Re: openssl 1.1.1k on solaris 2.6 sparc
Michael Wojcik wrote: From: openssl-users On Behalf Of david raingeard Sent: Thursday, 24 June, 2021 07:06 I compiled it using sun compiler, with some modifications to the source code. If memory serves, OpenSSL doesn't work on Solaris SPARC if built using the Sun compiler. You have to use GCC. I'm pretty sure we discovered this in our SPARC product builds. This, and some other platform issues (there's one with GCC optimization on x86 64-bit, the details of which escape me now), are things I keep hoping to find time to dig into, but more-pressing work never seems to ease up. -- Michael Wojcik You can build it on Solaris 10 SPARC, using Studio 12.2 for 32 bit, and Studio 12.4 for 64 bit. Make sure that these are fully patched up. -- Jeff Wieland, UNIX Systems Administrator Purdue University IT Infrastructure Services UNIX Platforms
RE: openssl 1.1.1k on solaris 2.6 sparc
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of david > raingeard > Sent: Thursday, 24 June, 2021 07:06 > I compiled it using sun compiler, with some modifications to the source code. If memory serves, OpenSSL doesn't work on Solaris SPARC if built using the Sun compiler. You have to use GCC. I'm pretty sure we discovered this in our SPARC product builds. This, and some other platform issues (there's one with GCC optimization on x86 64-bit, the details of which escape me now), are things I keep hoping to find time to dig into, but more-pressing work never seems to ease up. -- Michael Wojcik
openssl 1.1.1k on solaris 2.6 sparc
Hello, I compiled it using sun compiler, with some modifications to the source code. However :) openssl s_client -connect google.com:443 -tls1_2 works fine ! But openssl s_client -connect google.com:443 -tls1_3 fails on CRYPTO_memcmp. For easy debugging, I have made a copy of CRYPTO_memcmp in gcm128, called CRYPTO_gcm128_memcmp. Here is what I get (added some log ). As you can see, ctx->Xi.c and tag don't match. I have looked for hours to find why, with no luck yet. Any idea how to debug this ? Some tests to run to check if everything is ok ? crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1931 ctx->EK0.u[0]=a2e1d0203e9a02ca crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1932 ctx->EK0.u[1]=9fc11c97afde22db crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1933 ctx->Xi.u[0]=a22699a2cb77c69d crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1934 ctx->Xi.u[1]=5af190e82eeffaf3 crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1937 after xor: crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1938 ctx->Xi.u[0]=c74982f5edc457 crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1939 ctx->Xi.u[1]=c5308c7f8131d828 crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1941 crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1834 CRYPTO_gcm128_memcmp len=16 00^a7 c7^c1 49^4d 82^51 f5^0b ed^25 c4^ae 57^26 c5^d2 30^66 8c^33 7f^82 81^0f 31^75 d8^a4 28^e0 crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1842 CRYPTO_gcm128_memcmp crypto/modes/gcm128.c:1957 ret = 255
