Re: OTC Vote: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to set parameters.

2021-02-02 Thread Tomas Mraz
We discussed that within the call. We did not add the 'optional' word
because the meaning of it is convoluted with the parameter being really
optional (as in fn(a, b, ...)). That the caller can pass NULL as
OSSL_PARAM array pointer is already implicit.

On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 11:28 +, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
> +1
> 
> I recall that in our discussion the OSSL_PARAM array pointer was
> intended to be optional,
> i.e., NULL pointers allowed. Maybe the word 'optional' should be
> added as follows?
> 
>EVP init functions should accept an *optional* OSSL_PARAM array to
> set parameters.
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: openssl-project  On
> > Behalf Of Dr Paul Dale
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 10:18 AM
> > To: openssl-project@openssl.org
> > Subject: OTC Vote: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM
> > array to set parameters.
> > 
> > topic: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to set
> > parameters.
> > comment: This will mostly avoid calling the equivalent set_param
> > call.
> > Proposed by pauli.
> > Public: yes
> > opened: 2020-02-02
> > closed: 2020-02-02
> > accepted:  yes  (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 1, not voted: 2)
-- 
Tomáš Mráz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
  Turkish proverb
[You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your
conscience.]




RE: OTC Vote: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to set parameters.

2021-02-02 Thread Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
+1

I recall that in our discussion the OSSL_PARAM array pointer was intended to be 
optional,
i.e., NULL pointers allowed. Maybe the word 'optional' should be added as 
follows?

   EVP init functions should accept an *optional* OSSL_PARAM array to set 
parameters.


> -Original Message-
> From: openssl-project  On Behalf Of Dr 
> Paul Dale
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 10:18 AM
> To: openssl-project@openssl.org
> Subject: OTC Vote: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to 
> set parameters.
> 
> topic: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to set
> parameters.
> comment: This will mostly avoid calling the equivalent set_param call.
> Proposed by pauli.
> Public: yes
> opened: 2020-02-02
> closed: 2020-02-02
> accepted:  yes  (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 1, not voted: 2)


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


OTC Vote: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to set parameters.

2021-02-02 Thread Dr Paul Dale
topic: EVP init functions should accept an OSSL_PARAM array to set 
parameters.

comment: This will mostly avoid calling the equivalent set_param call.
Proposed by pauli.
Public: yes
opened: 2020-02-02
closed: 2020-02-02
accepted:  yes  (for: 8, against: 0, abstained: 1, not voted: 2)