.1 =  /lib/libdoor.so.1
libuutil.so.1 = /lib/libuutil.so.1
libgen.so.1 =   /lib/libgen.so.1
libm.so.2 = /lib/libm.so.2

 Is there a $HOME/.wgetrc ?

 No .wgetrc in home directory.

hrmm .. good one

Do you have a /etc/opt/csw/pkgutil.conf ?

do this, just copy and paste into the terminal there :

/usr/xpg4/bin/rm -f /opt/csw/etc/pkgutil.con*
/usr/xpg4/bin/rm -f /etc/opt/csw/pkgutil.conf
/bin/printf mirror=http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable\n; 
/etc/opt/csw/pkgutil.conf
/bin/printf pkgaddopts=-G\n  /etc/opt/csw/pkgutil.conf

Then run /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --catalog

and show me what you get.

dc





___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Artem Kachitchkine


Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 335743 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ff001fb94870 addr=0 occurred in module ip due 
to a NULL pointer dereference
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 unix: [ID 10 kern.notice] 
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94750 unix:die+dd ()

Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94860 
unix:trap+1752 ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94870 
unix:cmntrap+e9 ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94a00 
ip:ip_tcp_input+6a ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94bb0 
ip:ip_accept_tcp+7cf ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94c40 
ip:squeue_polling_thread+13f ()
Mar 11 12:48:14 cl1 genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff001fb94c50 
unix:thread_start+8 ()


Looks very similar to:

6791062 System panic in ip_tcp_input when a rule is added to ipfilter
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6791062

Bug state is 5-Cause Known, which means an engineer is working on a fix.

-Artem
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Life With Solaris

2009-03-11 Thread Andras Barna
search the forum
iirc it was licence issue .. dont know exact details

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Rallavagu rallav...@gmail.com wrote:
 Trying to configure lifewithsolaris (http://lifewithsolaris.jp/)
 repository and it seems to be down. Anybody has an idea if there are any
 alternatives? I have used blastwave but, their packages does not integrate
 well. For example, after installing an application it does not show up in
 the Gnome Menus. I am running OpenSolaris 0811.

 Thanks in advance

 Srikanth
 ___
 opensolaris-discuss mailing list
 opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org




-- 
Andy
http://blog.sartek.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Mike DeMarco
/opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --catalog
Fetching new catalog if available...
--14:08:06--  http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/catalog
   = `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0'
Resolving blastwave.network.com... 64.79.150.209
Connecting to blastwave.network.com|64.79.150.209|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 376,470 (368K) [text/plain]

100%[] 376,470  303.88K/s

14:08:07 (303.03 KB/s) - `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0' saved 
[376470/376470]

/opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -install stellarium
Parsing catalog, may take a while...
New packages: CSWcommon CSWexpat CSWiconv CSWzlib CSWggettext CSWftype2 
CSWisaexec CSWgpgerr CSWosslrt CSWlibx11 CSWpng CSWpixman CSWfconfig CSWncurses 
CSWgcrypt CSWosslutils CSWossldevel CSWsunmath CSWlibxrender CSWlibxdmcp 
CSWlibxau CSWjpeg CSWreadline CSWopencdk CSWossl CSWglib2 CSWlibxft2 CSWlibxcb 
CSWlibcairo CSWtiff CSWgnutls CSWbdb4 CSWnessuslib CSWlibidl CSWpango 
CSWlibcups CSWlibatk CSWjasper CSWlibdbus CSWsasl CSWlibnet CSWorbit2 
CSWlibxml2 CSWgtk2 CSWdbusglib CSWoldaprt CSWkrb5lib CSWbzip2 CSWfam CSWgconf2 
CSWlibpopt CSWsambalib CSWlibgnomecups CSWlibart CSWlibglade2 CSWgnomevfs2 
CSWbonobo2 CSWlibgnomeprint CSWlibgnomecanvas CSWlibogg CSWlibgsf 
CSWlibgnomeprintui CSWlibcroco CSWvorbis CSWlibsdl CSWsdlmixer CSWsdlimage 
CSWmesa CSWstellarium
Total size:   72.4 MB
Option -n selected, stopping here.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Shawn Walker

Mike DeMarco wrote:

/opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --catalog
Fetching new catalog if available...
--14:08:06--  http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/catalog
   = `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0'
Resolving blastwave.network.com... 64.79.150.209
Connecting to blastwave.network.com|64.79.150.209|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 376,470 (368K) [text/plain]

100%[] 376,470  303.88K/s

14:08:07 (303.03 KB/s) - `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0' saved 
[376470/376470]

/opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -install stellarium

   ^

There's your problem. '-install' should be '-i' or '--install'.

Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Dennis Clarke

 /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --catalog
 Fetching new catalog if available...
 --14:08:06--  http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/catalog
= `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0'
 Resolving blastwave.network.com... 64.79.150.209
 Connecting to blastwave.network.com|64.79.150.209|:80... connected.
 HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
 Length: 376,470 (368K) [text/plain]

 100%[] 376,470  303.88K/s

 14:08:07 (303.03 KB/s) - `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0' saved
 [376470/376470]

 /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -install stellarium
 Parsing catalog, may take a while...
 New packages: CSWcommon CSWexpat CSWiconv CSWzlib CSWggettext CSWftype2
 CSWisaexec CSWgpgerr CSWosslrt CSWlibx11 CSWpng CSWpixman CSWfconfig
 CSWncurses CSWgcrypt CSWosslutils CSWossldevel CSWsunmath CSWlibxrender
 CSWlibxdmcp CSWlibxau CSWjpeg CSWreadline CSWopencdk CSWossl CSWglib2
 CSWlibxft2 CSWlibxcb CSWlibcairo CSWtiff CSWgnutls CSWbdb4 CSWnessuslib
 CSWlibidl CSWpango CSWlibcups CSWlibatk CSWjasper CSWlibdbus CSWsasl
 CSWlibnet CSWorbit2 CSWlibxml2 CSWgtk2 CSWdbusglib CSWoldaprt CSWkrb5lib
 CSWbzip2 CSWfam CSWgconf2 CSWlibpopt CSWsambalib CSWlibgnomecups CSWlibart
 CSWlibglade2 CSWgnomevfs2 CSWbonobo2 CSWlibgnomeprint CSWlibgnomecanvas
 CSWlibogg CSWlibgsf CSWlibgnomeprintui CSWlibcroco CSWvorbis CSWlibsdl
 CSWsdlmixer CSWsdlimage CSWmesa CSWstellarium
 Total size:   72.4 MB
 Option -n selected, stopping here.

eek

Can you post this in the support forum here please ?

http://wiki.blastwave.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=5

we can sort this out.

Dennis

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Life With Solaris

2009-03-11 Thread Aaron Wilson
I think with the CSW or blastwave packages you need to install their 
version of gnome, and login in using it instead of the JDS version of 
gnome, and programs you install should show up in that gnome menu.


I for one though don't really like the blastwave version of gnome and 
prefer the JDS version much better. So, what I do is copy the .desktop 
file from /opt/csw/share/applications to /usr/share/applications log out 
and log back in and the icon appears in the gnome menu. Sometimes you 
might have to edit the .desktop file Category section to make it 
appear in the right place, but more often than not they work just fine 
as is.


I did not know about lifewithsolaris.jp. I wish the repository was up. I 
would very much love having a recent version of VLC on Solaris


Aaron


Rallavagu wrote:
Trying to configure lifewithsolaris (http://lifewithsolaris.jp/) 
repository and it seems to be down. Anybody has an idea if there are 
any alternatives? I have used blastwave but, their packages does not 
integrate well. For example, after installing an application it does 
not show up in the Gnome Menus. I am running OpenSolaris 0811.


Thanks in advance

Srikanth
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


--
Aaron Wilson
Ernie Ball, Inc.
I.T. Department
aa...@ernieball.com
(805)544-7726


NOTICE: This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this e-mail
or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply mail and destroy the
original and all copies of the original message.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Mike DeMarco
Mike DeMarco wrote:
 /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --catalog
 Fetching new catalog if available...
 --14:08:06--  http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/catalog
= `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0'
 Resolving blastwave.network.com... 64.79.150.209
 Connecting to blastwave.network.com|64.79.150.209|:80... connected.
 HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
 Length: 376,470 (368K) [text/plain]

 100%[] 376,470  303.88K/s

 14:08:07 (303.03 KB/s) - `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0' saved 
 [376470/376470]

 /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -install stellarium
  ^

There's your problem. '-install' should be '-i' or '--install'.

Cheers,
-- Shawn Walker
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Blastwave pkgutil

2009-03-11 Thread Dennis Clarke

 Mike DeMarco wrote:
  /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil --catalog
  Fetching new catalog if available...
  --14:08:06--
  http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/c
 talog
 =
 `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0'
  Resolving blastwave.network.com... 64.79.150.209
  Connecting to
 blastwave.network.com|64.79.150.209|:80...
 connected.
  HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
  Length: 376,470 (368K) [text/plain]
 
  100%[] 376,470
  303.88K/s
 14:08:07 (303.03 KB/s) -
 `/var/opt/csw/pkgutil/catalog.i386.5.11.0' saved
 [376470/376470]
 
  /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -install stellarium
   ^
 . '-install' should be '-i' or '--install'.

 Cheers,
 -- Shawn Walker

 Shawn or Dennis:
 Great THis works! Can one of you change the example on the download
 page?


I'll get it.

Dennis


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] We Need a Critical Look at IIIM

2009-03-11 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
 but, speaking as an OpenSolaris user, I believe we
 need a compelling justification why we need it in the
 LiveCD!

Oops, compelling justification should be --compelling explanation--.  Thanks.
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 printer manager query

2009-03-11 Thread russell aspinwall
Hi,

Problem resolved, a case of RTFM. 

It appears that the Make, Model and Driver options do not appear after a clean 
install of Solaris 10 10/08 in the Printer Manager. However, if you create a 
printer with a ppd interface and then delete it the options remain. example 
below.

#  lpadmin -p hp1 -v /dev/lp1 -I postscript -m standard_foomatic -n 
/usr/lib/lp/model/ppd/system/foomatic//HP/HP-DeskJet_950C-hpijs.ppd.gz
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Life With Solaris

2009-03-11 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
 Trying to configure lifewithsolaris
 (http://lifewithsolaris.jp/) 
 repository and it seems to be down. Anybody has an
 idea if there are any 
 alternatives? I have used blastwave but, their
 packages does not 
 integrate well. For example, after installing an
 application it does not 
 show up in the Gnome Menus. I am running OpenSolaris
 0811.
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Srikanth

What's wrong with creating a desktop/panel icon to launch mplayer?  :-)
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] vim doesn't source ~/.vimrc

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Setup:
OS=Opensolaris 2008.11
vim=See full `:version output at the end

When I start vim on a file it does not source the ~/.vimrc file.
That file is actually a symlink to the hard file elsewhere.

Permissions are on both slink and hard copy:
ls -l ~/.vimrc:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 reader staff 35  [...] /export/home/reader/.vimrc - \
   /cvsb/zfs/export/home/reader/.vimrc

ls -l /cvsb/zfs/export/home/reader/.vimrc:
-rw-r--r-- 1 reader wheel 8649 [] \
/cvsb/zfs/export/home/reader/.vimrc

user reader belongs to both staff and wheel groups.

If I souce ~/.vimrc manually after opening a file it works fine:

vim .bashrc
 :so ~/.vimrc

Then all the setting I have in ~/.vimrc show up.  Obvious because
syntax highlignting suddenly comes on.

