Thanks very much. That helps a little. it's also in the Makefile very
clearly.
And why not use "1.0.1", like the "0.9.8" stream used?
Thanks again.
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Jeremy Farrell
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:01 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries have "1.0.0" in the names
opensslv.h
From: dave.mclel...@emc.com [mailto:dave.mclel...@emc.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:43 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.1 libraries have "1.0.0" in the names
I'm seeing "1.0.0" used in the library (.so) names for crypto and ssl versions.
I expected to see 1.0.1, consistent with the 0.9.X stream, where the version
number agrees with version in the library name (as referenced in the link of
the openssl executable for example).
Can someone help me understand why it shouldn't "1.0.1" in the library
reference names? I'm sorry if I've missed the mention of this in the CHANGES,
README, etc.
I have the official release kit, having moved on from beta3 kit.
Thanks.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Dave McLellan, Symmetrix Software Engineering
EMC Corporation, 176 South St, Hopkinton MA
Mail Stop 176-B1 1/P-36
office 508-249-1257, fax 508-497-8027
cell 978-500-2546
+-+-+-+-+-+-+
