[Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

2013-03-07 Thread Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL)
Hello,

I would like to know the plans for nova, glance, etc to adopt keystone v3 API. 
Is there an expectation that this happens in Havana timeframe?

I am asking as the it seems the Domains feature is not useful until services 
are capable of validating a v3 token and move to keystone v3 API.

Thanks in advance,

Glaucimar Aguiar



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

2013-03-07 Thread Dolph Mathews
The v3 API is largely abstracted from other services (horizon being a major
exception) using keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token, which is being
revised here [1] and here [2].

Because the clients do not necessarily follow the same release schedule as
the services, we've obviously been focused on the API and it's server-side
implementation. I expect we'll do a v3-compliant release of keystoneclient
around the time of grizzly's release. openstackclient (providing CLI
exposure) is in the works as well [3].

[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23401/
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21942/
[3]:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+status:open,n,z


-Dolph


On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I would like to know the plans for nova, glance, etc to adopt keystone v3
 API. Is there an expectation that this happens in Havana timeframe?

 I am asking as the it seems the Domains feature is not useful until
 services are capable of validating a v3 token and move to keystone v3 API.

 Thanks in advance,

 Glaucimar Aguiar



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

2013-03-07 Thread Dolph Mathews
Yes, exactly. Until keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token is revised, v3
tokens will basically only be useful against keystone.


-Dolph


On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:

  Hi Dolph,

 ** **

 Thank you very much for your answer. I really appreciate it.

 ** **

 Are you saying then, that I configure nova (for example) to use v3
 middleware, I should be able to call nova with a v3 token and this token
 will get validated?

 ** **

 Glaucimar Aguiar

 ** **

 ** **

 *From:* Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* quinta-feira, 7 de março de 2013 11:04
 *To:* Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL)
 *Cc:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 *Subject:* Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

 ** **

 The v3 API is largely abstracted from other services (horizon being a
 major exception) using keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token, which is being
 revised here [1] and here [2].

 ** **

 Because the clients do not necessarily follow the same release schedule as
 the services, we've obviously been focused on the API and it's server-side
 implementation. I expect we'll do a v3-compliant release of keystoneclient
 around the time of grizzly's release. openstackclient (providing CLI
 exposure) is in the works as well [3].


 [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23401/

 [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21942/

 [3]:
 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+status:open,n,z
 


 

 ** **

 -Dolph

 ** **

 On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
 glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I would like to know the plans for nova, glance, etc to adopt keystone v3
 API. Is there an expectation that this happens in Havana timeframe?

 I am asking as the it seems the Domains feature is not useful until
 services are capable of validating a v3 token and move to keystone v3 API.

 Thanks in advance,

 Glaucimar Aguiar



 ___
 Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
 Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
 More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

 ** **

___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

2013-03-07 Thread Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL)
Perfect, thanks!


From: Dolph Mathews [mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 7 de março de 2013 14:56
To: Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL); openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

Yes, exactly. Until keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token is revised, v3 tokens 
will basically only be useful against keystone.


-Dolph

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
glaucimar.agu...@hp.commailto:glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Dolph,

Thank you very much for your answer. I really appreciate it.

Are you saying then, that I configure nova (for example) to use v3 middleware, 
I should be able to call nova with a v3 token and this token will get validated?

Glaucimar Aguiar


From: Dolph Mathews 
[mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.commailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 7 de março de 2013 11:04
To: Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL)
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

The v3 API is largely abstracted from other services (horizon being a major 
exception) using keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token, which is being revised 
here [1] and here [2].

Because the clients do not necessarily follow the same release schedule as the 
services, we've obviously been focused on the API and it's server-side 
implementation. I expect we'll do a v3-compliant release of keystoneclient 
around the time of grizzly's release. openstackclient (providing CLI exposure) 
is in the works as well [3].

[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23401/
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21942/
[3]: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+status:open,n,z


-Dolph

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
glaucimar.agu...@hp.commailto:glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,

I would like to know the plans for nova, glance, etc to adopt keystone v3 API. 
Is there an expectation that this happens in Havana timeframe?

I am asking as the it seems the Domains feature is not useful until services 
are capable of validating a v3 token and move to keystone v3 API.

Thanks in advance,

Glaucimar Aguiar



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

2013-03-07 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
Hello,

I am sorry but I am still a tad bit confused with this email thread.

As of the Grizzly-3 release:


1.   Do Grizzly-3 OpenStack services  like Nova accept and validate 
Keystone V3 tokens (both UUID and PKI) ?

2.   Do Grizzly-3 OpenStack services use the Keystone v2.0 APIs or do they 
use the Keystone v3 APIs?

3.   Do the OpenStack services rely upon the keystoneclient? I thought the 
keystoneclient was a command line interface?

For the Grizzly final release:


1.   Will the Grizzly OpenStack services  like Nova accept and validate 
Keystone V3 tokens (both UUID and PKI) ?

2.   Will Grizzly OpenStack services use the Keystone v3 APIs?

3.   Will Grizzly OpenStack services use/implement new v3 features like 
domains and groups?

4.   How will the v3 keystoneclient and the v3 openstackclient be used 
other than as command line interfaces?

Regards,

Mark Miller


From: openstack-bounces+mark.m.miller=hp@lists.launchpad.net 
[mailto:openstack-bounces+mark.m.miller=hp@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf 
Of Dolph Mathews
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 9:56 AM
To: Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL); openstack
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

Yes, exactly. Until keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token is revised, v3 tokens 
will basically only be useful against keystone.


-Dolph

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
glaucimar.agu...@hp.commailto:glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Dolph,

Thank you very much for your answer. I really appreciate it.

Are you saying then, that I configure nova (for example) to use v3 middleware, 
I should be able to call nova with a v3 token and this token will get validated?

Glaucimar Aguiar


From: Dolph Mathews 
[mailto:dolph.math...@gmail.commailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 7 de março de 2013 11:04
To: Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL)
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Keystone v3 adoption

The v3 API is largely abstracted from other services (horizon being a major 
exception) using keystoneclient.middleware.auth_token, which is being revised 
here [1] and here [2].

Because the clients do not necessarily follow the same release schedule as the 
services, we've obviously been focused on the API and it's server-side 
implementation. I expect we'll do a v3-compliant release of keystoneclient 
around the time of grizzly's release. openstackclient (providing CLI exposure) 
is in the works as well [3].

[1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/23401/
[2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21942/
[3]: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+status:open,n,z


-Dolph

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Aguiar, Glaucimar (Brazil RD-ECL) 
glaucimar.agu...@hp.commailto:glaucimar.agu...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,

I would like to know the plans for nova, glance, etc to adopt keystone v3 API. 
Is there an expectation that this happens in Havana timeframe?

I am asking as the it seems the Domains feature is not useful until services 
are capable of validating a v3 token and move to keystone v3 API.

Thanks in advance,

Glaucimar Aguiar



___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : 
openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp