Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
> I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX > was still intact. > This was with the development edition "dev300_m53" > (future v3.2). How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
I dont know, but one way is to use IPS, then a new BE will be created. You install them both via IPS, and will have in GRUB: 1. StableOOo31 2. DevOOo And then you choose which to boot from. Another way is to use Zones and install them in separate Zones - then you can run them at the same time. Or via VirtualBox. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
Thommy M. Malmström wrote: I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX was still intact. This was with the development edition "dev300_m53" (future v3.2). How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06? If you install it from their setup/upgrade utilities (basically a pkgadd/pkgrm script) it should be able to live along side the released product. $ ls -al /opt ... ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:54 ooo-dev drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:52 ooo-dev3 drwxr-xr-x 5 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org3 ... ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 15 23:26 staroffice8 $ Staroffice8 shares the openoffice.org directory. As you can see the development directory is separate from the openoffice 3.1 (openoffice.org3) directory. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] [Fwd: Re: Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?]
Sorry, I stripped out a directory in /opt, is should have read: $ ls -al /opt ... ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:54 ooo-dev drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:52 ooo-dev3 drwxr-xr-x 5 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org3 ... ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 15 23:26 staroffice8 drwxr-xr-x 6 root bin 512 Jun 15 23:50 staroffice9 $ --- Begin Message --- Thommy M. Malmström wrote: I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX was still intact. This was with the development edition "dev300_m53" (future v3.2). How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06? If you install it from their setup/upgrade utilities (basically a pkgadd/pkgrm script) it should be able to live along side the released product. $ ls -al /opt ... ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:54 ooo-dev drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Jul 24 11:52 ooo-dev3 drwxr-xr-x 5 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org drwxr-xr-x 7 root bin 512 Apr 30 12:29 openoffice.org3 ... ... drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 512 Jun 15 23:26 staroffice8 $ Staroffice8 shares the openoffice.org directory. As you can see the development directory is separate from the openoffice 3.1 (openoffice.org3) directory. --- End Message --- ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
I was wondering if anyone might be able to give me some pointers on troubleshooting extremely long startup times (2.5hrs). This is a problem that has only manifest itself in 2009.06 and was not present in either 2008.05 or 2008.11. The hardware configuration has not changed. The issue is definitely related to the 4x1TB Raid-z array on the box, when I disconnect the drives the boot time is very snappy. With them connected it sits there for 2.5hrs seemingly doing nothing. The box is pingable but not fully up (ssh etc are refused). Looking in /var/adm/messages doesn't give a lot of help, with the only message that an IRQ is being assigned to CPU 0 and CPU 1 alternatively. I'll add an exact snippet once the box has booted as it's in this state atm. I've looked to see whether this is an IRQ conflict, and have enabled MSI interrupts on the NGE driver to remove the major conflicts but without any change. Any pointers would be appreciated! Thanks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
Andrew Turner wrote: I was wondering if anyone might be able to give me some pointers on troubleshooting extremely long startup times (2.5hrs). This is a problem that has only manifest itself in 2009.06 and was not present in either 2008.05 or 2008.11. The hardware configuration has not changed. The issue is definitely related to the 4x1TB Raid-z array on the box, when I disconnect the drives the boot time is very snappy. What happens if you export the pool (but leave the drives connected) before rebooting? -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris 2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of them. Can this just be hearsay? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
