date:20130404

Re: [Openstack] CY13-Q1 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs Eucalyptus vs CloudStack

2013-04-04 Thread Qingye Jiang (John)

Thanks a lot for the hints. This is very helpful.

John

在 2013-4-3，下午6:29，Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com 写道：

 On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
 Qingye Jiang (John) wrote:
 I saw Jay's suggestion on removing review.openstack.org from the git domain 
 analysis. Can you shed some light on how this system works? Is this system 
 shadowing more real code contributors?
 
 Merge commits are created in git history when branches are merged.
 They appear as having two parent commits. In OpenStack, our Gerrit
 review system automatically creates them when merging into master, so
 jenk...@review.openstack.org appears as the author of all of them.
 
 NB you don't need to exclude based on author name. You can simply ask
 git for the history, without merges using 'git log --no-merges'
 
 Regards,
 Daniel
 -- 
 |: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
 |: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
 |: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
 |: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] How to purge old meter data of Ceilometer

2013-04-04 Thread Harri Pyy

With the default 1 minute interval, Ceilometer collects quite large amounts of 
meter data.

Does Ceilometer provide a TTL configuration option for the meter data, or some 
other functionality or API for purging old meter data?
 
Thanks for any help,
Harri


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] How to purge old meter data of Ceilometer

2013-04-04 Thread Julien Danjou

On Thu, Apr 04 2013, Harri Pyy wrote:

 With the default 1 minute interval, Ceilometer collects quite large amounts 
 of meter data.

 Does Ceilometer provide a TTL configuration option for the meter data, or
 some other functionality or API for purging old meter data?

Not yet unfortunately.

-- 
Julien Danjou
;; Free Software hacker ; freelance consultant
;; http://julien.danjou.info


pgp1Idj4d32BF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] Could not connect to VM

2013-04-04 Thread Avi Bashan

Hello,

I'm having some issues with ping or connecting with SSH to A vm after
creation.

My setup is
- 1 controller node + networking node
- 2 compute nodes

all are running ubuntu 12.04

when trying to ping a vm after creation i get the following output:

ping 50.50.1.3
PING 50.50.1.3 (50.50.1.3) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 109.226.32.198 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable

I can see from the horizon console log that the vm is not getting an ip
address from the metaserver:

wget: can't connect to remote host (169.254.169.254): Network is unreachable

Any help would be very appreciated.

i'm attaching the ifconfig and ovs-vsctl show of the controller
node+network and 1 of the computer nodes.

Thanks,
Avi


controller node+network:

br-ex Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr ac:16:2d:76:03:b8
  inet6 addr: fe80::c494:14ff:fee2:ff34/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:351438 errors:0 dropped:83332 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:21670232 (21.6 MB)  TX bytes:888 (888.0 B)

br-intLink encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 42:98:14:5a:c7:45
  inet6 addr: fe80::852:35ff:fef8:c0d/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:266 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:12828 (12.8 KB)  TX bytes:468 (468.0 B)

br-tunLink encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 3e:6f:76:b8:33:4d
  inet6 addr: fe80::e4be:9ff:fecd:3d69/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:115 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:5706 (5.7 KB)  TX bytes:468 (468.0 B)

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr ac:16:2d:76:03:b8
  inet6 addr: fe80::ae16:2dff:fe76:3b8/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:355057 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:1481 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:23583676 (23.5 MB)  TX bytes:109191 (109.1 KB)
  Interrupt:32

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr ac:16:2d:76:03:b9
  inet addr:172.16.20.1  Bcast:172.16.20.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::ae16:2dff:fe76:3b9/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1217937 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:965032 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:348242626 (348.2 MB)  TX bytes:741457958 (741.4 MB)
  Interrupt:36

eth3  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr ac:16:2d:76:03:bb
  inet addr:109.226.32.196  Bcast:109.226.32.223
 Mask:255.255.255.224
  inet6 addr: fe80::ae16:2dff:fe76:3bb/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:641690 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:153774 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:338543594 (338.5 MB)  TX bytes:31423041 (31.4 MB)
  Interrupt:36

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:39225048 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:39225048 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:8572204782 (8.5 GB)  TX bytes:8572204782 (8.5 GB)

tapb6bae46b-75 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr fa:16:3e:04:79:73
  inet addr:50.50.1.2  Bcast:50.50.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::9004:22ff:fee3:6bc1/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:1056 (1.0 KB)  TX bytes:1098 (1.0 KB)


ovs-vsctl show
1f989ce1-998a-45a7-8eef-e0bda6d8ecc8
Bridge br-int
Port qr-721fe4cd-9d
Interface qr-721fe4cd-9d
type: internal
Port br-int
Interface br-int
type: internal
Port patch-tun
Interface patch-tun
type: patch
options: {peer=patch-int}
Port tapb6bae46b-75
tag: 2
Interface tapb6bae46b-75
type: internal
Bridge br-tun
Port patch-int
Interface patch-int
type: patch
options: {peer=patch-tun}
Port gre-4
Interface gre-4
type: gre

[Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

2013-04-04 Thread Giovanni Colapinto

Hi to all.

I try to configure swift proxy to work with swift-informant.

I've installed swift-informant and add/modify the following section to
/etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:

[pipeline:main]
pipeline = informant healthcheck cache swift3 authtoken keystone
proxy-server

[filter:informant]
use = egg:informant#informant
statsd_host = 10.0.1.154
metric_name_prepend = inndig.

When I start proxy-server it returns the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server, line 22, in module
run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', default_port=8080, **options)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/wsgi.py, line 138,
in run_wsgi
loadapp('config:%s' % conf_file, global_conf={'log_name': log_name})
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
247, in loadapp
return loadobj(APP, uri, name=name, **kw)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
271, in loadobj
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
296, in loadcontext
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
320, in _loadconfig
return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
450, in get_context
global_additions=global_additions)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
562, in _pipeline_app_context
for name in pipeline[:-1]]
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
454, in get_context
section)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
476, in _context_from_use
object_type, name=use, global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
406, in get_context
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
296, in loadcontext
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
328, in _loadegg
return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
620, in get_context
object_type, name=name)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
646, in find_egg_entry_point
possible.append((entry.load(), protocol, entry.name))
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2017, in
load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
  File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/informant-0.0.10-py2.7.egg/informant/middleware.py,
line 16, in module
from swift.common.swob import Request
ImportError: No module named swob

Searching on google I understand that swob is a module of swift = 1.7.5,
but on my ubuntu 12.10 swift is 1.7.4

How can I resolv this situation? Is there a way to upgrade swift?

Thank you
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] New schema for LDAP + Keystone Grizzly?

2013-04-04 Thread Marcelo Mariano Miziara


Hello to all!Before the release of version grizzly 3, the suggested schema in the openstack documentation (http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/configuring-keystone-for-ldap-backend.html) worked fine. This is the suggested schema:dn: cn=openstack,cn=org
dc: openstack
objectClass: dcObject
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: openstack

dn: ou=Groups,cn=openstack,cn=org
objectClass: top
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: groups

dn: ou=Users,cn=openstack,cn=org
objectClass: top
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: users

dn: ou=Roles,cn=openstack,cn=org
objectClass: top
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: rolesBut after the release of the version grizzly 3 I think that's not enough anymore, mainly because of the "domain" concept.I'm kind of lost trying to make LDAP work with keystone now...does anyone succeed in this? I created a new dn, something like:dn: ou=Domains,cn=openstack,cn=org
objectClass: top
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: Domains
But when I run the "keystone-manage db_sync" the "default" domain isn't created in the LDAP...When I manually create the domain in there, I have a problem with authentication...I think I must be doing something wrong, does anyone have a light?Thanks in advance,Marcelo M. Miziara
marcelo.mizi...@serpro.gov.br


-


Esta mensagem do SERVIO FEDERAL DE PROCESSAMENTO DE DADOS (SERPRO), empresa pblica federal regida pelo disposto na Lei Federal n 5.615,  enviada exclusivamente a seu destinatrio e pode conter informaes confidenciais, protegidas por sigilo profissional. Sua utilizao desautorizada  ilegal e sujeita o infrator s penas da lei. Se voc a recebeu indevidamente, queira, por gentileza, reenvi-la ao emitente, esclarecendo o equvoco.

This message from SERVIO FEDERAL DE PROCESSAMENTO DE DADOS (SERPRO) -- a government company established under Brazilian law (5.615/70) -- is directed exclusively to its addressee and may contain confidential data, protected under professional secrecy rules. Its unauthorized use is illegal and may subject the transgressor to the laws penalties. If youre not the addressee, please send it back, elucidating the failure.




___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

2013-04-04 Thread Tong Li


swob is not a separate package, it is part of the swift core. You may
either get older version of informant which does not use swob or upgrade
swift.

Tong Li
Emerging Technologies  Standards
Building 501/B205
liton...@us.ibm.com



From:   Giovanni Colapinto giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
Date:   04/04/2013 04:26 AM
Subject:[Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant
Sent by:openstack-bounces+litong01=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net



Hi to all.

I try to configure swift proxy to work with swift-informant.

I've installed swift-informant and add/modify the following section
to /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:

[pipeline:main]
pipeline = informant healthcheck cache swift3 authtoken keystone
proxy-server

[filter:informant]
use = egg:informant#informant
statsd_host = 10.0.1.154
metric_name_prepend = inndig.

