[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3719] Bug report: Documentation for -no_explicit option of openssl ocsp missing

2015-02-25 Thread Matt Caswell via RT
Steve has added documentation for this. Closing ticket.

Matt

___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev


[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3719] Bug report: Documentation for -no_explicit option of openssl ocsp missing

2015-02-24 Thread Stephan Mühlstrasser via RT
There's no documentation available for the -no_explicit option of 
openssl ocsp:

https://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/ocsp.html

Dr. Henson explained the meaning of the option and of the corresponding 
flag OCSP_NOEXPLICIT for OCSP_basic_verify() like this on the 
openssl-users list:

 If the responder root CA is set to be trusted for OCSP signing then it can be
 used to sign OCSP responses for any certificate (aka a global responder). This
 comes under:

1. Matches a local configuration of OCSP signing authority for the
certificate in question

 or alternatively:

Additional acceptance or rejection criteria may apply to either the
response itself or to the certificate used to validate the signature
on the response.

 from RFC2560 et al.

 If the -no_explicit flag is set or OCSP_NOEXPLICIT is set then this behaviour
 is disabled.


--
Stephan


___
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev