[openstack-dev] [devstack] Review request for 41053

2013-09-02 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Hi fellows,

Can someone of the devstack-core team please review this patch: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41053/ ?


- Roman


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Documentation and patches

2013-09-02 Thread Thierry Carrez
Lorin Hochstein wrote:
 Would it help  if doc bugs were associated with the relevant OpenStack
 project, in addition to the openstack-manauls project? For example, we
 could mark nova-related doc bugs as nova project bugs in addition to
 openstack-manuals project bugs.

I'm not a big fan of this idea.

The goal of task tracking is to have actionable tasks that can be
completed by committing a solution to one given repository. So if the
fix is supposed to land in an docs repo (and not, say, in the nova
repo), then the bug should appear in the docs task tracking, and be
automatically closed when the commit mentioning the bug lands into that
repository.

The problem if you add a 'nova' task for the same bug is that there will
be no way of closing that bug automatically, since there is actually
nothing to land in that repository. You're using task tracking to do a
notification and an easy search for the developers. That is not what the
'project' means in task tracking. You're using a 'nova' task only to
attract 'nova devs' attention. This makes the whole task tracking more
inaccurate.

I would rather use tagging to link a doc bug (or a QA bug) to a wanted
audience, and encourage people to search for tasks being tagged with the
name of their project, which is where their help is required. Or use
subscription. Something that is linked to the people and not the code
repository.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Resource URL support for more than two levels

2013-09-02 Thread P Balaji-B37839
Hi Mark,

Do you suggest us to pause on this BP. Let us know if someone is already 
working on this.

Regards,
Balaji.P

From: Mark McClain [mailto:mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 5:41 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Resource URL support for more than two 
levels

Stay tuned.  There are folks working on a proposed set of API framework 
changes.  This will be something that we'll discuss as part of deciding the 
features in the Icehouse release.

mark

On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Justin Hammond 
justin.hamm...@rackspace.commailto:justin.hamm...@rackspace.com wrote:


I find that kind of flexibility quite valuable for plugin developers. +1 to 
this. I'd like to be involved if possible with helping you with it.

From: balaji patnala patnala...@gmail.commailto:patnala...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:02:33 +0530
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List 
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: openst...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openst...@lists.openstack.org 
openst...@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openst...@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Resource URL support for more than two 
levels

Hi,

When compared to Nova URL implementations, It is observed that the Neutron URL 
support cannot be used for more than TWO levels.

Applications which want to add as PLUG-IN may be restricted with this.

We want to add support for changes required for supporting more than TWO Levels 
of URL by adding the support changes required in Core Neutron Files.

Any comments/interest in this.?

Regards,
Balaji.P




On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:04 PM, B Veera-B37207 
b37...@freescale.commailto:b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,

The current infrastructure provided in Quantum [Grizzly], while building 
Quantum API resource URL using the base function 'base.create_resource()' and 
RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_MAP/SUB_RESOURCE_ATTRIBUTE_MAP, supports only two level URI.
Example:
GET  /lb/pools/pool_id/members/member_id

Some applications may need more than two levels of URL support. Example: GET  
/lb/pools/pool_id/members/member_id/xyz/xyz_id

If anybody is interested in this, we want to contribute for this as BP and make 
it upstream.

Regards,
Veera.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___ OpenStack-dev mailing list 
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org 
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Help needed in installing xmlsec1 python library

2013-09-02 Thread D . Selvaraj
Hi,

Thank you so much for  the response. I got it sorted out. 

Regards



Deepak Selvaraj

MSc.,Future Computing

University of Kent


From: Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 3:47 AM
To: D.Selvaraj
Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Help needed in installing xmlsec1 python library

D.Selvaraj ds...@kent.ac.uk writes:

 Hi Stackers,

 Can someone please suggest me with an easy way to download Xmlsec module in 
 my unix environment ? I have downloaded it but I am not able to install it. 
 When I click make it shows an error stating there is no make available. 
 Please help



More information will be helpful to provide concrete answers.

1. Which version of Unix?
2. Where did you download the package from?
3. What are the steps you followed?

Thanks and Regards
Noorul

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] Review request for 40171

2013-09-02 Thread Yingjun Li
Hi, all,

Could any one from the nova core team take a look at the patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40171/

Clean destroy for project quota

* Destroy user quotas under the project when deleting project quota.
* Fixes bug 1206479 https://code.launchpad.net/bugs/1206479

Change-Id: 
Id8391a2f6c25974b990c4a95a6bc99d696cd1c98https://review.openstack.org/#q,Id8391a2f6c25974b990c4a95a6bc99d696cd1c98,n,z

Thanks

Yingjun
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data Protection As a Service project

2013-09-02 Thread Zane Bitter

On 01/09/13 23:11, Alex Rudenko wrote:

Hello everyone,

I would like to ask a question. But, first of all, I would like to say
that I'm new to OpenStack so the question might be irrelevant. From what
I've understood, the idea is to back up an entire stack including VMs,
volumes, networks etc. Let's call the information about how these pieces
are interconnected - a topology. This topology also has to be backed up
along with VMs, volumes, networks, right? And then this topology can be
used to restore the entire stack. As for me, it looks very similar to
what the Heat project does. Am I right? So maybe it's possible to use
the Heat project for this kind of backup/restore functionality?

Best regards,
Alex


That's actually an excellent question.

One of the things that's new in Heat for the Havana release is 
Suspend/Resume operations on stacks. Basically this involves going 
through the stack in (reverse) dependency order and calling 
suspend/resume APIs for each resource where that makes sense. Steve 
Hardy has written the code for this in such a way as to be pretty 
generic and allow us to add more operations quite easily in the future.


So to the extent that you just require something to go through every 
resource in a stack in dependency order and call an *existing* backup 
API, then Heat could fit the bill. If you require co-ordination between 
e.g. Nova and Cinder then Heat is probably not a good vehicle for 
implementing that.


cheers,
Zane.



On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Giri Basava giri.bas...@triliodata.com
mailto:giri.bas...@triliodata.com wrote:

Dear All,

This is a great discussion. If I understand this correctly, this is
a proposal for data protection as a whole for the OpenStack cloud,
however this is not yet an official incubation request. We are
having a good discussion on how we can better serve the adoption of
OpenStack.

Having said that, the proposal will reuse the existing API and
contributions by the community that are already in place. For
example, Catlin's point is very valid... the Cinder storage vendor
knows the best way to implement snapshots for their storage
platforms. No doubt, Raksha should be leveraging that IP. Similarly
Raksha will be leveraging Nova, Swift as well as Glance. Don't
forget Neutron networking is very critical part of data
protection for any VM or set of VMs.

No one project has one single answer for a comprehensive data
protection. The capabilities for backup and recovery exist in silos
in various projects...

1. Images are backed-up by Nova
2. Volumes are backed-up by Cinder
3. I am not aware of a solution that can backup network configuration.
4. Not sure if we have something that can backup the resources of a
VM ( vCPUs, Memory Configuration etc.)
5. One can't schedule and automate the above very easily.

Ronen's point about consistency groups is right on the mark. We need
to treat an application as an unit that may span multiple VMs, one
or more images and one or more volumes.

Just to reiterate, some form of these capabilities exist in the
current projects, however as a user of OpenStack, I may not have a
simple one click solution.

With this proposal, the ask is to engage in a discussion to address
the above use cases. IMHO we are on the right track with these
discussions. We will be submitting the code in few days and looking
forward for your feedback. I would also suggest a design summit
where we can flush out more details.

Regards,
Giri

-Original Message-
From: Avishay Traeger [mailto:avis...@il.ibm.com
mailto:avis...@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 10:53 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data Protection
As a Service project

+1



From:   Ronen Kat/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
 openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date:   09/01/2013 08:02 AM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data
Protection As a
 Service project



Hi Murali,

Thanks for answering. I think the issues you raised indeed make
sense, and important ones.

We need to provide backup both for:
1. Volumes
2. VM instances (VM image, VM metadata, and attached volumes)

While the Cinder-backup handles (1), and is a very mature service,
it does not provide (2), and for Cinder-backup it does not make
sense to handle (2) as well.
Backup of VMs (as a package) is beyond the scope of Cinder, which
implies that indeed something beyond Cinder should take this task.
I think this can be done by having Nova orchestrate or assist the
backup, either of volumes or VMs.

