Using filter BIO's and MD5

2002-04-25 Thread Jerry Napoli


Hello,

I'm trying generate a base64 encoding of an MD5 hash of a string using a
chain of filter BIO's attached to a memory BIO sink.  When I extract the
data from the memory BIO (after performing a BIO_write followed by a
BIO_flush), it appears that only the base64 encoding is performed.  When
I remove the base64 filter BIO from the chain, the data extracted from
the memory BIO is unaltered.

I have no problems performing an MD5 hash using the underlying EVP_
functions directly, but I was hoping to be able to use a chain of BIO
filters instead.

Does anyone have suggestions on this matter?

Thanks in advance,
Jerry Napoli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: I need basic assistance!

2002-01-30 Thread Jerry Napoli

Unzip the package, then follow the instructions in the INSTALL.W32 file
(I assume you're on win-32 platform).

Once you've build everything, it should then be a matter of using the
openssl.exe commandline utility:

 openssl pkcs12 -in input-file -inform DER -out output-file
-outform PEM

Hope this helps.

Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Ann Eklund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I need basic assistance!


I've never used OpenSSL before--all I want to do is convert a PKCS#12
certificate to a PEM or CRT certificate. 

I downloaded openssl-engine-0.9.6c.tar.gz and tried to extract it, but
WinZip doesn't do it--it wants to use WinZipClassic, which I must be
doing something wrong--I'm not able to get anywhere that looks like an
executable program. 

Can someone walk me through this? Please/thanks.

Ann


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Question on SSL_dup...

2001-12-27 Thread Jerry Napoli

Out of curiosity, doesn't one also have to lock the SSL* itself against
concurrent access during read/write operations, or does OpenSSL guard it
for the programmer?

thanks,
jerry


-Original Message-
From: Sankaran Narayanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question on SSL_dup...


 I am afraid that SSL_dup() does not fulfill your requirements.
 You can only have one datastream through one SSL object at a time,
 so that you cannot have two threads concurrently accessing one SSL
object.
 Thanks. It was fairly trivial to write a reference counted wrapper
object
for SSL*, so that i could avoid using SSL_dup and still allow multiple
threads to
do free.

thanks anyway.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]