X509_new
Hi,
We are new developing applications with the openssl libraries. We are
trying to develop a very simple application, we want to create an empty
certificate. The source code of our application is as follows:
#include openssl/x509.h
#include openssl/pem.h
#include openssl/err.h
#include stdio.h
void main void ()
{
X509* x;
.
.
.
x = X509_new();
.
.
.
}
When we build it, we obtain an error: unresolved external symbol _X509_new.
We have added the path where X509.h file is. We don't know what's
happening. Could anyone help us please? Thanks in advance,
Aintzane
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X509_new
This a openssl-users group question but... ¿Are you linking with OpenSSL
libraries?
(-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lcrypto line in your makefile, or libeay32.lib in
your VC++ project libraries tab)
- Original Message -
From: Aintzane Armentia Diaz de Tuesta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: X509_new
Hi,
We are new developing applications with the openssl libraries. We
are
trying to develop a very simple application, we want to create an
empty
certificate. The source code of our application is as follows:
#include openssl/x509.h
#include openssl/pem.h
#include openssl/err.h
#include stdio.h
void main void ()
{
X509* x;
.
.
.
x = X509_new();
.
.
.
}
When we build it, we obtain an error: unresolved external symbol
_X509_new.
We have added the path where X509.h file is. We don't know
what's
happening. Could anyone help us please? Thanks in advance,
Aintzane
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #650] [PATCH] new option '-issuer_hash' for the x509 command
Hi, attached is a small patch to implement a new '-issuer_hash' option for the 'x509' command. With this patch 'openssl x509 -issuer_hash ...' returns the hash value of the issuer name (similar to the normal '-hash' option which returns the hash value of the subject name). Regards, Nils __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: d2i and ASN1_CHOICE
I found the error. At the end, the problem was a bad definition of
Sub_seq100. I have fixed it and ASN1_CHOICE works fine now. Thanks to all.
Regards.
Fernando Moya Bernal.
University of Malaga. Spain.
Hi, I am having problems with CHOICE in the following ASN.1 sequence:
-
DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS
Sub_seq200 ::= SEQUENCE
{
sub_field1 Sub_seq100 OPTIONAL,
sub_field2 [0] Sub_seq400 OPTIONAL
}
Seq1 ::= CHOICE
{
field1 Sub_seq100,
field2 [0] Sub_seq200
}
-
Implemented by:
typedef struct Sub_seq200_st
{
Sub_seq100 *sub_field1;
Sub_seq200 *sub_field2;
}Sub_seq200;
typedef struct Seq1_st
{
int type;
union {
char *ptr;
Sub_seq100 *field1;
Sub_seq200 *field2;
}value;
}Seq1;
ASN1_SEQUENCE(Sub_seq200) = {
ASN1_OPT(Sub_seq200,sub_field1, Sub_seq100),
ASN1_IMP_OPT(Sub_seq200,sub_field2, Sub_seq400,0),
} ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(Sub_seq200)
IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(Sub_seq200)
ASN1_CHOICE(Seq1) = {
ASN1_SIMPLE(Seq1, value.field1,Sub_seq100),
ASN1_IMP(Seq1, value.field2,Sub_seq200, 0)
} ASN1_CHOICE_END(Seq1)
IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(Seq1)
Well, Seq1_new, Seq1_free and i2d_Seq1 functions work correctly and DER
output is right, but when I call d2i_Seq1 with DER output from i2d_Seq1,
it
returns NULL. I think it could be an incorrect definition of
ASN1_CHOICE(Seq1).
Does Anybody know what is wrong?
See what error message you get with ERR_print_errors_fp(srderr);
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson.
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Freelance consultant see: http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP key: via homepage.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
submission: GOST objects
Dear OpenSSL team, please accept object definitions from recent IETF drafts: draft-leontiev-cryptopro-cpcms-00.txt draft-leontiev-cryptopro-cppk-00.txt draft-chudov-cryptopro-cptls-00.txt Also attached is a CA certificate using this objects for signature algorithm, public key type and parameters. Hint wanted: what exactly is a 1.3.6.1.4.311.21.1 object listed as the last extension there? thank you, Vadim Fedukovich -- Naina library: http://www.unity.net/~vf/naina_r1.tgz certnew.cer Description: Binary data --- crypto/objects/objects.txt.orig Fri Dec 20 11:39:42 2002 +++ crypto/objects/objects.txt Mon Jun 30 23:44:04 2003 @@ -915,3 +915,45 @@ rsadsi 3 10: DES-CDMF : des-cdmf rsadsi 1 1 6 : rsaOAEPEncryptionSET + +member-body 643: ISO-RU: ISO RU Member Body +ISO-RU 2 : rans +rans 2 : cryptopro + +cryptopro 3: GOSTsig-R3410-ECC +cryptopro 4: GOSTsig-R3410-modprime +cryptopro 9: GOSThash-R3411 +cryptopro 10 : GOSThmac-R3411 +cryptopro 13 1 : GOSTkeyWrap +cryptopro 14 1 : GOSTkeyMix +cryptopro 19 : GOSTpk-R3410-ECC +cryptopro 20 : GOSTpk-R3410-modprime +cryptopro 21 : GOST28147 + +cryptopro 30 : GOST-hashes +cryptopro 32 : GOST-signs +cryptopro 33 : GOST-exchanges +cryptopro 35 : GOST-eccsigns +cryptopro 36 : GOST-eccexchanges +cryptopro 37 : GOST-privkeys + +GOST-hashes 0 : GOST-hashparam-test +GOST-hashes 1 : GOST-hashparam-default + +GOST-signs 0 : GOST-pkparam-test +GOST-signs 2 : GOST-pkparam-A +GOST-signs 3 : GOST-pkparam-B +GOST-signs 4 : GOST-pkparam-C +GOST-signs 5 : GOST-pkparam-D + +GOST-eccsigns 0: GOST-eccparam-test +GOST-eccsigns 1: GOST-eccparam-A +GOST-eccsigns 2: GOST-eccparam-B +GOST-eccsigns 3: GOST-eccparam-C + +GOST-exchanges 1 : GOST-XchA +GOST-exchanges 2 : GOST-XchB +GOST-exchanges 3 : GOST-XchC + +GOST-eccexchanges 0: GOST-eccXchA +GOST-eccexchanges 1: GOST-eccXchB