What might cause ~/.vimrc to be ignored on vim start

= * = * = * =
 
:version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Feb  3 2009 02:11:30)
Included patches: 1-6, 8-35, 37-40, 42-48, 50-70, 73, 75-84
Compiled by r...@sfwnv-x
Huge version without GUI.  Features included (+) or not (-):
+arabic +autocmd -balloon_eval -browse ++builtin_terms +byte_offset +cindent 
-clientserver -clipboard +cmdline_compl +cmdline_hist +cmdline_info +comments 
+cryptv +cscope +cursorshape +dialog_con +diff +digraphs -dnd -ebcdic 
+emacs_tags +eval +ex_extra +extra_search +farsi +file_in_path +find_in_path 
+float +folding -footer +fork() -gettext -hangul_input +iconv +insert_expand 
+jumplist +keymap +langmap +libcall +linebreak +lispindent +listcmds +localmap 
+menu +mksession +modify_fname +mouse -mouseshape +mouse_dec -mouse_gpm 
-mouse_jsbterm +mouse_netterm -mouse_sysmouse +mouse_xterm +multi_byte 
+multi_lang -mzscheme -netbeans_intg -osfiletype +path_extra -perl +postscript 
+printer +profile -python +quickfix +reltime +rightleft -ruby +scrollbind 
+signs +smartindent -sniff +statusline -sun_workshop +syntax +tag_binary 
+tag_old_static -tag_any_white -tcl +terminfo +termresponse +textobjects +title
 -toolbar +user_commands +vertsplit +virtualedit +visual +visualextra +viminfo 
+vreplace +wildignore +wildmenu +windows +writebackup -X11 -xfontset -xim -xsmp
 -xterm_clipboard -xterm_save 
   system vimrc file: $VIM/vimrc
 user vimrc file: $HOME/.vimrc
  user exrc file: $HOME/.exrc
  fall-back for $VIM: /usr/share/vim
Compilation: /opt/SUNWspro.40/SS12/bin/cc -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -xO
3 -m32 -xchip=pentium -xspace -Xa  -xildoff -xc99=all 
Linking: /opt/SUNWspro.40/SS12/bin/cc-o vim   -lm -ltermlib 

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] vim doesn't source ~/.vimrc

2009-03-11 Thread Shawn Walker

Harry Putnam wrote:

Setup:
OS=Opensolaris 2008.11
vim=See full `:version output at the end

When I start vim on a file it does not source the ~/.vimrc file.
That file is actually a symlink to the hard file elsewhere.

Permissions are on both slink and hard copy:
ls -l ~/.vimrc:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 reader staff 35  [...] /export/home/reader/.vimrc - \
   /cvsb/zfs/export/home/reader/.vimrc

ls -l /cvsb/zfs/export/home/reader/.vimrc:
-rw-r--r-- 1 reader wheel 8649 [] \
/cvsb/zfs/export/home/reader/.vimrc

user reader belongs to both staff and wheel groups.

If I souce ~/.vimrc manually after opening a file it works fine:

vim .bashrc
 :so ~/.vimrc

Then all the setting I have in ~/.vimrc show up.  Obvious because
syntax highlignting suddenly comes on.

What might cause ~/.vimrc to be ignored on vim start


It works fine on my system, but the file is owned by me, and it's not a 
symlink.


--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris Bible: Buy it!

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:

 You probably know this already but 2 full chapters are available at
 opensolaris sites.  There is probably a link at opensolaris.org but I
 know for sure there is an obvious link on the left side at
 opensolaris.com.   

Ack.. sorry that would be RIGHT side.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Cathy Zhou
It looks like the FW_HOOKS() macro has already set mp and ipha to NULL, 
but we continues to call ip_tcp_input() and lead to the panic.


I will see whether there is already bug filed for this, and if not, file a 
new bug.


Thanks
- Cathy


Gino wrote:


# mdb -k unix.0 vmcore.0
Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic 
cpu_ms.AuthenticAMD.15 uppc pcplusmp scsi_vhci zfs sd mpt fcp fctl qlc 
sockfs ip hook neti sctp arp usba stmf idm md cpc random crypto smbsrv 
nfs nca fcip lofs logindmux ptm nsctl sdbc ufs sv ii sppp nsmb rdc ]

$c

ip_tcp_input+0x6a(0, 0, ff04dc34d068, 0, ff052e7db408, 0)
ip_accept_tcp+0x7cf(ff04dc34d068, ff04e9519088, 
ff04e2cddc40, ff04e80a3bc0, ff001fb94be8, ff001fb94be4)

squeue_polling_thread+0x13f(ff04e2cddc40)
thread_start+8()



It looks like ip_tcp_input() has been called with a NULL mblk and ipha. 
cc-ing network discuss to see if this looks familiar to anyone. As a 
matter of interest, what network driver are you using?


  Paul



___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Life With Solaris

2009-03-11 Thread Rallavagu



W. Wayne Liauh wrote:

Trying to configure lifewithsolaris
(http://lifewithsolaris.jp/) 
repository and it seems to be down. Anybody has an
idea if there are any 
alternatives? I have used blastwave but, their
packages does not 
integrate well. For example, after installing an
application it does not 
show up in the Gnome Menus. I am running OpenSolaris

0811.

Thanks in advance

Srikanth


What's wrong with creating a desktop/panel icon to launch mplayer?  :-)


There is nothing wrong in it. Trying to move from Fedora where the 
packages and repositories are maintained and integrated well.


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] [networking-discuss] SXCE 109 kernel panic

2009-03-11 Thread Cathy Zhou

Okay. This is 6791062.

- Cathy

It looks like the FW_HOOKS() macro has already set mp and ipha to NULL, 
but we continues to call ip_tcp_input() and lead to the panic.


I will see whether there is already bug filed for this, and if not, file 
a new bug.


Thanks
- Cathy


Gino wrote:


# mdb -k unix.0 vmcore.0
Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic 
cpu_ms.AuthenticAMD.15 uppc pcplusmp scsi_vhci zfs sd mpt fcp fctl 
qlc sockfs ip hook neti sctp arp usba stmf idm md cpc random crypto 
smbsrv nfs nca fcip lofs logindmux ptm nsctl sdbc ufs sv ii sppp nsmb 
rdc ]

$c

ip_tcp_input+0x6a(0, 0, ff04dc34d068, 0, ff052e7db408, 0)
ip_accept_tcp+0x7cf(ff04dc34d068, ff04e9519088, 
ff04e2cddc40, ff04e80a3bc0, ff001fb94be8, ff001fb94be4)

squeue_polling_thread+0x13f(ff04e2cddc40)
thread_start+8()



It looks like ip_tcp_input() has been called with a NULL mblk and 
ipha. cc-ing network discuss to see if this looks familiar to anyone. 
As a matter of interest, what network driver are you using?


  Paul



___
networking-discuss mailing list
networking-disc...@opensolaris.org


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris Bible: Buy it!

2009-03-11 Thread Dave Miner
Harry, thanks for taking the time to provide your feedback.  A couple of 
comments in-line below.


Harry Putnam wrote:

Emmanuel De Paepe
emmanuel_depa...@yahoo.com writes:


Idem over here.

I paid it only 28.5 Euro, which is an excellent price if you see the '50 US 
dollar' on the back of the cover.

The only issue is the quality of the book. I was surprised that Wiley uses such 
low quality phone book paper. This is a big contrast compared to all my other 
Wiley (semiconductor) technical books.


I too see poor quality in paper... and apparently the printing too.
It appears the printer was low on ink.   Nothing is really crisp.



As authors, we had no control over the printing process or paper 
quality; it seems to be similar to the other titles in the Bible 
series that I have samples of, so I'd say it's consistent, anyway.  We 
can bring it up with Wiley for future printings, I guess, though I'm 
doubtful it would make any difference.  In their defense, we did deliver 
a bit more material than was originally specified, but they bent over 
backwards to put it all in.



Regarding the contents, I certainly can recommend this book. It's easy to read 
and I was surprised to see the number of commands I have never heard of. 
Commands which are otherwise well hidden in the man pages.


I am beginning to disagree about contents too.  I'm way low on the
skill level in unix or Solaris but have run unix or unix like OS for
over 10 yrs, mostly linux but with several months experience with 2 of
the BSDs (open and free) and at least 2 mnths with early offerings
from solaris... somwhere around 200[03].  As I recall you paid
something like $40 for a DVD with a x86 Solaris OS, the OS was free
but the processing cost (It may have been less, but $40 sticks in my
mind).

I see what could be described as a `thin' coverage of many things.



[remainder ellided]

We appreciate the feedback on topics you think deserve deeper coverage. 
 The scope of the book is very broad, and that breadth definitely 
compromises depth.  I would think that in every subject area we could 
have gone much deeper; the resources section provided with each chapter 
is really designed to direct you to materials, such as the Sun product 
documentation, that offer greater depth.  Ultimately, I expect the book 
to be more satisfying to those who are new(er) to OpenSolaris, not users 
or administrators with long Solaris experience, though I think it can 
serve as a handy reference to the latter for parts of the system that 
they are less frequently in contact with.


Specifically in the case of partitioning, I think we chose not to 
emphasize this as strongly, as ZFS makes it a far less interesting topic 
in general; you really want to just be giving it whole disks and making 
your life simpler.  Perhaps that's being a little too optimistic about 
ZFS for some :-)


We'll archive your feedback, as well as any others offered, for 
consideration should there be a second edition.  Feel free to drop any 
of us a note, or post here, with further thoughts on what would make a 
better book for you.


Dave
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris Bible: Buy it!

2009-03-11 Thread Brian Cameron


Dave:


Specifically in the case of partitioning, I think we chose not to
emphasize this as strongly, as ZFS makes it a far less interesting topic
in general; you really want to just be giving it whole disks and making
your life simpler. Perhaps that's being a little too optimistic about
ZFS for some :-)


For those OpenSolaris desktop users out there, figuring out how to set
up OpenSolaris in multi-partition environments where you may have
Linux, OpenSolaris, Windows, etc. on the same machine is complicated.

I'd bet that most people who install OpenSolaris as a desktop platform
wouldn't want to dedicate their laptop's entire disk to a single OS.

Brian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] unable to install using installadm - error 20 multiboot kernel must be load

2009-03-11 Thread Jay Seaman
I'm attempting to perform a network install of OpenSolaris to a SunFire x4500 
(thumper) which does not have a local dvd. I setup an install server on another 
X86 system, created manifests etc.. When I boot the X4500, I get the grub menu, 
which is nice and I think a good sign. However pressing the enter key starts to 
load the kernel but aborts with the message:

error 20 mutliboot kernel must be loaded before modules

I've done some googling, but not finding anything useful in this area.

If I try to load this from the command line, something seems to load (a few 
dots appear on the screen) and there's no errors reported when the kernel$ line 
executes. But when running the module line, I still get the error 20.

Any thoughts on how to troubleshoot this would be appreciated.

Jay
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-11 Thread Rick S.
Hi all.

I come from the Real Solaris world, been working with Solaris 10 for about 3 
years now, and decided to give OpenSoalaris a place on my home server vice 
Soalris 10 x86.

I think I'm missing something here, on Solaris 10 when I create a 'full' root 
zone, it copies over 100,000's of files, and take up about 4GB.

I try that in Opensolaris and it copies over 72 MB WTF?

So, I did the sysid cfg and logged in and started to compile some stuff, only 
to note that there is ton's of stuff missing.  X11 libraries, etc...

Is this the default behaviour of Opensolaris, a 'full' root really means. 1/10 
of the OS installed?

Here is my zone file, the zone it self works, but is missing tons of pkgs!

# uname -a
SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_101b i86pc i386 i86pc

# cat test_full.cfg 
create -b
set zonepath=/zones/test
set autoboot=true
set ip-type=shared
add net
set address=192.168.1.61
set physical=e1000g0
end
add attr
set name=comment
set type=string
set value=Test Zones
end

# zoneadm -z test install
A ZFS file system has been created for this zone.
  Authority: Using http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release/.
  Image: Preparing at /zones/test/root ... done.
  Cache: Using /var/pkg/download.
 Installing: (output follows)
DOWNLOADPKGS   FILES XFER (MB)
Completed  52/52   7862/7862   72.41/72.41 

PHASEACTIONS
Install Phase12939/12939 
PHASE  ITEMS
Reading Existing Index   9/9 
Indexing Packages  52/52 

   Note: Man pages can be obtained by installing SUNWman
Postinstall: Copying SMF seed repository ... done.
Postinstall: Working around http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=741
   Done: Installation completed in 274.436 seconds.

 Next Steps: Boot the zone, then log into the zone console
 (zlogin -C) to complete the configuration process
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Opensolaris Bible: Buy it!