I think that from a backup perspective, there is also a need for

[openstack-dev] Backwards incompatible migration changes - Discussion

2013-09-02 Thread Joshua Hesketh

Howdy,

At the moment database migrations are required to implement a downgrade
method to ensure updates can be rolled back. Currently downgrades are only
being tested by Jenkins/tox against sqlite databases. MySQL and Postgresql
are not tested and often have special edge cases. I have been working on
fixing broken downgrades to work correctly for these engines[0].

However, separate to that, there are cases where a migration may upgrade 
in a

way that is not backwards compatible. For example, a column or even whole
table may be dropped. The question of what to do in these circumstances is
unclear with many migrations taking different approaches.

For example, migration 209 creates a dump_table and populates it with data
that will be dropped in the upgrade. This then sits there until the 
migration

is downgraded at which point the data is copied back into place and the
dump_table is removed. A similar approach (in [1]) is also being reviewed
where lost data is copied into backup_table_migration_214 and restored on
downgrade. Then we have the example [2] where no lost data is preserved.

These all pose a few different questions. Namely:

1) Do we want to require migrations to downgrade data, or just schema?
2) If we do downgrade data then how should it look?

There is perhaps a secondary discussion around the necessity of downgrades
given most sysadmins would snapshot/backup a restore point before upgrading
themselves but I want to suspend that for the purpose of this discussion.

I think with #2 we should at least be listing the migration number in the
table name for reference sake. This will also give administrators an idea of
when they can safely drop backup tables (as a side note, perhaps this should
be documented).

We also have examples where data can be reconstructed without a backup 
table,

usually when the migration moves data into a new table (for example [3]). So
perhaps another option is we only require downgrading for data that can be
reconstructed without backups.

Cheers,
Josh

[0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40137/
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39685/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42736/
[3] Migration 186

--
Rackspace Australia

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Savanna] supported hadoop versions

2013-09-02 Thread Nadezhda Privalova
Hi Arindam,

Currently Savanna has plugin structure and Vanilla plugin supports only
Hadoop 1.1.2. But this restriction is reflected mostly in configs for
Hadoop. You may take a look to all config-defaults files in
https://github.com/stackforge/savanna/tree/master/savanna/plugins/vanilla/resources.
Services starting may depend on version too.  E.g. all processes are
started using hadoop-daemon.sh. You may examine all this start-commands in
this file:
https://github.com/stackforge/savanna/blob/master/savanna/plugins/vanilla/run_scripts.py.
So to support earlier hadoop versions a new plugin may be created and
it
will not be too different from existing Vanilla plugin. If you are
interested in it's implementation you are very welcome!

Thanks,
Nadya
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data Protection As a Service project

2013-09-02 Thread Murali Balcha
I am not an expert in Heat but the way I understood the Heat project is that it 
is an orchestration layer that instantiate a composite application based on a 
template definition. The template may identify the vms, networks and storage 
resources needed to instantiate the composite application. Using the template, 
a tenant may instantiate one of more instances of composite application. 

Backup service such as Raksha has to backup composite application instances in 
their entirety. It can look into Heat meta data to understand the application 
definition and correctly backup the application.

 I am not sure Heat can manage individual application instances once they are 
created. I need to do more research on Heat, but I also defer comments to Heat 
experts.

Other way to integrate Heat with Raskha is to make a backup policy part of Heat 
template and let Heat setup correct backup policy by calling Rakha Apis during 
composite application instantiation.

Thanks,
Murali Balcha

On Sep 2, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:

 On 01/09/13 23:11, Alex Rudenko wrote:
 Hello everyone,
 
 I would like to ask a question. But, first of all, I would like to say
 that I'm new to OpenStack so the question might be irrelevant. From what
 I've understood, the idea is to back up an entire stack including VMs,
 volumes, networks etc. Let's call the information about how these pieces
 are interconnected - a topology. This topology also has to be backed up
 along with VMs, volumes, networks, right? And then this topology can be
 used to restore the entire stack. As for me, it looks very similar to
 what the Heat project does. Am I right? So maybe it's possible to use
 the Heat project for this kind of backup/restore functionality?
 
 Best regards,
 Alex
 
 That's actually an excellent question.
 
