Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3544] Remove MWERKS support

[NormW via RT]

Thanks!
Norm

On 18/12/2014 9:26 AM, Rich Salz via RT wrote:
 MWERKS added back to nw_rand.c
 --
 Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org

 ___
 openssl-dev mailing list
 openssl-dev@openssl.org
 https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev



___
openssl-dev mailing list
openssl-dev@openssl.org
https://mta.opensslfoundation.net/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

[openssl.org #2226] OSSL 1.0.0 and NetWare + nasm

[NormW via RT]

Hi,
If I try to build for win32 I do:

 perl Configure VC-WIN32 --prefix=c:\some\openssl\dir

then (via ms\do_nasm.bat)
 perl util\mkfiles.pl MINFO
 perl util\mk1mf.pl dll nasm VC-WIN32 ms\ntdll.mak

I get ms\ntdll.mak that includes asm support, such as:

 $(TMP_D)\x86cpuid.asm: crypto\x86cpuid.pl
   $(PERL) crypto\x86cpuid.pl win32n $(CFLAG) $@

 $(OBJ_D)\x86cpuid.obj: $(TMP_D)\x86cpuid.asm
   $(ASM) -o $@ $(TMP_D)\x86cpuid.asm

When I run the same process for NetWare:

 perl Configure netware-libc
 perl util\mkfiles.pl MINFO
 perl util\mk1mf.pl nw-nasm netware-libc Netware\netware-libc.mak

the resulting .mak file has none of the asm targets or objects in the 
libraries and (consequently) linking of nlm's fail. (A build of OSSL 
without asm support builds correctly).

In builds of OSSL 0.9.8 the NetWare asm files were built separately (in 
Netware\build.bat) but see no reason why targets similar to that for 
win32 (above) cannot be used (with proper variable substitution) for 
NetWare, thereby standardising the build process... Any assistance for 
resolving the absence of asm targets for NetWare is appreciated.

Regards,
Norm


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org

[openssl.org #1948] [PROPOSAL] change ecdsatest,enginetest to fit into 8.3 naming scheme

[NormW via RT]

Hi all,
On NetWare CLIB platform Perl has problems with executing tests with
longer names than 8.3 dos style. Since this problem occurs only with
these two tests (ecdsatest, enginetest) can we perhaps rename these to 
fit an 8.3 scheme?

Thanks
Norm

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org