Re: [External] : Agenda for the next OTC meeting
> I would like to also discuss code coverage, and in particular adding tests > for any new code that is added. It was always my understanding that our policy was that tests need to be added. We have a checkbox in the pull request to indicate that it's been done. But maybe it's not written down in a document that that is what is expected. Kurt
Re: [External] : Agenda for the next OTC meeting
I would like to also discuss code coverage, and in particular adding tests for any new code that is added. From: openssl-project on behalf of Matt Caswell Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 10:23 PM To: openssl-project@openssl.org Subject: [External] : Agenda for the next OTC meeting My proposed agenda for the next OTC meeting (2021-10-19): 1) Nominate a minute taker and confirm agenda 2) Review policy process strawman 3) PR #16725 4) Agree agenda for next meeting 5) AOB Matt
Re: Agenda for the next OTC meeting
I'd like to add 2 more items to the agenda: 1. Do we want to restart the GH items review in this or that form? 2. Can we do anything with file load performance regression On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 2:23 PM Matt Caswell wrote: > My proposed agenda for the next OTC meeting (2021-10-19): > > 1) Nominate a minute taker and confirm agenda > 2) Review policy process strawman > 3) PR #16725 > 4) Agree agenda for next meeting > 5) AOB > > > Matt > > -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
Agenda for the next OTC meeting
My proposed agenda for the next OTC meeting (2021-10-19): 1) Nominate a minute taker and confirm agenda 2) Review policy process strawman 3) PR #16725 4) Agree agenda for next meeting 5) AOB Matt