 One of the things that's new in Heat for the Havana release is Suspend/Resume 
 operations on stacks. Basically this involves going through the stack in 
 (reverse) dependency order and calling suspend/resume APIs for each resource 
 where that makes sense. Steve Hardy has written the code for this in such a 
 way as to be pretty generic and allow us to add more operations quite easily 
 in the future.
 
 So to the extent that you just require something to go through every resource 
 in a stack in dependency order and call an *existing* backup API, then Heat 
 could fit the bill. If you require co-ordination between e.g. Nova and Cinder 
 then Heat is probably not a good vehicle for implementing that.
 
 cheers,
 Zane.
 
 
 On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Giri Basava giri.bas...@triliodata.com
 mailto:giri.bas...@triliodata.com wrote:
 
Dear All,
 
This is a great discussion. If I understand this correctly, this is
a proposal for data protection as a whole for the OpenStack cloud,
however this is not yet an official incubation request. We are
having a good discussion on how we can better serve the adoption of
OpenStack.
 
Having said that, the proposal will reuse the existing API and
contributions by the community that are already in place. For
example, Catlin's point is very valid... the Cinder storage vendor
knows the best way to implement snapshots for their storage
platforms. No doubt, Raksha should be leveraging that IP. Similarly
Raksha will be leveraging Nova, Swift as well as Glance. Don't
forget Neutron networking is very critical part of data
protection for any VM or set of VMs.
 
No one project has one single answer for a comprehensive data
protection. The capabilities for backup and recovery exist in silos
in various projects...
 
1. Images are backed-up by Nova
2. Volumes are backed-up by Cinder
3. I am not aware of a solution that can backup network configuration.
4. Not sure if we have something that can backup the resources of a
VM ( vCPUs, Memory Configuration etc.)
5. One can't schedule and automate the above very easily.
 
Ronen's point about consistency groups is right on the mark. We need
to treat an application as an unit that may span multiple VMs, one
or more images and one or more volumes.
 
Just to reiterate, some form of these capabilities exist in the
current projects, however as a user of OpenStack, I may not have a
simple one click solution.
 
With this proposal, the ask is to engage in a discussion to address
the above use cases. IMHO we are on the right track with these
discussions. We will be submitting the code in few days and looking
forward for your feedback. I would also suggest a design summit
where we can flush out more details.
 
Regards,
Giri
 
-Original Message-
From: Avishay Traeger [mailto:avis...@il.ibm.com
mailto:avis...@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 10:53 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data Protection
As a 

Re: [openstack-dev] Adding a new column to a table.

2013-09-02 Thread Boris Pavlovic
You should add also corresponding migration in:

Nova/db/sqlalchemy/migrate_repo/...



Send from my phone

02.09.2013, в 12:41, Peeyush Gupta gpeey...@ymail.com написал(а):

 Hi,
 
 I have been trying to add a new column to compute_nodes table.
 I understand the table is defined at db.sqlalchemy.models.py. So,
 I added a new field in the file and restarted the nova-compute process.
 But, there is no change in the table. What am I doing wrong? Where 
 should I make changes to add the column?
 
 P.S: I am using devstack on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
 
 Thanks,   
  
 ~Peeyush Gupta
 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Murano] Murano v0.2 RC1 has been released

2013-09-02 Thread Timur Sufiev
Good news everyone!

Murano v0.2 Release Candidate 1 has been released, here are links to the
sources:
API Service: https://github.com/stackforge/murano-api/releases/tag/rc1
Client:
https://github.com/stackforge/python-muranoclient/releases/tag/rc1
OS Agent: https://github.com/stackforge/murano-agent/releases/tag/rc1
Orchestration Engine:
https://github.com/stackforge/murano-conductor/releases/tag/rc1
Dashboard:
https://github.com/stackforge/murano-dashboard/releases/tag/rc1
Documentation:
https://github.com/stackforge/murano-docs/releases/tag/rc1

You can try it and if you submit any new bugs (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano), there is a good chance they'll be fixed
in final version 0.2 - which will be released on 5th September, as planned.
We are finishing several screencasts right now, so stay tuned :)!