When I start proxy-server it returns the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server, line 22, in module
    run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', default_port=8080, **options)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/wsgi.py, line 138,
in run_wsgi
    loadapp('config:%s' % conf_file, global_conf={'log_name': log_name})
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
247, in loadapp
    return loadobj(APP, uri, name=name, **kw)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
271, in loadobj
    global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
296, in loadcontext
    global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
320, in _loadconfig
    return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
450, in get_context
    global_additions=global_additions)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
562, in _pipeline_app_context
    for name in pipeline[:-1]]
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
454, in get_context
    section)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
476, in _context_from_use
    object_type, name=use, global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
406, in get_context
    global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
296, in loadcontext
    global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
328, in _loadegg
    return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
620, in get_context
    object_type, name=name)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
646, in find_egg_entry_point
    possible.append((entry.load(), protocol, entry.name))
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2017, in
load
    entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
  File
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/informant-0.0.10-py2.7.egg/informant/middleware.py,
 line 16, in module
    from swift.common.swob import Request
ImportError: No module named swob

Searching on google I understand that swob is a module of swift = 1.7.5,
but on my ubuntu 12.10 swift is 1.7.4

How can I resolv this situation? Is there a way to upgrade swift?

Thank you___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
inline: graycol.gif___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

2013-04-04 Thread Giovanni Colapinto

Thank you for the reply. How I can upgrade swift?


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tong Li liton...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 swob is not a separate package, it is part of the swift core. You may
 either get older version of informant which does not use swob or upgrade
 swift.

 Tong Li
 Emerging Technologies  Standards
 Building 501/B205
 liton...@us.ibm.com

 [image: Inactive hide details for Giovanni Colapinto ---04/04/2013
 04:26:57 AM---Hi to all. I try to configure swift proxy to work with]Giovanni
 Colapinto ---04/04/2013 04:26:57 AM---Hi to all. I try to configure swift
 proxy to work with swift-informant.

 From: Giovanni Colapinto giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com
 To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
 Date: 04/04/2013 04:26 AM
 Subject: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant
 Sent by: openstack-bounces+litong01=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
 --



 Hi to all.

 I try to configure swift proxy to work with swift-informant.

 I've installed swift-informant and add/modify the following section to
 /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:

 [pipeline:main]
 pipeline = informant healthcheck cache swift3 authtoken keystone
 proxy-server

 [filter:informant]
 use = egg:informant#informant
 statsd_host = 10.0.1.154
 metric_name_prepend = inndig.

 When I start proxy-server it returns the following error:

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server, line 22, in module
 run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', default_port=8080, **options)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/wsgi.py, line 138,
 in run_wsgi
 loadapp('config:%s' % conf_file, global_conf={'log_name': log_name})
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 247, in loadapp
 return loadobj(APP, uri, name=name, **kw)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 271, in loadobj
 global_conf=global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 296, in loadcontext
 global_conf=global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 320, in _loadconfig
 return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 450, in get_context
 global_additions=global_additions)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 562, in _pipeline_app_context
 for name in pipeline[:-1]]
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 454, in get_context
 section)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 476, in _context_from_use
 object_type, name=use, global_conf=global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 406, in get_context
 global_conf=global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 296, in loadcontext
 global_conf=global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 328, in _loadegg
 return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 620, in get_context
 object_type, name=name)
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
 646, in find_egg_entry_point
 possible.append((entry.load(), protocol, *entry.name*http://entry.name/
 ))
   File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2017, in
 load
 entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
   File
 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/informant-0.0.10-py2.7.egg/informant/middleware.py,
 line 16, in module
 from swift.common.swob import Request
 ImportError: No module named swob

 Searching on google I understand that swob is a module of swift = 1.7.5,
 but on my ubuntu 12.10 swift is 1.7.4

 How can I resolv this situation? Is there a way to upgrade swift?

 Thank you___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


graycol.gif___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] OpenStack on two physical servers - devstack

2013-04-04 Thread Andy Holt

Hello all.

For getting a 'full' OpenStack environment up and running for testing and
semi-serious use, with two physical servers (to enable redundancy), is
devstack still the way to go?

thanks,Andy
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

2013-04-04 Thread Tong Li


on ubuntu, you can try the following.

apt-get install python-software-properties
add-apt-repository ppa:swift-core/release
apt-get update
apt-get install swift python-swiftclient

Also look into the doc at this link.
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/howto_installmultinode.html

If you want to use the latest swift code, you can get the code from github
and build it yourself but I would not recommend to do it for the production
system.

Hope that helps.

Tong Li
Emerging Technologies  Standards
Building 501/B205
liton...@us.ibm.com



From:   Giovanni Colapinto giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com
To: Tong Li/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net, openstack-bounces
+litong01=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
Date:   04/04/2013 09:20 AM
Subject:Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant



Thank you for the reply. How I can upgrade swift?


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tong Li liton...@us.ibm.com wrote:
  swob is not a separate package, it is part of the swift core. You may
  either get older version of informant which does not use swob or upgrade
  swift.

  Tong Li
  Emerging Technologies  Standards
  Building 501/B205
  liton...@us.ibm.com

  Inactive hide details for Giovanni Colapinto ---04/04/2013 04:26:57
  AM---Hi to all. I try to configure swift proxy to work withGiovanni
  Colapinto ---04/04/2013 04:26:57 AM---Hi to all. I try to configure swift
  proxy to work with swift-informant.

  From: Giovanni Colapinto giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com
  To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
  Date: 04/04/2013 04:26 AM
  Subject: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant
  Sent by: openstack-bounces+litong01=us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net




  Hi to all.

  I try to configure swift proxy to work with swift-informant.

  I've installed swift-informant and add/modify the following section
  to /etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:

  [pipeline:main]
  pipeline = informant healthcheck cache swift3 authtoken keystone
  proxy-server

  [filter:informant]
  use = egg:informant#informant
  statsd_host = 10.0.1.154
  metric_name_prepend = inndig.

  When I start proxy-server it returns the following error:

  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server, line 22, in module
      run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', default_port=8080, **options)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/wsgi.py, line 138,
  in run_wsgi
      loadapp('config:%s' % conf_file, global_conf={'log_name': log_name})
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  247, in loadapp
      return loadobj(APP, uri, name=name, **kw)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  271, in loadobj
      global_conf=global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  296, in loadcontext
      global_conf=global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  320, in _loadconfig
      return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  450, in get_context
      global_additions=global_additions)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  562, in _pipeline_app_context
      for name in pipeline[:-1]]
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  454, in get_context
      section)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  476, in _context_from_use
      object_type, name=use, global_conf=global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  406, in get_context
      global_conf=global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  296, in loadcontext
      global_conf=global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  328, in _loadegg
      return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  620, in get_context
      object_type, name=name)
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py, line
  646, in find_egg_entry_point
      possible.append((entry.load(), protocol, entry.name))
    File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py, line 2017, in
  load
      entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(),
  ['__name__'])
    File
  
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/informant-0.0.10-py2.7.egg/informant/middleware.py,
 line 16, in module
      from swift.common.swob import Request
  ImportError: No module named swob

  Searching on google I understand that swob is a module of swift = 1.7.5,
  but on my ubuntu 12.10 swift is 1.7.4

  How can I resolv this situation? Is there a way to upgrade swift?

  Thank you___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net

[Openstack] OpenStack 2013.1 (Grizzly) is released !

2013-04-04 Thread Thierry Carrez

Hello everyone,

The Grizzly development cycle, started 6 months ago, ends today with
the immediate release of OpenStack 2013.1. It is the result of the work
of 550 different people who contributed code, documentation, or
infrastructure configurations. This amazing journey saw the
implementation of 232 blueprints and the fixing of 1900 bugs within the
7 integrated projects alone.

You can find source tarballs for each integrated project, together with
lists of features and bugfixes, at:

OpenStack Compute:https://launchpad.net/nova/grizzly/2013.1
OpenStack Object Storage: https://launchpad.net/swift/grizzly/1.8.0
OpenStack Image Service:  https://launchpad.net/glance/grizzly/2013.1
OpenStack Networking: https://launchpad.net/quantum/grizzly/2013.1
OpenStack Block Storage:  https://launchpad.net/cinder/grizzly/2013.1
OpenStack Identity:   https://launchpad.net/keystone/grizzly/2013.1
OpenStack Dashboard:  https://launchpad.net/horizon/grizzly/2013.1

The Grizzly Release Notes contain an overview of the key features, as
well as upgrade notes and current lists of known issues. You can access
them at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly

In 11 days our community will gather in Portland, OR for the OpenStack
Summit: 4 days of conference to discuss the state of OpenStack and a
Design Summit to plan the next 6-month development cycle, codenamed
Havana. See https://www.openstack.org/summit/portland-2013/ for more
details.

Congratulations everyone on this awesome release !

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Release Manager, OpenStack

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-announce] OpenStack 2013.1 (Grizzly) is released !

2013-04-04 Thread Mark Collier


Amazing accomplishment everyone!  I just posted a blog post with a few 
highlights and included a link to your message, Thierry.
 
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/04/openstack-grizzly/
 


 
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 9:47am, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org 
said:



 Hello everyone,
 
 The Grizzly development cycle, started 6 months ago, ends today with
 the immediate release of OpenStack 2013.1. It is the result of the work
 of 550 different people who contributed code, documentation, or
 infrastructure configurations. This amazing journey saw the
 implementation of 232 blueprints and the fixing of 1900 bugs within the
 7 integrated projects alone.
 
 You can find source tarballs for each integrated project, together with
 lists of features and bugfixes, at:
 
 OpenStack Compute:https://launchpad.net/nova/grizzly/2013.1
 OpenStack Object Storage: https://launchpad.net/swift/grizzly/1.8.0
 OpenStack Image Service:  https://launchpad.net/glance/grizzly/2013.1
 OpenStack Networking: https://launchpad.net/quantum/grizzly/2013.1
 OpenStack Block Storage:  https://launchpad.net/cinder/grizzly/2013.1
 OpenStack Identity:   https://launchpad.net/keystone/grizzly/2013.1
 OpenStack Dashboard:  https://launchpad.net/horizon/grizzly/2013.1
 
 The Grizzly Release Notes contain an overview of the key features, as
 well as upgrade notes and current lists of known issues. You can access
 them at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly
 
 In 11 days our community will gather in Portland, OR for the OpenStack
 Summit: 4 days of conference to discuss the state of OpenStack and a
 Design Summit to plan the next 6-month development cycle, codenamed
 Havana. See https://www.openstack.org/summit/portland-2013/ for more
 details.
 
