Re: Is CRL verification automatic in openSSL?

2012-03-29 Thread Ashok C
Hi,

On further investigation, we have found that the addition of the following
piece of code enables the CRL checking.

X509_STORE *store = getStore();



// Enable CRL checking

X509_VERIFY_PARAM *param = X509_VERIFY_PARAM_new();

X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags(param, X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK);

X509_STORE_set1_param(store, param);
X509_VERIFY_PARAM_free(param);

And it is also clear that we need to use SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations() is
required to be used to load CA certificate + CRL concatenated into a PEM
file.(Alternatively CAPath also, but we did not try that yet).

I guess my problems are solved for now. If you guys have any comments on
this, please let me know. Otherwise you can ignore the previous email.

Regds,
Ashok

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Ashok C ash@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 I am implementing CRL feature for my application and was doing a proof of
 concept using openSSL.
 Here is what I did:

1. I used openssl commands to generate a v3 root CA certificate and
also the corresponding server certificate.
2. Now i revoked the server certificate using openssl commands.
3. First I tested this with the openSSL s_client and s_server. I
understood from googling, that I need to use the -crl-check option in the
s_client side to do the CRL validation and as instructed in the reference
manual, I concatenated my CA certificate as well as the CRL into a single
PEM file and passed it to openssl client in the -CAFile field.
4. Things went as expected and I got the error code for CRL validation
failure.
5. Next step, I wanted to do the same for my sample SSL client and
server.
6. Here, from my client side, I loaded the concatenated cert + crl
into combined.pem and loaded it using
7. SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations(ctx,combined.pem,NULL). While doing
the SSL connection, I found that the CRL _was not_ checked. (I understand
now that this is NOT the API to set the CRL into verification paths)
8. Later, from further reading I understood that CRL check is not done
by default and I need to add the CRL to the verification paths using X509
level APIs. (

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4389954/does-openssl-automatically-handle-crls-certificate-revocation-lists-now
)

 

 X509_STORE *store = getStore();



 // Enable CRL checking

 X509_VERIFY_PARAM *param = X509_VERIFY_PARAM_new();

 X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags(param, X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK);

 X509_STORE_set1_param(store, param);

 X509_VERIFY_PARAM_free(param);
 

 I am going to try this out now, but before that , wanted to check with the
 community:

- If the way I am proceeding is correct?
- Are there any other simpler ways to do this?
- What would be best approach to follow for CRL checking enabling?
- Are there any SSL_CTX level APIs for this now?


 I am using openssl version openssl-0.9.8r(Also wanted to know if this
 behaviour has changed in higher versions of openssl)
 Thanks in advance!

 Regds,
 Ashok





Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012, Prashanth kumar N wrote:

 Thanks Marek. I will try the attached code in the attached files.
 In many of the examples i have come across, i see IV is always being. Is it
 not possible to use this API by setting IV to NULL? (As i understand for
 CBC IV is a must) . In AES_Encrypt(), we don't use IV. Does this mean this
 does stream ciphering (byte by byte)?
 

The IV should be random and must be set to the same value on encrypt and
decrypt. The information isn't security sensitive and can be sent in plain 
text. 

If you use AES_encrypt you're effectively using ECB mode.

 Does any one know if Openssl supports AES-XTS? Reason is we are exploring
 to see if we can employ this.
 When i Googled, i did see some change request log which said AES-XTS has
 been added to Openssl in v1.1.0 which i am not able to find for download...
 Any idea on this?
 

XTS mode is very new and only supported in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and later. You use
EVP_CIPHER functions EVP_aes_128_xts() and EVP_aes_256_xts().

Note that the key length is double that for nomal AES. You can get the key
length of any cipher (provided you use EVP) using EVP_CIPHER_key_length().

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org


Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Ken Goldman

On 3/29/2012 1:40 AM, Prashanth kumar N wrote:

Thanks Ken for pointing out the mistake...  after changing to
AES_Decrypt(), it worked but i still see issue when i print the
decrypted output as it has extra non-ascii characters in it.