Thanks, I'll try that later tho I expect it to boot cleanly, as I have tried rebuilding a clean version of 2009.06 in the past and then imported the pool. Pre-Import it was snappy, post-import terrible. For the record, I upgraded the pool to v14 when I moved to 2009.06. Pulling the messages from /var/adm/messages it boots normally upto Jul 26 17:49:03 Moria genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] lx_systrace0 is /pseudo/lx_systr...@0 Jul 26 17:49:03 Moria pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x41 ioapic 0x4 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 0 Jul 26 17:49:14 Moria pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x41 ioapic 0x4 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 and then a few thousand messages and 3 hours later.. Jul 26 20:54:34 Moria pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x41 ioapic 0x4 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Jul 26 20:54:41 Moria pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x41 ioapic 0x4 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 0 Jul 26 20:54:49 Moria genunix: [ID 454863 kern.info] dump on /dev/zvol/dsk/rpool/dump size 2047 MB Jul 26 20:54:53 Moria /usr/lib/power/powerd: [ID 387247 daemon.error] Able to open /dev/srn Current IRQ's are echo ::interrupts -d | mdb -k IRQ Vect IPL BusTrg Type CPU Share APIC/INT# Driver Name(s) 40xb0 12 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x4 asy#0 90x81 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x9 acpi_wrapper_isr 14 0x40 5 ISAEdg Fixed 0 1 0x0/0xe ata#0 16 0x83 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x10 nvidia#0 20 0x85 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 2 0x0/0x14 ohci#0, nv_sata#0 21 0x42 5 PCILvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x15 nv_sata#1 22 0x43 5 PCILvl Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x16 nv_sata#2 23 0x84 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x17 ehci#0 24 0x82 7 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - pcie_pci#1 25 0x60 6 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - nge#0 26 0x61 6 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - nge#0 27 0x62 6 PCIEdg MSI0 1 - nge#1 28 0x63 6 PCIEdg MSI0 1 - nge#1 160 0xa0 0 Edg IPIall 0 - poke_cpu 192 0xc0 13 Edg IPIall 1 - xc_serv 208 0xd0 14 Edg IPIall 1 - kcpc_hw_overflow_intr 209 0xd1 14 Edg IPIall 1 - cbe_fire 210 0xd3 14 Edg IPIall 1 - cbe_fire 240 0xe0 15 Edg IPIall 1 - xc_serv 241 0xe1 15 Edg IPIall 1 - apic_error_intr Cheers! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] dev repository issues??
Hi all - where do we need to log issues with the dev repository??? I have tried to fetch some things and every fetch breaks in the same way, even after flushing my download cache... so i suspect broken files, because if it was network, it would not likely be a break at the same place... thanx, rich ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] dev repository issues??
Rich Reynolds wrote: Hi all - where do we need to log issues with the dev repository??? Report them to the pkg-discuss mailing list. I have tried to fetch some things and every fetch breaks in the same way, even after flushing my download cache... so i suspect broken files, because if it was network, it would not likely be a break at the same place... Are you running build 118 and are you seeing timeout errors? If so, due to a known issue, you'll have to set an environment variable before running the pkg command: export PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT=900 Where 900 is the number of seconds to wait before timing out. See bug 10010 for the timeout issue. Alternatively, describe your issues in detail. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
> I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
> OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version
> of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
> 2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of
> them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I might add: the OpenSolaris 2009.06 LiveCD does not seem to
come with OOo (as far as I can tell).
As of yesterday, only OOo 3.0 was in the default repo. This is the last
version of OOo where this bug still exists.
But as of today, the repository has been updated, and the version of OOo has
been elevated to 3.1. As you correctly pointed out, this notorious bug no
longer shows up!!! (I am sure this repository update has nothing to do with
Anon's post. :-) )
AFAIC Sun's OpenSolaris developers made a very smart decision in not including
OOo in the 2009.06 LiveCD. The Solaris version of OOo (3.0 and prior) also
contains another deadly bug in that it has problems displaying some Chinese
characters when running in OpenSolaris (but not in the Solaris proper or any
other OS).
Can anyone imagine Sun tries to promote a product in China which implies a
great contempt for China's current and next-in-line presidents? Both of their
names were badly garbled in {OOo+OpenSolaris}. As I mentioned in other
threads, this problem is also solved in OOo 3.1. But it understandably was not
yet ready to be included in the 2009.06 LiveCD.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
W. Wayne Liauh wrote: I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris 2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of them. Can this just be hearsay? Hi Thommy, A small correction I might add: the OpenSolaris 2009.06 LiveCD does not seem to come with OOo (as far as I can tell). As of yesterday, only OOo 3.0 was in the default repo. This is the last version of OOo where this bug still exists. But as of today, the repository has been updated, and the version of OOo has been elevated to 3.1. As you correctly pointed out, this notorious bug no longer shows up!!! (I am sure this repository update has nothing to do with Anon's post. :-) ) OpenOffice 3.1 has been in the repository for a month now at least I believe. Perhaps you missed it accidentally? Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
Export completes successfully in 30s or so. Re-Importing now, same messages in the log and it's been running 1h43m and counting. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
On Mon 27/07/09 02:38 , "Andrew Turner" andrew.tur...@spearpointsolutions.co.uk sent: > Export completes successfully in 30s or so. Re-Importing now, same messages > in the log and it's been running 1h43m and counting. How many filesystems are in the pool? -- Ian. ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
Cleaning up the Thread.. > Export completes successfully in 30s or so. Re-Importing now, same messages > in the log and it's been running 1h43m and counting. How many filesystems are in the pool? -- Ian. Hi Ian There's two zfs filesystems, one of 2.2T shared via CIFS and one of 500G which is shared by ISCSI, used for Timemachine and thus reformated into UFS+. Regards Andy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anybody in OpenSolaris land run in to this bug in Open Office?
> >> I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in > >> OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development > version > >> of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris > >> 2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either > of > >> them. Can this just be hearsay? > > > > Hi Thommy, > > > > A small correction I might add: the OpenSolaris > 2009.06 LiveCD does not seem to come with OOo (as far > as I can tell). > > > > As of yesterday, only OOo 3.0 was in the default > repo. This is the last version of OOo where this bug > still exists. > > > > But as of today, the repository has been updated, > and the version of OOo has been elevated to 3.1. As > you correctly pointed out, this notorious bug no > longer shows up!!! (I am sure this repository update > has nothing to do with Anon's post. :-) ) > > OpenOffice 3.1 has been in the repository for a month > now at least I > believe. Perhaps you missed it accidentally? > > Cheers, > -- > Shawn Walker You could be right, as I remember I forgot to do a repo update when I installed OOo last night. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
Ok this is bug 9909/bugster 6863859. Very frustrating! Thanks for the help anyway! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Long Startup Times (2.5hrs) in 2009.06
Ian, as this is orphaned from the main thread, can you delete the post? Thanks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] dev repository issues??
Shawn - thanx for the quick turn on this... frankly i had tried to send thw original mail three time in the last week, and it never made to the list so thanx also to Derek for fixing that... yes, im running 118, was this in the release notes and i missed it(not so unusual), or is it a post release issue??? so thanx for the redirection, i was under the false assumption that pkg-discuss was about IPS as a technology not the implementation at the repository level... i will try the work-around and if not successful i will post to the appropriate lists. thanx again, rich Shawn Walker wrote: Rich Reynolds wrote: Hi all - where do we need to log issues with the dev repository??? Report them to the pkg-discuss mailing list. I have tried to fetch some things and every fetch breaks in the same way, even after flushing my download cache... so i suspect broken files, because if it was network, it would not likely be a break at the same place... Are you running build 118 and are you seeing timeout errors? If so, due to a known issue, you'll have to set an environment variable before running the pkg command: export PKG_CLIENT_TIMEOUT=900 Where 900 is the number of seconds to wait before timing out. See bug 10010 for the timeout issue. Alternatively, describe your issues in detail. Cheers, ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] dev repository issues??
Rich Reynolds wrote: Shawn - thanx for the quick turn on this... frankly i had tried to send thw original mail three time in the last week, and it never made to the list so thanx also to Derek for fixing that... yes, im running 118, was this in the release notes and i missed it(not so unusual), or is it a post release issue??? It was in the release announcement: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=107862&tstart=15 so thanx for the redirection, i was under the false assumption that pkg-discuss was about IPS as a technology not the implementation at the repository level... The pkg(5) team maintains the pkg.opensolaris.org repositories in addition to the pkg software. i will try the work-around and if not successful i will post to the appropriate lists. Please do. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] zpool attach, prtvtoc, fmthard fmthard: Cannot open device /dev/rdsk/c8t2
successfully installed 2009 06 on hp pavillion dv9000. i had linux before. system has 2 harddrives. has solaris installed on one and wanted to mirror the other one. 1. used format to delete the ext3 partition and create solaris2, on the second drive. 2. trying to copy volume table of contents to drive 2 before attaching to the pool. pfexec prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c8t0d0s2 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c8t2d0s2 getting this. fmthard: Cannot open device /dev/rdsk/c8t2d0s2 - Permission denied the disk seems ok as i can install linux suse11 and windows...it seems like format thinks it is still busy with something??? tried to format the second disk using format. Retry format without mode selects and Grown Defects list? y Formatting... Illegal request during format: block 0 (0x0) (0/0/0) ASC: 0x20 ASCQ: 0x0 Illegal request during format: block 0 (0x0) (0/0/0) ASC: 0x20 ASCQ: 0x0 failed here is the output from disk selection Total disk size is 14593 cylinders Cylinder size is 16065 (512 byte) blocks Cylinders Partition StatusType Start End Length% = == = === == === 1 ActiveSolaris2 1 1459214592100 Please help! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?
Although we don't use it in any of the data centers that I've worked at (we either pay the exhorbitant, over-priced Red Hat support fees or use CentOS free of charge), I suspect that Oracle's Unbreakable Enterprise Linux is probably doing a lot better than people around here give it credit for doing. They already had a decent customer base of 26 major customers back in March 2007, as reading the article at the following link below will show: http://www.cbronline.com/news/oracle_names_26_unbreakable_linux_customers And then about eight months later the number of customers somehow increased exponentially from 26 customers to 1,500 customers (!) as you can see from this link: http://www.linuxlookup.com/2007/nov/15/oracle_unbreakable_linux_support_demonstrates_exceptional_momentum Customers for Oracle Enterprise Linux include the following: Yahoo!, Timex, Diebold, Globecast, ABC Stores, Mutual Materials, Abercrombie & Fitch, Mitsubishi, Nissan, the New York State Insurance Dept... I don't know about the rest of you, but as a long time Red Hat user and sysadmin I'm actually looking forward to running Oracle Unbreakable Enterprise Linux.. ..in an LX brand SOLARIS ZONE!!! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] problem with parcellite package
Santheep, I think you need to install the SUNWgnome-common-devel package from the IPS repository in order for your software to build correctly. Type in this command at the BASH command line: pkg info SUNWgnome-common-devel If the output of the command looks like this: pkg: no packages matching the following patterns you specified are installed on the system. Try specifying -r to query remotely then try running this command: pkg info -r SUNWgnome-common-devel to query the remote package repository. Likewise, you can also search for intltool in the remote package repository by typing in this command: pkg search -r intltool and you will see that /usr/lib/intltool is part of the SUNWgnome-common-devel package. To install the package type in this command: pfexec pkg install SUNWgnome-common-devel and the package should install itself if you have the appropriate permissions. After it's done installing you should be able to compile parcellite. If you're still having problems, let me know in this thread and I will do what I can to help. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] zpool attach, prtvtoc, fmthard fmthard: Cannot open device /dev/rdsk/c8t2
Hi gahlawat, if what you are trying to do is mirror your root zpool (rpool?) on two different disks, this link below contains some instructions that might help: http://darkstar-solaris.blogspot.com/2008/09/zfs-root-mirror.html Try following those steps and tell me if it works. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