 Congratulations everyone on this awesome release !
 
 --
 Thierry Carrez (ttx)
 Release Manager, OpenStack
 
 ___
 OpenStack-announce mailing list
 openstack-annou...@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-announce
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] Ceilometer 2013.1 released

2013-04-04 Thread Julien Danjou

Hello,

Ceilometer 2013.1 has been released, ending the Grizzly development
cycle where we were an incubated project, and became an integrated one
for the Havana cycle.

The tarball can be found with the list of features and bugfixes here:

https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/grizzly/2013.1

Congratulations to everyone for this!

-- 
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker - freelance consultant
-- http://julien.danjou.info


pgpGYgEau09B1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] How to purge old meter data of Ceilometer

2013-04-04 Thread Doug Hellmann

I created a blueprint for this:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/purge-data


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 04 2013, Harri Pyy wrote:

  With the default 1 minute interval, Ceilometer collects quite large
 amounts of meter data.
 
  Does Ceilometer provide a TTL configuration option for the meter data, or
  some other functionality or API for purging old meter data?

 Not yet unfortunately.

 --
 Julien Danjou
 ;; Free Software hacker ; freelance consultant
 ;; http://julien.danjou.info

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Creating instances with custom UUIDs

2013-04-04 Thread Joe Gordon

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote:

 I'm having a hard time understanding the original problem.  nova boot
 should return in milliseconds.  There's no blocking on provisioning.


The only thing that could block is DB access, as AFAIK the RPC to the
scheduler is still pass by reference.

- Chris

 On Apr 3, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Rafael Rosa rafaelros...@gmail.com wrote:

 API wise I was thinking about something like nova boot
 --custom-instance-uuid ABC... or something like that. To avoid problems
 with any current implementation I would set it to disabled by default and
 add a config option to enable it.

 As for collisions, my take is that if you're passing a custom UUID you
 know what you're doing and is generating them in a way that won't be
 duplicated. Just by using standard UUID generators the possibility of
 collisions are really really small.

 Thanks for the feeback :)

 Rafael Rosa Fu


 2013/4/3 Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com

 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Rafael Rosa rafaelros...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi,
 
  In our OpenStack installation we have an issue when creating new
 instances,
  we need to execute some long running processes before calling nova
 boot
  and the call blocks for the end user for a while. We would like to
 return
  immediately to the caller with a final instance UUID and do the work
 on
  the background, but it's only generated when during actual instance
  creation, which is a no go in our situation.

 The instance_create database call already accepts an instance UUID as
 an argument, so that bit looks like it should work out well for you.
 So, I guess this is mostly a case of working out how you want the API
 to work.

 Personally, I would have no problem with something like this, so long
 as we could somehow reserve the instance UUID so that another caller
 doesn't try and create an instance with the same UUID while you're
 doing your slow thing.

 Cheers,
 Michael


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Anybody implemented DMZ?

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Rosen

Hi David,

The quantum network node would route traffic between the non-DMZ-DMZ
network if both of those subnets are uplinked to the same quantum router. I
believe if you create another router for your dmz hosts then traffic in/out
of that network should route our to your physical infrastructure which will
go through your router to do filtering.

Thanks,

Aaron


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, David Kang dk...@isi.edu wrote:


  Hi,

  We are trying to set up Quantum network for non-DMZ and DMZ networks.
 The cloud has both non-DMZ networks and a DMZ network.
 We need to route traffic from DMZ network to a specific router before it
 reaches
 anywhere else in non-DMZ networks.
 However, Quantum Network Node routes the traffic between DMZ network and
 non-DMZ network within itself by default.
 Have anybody configured Quantum for this case?
 Any help will be appreciated.
 We are using Quantum linuxbridge-agent.

  Thanks,
  David

 --
 --
 Dr. Dong-In David Kang
 Computer Scientist
 USC/ISI

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Anybody implemented DMZ?

2013-04-04 Thread David Kang


 
 Hi Aron,

 Thank you for your reply.

 We deploy one (quantum) subnet as a DMZ network and the other (quantum) subnet
as a non-DMZ network.
They are routed to the network node where quantum services (dhcp, l3, 
linuxbridge)
are running.
They can talk each other through network node, now.

 However, we do not want to the network node to route the traffic between them 
directly.
Instead we want them to be routed to different (external) routers such that
we can apply filtering/firewall/etc. on the traffic from DMZ network.

 Do you think is it possible using two l3-agents or any other way?
Currently, I manually set up routings for those two subnets.

 Thanks,
 David

- Original Message -
 Hi David,
 
 
 The quantum network node would route traffic between the non-DMZ-DMZ
 network if both of those subnets are uplinked to the same quantum
 router. I believe if you create another router for your dmz hosts then
 traffic in/out of that network should route our to your physical
 infrastructure which will go through your router to do filtering.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 Aaron
 
 
 
 On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, David Kang  dk...@isi.edu  wrote:
 
 
 
 Hi,
 
 We are trying to set up Quantum network for non-DMZ and DMZ networks.
 The cloud has both non-DMZ networks and a DMZ network.
 We need to route traffic from DMZ network to a specific router before
 it reaches
 anywhere else in non-DMZ networks.
 However, Quantum Network Node routes the traffic between DMZ network
 and
 non-DMZ network within itself by default.
 Have anybody configured Quantum for this case?
 Any help will be appreciated.
 We are using Quantum linuxbridge-agent.
 
 Thanks,
 David
 
 --
 --
 Dr. Dong-In David Kang
 Computer Scientist
 USC/ISI
 
 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- 
--
Dr. Dong-In David Kang
Computer Scientist
USC/ISI

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

2013-04-04 Thread Ronak Shah

Hi,

As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the
gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your
company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts.

In general, what is the best practice in terms of environment for
generating code review?

I appreciate the response in advance.

Thanks,
Ronak
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Anybody implemented DMZ?

2013-04-04 Thread Aaron Rosen

In my reply I suggested you to create two quantum routers which I believe
should solve this for you.


quantum net-create DMZ-net --external=True
quantum subnet-create --name DMZ-Subnet1 DMZ-net  dmz_cidr   # Public ip
pool
quantum net-create non-DMZ  --external=True
quantum subnet-create --name nonDMZ-Subnet1 non-DMZ non_dmz_cidr #
Public ip pool


quantum router-create DMZ-router
quantum router-create non-DMZ-router
quantum router-interface-add DMZ-router DMZ DMZ-Subnet1
quantum router-interface-add non-DMZ-router  nonDMZ-Subnet1

quantum router-gateway-set  DMZ-router DMZ-net
quantum router-gateway-set   non-DMZ-router  non-DMZ


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:51 AM, David Kang dk...@isi.edu wrote:



  Hi Aron,

  Thank you for your reply.

  We deploy one (quantum) subnet as a DMZ network and the other (quantum)
 subnet
 as a non-DMZ network.
 They are routed to the network node where quantum services (dhcp, l3,
 linuxbridge)
 are running.
 They can talk each other through network node, now.

  However, we do not want to the network node to route the traffic between
 them directly.
 Instead we want them to be routed to different (external) routers such that
 we can apply filtering/firewall/etc. on the traffic from DMZ network.

  Do you think is it possible using two l3-agents or any other way?
 Currently, I manually set up routings for those two subnets.

  Thanks,
  David

 - Original Message -
  Hi David,
 
 
  The quantum network node would route traffic between the non-DMZ-DMZ
  network if both of those subnets are uplinked to the same quantum
  router. I believe if you create another router for your dmz hosts then
  traffic in/out of that network should route our to your physical
  infrastructure which will go through your router to do filtering.
 
 
  Thanks,
 
 
  Aaron
 
 
 
  On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:26 AM, David Kang  dk...@isi.edu  wrote:
 
 
 
  Hi,
 
  We are trying to set up Quantum network for non-DMZ and DMZ networks.
  The cloud has both non-DMZ networks and a DMZ network.
  We need to route traffic from DMZ network to a specific router before
  it reaches
  anywhere else in non-DMZ networks.
  However, Quantum Network Node routes the traffic between DMZ network
  and
  non-DMZ network within itself by default.
  Have anybody configured Quantum for this case?
  Any help will be appreciated.
  We are using Quantum linuxbridge-agent.
 
  Thanks,
  David
 
  --
  --
  Dr. Dong-In David Kang
  Computer Scientist
  USC/ISI
 
  ___
  Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
  Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
  More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

 --
 --
 Dr. Dong-In David Kang
 Computer Scientist
 USC/ISI

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

2013-04-04 Thread Jeremy Stanley

On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote:
 As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh
 into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face
 problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to external
 hosts.
[...]

It usually involves the uphill battle of convincing whoever manages
network security/firewalls/proxies for your employer that the
Internet is more than just a bunch of Web pages. Companies which
exclusively limit their employees to only browsing the Web are
basically cutting themselves off from innovations which rely on a
myriad of other protocols. For non-technology companies that might
be fine, but for a technology company that's often a sign that it's
going out of business pretty soon.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

2013-04-04 Thread Jay Pipes

On 04/04/2013 02:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
 On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote:
 As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh
 into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face
 problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to external
 hosts.
 [...]
 
 It usually involves the uphill battle of convincing whoever manages
 network security/firewalls/proxies for your employer that the
 Internet is more than just a bunch of Web pages. Companies which
 exclusively limit their employees to only browsing the Web are
 basically cutting themselves off from innovations which rely on a
 myriad of other protocols. For non-technology companies that might
 be fine, but for a technology company that's often a sign that it's
 going out of business pretty soon.

+1000

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

2013-04-04 Thread Pranav

+1

Regards,
Pranav


On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 04/04/2013 02:23 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
  On 2013-04-04 10:51:20 -0700 (-0700), Ronak Shah wrote:
  As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh
  into the gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face
  problems where your company/org does not allow ssh to external
  hosts.
  [...]
 
  It usually involves the uphill battle of convincing whoever manages
  network security/firewalls/proxies for your employer that the
  Internet is more than just a bunch of Web pages. Companies which
  exclusively limit their employees to only browsing the Web are
  basically cutting themselves off from innovations which rely on a
  myriad of other protocols. For non-technology companies that might
  be fine, but for a technology company that's often a sign that it's
  going out of business pretty soon.

 +1000

 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] multi-host mode in quantum

2013-04-04 Thread Xin Zhao


Hello,

As Grizzly is released today, can anybody confirm that the multi-host 
network mode is supported by Quantum in this new release?


Thanks,
Xin

On 12/13/2012 6:04 AM, Heiko Krämer wrote:

Hey Guys,

it's a good point. I hope this option will include in Grizzly. We get 
now (since the switch to Quantum) network I/O bottlenecks without 
using all NIC's of our nodes.

So I'm looking forward to Grizzly 

Greetings
Heiko

Am 12.12.2012 17:11, schrieb Gary Kotton:

On 12/12/2012 05:58 PM, Xin Zhao wrote:

Hello,

If I understand it correctly, multi-host network mode is not 
supported (yet) in quantum in Folsom.
I wonder what's the recommended way of running multiple network 
nodes (for load balancing and
bandwidth concerns) in quantum?  Any documentation links will be 
appreciated.


At the moment this is in discussion upstream. It is currently not 
supported but we are hoping to have support for this in grizzly.


Thanks,
Xin



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp





___
Mailing list:https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to :openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   :https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] multi-host mode in quantum

2013-04-04 Thread Anne Gentle

Hi Xin,
This is in the release notes at
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly#OpenStack_Network_Service_.28Quantum.29


   - Multiple Network support for multiple network nodes running L3-agents
   and DHCP-agents
  - provides better scale + high-available for quantum deployments.


Anne


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Xin Zhao xz...@bnl.gov wrote:

  Hello,

 As Grizzly is released today, can anybody confirm that the multi-host
 network mode is supported by Quantum in this new release?

 Thanks,
 Xin


 On 12/13/2012 6:04 AM, Heiko Krämer wrote:

 Hey Guys,

 it's a good point. I hope this option will include in Grizzly. We get now
 (since the switch to Quantum) network I/O bottlenecks without using all
 NIC's of our nodes.
 So I'm looking forward to Grizzly 

 Greetings
 Heiko

 Am 12.12.2012 17:11, schrieb Gary Kotton:

 On 12/12/2012 05:58 PM, Xin Zhao wrote:

 Hello,

 If I understand it correctly, multi-host network mode is not supported
 (yet) in quantum in Folsom.
 I wonder what's the recommended way of running multiple network nodes (for
 load balancing and
 bandwidth concerns) in quantum?  Any documentation links will be
 appreciated.


 At the moment this is in discussion upstream. It is currently not
 supported but we are hoping to have support for this in grizzly.


 Thanks,
 Xin



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp





 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] multi-host mode in quantum

2013-04-04 Thread Henry Gessau

Unfortunately, I don't think multiple network nodes is the same
multi-host network mode that Xin is asking about.

The following did not make it into grizzly and is now targeted for havana:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost

-- Henry

On Thu, Apr 04, at 3:11 pm Anne Gentle (a...@openstack.org) wrote:
 Hi Xin,
 This is in the release notes at
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly#OpenStack_Network_Service_.28Quantum.29

   * Multiple Network support for multiple network nodes running L3-agents
 and DHCP-agents
   o provides better scale + high-available for quantum deployments.


 Anne


 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Xin Zhao xz...@bnl.gov
 mailto:xz...@bnl.gov wrote:

 Hello,

 As Grizzly is released today, can anybody confirm that the multi-host
 network mode is supported by Quantum in this new release?

 Thanks,
 Xin


 On 12/13/2012 6:04 AM, Heiko Krämer wrote:
 Hey Guys,

 it's a good point. I hope this option will include in Grizzly. We get
 now (since the switch to Quantum) network I/O bottlenecks without
 using all NIC's of our nodes.
 So I'm looking forward to Grizzly 

 Greetings
 Heiko

 Am 12.12.2012 17:11, schrieb Gary Kotton:
 On 12/12/2012 05:58 PM, Xin Zhao wrote:
 Hello,

 If I understand it correctly, multi-host network mode is not
 supported (yet) in quantum in Folsom.
 I wonder what's the recommended way of running multiple network
 nodes (for load balancing and
 bandwidth concerns) in quantum?  Any documentation links will be
 appreciated.

 At the moment this is in discussion upstream. It is currently not
 supported but we are hoping to have support for this in grizzly.

 Thanks,
 Xin



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack 
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net 
 mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack 
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack 
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net 
 mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack 
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] multi-host mode in quantum

2013-04-04 Thread Anne Gentle

Henry, thank you for clarifying! I was just posting what was in the release
notes. Perhaps someone on the Quantum core team can add to the release
notes for clarity.

Anne


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:

  Unfortunately, I don't think multiple network nodes is the same
 multi-host network mode that Xin is asking about.

 The following did not make it into grizzly and is now targeted for havana:
 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost

 -- Henry


 On Thu, Apr 04, at 3:11 pm Anne Gentle (a...@openstack.org) wrote:

 Hi Xin,
 This is in the release notes at

 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly#OpenStack_Network_Service_.28Quantum.29


- Multiple Network support for multiple network nodes running
L3-agents and DHCP-agents
   - provides better scale + high-available for quantum deployments.


  Anne


 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Xin Zhao xz...@bnl.gov wrote:

  Hello,

 As Grizzly is released today, can anybody confirm that the multi-host
 network mode is supported by Quantum in this new release?

 Thanks,
 Xin


 On 12/13/2012 6:04 AM, Heiko Krämer wrote:

 Hey Guys,

 it's a good point. I hope this option will include in Grizzly. We get now
 (since the switch to Quantum) network I/O bottlenecks without using all
 NIC's of our nodes.
 So I'm looking forward to Grizzly 

 Greetings
 Heiko

 Am 12.12.2012 17:11, schrieb Gary Kotton:

 On 12/12/2012 05:58 PM, Xin Zhao wrote:

 Hello,

 If I understand it correctly, multi-host network mode is not supported
 (yet) in quantum in Folsom.
 I wonder what's the recommended way of running multiple network nodes
 (for load balancing and
 bandwidth concerns) in quantum?  Any documentation links will be
 appreciated.


 At the moment this is in discussion upstream. It is currently not
 supported but we are hoping to have support for this in grizzly.


 Thanks,
 Xin



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp





 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp




 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] multi-host mode in quantum

2013-04-04 Thread Jonathan Proulx

Hi All,

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote:
Unfortunately, I don't think multiple network nodes is the same
multi-host network mode that Xin is asking about.

The following did not make it into grizzly and is now targeted for havana:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihosthttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-multihost

I'm hoping that means there still needs to be a central dhcp server but the
multiple L3 agents mean actual traffic from VMs can be managed directly on
the compute note they are running on and doesn't need to be sent back to a
different network node before being nat'ed or tagged?

Multi-host was the single most important feature for me in the quantum blue
prints, if nat'ed networks need to be piped through a gateway box other
than the physical host the instance is on quantum remains a no go for me.
Having a central (but redundant) dhcp with distributed NAT may actually be
an improvement over having to run dnsmasq literally everywhere.

-Jon
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] AUTO: I am out of the office. (returning 2013/04/06)

2013-04-04 Thread Hai Quan Chen



I am out of the office until 2013/04/06.

I will respond to your message when I return.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  [Openstack] OpenStack
2013.1 (Grizzly) is released ! sent on 04/04/2013 22:47:45.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack] Grizzly release notes and the never-ending image-cache-manager issue

2013-04-04 Thread Lorin Hochstein

Michael (et al):

The Grizzly release notes 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly say:

The image-cache-manager has been turned on by default. This may have
potential issues for users who are using a shared filesystem for their
instances_path. Set remove_unused_base_images=false in your nova.conf file
on your compute nodes to revert this behaviour.


My understanding was that in Grizzly, this wasn't an issue since shared
storage was automatically detected (e.g.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075018)

Is it safe to zap this from the release notes?

Lorin

-- 
Lorin Hochstein
Lead Architect - Cloud Services
Nimbis Services, Inc.
www.nimbisservices.com
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Grizzly release notes and the never-ending image-cache-manager issue

2013-04-04 Thread Michael Still

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Lorin Hochstein
lo...@nimbisservices.com wrote:
 Michael (et al):

 The Grizzly release notes
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Grizzly say:

 The image-cache-manager has been turned on by default. This may have
 potential issues for users who are using a shared filesystem for their
 instances_path. Set remove_unused_base_images=false in your nova.conf file
 on your compute nodes to revert this behaviour.

 My understanding was that in Grizzly, this wasn't an issue since shared
 storage was automatically detected (e.g.
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1075018)

This is my understanding as well -- that we now detect shared storage
and do the right thing. I don't have any data on how much real world
testing that code has experienced though.

 Is it safe to zap this from the release notes?

Safe is a relative thing. I'd be more comfortable if I knew that
someone had deployed the code and had a good experience, but when I
ask on the operators list I get puzzled stares...