That's what happens in C if you try to printf an array that's not NUL 
terminated.  The printf just keeps going, right past the end of the 
buffer, until it either hits a \0 or segfaults.


You encrypted 16 bytes, not nul terminated, decrypted to the same 16 
bytes, then pretended that it was nul terminated and tried to printf.



Below is the input
  unsigned char text[]=test12345678abc2;
After decryption, i get the following string: Decrypted o/p:
test12345678abc2Ȳu�z�B�����A��S��
Few questions...

1. If we use AES, will decrypted files have same number of bytes as
encrypted file? (I assume it should be same)


It depends on the mode and padding scheme.  Some (CTR, OFB) don't pad, 
some (CFC) do pad.


If you're just playing, fine.  But if this is a real product you're 
designing, you shouldn't be asking this question.  It's time to hire a 
crypto expert.  Otherwise, your product will be insecure.








__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org


Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Prashanth kumar N
Stephen,

Does it mean we can't use AES without IV ?

As per XTS support in Openssl, i find the following function but don't see
any implementation for the same
AES_xts_encrypt(). I found the below link form which what i understand is
new file called e_aes_xts.c
should be present... am i missing something?

lpermalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.devel/18755



On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.orgwrote:

 On Thu, Mar 29, 2012, Prashanth kumar N wrote:

  Thanks Marek. I will try the attached code in the attached files.
  In many of the examples i have come across, i see IV is always being. Is
 it
  not possible to use this API by setting IV to NULL? (As i understand for
  CBC IV is a must) . In AES_Encrypt(), we don't use IV. Does this mean
 this
  does stream ciphering (byte by byte)?
 

 The IV should be random and must be set to the same value on encrypt and
 decrypt. The information isn't security sensitive and can be sent in plain
 text.

 If you use AES_encrypt you're effectively using ECB mode.

  Does any one know if Openssl supports AES-XTS? Reason is we are exploring
  to see if we can employ this.
  When i Googled, i did see some change request log which said AES-XTS has
  been added to Openssl in v1.1.0 which i am not able to find for
 download...
  Any idea on this?
 

 XTS mode is very new and only supported in OpenSSL 1.0.1 and later. You use
 EVP_CIPHER functions EVP_aes_128_xts() and EVP_aes_256_xts().

 Note that the key length is double that for nomal AES. You can get the key
 length of any cipher (provided you use EVP) using EVP_CIPHER_key_length().

 Steve.
 --
 Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
 Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
 __
 OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
 User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
 Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org



Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Prashanth kumar N
Bit confusing... are you saying that i need to add NULL termination at the
end of encrypted data? Isn't this wrong?  I assume i shouldn't be NULL
terminating the input string which needs to be encrypted.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 On 3/29/2012 1:40 AM, Prashanth kumar N wrote:

 Thanks Ken for pointing out the mistake...  after changing to
 AES_Decrypt(), it worked but i still see issue when i print the
 decrypted output as it has extra non-ascii characters in it.


 That's what happens in C if you try to printf an array that's not NUL
 terminated.  The printf just keeps going, right past the end of the buffer,
 until it either hits a \0 or segfaults.

 You encrypted 16 bytes, not nul terminated, decrypted to the same 16
 bytes, then pretended that it was nul terminated and tried to printf.


  Below is the input
  unsigned char text[]=test12345678abc2;
 After decryption, i get the following string: Decrypted o/p:
 test12345678abc2Ȳu�z�B��� ��A��S�� Few questions...

 1. If we use AES, will decrypted files have same number of bytes as
 encrypted file? (I assume it should be same)


 It depends on the mode and padding scheme.  Some (CTR, OFB) don't pad,
 some (CFC) do pad.

 If you're just playing, fine.  But if this is a real product you're
 designing, you shouldn't be asking this question.  It's time to hire a
 crypto expert.  Otherwise, your product will be insecure.

 My requirement is mainly to support AES XTS but the reason for asking the
 above question was to understand if their is addition of extra bytes to
 encrypted data as it might consume more space when written to a drive...
 does my question make sense?









 __**__**__
 OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
 User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
 Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org



Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Marek . Marcola
Hello,

If your data to encrypt is not exactly 16 bytes (AES block length), you 
should add block
padding before encryption and remove padding after decryption.
In your case you have string virident (8bytes), you should add 16-8=8 
bytes
of padding before encryption (fill last 8 bytes with value 8).
After decryption remove last 8 bytes (filed with value 8).
For printf() you may fill this last 8 bytes to 0.

Best regards,
--
Marek Marcola marek.marc...@malkom.pl


owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org wrote on 03/29/2012 04:02:17 PM:

 Prashanth kumar N prashanth.kuma...@gmail.com 
 Sent by: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
 
 03/29/2012 04:03 PM
 
 Please respond to
 openssl-users@openssl.org
 
 To
 
 openssl-users@openssl.org
 
 cc
 
 Subject
 
 Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl
 
 Bit confusing... are you saying that i need to add NULL termination at 
the end 
 of encrypted data? Isn't this wrong?  I assume i shouldn't be NULL 
terminating the input
 string which needs to be encrypted. 

 On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com 
wrote:
 On 3/29/2012 1:40 AM, Prashanth kumar N wrote:
 Thanks Ken for pointing out the mistake...  after changing to
 AES_Decrypt(), it worked but i still see issue when i print the
 decrypted output as it has extra non-ascii characters in it.
 
 That's what happens in C if you try to printf an array that's not NUL 
terminated.  The 
 printf just keeps going, right past the end of the buffer, until it 
either hits a \0 or segfaults.
 
 You encrypted 16 bytes, not nul terminated, decrypted to the same 16 
bytes, then 
 pretended that it was nul terminated and tried to printf.
 

 Below is the input
  unsigned char text[]=test12345678abc2;
 After decryption, i get the following string: Decrypted o/p:
 test12345678abc2Ȳu�z�B��� ��A��S�� Few questions...
 
 1. If we use AES, will decrypted files have same number of bytes as
 encrypted file? (I assume it should be same)
 
 It depends on the mode and padding scheme.  Some (CTR, OFB) don't pad, 
some (CFC) do pad.
 
 If you're just playing, fine.  But if this is a real product you're 
designing, you 
 shouldn't be asking this question.  It's time to hire a crypto expert. 
 Otherwise, your 
 product will be insecure.
 
 My requirement is mainly to support AES XTS but the reason for asking 
the above question
 was to understand if their is addition of extra bytes to encrypted data 
as it might 
 consume more space when written to a drive... does my question make 
sense?
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 __
 OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
 User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
 Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org


Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Prashanth kumar N
Thanks Marek. If i select CBC mode encryption and i have data which is
not aligned to block, i assume padding will be taken by the API's itself.

-Prashanth

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:50 PM, marek.marc...@malkom.pl wrote:

 Hello,

 If your data to encrypt is not exactly 16 bytes (AES block length), you
 should add block
 padding before encryption and remove padding after decryption.
 In your case you have string virident (8bytes), you should add 16-8=8
 bytes
 of padding before encryption (fill last 8 bytes with value 8).
 After decryption remove last 8 bytes (filed with value 8).
 For printf() you may fill this last 8 bytes to 0.

 Best regards,
 --
 Marek Marcola marek.marc...@malkom.pl


 owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org wrote on 03/29/2012 04:02:17 PM:

  Prashanth kumar N prashanth.kuma...@gmail.com
  Sent by: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
 
  03/29/2012 04:03 PM
 
  Please respond to
  openssl-users@openssl.org
 
  To
 
  openssl-users@openssl.org
 
  cc
 
  Subject
 
  Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl
 
  Bit confusing... are you saying that i need to add NULL termination at
 the end
  of encrypted data? Isn't this wrong?  I assume i shouldn't be NULL
 terminating the input
  string which needs to be encrypted.

  On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com
 wrote:
  On 3/29/2012 1:40 AM, Prashanth kumar N wrote:
  Thanks Ken for pointing out the mistake...  after changing to
  AES_Decrypt(), it worked but i still see issue when i print the
  decrypted output as it has extra non-ascii characters in it.
 
  That's what happens in C if you try to printf an array that's not NUL
 terminated.  The
  printf just keeps going, right past the end of the buffer, until it
 either hits a \0 or segfaults.
 
  You encrypted 16 bytes, not nul terminated, decrypted to the same 16
 bytes, then
  pretended that it was nul terminated and tried to printf.
 

  Below is the input
   unsigned char text[]=test12345678abc2;
  After decryption, i get the following string: Decrypted o/p:
  test12345678abc2Ȳu�z�B��� ��A��S�� Few questions...
 
  1. If we use AES, will decrypted files have same number of bytes as
  encrypted file? (I assume it should be same)
 
  It depends on the mode and padding scheme.  Some (CTR, OFB) don't pad,
 some (CFC) do pad.
 
  If you're just playing, fine.  But if this is a real product you're
 designing, you
  shouldn't be asking this question.  It's time to hire a crypto expert.
  Otherwise, your
  product will be insecure.
 
  My requirement is mainly to support AES XTS but the reason for asking
 the above question
  was to understand if their is addition of extra bytes to encrypted data
 as it might
  consume more space when written to a drive... does my question make
 sense?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  __
  OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
  User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
  Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org



Re: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012, Prashanth kumar N wrote:

 Thanks Marek. If i select CBC mode encryption and i have data which is
 not aligned to block, i assume padding will be taken by the API's itself.
 

Only if you use EVP. For low level APIs you have to manually add and remove
padding.

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org


RE: How to do encryption using AES in Openssl

2012-03-29 Thread Dave Thompson
   From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Prashanth kumar N
   Sent: Thursday, 29 March, 2012 10:02

   Bit confusing... are you saying that i need to add NULL termination 
 at the end of encrypted data? Isn't this wrong?  I assume i shouldn't be 
 NULL terminating the input string which needs to be encrypted. 

That's not what he said. See below.

   On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com
wrote:

   On 3/29/2012 1:40 AM, Prashanth kumar N wrote:


   Thanks Ken for pointing out the mistake...  after
changing to
   AES_Decrypt(), it worked but i still see issue when
i print the
   decrypted output as it has extra non-ascii
characters in it.

 That's what happens in C if you try to printf an array that's not 
 NUL terminated.  The printf just keeps going, right past the end of the
buffer, 
 until it either hits a \0 or segfaults.

 You encrypted 16 bytes, not nul terminated, decrypted to the same 
 16 bytes, then pretended that it was nul terminated and tried to printf. 

This is partly wrong. The input actually was nul-terminated, because
  unsigned char text[]=test12345678abc2;
allocates 17 bytes. If you had used printf %s on that input, it 
would have worked. But the termination wasn't needed for AES_Encrypt 
which takes exactly 16 bytes (one block) and ignores any more.
In general crypto routines like OpenSSL work on arbitrary bytes with 
explicit lengths or fixed length like here, not using nul-termination.
*Sometimes* plaintext is actually human-readable or otherwise printable 
characters, but sometimes it isn't, and (modern) ciphertext never is.

Similarly AES_Encrypt gives and AES_Decrypt takes exactly 16 bytes, 
as you did correctly, and AES_Decrypt gives exactly 16 bytes. So far 
so good. But those 16 bytes don't include a nul-terminator, and 
aren't followed by one in the same array, so when you use printf %s 
which *requires* a nul-terminated string, it screws up. Similarly 
if you used other C string functions like strcpy() strlen().

There are ways in C to handle character arrays that aren't 
nul-terminated. In this case you could use:
  printf (Decrypted: %.16s\n, decrypted);
which prints until nul OR 16 chars whichever is hit first.

But usually in C it's easiest to follow the beaten path and use 
nul-termination. To do that you need to decrypt into an array of 
*17* unsigned chars and set decrypted[16] = 0. Or if you prefer,
decrypt into an array of 16 bytes, then memcpy() that to an array 
of 17 bytes where you add the nul-terminator.


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing Listopenssl-users@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   majord...@openssl.org