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Brian Cameron brian.came...@sun.com writes:

 Dave:

 Specifically in the case of partitioning, I think we chose not to
 emphasize this as strongly, as ZFS makes it a far less interesting topic
 in general; you really want to just be giving it whole disks and making
 your life simpler. Perhaps that's being a little too optimistic about
 ZFS for some :-)

 For those OpenSolaris desktop users out there, figuring out how to set
 up OpenSolaris in multi-partition environments where you may have
 Linux, OpenSolaris, Windows, etc. on the same machine is complicated.

 I'd bet that most people who install OpenSolaris as a desktop platform
 wouldn't want to dedicate their laptop's entire disk to a single OS.

Adding to that... but first Thanks to D. Minor for his comments.

Another class of people who Brians comments might apply to are those
who don't mind trying out Osol on a whole disk, but in doing so will
miss out on many of nifty things about zfs since raidz does not accept
just one disk.

Thats exactly how I ended up disappoointed in the coverage of format,
fdisk and partition.  

I wanted to partition and slice up my disk to be able to work with
raidz.  Maybe that isn't really important and all the same stuff
applies to  any zpool.  I don't know yet... I'm just getting
started. 

I had some trouble getting advice about making raidz on partitions,
probably because it isn't the best usage of raidz or even of zfs.

I bought the OS Bible to get that information.  I didn't realize
there was a `Bible' series David alludes to and took it to mean it
would be chock full of solaris details, not citations to web
pages. That David points out are included.

David Wrote:

 Specifically in the case of partitioning, I think we chose not to
 emphasize this as strongly, as ZFS makes it a far less interesting
 topic in general; you really want to just be giving it whole disks and
 making your life simpler.  Perhaps that's being a little too
 optimistic about ZFS for some :-)

I suspected this was the case but only after buying the book and
realizing it didn't cover the older necessities.

But I would point out that its called the Bible of OpenSolaris .. not
the Bible of ZFS.  Not meaning to be too clever here, and thanks for
taking my post seriously.  I am quite a rank amatuer after all.

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] Full Root? - I think Not

2009-03-11 Thread Ché Kristo
A lot of the cruft has either been removed intentionally to fit onto CD size 
distribution or because the component is not redistributable...
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] How can I get rid of aggravating `Key ring'

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Can anyone tell me how to get rid of the aggravating `Key Ring' dialog
the jumps up on the opensolaris desktop every time I try to log into a 
remote machine via ssh.

I want to do it the simple way and enter my paswwd at the command
line.  Don't want to be bothered in anyway by helpful (unhelpful and
aggravating) dialog that someone else thought was nifty.

Under System/preferences... I don't see anything about key-ring,
passwd or security... where can I turn it off at?

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


[osol-discuss] Regarding Pstack

2009-03-11 Thread Akhil Jain
Hi all,

Can you please tell me some good doc links about understanding the output of 
Pstack. Like when I do a pstack on my process it shows like:

0009a890 main (1c, ffbff45c, ffbff4d0, 24d000, fd0a0380, fd0a03c0) + 2018
 00098448 _start   (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) + 108

So I want to know what exactly is +2018 or +108 . I want to know about the 
contents of the stack of a process.
Please help!

Thanks
Akhil Jain
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [osol-discuss] vim doesn't source ~/.vimrc

2009-03-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org writes:

 But still it does not get sourced when I start vim on a file.

 What build are you on?  I'm using 106.

 I´m on 108

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] How can I get rid of aggravating `Key ring'

2009-03-11 Thread Alfred Peng
you can go to System-Preferences-Sessions and uncheck GNOME Keyring 
Daemon Wrapper in the Startup Programs tab to turn off gnome-keyring, 
if you do not like it.


Detail can be found: 
https://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=310681#310681


-Alfred

Harry Putnam wrote:

Can anyone tell me how to get rid of the aggravating `Key Ring' dialog
the jumps up on the opensolaris desktop every time I try to log into a 
remote machine via ssh.


I want to do it the simple way and enter my paswwd at the command
line.  Don't want to be bothered in anyway by helpful (unhelpful and
aggravating) dialog that someone else thought was nifty.

Under System/preferences... I don't see anything about key-ring,
passwd or security... where can I turn it off at?

___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
  


___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org