Michael

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

2013-04-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange

On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:51:20AM -0700, Ronak Shah wrote:
 Hi,
 
 As OS dev cycle involves Gerrit review tool which requires ssh into the
 gerrit server, I was wondering if any of you guys face problems where your
 company/org does not allow ssh to external hosts.
 
 In general, what is the best practice in terms of environment for
 generating code review?

The traditional workaround when companies have insane firewalls blocking
SSH, is to run an SSH server on port 443, since firewalls typically
allow through any traffic on the HTTPS port, even if it isn't using the
HTTPS protocol :-) This workaround only fails if your company is also
doing a man-in-the-middle attack on HTTPS traffic[1]

GitHub actually have an SSH server on port 443 for exactly this reason

   https://help.github.com/articles/using-ssh-over-the-https-port

I don't know how hard it would be for OpenStack Infrastructure team
to officially make Gerrit available via port 443, in addition to the
normal SSH port.

Regards,
Daniel

[1] Yes some companies really do MITM attack all HTTPS connections
their employees make :-(
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Gerrit Review + SSH

2013-04-04 Thread Jeremy Stanley

On 2013-04-04 22:11:10 +0100 (+0100), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
 I don't know how hard it would be for OpenStack Infrastructure team
 to officially make Gerrit available via port 443, in addition to the
 normal SSH port.

We'd need to use different hostnames mapped to different IP
addresses since 443/tcp is already in use on review.openstack.org
for, well, HTTPS (the availability of fancy proxies which can
differentiate SSH from SSL/TLS notwithstanding--do those exist?).

The bigger question is whether it's worth the effort to maintain a
workaround like that... are there companies who want their employees
contributing to OpenStack development but won't grant those same
developers access to our code review system over the Internet? If
so, maybe some brave soul will take pity on them and set up a TCP
bounce proxy somewhere on port 443 to forward to port 29418 on our
Gerrit server for Git+SSH access on an alternate address and port. I
don't think that would need any sort of buy-off from our
Infrastructure Team (we can discuss if someone's actually interested
in setting it up), but probably wouldn't be official all the same.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant

2013-04-04 Thread Giovanni Colapinto

Yes, I read that documentation on upgrade, but unfortunately in that
repository quantal distribution doesn't exists. Is it safe to use precise
packages even if I got quantal?

Thank you


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Tong Li liton...@us.ibm.com wrote:

 on ubuntu, you can try the following.

 apt-get install python-software-properties
 add-apt-repository ppa:swift-core/release
 apt-get update
 apt-get install swift python-swiftclient

 Also look into the doc at this link.
 http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/howto_installmultinode.html

 If you want to use the latest swift code, you can get the code from github
 and build it yourself but I would not recommend to do it for the production
 system.

 Hope that helps.


 Tong Li
 Emerging Technologies  Standards
 Building 501/B205
 liton...@us.ibm.com

 [image: Inactive hide details for Giovanni Colapinto ---04/04/2013
 09:20:50 AM---Thank you for the reply. How I can upgrade swift? On T]Giovanni
 Colapinto ---04/04/2013 09:20:50 AM---Thank you for the reply. How I can
 upgrade swift? On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tong Li litong01@

 From: Giovanni Colapinto giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com
 To: Tong Li/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS,
 Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net, openstack-bounces+litong01=
 us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
 Date: 04/04/2013 09:20 AM
 Subject: Re: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant
 --



 Thank you for the reply. How I can upgrade swift?


 On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tong Li 
 *liton...@us.ibm.com*liton...@us.ibm.com
 wrote:

swob is not a separate package, it is part of the swift core. You may
either get older version of informant which does not use swob or upgrade
swift.

Tong Li
Emerging Technologies  Standards
Building 501/B205*
**liton...@us.ibm.com* liton...@us.ibm.com

[image: Inactive hide details for Giovanni Colapinto ---04/04/2013
04:26:57 AM---Hi to all. I try to configure swift proxy to work 
 with]Giovanni
Colapinto ---04/04/2013 04:26:57 AM---Hi to all. I try to configure swift
proxy to work with swift-informant.

From: Giovanni Colapinto 
 *giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com*giovanni.colapi...@gmail.com

To: *openstack@lists.launchpad.net* openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
Date: 04/04/2013 04:26 AM
Subject: [Openstack] Swift proxy and swift-informant
Sent by: 
 openstack-bounces+litong01=*us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net*us.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
--




Hi to all.

I try to configure swift proxy to work with swift-informant.

I've installed swift-informant and add/modify the following section to
/etc/swift/proxy-server.conf:

[pipeline:main]
pipeline = informant healthcheck cache swift3 authtoken keystone
proxy-server

[filter:informant]
use = egg:informant#informant
statsd_host = 10.0.1.154
metric_name_prepend = inndig.

When I start proxy-server it returns the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/swift-proxy-server, line 22, in module
run_wsgi(conf_file, 'proxy-server', default_port=8080, **options)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/swift/common/wsgi.py, line
138, in run_wsgi
loadapp('config:%s' % conf_file, global_conf={'log_name':
log_name})
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 247, in loadapp
return loadobj(APP, uri, name=name, **kw)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 271, in loadobj
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 296, in loadcontext
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 320, in _loadconfig
return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 450, in get_context
global_additions=global_additions)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 562, in _pipeline_app_context
for name in pipeline[:-1]]
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 454, in get_context
section)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 476, in _context_from_use
object_type, name=use, global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 406, in get_context
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 296, in loadcontext
global_conf=global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 328, in _loadegg
return loader.get_context(object_type, name, global_conf)
  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/paste/deploy/loadwsgi.py,
line 620, in get_context

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_havana_nova_trunk #36

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_havana_nova_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_havana_nova_trunk/36/Project:precise_havana_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:02:32 -0400Build duration:4 min 16 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 2 out of the last 5 builds failed.60ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 4 lines...]Last Built Revision: Revision f96c9ab31700bc37792de0b3bec97edd7d99aa29 (origin/master)Checkout:nova / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_havana_nova_trunk/nova - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/nova.gitERROR: Problem fetching from origin / origin - could be unavailable. Continuing anyway.hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Error performing command: git fetch -t https://github.com/openstack/nova.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*Command "git fetch -t https://github.com/openstack/nova.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*" returned status code 128: error: The requested URL returned error: 403 Forbidden while accessing https://github.com/openstack/nova.git/info/refsfatal: HTTP request failed	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:776)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommand(GitAPI.java:741)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.fetch(GitAPI.java:190)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.fetch(GitAPI.java:978)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1049)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command "git fetch -t https://github.com/openstack/nova.git +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*" returned status code 128: error: The requested URL returned error: 403 Forbidden while accessing https://github.com/openstack/nova.git/info/refsfatal: HTTP request failed	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 16 moreERROR: Could not fetch from any repositoryFATAL: Could not fetch from any repositoryhudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not fetch from any repository	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1061)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: quantal_folsom_keystone_stable #111

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: quantal_folsom_keystone_stable
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_keystone_stable/111/Project:quantal_folsom_keystone_stableDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:32:33 -0400Build duration:2 min 50 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0Changeskey all backends off of hash of pki token.by ayoungeditkeystone/token/backends/memcache.pyeditkeystone/token/backends/sql.pyeditkeystone/token/core.pyeditkeystone/token/backends/kvs.pyConsole Output[...truncated 1765 lines...]Applying patch sql_connection.patchpatching file etc/keystone.conf.sampleApplying patch CVE-2013-1865.patchpatching file keystone/service.pyHunk #1 FAILED at 490.1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file keystone/service.pypatching file tests/test_service.pyHunk #1 FAILED at 150.1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file tests/test_service.pyPatch CVE-2013-1865.patch can be reverse-appliedERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'quantal-amd64-56407614-0295-4281-826b-4602166a7d31', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3ERROR:root:Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'quantal-amd64-56407614-0295-4281-826b-4602166a7d31', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/keystone/folsom /tmp/tmpR0YVrQ/keystonemk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpR0YVrQ/keystone/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 255b1d43500f5d98ec73a0056525b492b14fec05..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sdch -b -D quantal --newversion 2012.2.4+git201304041433~quantal-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [1889299] key all backends off of hash of pki token.dch -a [9e0a97d] Retry http_request and json_request failure.dch -a [40660f0] auth_token hash pki key PKI tokens on hash in memcached when accessed by auth_token middelwaredch -a [b3ce6a7] Use the right subprocess based on os monkeypatchdch -a [bb1ded0] add check for config-dir parameter (bug1101129)debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucTraceback (most recent call last):  File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 139, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'quantal-amd64-56407614-0295-4281-826b-4602166a7d31', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last):  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last):  File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 139, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'quantal-amd64-56407614-0295-4281-826b-4602166a7d31', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #236

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/236/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:49:30 -0400Build duration:2 min 50 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 454 lines...]Receiving objects:  83% (20158/24062), 8.60 MiB | 602 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  83% (20158/24062), 8.61 MiB | 368 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  83% (20185/24062), 8.81 MiB | 155 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  83% (20185/24062), 8.82 MiB | 55 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  84% (20213/24062), 8.82 MiB | 55 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  85% (20453/24062), 8.90 MiB | 22 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  86% (20694/24062), 8.90 MiB | 22 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  87% (20934/24062), 8.90 MiB | 22 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  87% (20965/24062), 8.90 MiB | 22 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  88% (21175/24062), 8.90 MiB | 22 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  89% (21416/24062), 8.90 MiB | 22 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  90% (21656/24062), 9.24 MiB | 43 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  91% (21897/24062), 9.50 MiB | 65 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  91% (21964/24062), 9.73 MiB | 93 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  92% (22138/24062), 9.73 MiB | 93 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  93% (22378/24062), 9.85 MiB | 133 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  93% (22545/24062), 9.97 MiB | 254 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  93% (22545/24062), 10.05 MiB | 238 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22619/24062), 10.05 MiB | 238 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22646/24062), 10.19 MiB | 274 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22658/24062), 10.35 MiB | 277 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22711/24062), 10.61 MiB | 156 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22711/24062), 10.61 MiB | 68 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22711/24062), 10.63 MiB | 15 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  94% (22712/24062), 10.65 MiB | 5 KiB/s   error: RPC failed; result=56, HTTP code = 200fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedlyfatal: early EOFfatal: index-pack failed	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #237

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/237/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:01:29 -0400Build duration:1 min 50 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 2 out of the last 5 builds failed.60ChangesNo ChangesConsole OutputStarted by an SCM changeBuilding remotely on pkg-builder in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkCheckout:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk - hudson.remoting.Channel@2c824005:pkg-builderUsing strategy: DefaultLast Built Revision: Revision d5dcb3babf57c6393c15f0ffc911fc7a833d58bd (origin/milestone-proposed)Checkout:keystone / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/keystone - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/keystone.gitERROR: Couldn't find any revision to build. Verify the repository and branch configuration for this job.Email was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_havana_keystone_trunk #8

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_havana_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_havana_keystone_trunk/8/Project:precise_havana_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:01:30 -0400Build duration:7 min 13 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 2 out of the last 5 builds failed.60ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 408 lines...]Receiving objects:  55% (13235/24062), 3.00 MiB | 374 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  56% (13475/24062), 3.00 MiB | 374 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13716/24062), 3.00 MiB | 374 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13730/24062), 3.57 MiB | 423 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13731/24062), 3.61 MiB | 352 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13734/24062), 3.61 MiB | 352 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13736/24062), 3.85 MiB | 204 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13749/24062), 3.85 MiB | 204 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13751/24062), 4.19 MiB | 203 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13752/24062), 4.36 MiB | 161 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13752/24062), 4.37 MiB | 134 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  57% (13754/24062), 4.44 MiB | 137 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (13956/24062), 4.60 MiB | 98 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14141/24062), 4.60 MiB | 98 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14164/24062), 4.73 MiB | 111 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14168/24062), 4.79 MiB | 87 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14168/24062), 4.80 MiB | 65 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14168/24062), 4.81 MiB | 57 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14169/24062), 4.85 MiB | 31 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14170/24062), 4.86 MiB | 9 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14170/24062), 4.86 MiB | 4 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14173/24062), 4.91 MiB | 1 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14173/24062), 4.93 MiB | 1 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  58% (14174/24062), 4.96 MiB   Receiving objects:  58% (14175/24062), 4.97 MiB   error: RPC failed; result=56, HTTP code = 200fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedlyfatal: early EOFfatal: index-pack failed	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #239

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/239/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:14:59 -0400Build duration:31 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 3 out of the last 5 builds failed.40ChangesNo ChangesConsole OutputStarted by user Adam GandelmanBuilding remotely on pkg-builder in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkCheckout:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk - hudson.remoting.Channel@2c824005:pkg-builderUsing strategy: DefaultLast Built Revision: Revision d5dcb3babf57c6393c15f0ffc911fc7a833d58bd (origin/milestone-proposed)Checkout:keystone / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/keystone - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/keystone.gitERROR: Couldn't find any revision to build. Verify the repository and branch configuration for this job.Email was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #240

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/240/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:20:19 -0400Build duration:4 min 24 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 4 out of the last 5 builds failed.20ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 494 lines...]Receiving objects:  59% (14385/24062), 5.03 MiB | 44 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  59% (14410/24062), 5.04 MiB | 33 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  59% (14432/24062), 5.07 MiB | 25 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  60% (14438/24062), 5.07 MiB | 25 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  60% (14554/24062), 5.11 MiB | 21 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  60% (14665/24062), 5.14 MiB | 15 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  61% (14678/24062), 5.14 MiB | 15 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  61% (14804/24062), 5.18 MiB | 11 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  61% (14812/24062), 5.19 MiB | 8 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  61% (14828/24062), 5.21 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  62% (14919/24062), 5.21 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  62% (14943/24062), 5.25 MiB | 3 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  62% (15052/24062), 5.25 MiB | 3 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  63% (15160/24062), 5.25 MiB | 3 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  63% (15218/24062), 5.32 MiB | 4 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  63% (15281/24062), 5.32 MiB | 4 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  64% (15400/24062), 5.32 MiB | 4 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  64% (15489/24062), 5.40 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  64% (15519/24062), 5.41 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  65% (15641/24062), 5.41 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  65% (15728/24062), 5.44 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  65% (15864/24062), 5.45 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  66% (15881/24062), 5.45 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  66% (15987/24062), 5.46 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  67% (16122/24062), 5.46 MiB | 5 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  67% (16271/24062), 5.51 MiB | 6 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  68% (16363/24062), 5.51 MiB | 6 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  68% (16431/24062), 5.55 MiB | 8 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  68% (16595/24062), 5.57 MiB | 9 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  69% (16603/24062), 5.57 MiB | 9 KiB/s   	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #241

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/241/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:24:53 -0400Build duration:3 min 31 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 364 lines...]Receiving objects:  43% (10347/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  43% (10550/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  44% (10588/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  45% (10828/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  46% (11069/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  47% (11310/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  48% (11550/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  49% (11791/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  50% (12031/24062), 2.36 MiB | 635 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  50% (12200/24062), 2.60 MiB | 504 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  51% (12272/24062), 2.60 MiB | 504 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12513/24062), 2.60 MiB | 504 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12619/24062), 2.65 MiB | 287 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12672/24062), 2.66 MiB | 195 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12694/24062), 2.68 MiB | 142 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12694/24062), 2.69 MiB | 31 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12694/24062), 2.70 MiB | 16 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12695/24062), 2.81 MiB | 7 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12695/24062), 2.86 MiB | 4 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12717/24062), 2.89 MiB | 3 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12740/24062), 2.89 MiB | 2 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  53% (12753/24062), 2.89 MiB | 2 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  53% (12833/24062), 2.93 MiB | 2 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  53% (12873/24062), 2.98 MiB | 1 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  53% (12883/24062), 3.00 MiB | 1 KiB/s   error: RPC failed; result=56, HTTP code = 200fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedlyfatal: early EOFfatal: index-pack failed	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_havana_glance_trunk #9

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_havana_glance_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_havana_glance_trunk/9/Project:precise_havana_glance_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:33:41 -0400Build duration:8.2 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 4 out of the last 5 builds failed.20ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 218 lines...]remote: Compressing objects:  75% (3809/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  76% (3860/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  77% (3911/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  78% (3961/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  79% (4012/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  80% (4063/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  81% (4114/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  82% (4164/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  83% (4215/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  84% (4266/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  85% (4317/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  86% (4368/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  87% (4418/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  88% (4469/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  89% (4520/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  90% (4571/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  91% (4621/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  92% (4672/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  93% (4723/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  94% (4774/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  95% (4825/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  96% (4875/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  97% (4926/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  98% (4977/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects:  99% (5028/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects: 100% (5078/5078)   [Kremote: Compressing objects: 100% (5078/5078), done.[KReceiving objects:   0% (1/20594)   Receiving objects:   1% (206/20594)   Receiving objects:   1% (284/20594), 84.00 KiB | 24 KiB/s   	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_folsom_nova_stable #721

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_folsom_nova_stable
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_stable/721/Project:precise_folsom_nova_stableDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:31:30 -0400Build duration:2 min 19 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 346 lines...]Receiving objects:   2% (4496/168014), 1.32 MiB | 26 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   2% (4550/168014), 1.32 MiB | 26 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   2% (4948/168014), 1.45 MiB | 37 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   2% (5027/168014), 1.47 MiB | 53 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   3% (5041/168014), 1.47 MiB | 53 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   3% (5392/168014), 1.58 MiB | 55 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   3% (6064/168014), 1.66 MiB | 69 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   4% (6721/168014), 1.79 MiB | 81 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   4% (6814/168014), 1.98 MiB | 102 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   4% (7453/168014), 2.14 MiB | 121 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   4% (7602/168014), 2.18 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   4% (8308/168014), 2.18 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (8401/168014), 2.18 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (8965/168014), 2.56 MiB | 126 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9028/168014), 2.57 MiB | 114 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9057/168014), 2.58 MiB | 100 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9197/168014), 2.62 MiB | 67 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9257/168014), 2.64 MiB | 42 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9316/168014), 2.64 MiB | 42 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9344/168014), 2.66 MiB | 18 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   5% (9489/168014), 2.70 MiB | 14 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   6% (10081/168014), 2.70 MiB | 14 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   6% (10109/168014), 2.86 MiB | 18 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   6% (10943/168014), 2.89 MiB | 12 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   7% (11761/168014), 2.89 MiB | 12 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   7% (13405/168014), 3.48 MiB | 25 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   8% (13442/168014), 3.48 MiB | 25 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   8% (13447/168014), 3.49 MiB | 25 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   8% (14861/168014), 3.71 MiB | 34 KiB/s   Receiving objects:   8% (15020/168014), 3.79 MiB | 65 KiB/s   	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: quantal_folsom_nova_stable #712

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: quantal_folsom_nova_stable
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_nova_stable/712/Project:quantal_folsom_nova_stableDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:34:03 -0400Build duration:1 min 23 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 10 lines...]hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone https://github.com/openstack/nova.git	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.clone(GitAPI.java:245)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1029)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Error performing command: git clone --progress -o origin https://github.com/openstack/nova.git /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/quantal_folsom_nova_stable/novaCommand "git clone --progress -o origin https://github.com/openstack/nova.git /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/quantal_folsom_nova_stable/nova" returned status code 143: Cloning into '/var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/quantal_folsom_nova_stable/nova'...Process leaked file descriptors. See http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Spawning+processes+from+build for more information	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:776)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.access$000(GitAPI.java:38)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI$1.invoke(GitAPI.java:241)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI$1.invoke(GitAPI.java:221)	at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:842)	at hudson.FilePath.act(FilePath.java:824)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.clone(GitAPI.java:221)	... 13 moreCaused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command "git clone --progress -o origin https://github.com/openstack/nova.git /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/quantal_folsom_nova_stable/nova" returned status code 143: Cloning into '/var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/quantal_folsom_nova_stable/nova'...Process leaked file descriptors. See http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Spawning+processes+from+build for more information	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #244

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/244/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:35:28 -0400Build duration:6 min 15 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 376 lines...]Receiving objects:  37% (8903/24062), 1.92 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  38% (9144/24062), 1.92 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  38% (9197/24062), 1.92 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  39% (9385/24062), 1.92 MiB | 85 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  40% (9625/24062), 2.21 MiB | 95 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  41% (9866/24062), 2.21 MiB | 95 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  42% (10107/24062), 2.21 MiB | 95 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  43% (10347/24062), 2.21 MiB | 95 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  44% (10588/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  44% (10637/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  45% (10828/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  46% (11069/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  47% (11310/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  48% (11550/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  49% (11791/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  50% (12031/24062), 2.40 MiB | 116 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  50% (12200/24062), 2.60 MiB | 158 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  51% (12272/24062), 2.60 MiB | 158 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  51% (12476/24062), 2.61 MiB | 77 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12513/24062), 2.61 MiB | 77 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12527/24062), 2.63 MiB | 24 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12672/24062), 2.66 MiB | 10 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12694/24062), 2.68 MiB | 6 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12694/24062), 2.71 MiB | 2 KiB/s   Receiving objects:  52% (12695/24062), 2.71 MiB | 2 KiB/s   error: RPC failed; result=56, HTTP code = 200fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedlyfatal: early EOFfatal: index-pack failed	at hudson.plugins.git.GitAPI.launchCommandIn(GitAPI.java:771)	... 19 moreTrying next repositoryERROR: Could not clone repositoryFATAL: Could not clonehudson.plugins.git.GitException: Could not clone	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:1041)	at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM$2.invoke(GitSCM.java:970)	at hudson.FilePath$FileCallableWrapper.call(FilePath.java:2236)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:118)	at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:48)	at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:326)	at hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:72)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)	at hudson.remoting.Engine$1$1.run(Engine.java:60)	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #245

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/245/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:48:54 -0400Build duration:18 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole OutputStarted by user Adam GandelmanBuilding remotely on pkg-builder in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkCheckout:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk - hudson.remoting.Channel@2c824005:pkg-builderUsing strategy: DefaultLast Built Revision: Revision d5dcb3babf57c6393c15f0ffc911fc7a833d58bd (origin/milestone-proposed)Checkout:keystone / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/keystone - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/keystone.gitERROR: Couldn't find any revision to build. Verify the repository and branch configuration for this job.Email was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #247

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/247/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:54:40 -0400Build duration:9.9 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole OutputStarted by user Adam GandelmanBuilding remotely on pkg-builder in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkCheckout:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk - hudson.remoting.Channel@2c824005:pkg-builderUsing strategy: DefaultLast Built Revision: Revision d5dcb3babf57c6393c15f0ffc911fc7a833d58bd (origin/milestone-proposed)Checkout:keystone / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/keystone - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/keystone.gitERROR: Couldn't find any revision to build. Verify the repository and branch configuration for this job.Email was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_havana_nova_trunk #39

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_havana_nova_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_havana_nova_trunk/39/Project:precise_havana_nova_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:02:30 -0400Build duration:2 min 52 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 3 out of the last 5 builds failed.40ChangesAdd CRUD methods for tags to the EC2 API.by stephen.graneditnova/tests/test_db_api.pyeditnova/db/sqlalchemy/api.pyeditnova/compute/api.pyeditnova/db/api.pyeditnova/tests/api/ec2/test_cloud.pyeditnova/api/ec2/cloud.pyeditnova/tests/fake_policy.pyeditnova/api/ec2/ec2utils.pyFallback to conductor if types are not stashed.by bdelliotteditnova/compute/resource_tracker.pyeditnova/tests/compute/test_resource_tracker.pyRemove deprecated Grizzly code.by jogoeditnova/scheduler/filters/__init__.pyeditnova/availability_zones.pyeditnova/tests/scheduler/test_host_filters.pyeditnova/virt/hyperv/volumeops.pydeletenova/virt/libvirt/volume_nfs.pyeditnova/scheduler/filters/type_filter.pydeletenova/scheduler/weights/least_cost.pydeletenova/network/api_deprecated.pyeditnova/scheduler/filters/trusted_filter.pydeletenova/tests/network/test_deprecated_api.pyeditnova/tests/scheduler/test_weights.pyeditdoc/source/devref/filter_scheduler.rstdeletenova/tests/scheduler/test_least_cost.pyeditnova/virt/hyperv/vmops.pyeditnova/virt/hyperv/vif.pyeditnova/scheduler/weights/__init__.pyMove console scripts to entrypoints.by mikaleditbin/nova-consoleautheditbin/nova-rootwrapaddnova/cmd/rpc_zmq_receiver.pyaddnova/cmd/api_os_compute.pyeditnova/tests/test_nova_manage.pyeditbin/nova-certeditbin/nova-dhcpbridgeaddnova/cmd/consoleauth.pyaddnova/cmd/baremetal_deploy_helper.pyaddnova/cmd/cert.pyedittools/run_pep8.shaddnova/cmd/dhcpbridge.pyeditbin/nova-spicehtml5proxyeditbin/nova-api-os-computeaddnova/cmd/scheduler.pyaddnova/cmd/compute.pyaddnova/cmd/rootwrap.pyeditbin/nova-xvpvncproxyeditsetup.pyaddnova/cmd/api.pyeditnova/tests/baremetal/test_nova_baremetal_deploy_helper.pyeditbin/nova-clear-rabbit-queuesaddnova/cmd/network.pyeditbin/nova-api-metadataaddnova/cmd/spicehtml5proxy.pyaddnova/cmd/xvpvncproxy.pyeditbin/nova-api-ec2addnova/cmd/clear_rabbit_queues.pyeditbin/nova-baremetal-manageaddnova/cmd/conductor.pyeditnova/test.pyaddnova/cmd/api_ec2.pyeditbin/nova-alladdnova/cmd/console.pyaddnova/cmd/all.pyaddnova/cmd/cells.pyeditbin/nova-consoleeditbin/nova-schedulereditbin/nova-rpc-zmq-receivereditbin/nova-cellseditbin/nova-networkeditbin/nova-conductoraddnova/cmd/objectstore.pyeditbin/nova-baremetal-deploy-helpereditbin/nova-computeaddnova/cmd/baremetal_manage.pyeditbin/nova-manageaddnova/cmd/__init__.pyeditbin/nova-novncproxyeditnova/tests/baremetal/test_nova_baremetal_manage.pyaddnova/cmd/api_metadata.pyeditbin/nova-apiaddnova/cmd/novncproxy.pyeditbin/nova-objectstoreaddnova/cmd/manage.pyOptimize resource tracker queries for instancesby bdelliotteditnova/tests/test_db_api.pyeditnova/db/sqlalchemy/api.pyConsole Output[...truncated 4365 lines...]Source-Version: 1:2013.2+git201304041703~precise-0ubuntu1Space: 0Status: failedVersion: 1:2013.2+git201304041703~precise-0ubuntu1Finished at 20130404-1704Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disc spaceE: Package build dependencies not satisfied; skippingERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-havana', '-n', '-A', 'nova_2013.2+git201304041703~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 3ERROR:root:Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-havana', '-n', '-A', 'nova_2013.2+git201304041703~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 3INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/grizzly /tmp/tmpZBmRad/novamk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpZBmRad/nova/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log b32573ca258cf9a42a72b7d5700bf9da5e432adc..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sdch -b -D precise --newversion 1:2013.2+git201304041703~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [e844946] Optimize resource tracker queries for instancesdch -a [799a925] Move console scripts to entrypoints.dch -a [820f43f] Remove deprecated Grizzly code.dch -a [e9c88b7] Fallback

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_nova_stable #722

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_folsom_nova_stable
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_stable/722/Project:precise_folsom_nova_stableDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:01:30 -0400Build duration:7 min 36 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesAdd a format_message method to the Exceptionsby ndipanoveditnova/exception.pyeditnova/tests/test_exception.pyUse format_message on exceptions instead of str()by ndipanoveditnova/api/openstack/compute/servers.pyeditnova/compute/api.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/admin_actions.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/consoles.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/flavorextraspecs.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/flavor_access.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/security_groups.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/flavormanage.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/floating_ip_dns.pyeditnova/api/openstack/compute/server_metadata.pyConsole Output[...truncated 2480 lines...]Hunk #8 FAILED at 1014.Hunk #9 succeeded at 1076 with fuzz 1 (offset 21 lines).Hunk #10 succeeded at 1184 with fuzz 1 (offset 24 lines).6 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file nova/tests/test_quota.pyPatch CVE-2013-1838.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)ERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-af2c221e-2cbb-4527-afa5-36c7f2a6fea5', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3ERROR:root:Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-af2c221e-2cbb-4527-afa5-36c7f2a6fea5', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/nova/folsom /tmp/tmphhHtyn/novamk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmphhHtyn/nova/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 5b43cef510b68cff1f6e2f80742d3204b0b51e45..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sdch -b -D precise --newversion 2012.2.4+git201304041707~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [056a7df] Use format_message on exceptions instead of str()dch -a [c4c417e] Set default fixed_ip quota to unlimited.dch -a [8f8ef21] Add a format_message method to the Exceptionsdch -a [c85683e] Adding netmask to dnsmasq argument --dhcp-rangedch -a [50dece6] Fix Wrong syntax for set:tag in dnsmasq startup optiondch -a [2dd8f3e] LibvirtHybridOVSBridgeDriver update for STPdch -a [69ba489] Fixes PowerVM spawn failed as missing attr supported_instancesdch -a [28aacf6] Fix bad Log statement in nova-managedch -a [524a5a3] Don't include traceback when wrapping exceptionsdch -a [67eb495] Decouple EC2 API from using instance iddch -a [f8c5492] libvirt: Optimize test_connection and capabilitiesdch -a [53626bf] populate dnsmasq lease db with valid leasesdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucTraceback (most recent call last):  File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 139, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-af2c221e-2cbb-4527-afa5-36c7f2a6fea5', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last):  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last):  File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 139, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['/usr/bin/schroot', '-p', '-r', '-c', 'precise-amd64-af2c221e-2cbb-4527-afa5-36c7f2a6fea5', '-u', 'jenkins', '--', 'bzr', 'builddeb', '-S', '--', '-sa', '-us', '-uc']' returned non-zero exit status 3Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_havana_glance_trunk #10

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_havana_glance_trunk
General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_havana_glance_trunk/10/Project:precise_havana_glance_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:05:22 -0400Build duration:11 minBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 4 out of the last 5 builds failed.20ChangesRemove internal store references from migration 017by jbresnaheditglance/db/sqlalchemy/migrate_repo/versions/017_quote_encrypted_swift_credentials.pyFunctional tests display the logs of the services they startedby jbresnaheditglance/tests/functional/__init__.pyMake is_public an argument rather than a filter.by mark.washenbergereditglance/db/sqlalchemy/api.pyeditglance/tests/unit/v1/test_api.pyeditglance/tests/functional/db/base.pyeditglance/db/simple/api.pyeditglance/tests/unit/test_clients.pyeditglance/registry/api/v1/images.pyInvalid reference to self in functional test test_scrubber.pyby jbresnaheditglance/tests/functional/test_scrubber.pyConsole Output[...truncated 6446 lines...]gpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key) "gpg: Signature made Thu Apr  4 17:07:30 2013 EDT using RSA key ID 9935ACDCgpg: Good signature from "Openstack Ubuntu Testing Bot (Jenkins Key) "Checking signature on .changesGood signature on /tmp/tmpzaS840/glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changes.Checking signature on .dscGood signature on /tmp/tmpzaS840/glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc.Uploading to ppa (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net):  Uploading glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc: done.  Uploading glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise.orig.tar.gz: done.  Uploading glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz: done.  Uploading glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changes: done.Successfully uploaded packages.INFO:root:Installing build artifacts into /var/lib/jenkins/www/aptDEBUG:root:['reprepro', '--waitforlock', '10', '-Vb', '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt', 'include', 'precise-havana', 'glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changes']Exporting indices...Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-havana/Release.gpg.new'Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-havana/InRelease.new'Deleting files no longer referenced...deleting and forgetting pool/main/g/glance/glance-api_2013.2+git201304022337~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/g/glance/glance-common_2013.2+git201304022337~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/g/glance/glance-registry_2013.2+git201304022337~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/g/glance/glance_2013.2+git201304022337~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/g/glance/python-glance-doc_2013.2+git201304022337~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/g/glance/python-glance_2013.2+git201304022337~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: 07eda706f43c907b1d212a48c6b9514d83bbcdc1INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/glance/grizzly /tmp/tmpzaS840/glancemk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpzaS840/glance/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log bd9405402a232eafe701fbd15b4740b7503ed27f..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sdch -b -D precise --newversion 1:2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [07eda70] Invalid reference to self in functional test test_scrubber.pydch -a [d8e3f87] Make is_public an argument rather than a filter.dch -a [6ea699b] Functional tests display the logs of the services they starteddch -a [f17f483] Add 'set_image_location' policy optiondch -a [f1804c4] Remove internal store references from migration 017debcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-havana -n -A glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/havana glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include precise-havana glance_2013.2+git201304041706~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Fixed: precise_havana_quantum_trunk #23

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_havana_quantum_trunk
General InformationBUILD SUCCESSBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_havana_quantum_trunk/23/Project:precise_havana_quantum_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:03:28 -0400Build duration:18 minBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 1 out of the last 5 builds failed.80ChangesAdd expected IDs to router.interface.* notificationsby eglynneditquantum/db/l3_db.pyeditquantum/tests/unit/test_l3_plugin.pyConsole Output[...truncated 12037 lines...]INFO:root:Installing build artifacts into /var/lib/jenkins/www/aptDEBUG:root:['reprepro', '--waitforlock', '10', '-Vb', '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt', 'include', 'precise-havana', 'quantum_2013.2+git201304041705~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changes']Exporting indices...Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-havana/Release.gpg.new'Successfully created '/var/lib/jenkins/www/apt/dists/precise-havana/InRelease.new'Deleting files no longer referenced...deleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/python-quantum_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-common_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-dhcp-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-l3-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-lbaas-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-metadata-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-bigswitch_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-brocade_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-cisco_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-hyperv_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-linuxbridge-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-linuxbridge_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-metaplugin_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-midonet_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-nec-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-nec_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-nicira_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-openvswitch-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-openvswitch_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-plumgrid_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-ryu-agent_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-plugin-ryu_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debdeleting and forgetting pool/main/q/quantum/quantum-server_2013.2+git201304040306~precise-0ubuntu1_all.debINFO:root:Storing current commit for next build: 1daf927c9df046c17a8c3f07350f60cf488a4215INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/quantum/grizzly /tmp/tmpked35M/quantummk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmpked35M/quantum/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log f6f253a6cf981f41a6e725abada22ebc51b1aa4e..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sdch -b -D precise --newversion 1:2013.2+git201304041705~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [1daf927] Add expected IDs to router.interface.* notificationsdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC quantum_2013.2+git201304041705~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-havana -n -A quantum_2013.2+git201304041705~precise-0ubuntu1.dscdput ppa:openstack-ubuntu-testing/havana quantum_2013.2+git201304041705~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changesreprepro --waitforlock 10 -Vb /var/lib/jenkins/www/apt include precise-havana quantum_2013.2+git201304041705~precise-0ubuntu1_amd64.changesEmail was triggered for: FixedTrigger Success was overridden by another trigger and will not send an email.Sending email for trigger: Fixed-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to :

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk #249

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_grizzly_keystone_trunk/249/Project:precise_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:17:46 -0400Build duration:6 min 28 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: All recent builds failed.0ChangesNo ChangesConsole Output[...truncated 38490 lines...]Fail-Stage: buildHost Architecture: amd64Install-Time: 27Job: keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1.dscMachine Architecture: amd64Package: keystonePackage-Time: 300Source-Version: 1:2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1Space: 14916Status: attemptedVersion: 1:2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1Finished at 20130404-1724Build needed 00:05:00, 14916k disc spaceERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation/build: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2ERROR:root:Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2INFO:root:Complete command log:INFO:root:Destroying schroot.bzr branch lp:~openstack-ubuntu-testing/keystone/grizzly /tmp/tmp4XCw7b/keystonemk-build-deps -i -r -t apt-get -y /tmp/tmp4XCw7b/keystone/debian/controlpython setup.py sdistgit log -n1 --no-merges --pretty=format:%Hgit log 93b8f2ddf7f00747d7ccace8401b2b68a11bf98f..HEAD --no-merges --pretty=format:[%h] %sdch -b -D precise --newversion 1:2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1 Automated Ubuntu testing build:dch -a [ec9115b] Bump stable/grizzly next version to 2013.1.1dch -a [f4b8ae2] use the roles in the token when recreatingdebcommitbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucbzr builddeb -S -- -sa -us -ucdebsign -k9935ACDC keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1_source.changessbuild -d precise-grizzly -n -A keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1.dscTraceback (most recent call last):  File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 139, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2Error in sys.excepthook:Traceback (most recent call last):  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apport_python_hook.py", line 68, in apport_excepthookbinary = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(os.getcwd(), sys.argv[0]))OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directoryOriginal exception was:Traceback (most recent call last):  File "/var/lib/jenkins/tools/openstack-ubuntu-testing/bin/build-package", line 139, in raise esubprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['sbuild', '-d', 'precise-grizzly', '-n', '-A', 'keystone_2013.1+git201304041718~precise-0ubuntu1.dsc']' returned non-zero exit status 2Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failureEmail was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: raring_grizzly_keystone_trunk #240

2013-04-04 Thread openstack-testing-bot

Title: raring_grizzly_keystone_trunk
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/raring_grizzly_keystone_trunk/240/Project:raring_grizzly_keystone_trunkDate of build:Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:31:58 -0400Build duration:17 secBuild cause:Started by user Adam GandelmanBuilt on:pkg-builderHealth ReportWDescriptionScoreBuild stability: 2 out of the last 5 builds failed.60ChangesNo ChangesConsole OutputStarted by user Adam GandelmanBuilding remotely on pkg-builder in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/raring_grizzly_keystone_trunkCheckout:raring_grizzly_keystone_trunk / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/raring_grizzly_keystone_trunk - hudson.remoting.Channel@2c824005:pkg-builderUsing strategy: DefaultLast Built Revision: Revision d5dcb3babf57c6393c15f0ffc911fc7a833d58bd (origin/milestone-proposed)Checkout:keystone / /var/lib/jenkins/slave/workspace/raring_grizzly_keystone_trunk/keystone - hudson.remoting.LocalChannel@18da3e94Wiping out workspace first.Cloning the remote Git repositoryCloning repository originFetching upstream changes from https://github.com/openstack/keystone.gitERROR: Couldn't find any revision to build. Verify the repository and branch configuration for this job.Email was triggered for: FailureSending email for trigger: Failure-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

53 matches

Mail list logo