-- 
Timur Sufiev
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for Raksha, a Data Protection As a Service project

2013-09-02 Thread Sylvain Bauza

Hi Murali,

Le 02/09/2013 15:19, Murali Balcha a écrit :

I am not an expert in Heat but the way I understood the Heat project is that it 
is an orchestration layer that instantiate a composite application based on a 
template definition. The template may identify the vms, networks and storage 
resources needed to instantiate the composite application. Using the template, 
a tenant may instantiate one of more instances of composite application.


As per Heat mission statement [1], Heat role is to manage lifecycle of 
applications. I'm not an Heat expert at all, but at least regarding 
Nova, doing a snapshot is conceptually on the same page as boot or 
destroy. Re: Cinder, I would assume snapshotting a volume is also part 
of its management, like attaching it.


From my pov, it would then make sense to describe the /backup operation 
/as a extended capability of the Heat API which could then calls its 
dependencies.


-Sylvain



Backup service such as Raksha has to backup composite application instances in 
their entirety. It can look into Heat meta data to understand the application 
definition and correctly backup the application.

  I am not sure Heat can manage individual application instances once they are 
created. I need to do more research on Heat, but I also defer comments to Heat 
experts.

Other way to integrate Heat with Raskha is to make a backup policy part of Heat 
template and let Heat setup correct backup policy by calling Rakha Apis during 
composite application instantiation.

Thanks,
Murali Balcha

On Sep 2, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:


On 01/09/13 23:11, Alex Rudenko wrote:

Hello everyone,

I would like to ask a question. But, first of all, I would like to say
that I'm new to OpenStack so the question might be irrelevant. From what
I've understood, the idea is to back up an entire stack including VMs,
volumes, networks etc. Let's call the information about how these pieces
are interconnected - a topology. This topology also has to be backed up
along with VMs, volumes, networks, right? And then this topology can be
used to restore the entire stack. As for me, it looks very similar to
what the Heat project does. Am I right? So maybe it's possible to use
the Heat project for this kind of backup/restore functionality?

Best regards,
Alex

That's actually an excellent question.

One of the things that's new in Heat for the Havana release is Suspend/Resume 
operations on stacks. Basically this involves going through the stack in 
(reverse) dependency order and calling suspend/resume APIs for each resource 
where that makes sense. Steve Hardy has written the code for this in such a way 
as to be pretty generic and allow us to add more operations quite easily in the 
future.

So to the extent that you just require something to go through every resource 
in a stack in dependency order and call an *existing* backup API, then Heat 
could fit the bill. If you require co-ordination between e.g. Nova and Cinder 
then Heat is probably not a good vehicle for implementing that.

cheers,
Zane.



On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Giri Basava giri.bas...@triliodata.com
mailto:giri.bas...@triliodata.com wrote:

Dear All,

This is a great discussion. If I understand this correctly, this is
a proposal for data protection as a whole for the OpenStack cloud,
however this is not yet an official incubation request. We are
having a good discussion on how we can better serve the adoption of
OpenStack.

Having said that, the proposal will reuse the existing API and
contributions by the community that are already in place. For
example, Catlin's point is very valid... the Cinder storage vendor
knows the best way to implement snapshots for their storage
platforms. No doubt, Raksha should be leveraging that IP. Similarly
Raksha will be leveraging Nova, Swift as well as Glance. Don't
forget Neutron networking is very critical part of data
protection for any VM or set of VMs.

No one project has one single answer for a comprehensive data
protection. The capabilities for backup and recovery exist in silos
in various projects...

1. Images are backed-up by Nova
2. Volumes are backed-up by Cinder
3. I am not aware of a solution that can backup network configuration.
4. Not sure if we have something that can backup the resources of a
VM ( vCPUs, Memory Configuration etc.)
5. One can't schedule and automate the above very easily.

Ronen's point about consistency groups is right on the mark. We need
to treat an application as an unit that may span multiple VMs, one
or more images and one or more volumes.

Just to reiterate, some form of these capabilities exist in the
current projects, however as a user of OpenStack, I may not have a
simple one click solution.

With this proposal, the ask is to engage in a discussion to address
the above use cases. IMHO we are on the 

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Meeting Minutes 2013-08-26

2013-09-02 Thread Denis Koryavov
Hello,

Below, you can see the meeting minutes from today's Murano meeting.

Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2013/murano.2013-09-02-15.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2013/murano.2013-09-02-15.02.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2013/murano.2013-09-02-15.02.log.html

The next meeting will be 9th Sep. Have a nice day.

--
Denis
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday September 3rd at 19:00 UTC

2013-09-02 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday September 3rd, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting

Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)

Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding
automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend.

-- 
Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pleia2
http://www.princessleia.com

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [Nova] Testing support for PCI passthrough

2013-09-02 Thread Irena Berezovsky
Hi guys,
Great work on adding PCI pass-through support to nova.
We would like  to test the support for PCI pass-through.
We thought to use devstack (nova) on physical machine with SR-IOV devices and 
apply patches that are still under review.
Can you please advise what should be defined in nova.conf and what should be 
requested on nova-boot command in order to create VM with PCI device?
Is it according to documented at 
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Enhanced-platform-awareness-pcie?
Can you please help me to identify the use cases that merged patches support?

Thank you very much,
Irena
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] Openstack Folsom + Quantum + XenServer 6.1.0 + Windows VM

2013-09-02 Thread Dbarros
Hi,

I'm having a network problem when spawn windows vm into xenserver.
A 'tap' and 'vif' interface are created until the boot is completed, after
that interface 'tap' is removed and interface 'vif' loses id tag
From what i searched, because of this Windows VM cant configure network
correctly.

ps; I can see the DHCP requests on the host, but them arent being sent to
the network node by gre tunnel.

It's been weeks trying to find for a solution with no success. Can someone
please help me on this issue?
I've followed the link below to configure xenserver to openstack

https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/plugins/xenserver/doc/networking.rst

Thanks in advance
-- 
Dbarros
5585 9919 6279
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [nova] sample configuration file

2013-09-02 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi,
Whilst reviewing the olso messaging (my poor browser with all of the open tabs) 
it has come to my attention that the nova sample configuration file no longer 
has the RPC message configuration values. The common CFG values are also no 
longer in the file. I think that this is a bug and would like to know what 
others think.
Thanks
Gary
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] Questions related to live migration without target host

2013-09-02 Thread Guangya Liu
Greetings,

There is an issue related to live migration without target host might
want to get more discussion/feedback from you experts:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1214943.

I have proposed a fix for this issue (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43213/), the fix was directly remove the
checking for free ram and always trust the result from nova scheduler as
nova scheduler already select a best host for live migration based on the
function filter_scheduler.py:select_hosts.

Please show your comments if any, you can also directly append your
comments to  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43213/.

Thanks,

Jake Liu
UnitedStack Inc
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] Questions related to live migration without target host

2013-09-02 Thread Guangya Liu
Greetings,

There is an issue related to live migration might want to get more
discussion/feedback from you experts:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1214943

I have proposed a fix for this issue (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/43213/), the fix was directly remove the
checking for free ram and always trust the result from nova scheduler as
nova scheduler already select a best host for live migration based on

Thanks,

Jake Liu
UnitedStack Inc
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] sample configuration file

2013-09-02 Thread Zhongyue Luo
This issue was first raised here,

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38333/

Some of us are trying to find a work-around solution but apparently things
aren't as simple as they seem.


On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:

 Hi,
 Whilst reviewing the olso messaging (my poor browser with all of the open
 tabs) it has come to my attention that the nova sample configuration file
 no longer has the RPC message configuration values. The common CFG values
 are also no longer in the file. I think that this is a bug and would like
 to know what others think.
 Thanks
 Gary

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
*Intel SSG/STOD/DCST/CIT*
880 Zixing Road, Zizhu Science Park, Minhang District, 200241, Shanghai,
China
+862161166500
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] Scheduler sub-group meeting on 9/3

2013-09-02 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Let's try and have a meeting this week (hopefully a few can attend).  Topics 
that come to mind:

1) Multiple-scheduler-drivers (seems to be some open issues from the mailing 
list)
2) Scheduler design sessions at the Icehouse summit
3) Perspective for Nova scheduler (Boris' proposal at 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_DRv7it_mwalEZzLy5WO92TJcummpmWL4NWsWf0UWiQ/edit#heading=h.6ixj0ctv4rwu
  )


--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786



___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev