Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] add service discovery, proxysql, vault, fabio and FQDN endpoints
> On 8. Oct 2018, at 19:48, Jay Pipes wrote: > > Why not send all read and all write traffic to a single haproxy endpoint and > just have haproxy spread all traffic across each Galera node? > > Galera, after all, is multi-master synchronous replication... so it shouldn't > matter which node in the Galera cluster you send traffic to. Probably because of MySQL deadlocks in Galera: —snip— Galera cluster has known limitations, one of them is that it uses cluster-wide optimistic locking. This may cause some transactions to rollback. With an increasing number of writeable masters, the transaction rollback rate may increase, especially if there is write contention on the same dataset. It is of course possible to retry the transaction and perhaps it will COMMIT in the retries, but this will add to the transaction latency. However, some designs are deadlock prone, e.g sequence tables. —snap— Source: https://severalnines.com/resources/tutorials/mysql-load-balancing-haproxy-tutorial Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Chason Chan (chason) as kolla-ansible core
+1 > On 25. Sep 2018, at 17:47, Eduardo Gonzalez wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose Chason Chan to the kolla-ansible core team. > > Chason is been working on addition of Vitrage roles, rework VpnaaS service, > maintaining > documentation as well as fixing many bugs. > > Voting will be open for 14 days (until 9th of Oct). > > Kolla-ansible cores, please leave a vote. > Consider this mail my +1 vote > > Regards, > Eduardo > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Nominating Steve Noyes for kolla-cli core reviewer
+1 > On 31. May 2018, at 19:02, Borne Mace wrote: > > Greetings all, > > I would like to propose the addition of Steve Noyes to the kolla-cli core > reviewer team. Consider this nomination as my personal +1. > > Steve has a long history with the kolla-cli and should be considered its > co-creator as probably half or more of the existing code was due to his > efforts. He has now been working diligently since it was pushed upstream to > improve the stability and testability of the cli and has the second most > commits on the project. > > The kolla core team consists of 19 people, and the kolla-cli team of 2, for a > total of 21. Steve therefore requires a minimum of 11 votes (so just 10 more > after my +1), with no veto -2 votes within a 7 day voting window to end on > June 6th. Voting will be closed immediately on a veto or in the case of a > unanimous vote. > > As I'm not sure how active all of the 19 kolla cores are, your attention and > timely vote is much appreciated. > > Thanks! > > -- Borne > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote]Core nomination for Mark Goddard (mgoddard) as kolla core member
+1 > On 26. Apr 2018, at 17:31, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote: > > Kolla core reviewer team, > > It is my pleasure to nominate mgoddard for kolla core team. > > Mark has been working both upstream and downstream with kolla and > kolla-ansible for over two years, building bare metal compute clouds with > ironic for HPC. He's been involved with OpenStack since 2014. He started > the kayobe deployment project which complements kolla-ansible. He is > also the most active non-core contributor for last 90 days[1] > > Consider this nomination a +1 vote from me > > A +1 vote indicates you are in favor of mgoddard as a candidate, a -1 > is a veto. Voting is open for 7 days until May 4th, or a unanimous > response is reached or a veto vote occurs. > > [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/kolla-group/90 > > -- > Regards, > Jeffrey Zhang > Blog: http://xcodest.me > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote]Retire kolla-kubernetes project
+1 > On 18. Apr 2018, at 03:51, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since many of the contributors in the kolla-kubernetes project are moved to > other things. And there is no active contributor for months. On the other > hand, there is another comparable project, openstack-helm, in the community. > For less confusion and disruptive community resource, I propose to retire the > kolla-kubernetes project. > > More discussion about this you can check the mail[0] and patch[1] > > please vote +1 to retire the repo, or -1 not to retire the repo. The vote > will be open until everyone has voted, or for 1 week until April 25th, 2018. > > [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128822.html > [1] https://review.openstack.org/552531 > > -- > Regards, > Jeffrey Zhang > Blog: http://xcodest.me > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla-ansible cli proposal
In my opinion, a separate repository would be most suitable for this. So we do not mix the ansible roll with a frontend for ansible itself and are independent. Importing the project into the OpenStack namespace is probably easier this way. Christian. > On 20. Mar 2018, at 18:02, Borne Mace <borne.m...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Greetings all, > > One of the discussions we had at the recent PTG was in regards to the > blueprint to add support for a kolla-ansible cli [0]. I would like to > propose that to satisfy this blueprint the thus far Oracle developed > kollacli be completely upstreamed and made a community guided project. > > The source for the project is available already [1] and it is known to > work against the Queens codebase. My suggestion would be that either a > new repository be created for it or it be included in the > kolla-ansible repository. Either way my hope is that it be under > kolla project control, as far as PTL guidance and core contributors. > > The kollacli is documented here [2] for your review, and along with > any discussion that folks want to have on the mailing list I will make > sure to be around for the next couple of wednesday kolla meetings so > that it can be discussed there as well. > > Thanks much for taking the time to read this, > > -- Borne Mace > > [0]: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/kolla-multicloud-cli > [1]: https://oss.oracle.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openstack-kollacli.git;a=summary > [2]: https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E90981_01/E90982/html/kollacli.html > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] core nomination for caoyuan
+1 > On 12. Mar 2018, at 03:06, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is my pleasure to nominate caoyuan for kolla core team. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][ptg] Team dinner
+1 Thanks for the organisation. > On 26. Feb 2018, at 20:39, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hey Kolla, > > Hope you're all enjoying Dublin so far :) Some have expressed interest in > getting together for a team meal, how does Thursday sound? Please reply to > this with +1/-1 and I can see about booking something. > > Cheers, > -Paul > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Rocky PTL candidacy
Hello Paul. > On 5. Feb 2018, at 11:12, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > This does not mean I don't have a vision for Kolla - no project is perfect Regardless of that, I would be interested in your visions. What specifically do you want to tackle in the next cycle in kolla? What should be the focus? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible] Proposing Surya (spsurya) for core
+1 > On 14. Jun 2017, at 17:46, Michał Jastrzębski <inc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > With great pleasure I'm kicking off another core voting to > kolla-ansible and kolla teams:) this one is about spsurya. Voting will > be open for 2 weeks (till 28th Jun). > > Consider this mail my +1 vote, you know the drill:) > > Regards, > Michal > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Which distros are used as base ones?
> On 27. Apr 2017, at 11:46, Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> > wrote: > > Does someone care about Ubuntu? Yes, we do. We are using the Ubuntu source images with the Newton and Ocata branches from kolla/kolla-ansible. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [openstack-docs] [dev] What's up, Doc?
> On 24 Feb 2017, at 13:32, Alexandra Settle <a.set...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Please vote for your fellow documenter below: The community voting for Boston already closed. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Structuring the documentation on all repositories
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:52, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > I'm a little confused on the final outcome, it sounds like most of what > you've written is currently the case. > > Besides a more user friendly deploy guide appearing under > https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/ocata/, what is changing? * all deploy instructions will be moved from doc directory in the deploy-guide directory * all generic information will be removed from kolla-ansible/kolla-k8s repositories and will be provided in the kolla repository * the generic information in the kolla repository will be extented Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [kolla] Structuring the documentation on all repositories
This is a summary about structuring the documentation on all repositories as discussed at the PTG (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-pike-ptg-docs). The doc directory: kolla/doc — kolla developer documentation (about our docker images) and generic documentation kolla-ansible/doc — kolla-ansible developer documentation kolla-k8s/doc — kolla-k8s developer documentation Contents will be published to https://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla…/ The doc directory in the kolla repositories will be splitted into 2 parts and will keep the generic kolla documentation (landing page, mission, philosophy, explanation of deliverables, overview of deployment guides (previous QSG), bug triage, how to contribute, ...) and the development documentation related to kolla images. The central entry point (landing page) for the kolla project will be https://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla. The deploy-guide directory: kolla-ansible/deploy-guide — Kolla deployment guide for Ansible, how to deploy with kolla-ansible (previous name: quick start guide) kolla-k8s/deploy-guide — Kolla deployment guide for K8S, how to deploy with kolla-k8s (previous name: quick start guide) We will add 2 links to https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/ocata/: * Kolla deployment guide for Ansible * Kolla deployment guide for K8S Sample split for kolla-ansible prepared at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427965/. The guides itself will be published at https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/ocata/kolla-ansible and https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/ocata/kolla-k8s. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mascot
> On 14 Feb 2017, at 17:27, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > > The mascot is absolutely fantastic! Nice work to all involved! Woot! Awesome! -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support
As discussed in todays team meeting [0]: * the vote is closed * the deprecation is delayed http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kolla/2017/kolla.2017-01-25-16.01.log.html Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support
As discussed in one of the last team meetings I want to propose the deprecation (this cycle) and removal (next cycle) of the Debian support in Kolla. More than 1 week ago I sent a pre warning mail to the openstack-operators mailing list, without any reply [0]. Kolla core reviewers, please vote now. The vote will be open for 7 days (26.01.2017). 1. Kolla needs support for Debian, it should not be deprecated 2. Kolla should deprecate support for Debian [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2017-January/012427.html -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] kolla-build building images that are known not to work for a given base/type
Hello David. Sounds reasonable. I transferred your mail into a Launchpad bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla/+bug/1656753 Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Stepping down from core
Matt, I wish you the best and much success on your further journey. In the past I was able to learn a lot from you and I always appreciated your work. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [kolla] Bugs cleanup dashboard
Hello everybody. Based on the dashboard which is used for the Nova project I have created one for Kolla. The dashboard gets updated hourly. http://kolla.betacloud.io/bugs-dashboard.html Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Question about config cinder volume
> On 2 Dec 2016, at 14:49, Jason HU <huzhiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > 1. Will Glance use Cinder volume as storage automatically when I enable > Cinder? The default store for Glance is “file" when not using Ceph. https://github.com/openstack/kolla-ansible/blob/master/ansible/roles/glance/templates/glance-api.conf.j2#L68-L71 You can change this by using custom configurations (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla/advanced-configuration.html#openstack-service-configuration-in-kolla). > 2. I heard that kolla has a third party plugin method which can be used to do > some setup on target node. Can it be used to setup the cinder-volume vg? Is > there any example on doing this? http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla/image-building.html#plugin-functionality We support a plugin functionality for our Docker templates. I think it is better to create the required volume group with a custom Ansible playbook during the bootstrap of your storage node. > 3. The storage system is HDS AMS2300 which seems do not supported by any > Cinder driver. So I have to use LVM backend. According to the cinder/glance > bug mentioned in Kolla doc, does it mean that I can not deploy > multi-controller scenario, unless using Ceph? Check if you can use the HDS AMS2300 as external iSCSI storage (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla/cinder-guide.html#cinder-back-end-with-external-iscsi-storage). I think the use of LVM2 / iSCSI as a layer before the storage backend is not a good idea. HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible][kolla-kubernetes] Kolla core election policy change - vote
+1 > On 16 Nov 2016, at 19:23, Michał Jastrzębski <inc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > In light of recent events (kolla-kubernetes becoming thriving project, > kolla-ansible being split) I feel we need to change of core reviewer > election process. > > Currently Kolla was single core team. That is no longer the case, as > right now we have 3 distinct core teams (kolla, kolla-ansible and > kolla-kubernetes), although for now with big overlap in terms of > people in them. > > For future-proofing, as we already have difference between teams, I > propose following change to core election process: > > > Core reviewer voting rights are reserved by core team in question. > Which means if someone propose core reviewer to kolla-kubernetes, only > kolla-kubernetes cores has a voting right (not kolla or kolla-ansible > cores). > > > Voting will be open until 30 Nov '16 end of day. Reviewers from all > core teams in kolla has voting rights on this policy change. > > Regards > Michal > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Vote to add zhubingbing to core team
> On 29 Nov 2016, at 17:21, Michał Jastrzębski <inc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd like to propose to add zhubingbing to kolla (and kolla-ansible) > core teams. He did great job reviewing code during last couple of > months. +1 -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Notes on Ansible fact gathering
> On 23 Nov 2016, at 12:12, Paul Bourke <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > In the cases where users have 500 control nodes and want to add five more > sequentially (the value of doing more than one sequentially is still not > clear to me), we could look into turning on fact caching. At https://betacloud.io/speedup-kolla-with-ansible-fact-caching/ I documented a few months ago how to enable fact caching for Kolla or for ansible in general. Possibly it is helpful for someone who wants to test it. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] the alternative of log processing tool
> On 27 Nov 2016, at 06:55, Jeffrey Zhang <zhang.lei@gmail.com> wrote: > > * Fluentd > * Logstash I do not have a strong behaviour. At the moment we use the E and K of the ELK stack. Because of that I think it makes sense to go with Logstash. In this way, we have a stack developed by one community and which is tuned to each other. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement
> On 3 Nov 2016, at 14:33, Mauricio Limawrote: > > I Agree. +1 +1 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation Policies (related to Heka)
> On 29 Sep 2016, at 06:26, Steven Dake (stdake)wrote: > > If you have a different parsing of the deprecation policy, feel free to chime > in. Heka is only used as an internal component of Kolla and is not provided as a service for the operators. It should be sufficient to replace Heka by something else without deprecating it. Christian. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] the user in container should NOT have write permission for configuration file
> On 26 Sep 2016, at 16:43, Sam Yaplewrote: > > So this actually makes it _less_ secure. The 0600 permissions were chosen for > a reason. The nova.conf file has passwords to the DB and rabbitmq. If the > configuration files are world readable then those passwords could leak to an > unprivileged user on the host. Confirmed. Please do not make configuration files world readable. We use volumes for the configuration file directories. Why do we not simply use read only volumes? This way we do not have to touch the current implementation (files are owned by the service user with 0600 permissions) and can make the configuration files read only. Christian. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support
> On 22 Sep 2016, at 17:16, Ryan Halliseywrote: > > I agree with Michal and Martin. I was a little reluctant to respond here > because the Debian additions are new, while Fedora has been around since the > beginning and never got a ton of testing. > > Berendt what's your take here? It is fine for me to keep Debian if someone committed to continue working on it. Christian. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support
Thanks for moving this forward. > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:44, Jeffrey Zhangwrote: > > Please vote: > > 1. Kolla needs support Debian( if so, we need some guys to set up the > gate and fix all the issues ASAP in O cycle) > 2. Kolla should deprecate Debian support +1 on option 2. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support
Thanks for moving this forward. > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:40, Jeffrey Zhangwrote: > > 1. Kolla needs support fedora( if so, we need some guys to set up the > gate and fix all the issues ASAP in O cycle) > 2. Kolla should deprecate fedora support +1 on option 2. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] Core Nomination for Christian Berendt (berendt on irc)
> On 16 Sep 2016, at 02:06, Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Welcome to the core review team! Thank you for being added to the group of core reviewers of Kolla. Looking forward to work with all of you. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] Splitting out Ansible into a separate deliverable
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 08:12, Steven Dake (stdake)wrote: > > c) Split the repository shortly after tagging 3.0.0 – creating a > kolla-ansible deliverable for Ocata. +1 Christian. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Problem regarding named volume data location
> On 02 Sep 2016, at 19:04, Jeffrey Zhangwrote: > > I think the right solution should warn the end-user: you need configure a > large partition for /var/lib/docker. Confirmed. The volumes of Mongodb and of Mariadb are getting pretty big as well. Using /var/lib/nova (or /var/lib/mariadb, ..) on the local filesystem instead of a named volume will change nothing. I think it is the best to stay with named volumes and to document the host requirements. While using named volumes it is also possible to use alternative Docker volume plugins like Convoy. Christian. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Requirement for bug when reno is present
> On 30 Aug 2016, at 12:42, Paul Bourkewrote: > > Do people feel we still want to require a bug-id in the commit message for > features, when reno notes are present? My understanding is that till now > we've required people to add bugs for non trivial features in order to track > them as part of releases. Does/should reno supersede this? I think it makes sense to keep the bug/blueprint id because some of our features are distributed in several reviews and only one of the reviews includes the release note. When removing the bug/blueprint ids from the commit message when a reno note will be added with one of the reviews it will be difficult to track the relations. Christian. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [kolla] future of Debian images
Hello everybody. With this mail I want to propose the deprecation and removal of Debian images from the Kolla project. * On the gates we only test the build of binary images for the following distributions: centos, oraclelinux, ubuntu-trusty, ubuntu-xenial (https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/master/jenkins/jobs/projects.yaml#L5485-L5510) * The most Dockerfile templates do not handle Debian for binary images (only 37 templates handle base_distro type debian, 108 templates handle base_distro type ubuntu) Christian. -- Christian Berendt Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mail: bere...@betacloud-solutions.de Web: https://www.betacloud-solutions.de Betacloud Solutions GmbH Teckstrasse 62 / 70190 Stuttgart / Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Christian Berendt Unternehmenssitz: Stuttgart Amtsgericht: Stuttgart, HRB 756139 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Call for papers already closed?
Hello. I am a little bit confused, according to openstack.org: FEBRUARY 1 IS THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT A TALK (11:59PM PST) I tried to edit a submitted talk and got the following message: Call for speaker closed! Also I have the following note in my interface: Warning! You reached presentations submissions limit (3). Is it not possible to submit more than 3 talks? Anyway, at the moment I only have 2 talks (1 submitted be my, 1 submitted by a other person). I am submitting the talks for all of my colleagues and we prepared more than 3 talks. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Call for papers already closed?
On 02/01/2016 08:46 AM, Wang, Shane wrote: Yes, I was confused too. The time is yet up. It should not be closed, but it is at the moment :/ I forwarded my previous mail to sum...@openstack.org and hope that somebody can take care of this issue. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova] do not account compute resource of instances in state SHELVED_OFFLOADED
After offloading a shelved instance the freed compute resources are still accounted. I think it makes sense to make this behavior configurable. We often have the request to not account the freed compute resources after an instances was offloaded to be able to spawn new instances or to unshelved offloaded instances even the assigned compute resource quota was archieved. Because the instance are shelved and offloaded they do not occupy compute resource and it is often safe to allow the freed compute resources for other inststances. Of coure it has to be checked if there are enough free compute resource when trying to unshelve an offloaded instance. What do you thin about this use case? If it make sense to you I want to propose to write a spec for this feature. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] How to get the current stable release
On 01/12/2016 08:55 AM, Christian Berendt wrote: Sorry if this is a stupid question and I waste your time. I am looking for a file that speicifes the name and version number of the latest stable release. As a use case the following example: We have a sitemap generator that builds a sitemap.xml file for docs.o.o. Now we want to set a higher priority for URLs related to the current stable release ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266241/ ). At the moment I have to hard code the name of the current stable release to be able to check for it and have to remember this and update it with every upcoming release. I think it is more intuitive to have this piece of information in a central file. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] How to get the current stable release
Sorry if this is a stupid question and I waste your time. I am looking for a file that speicifes the name and version number of the latest stable release. I have not found this information in the governance repository (I only found a hard coded variable called latest_stable_branch in the tool/stable.py script, using kilo as the current value (https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/tools/stable.py#L21-L24)). In the releases repository is a note in the doc/source/index.rst file (I think this is the source of http://docs.openstack.org/releases/) that releases/liberty is the current stable release. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs] Incorrect '/p' in Project Source URLs on docs.openstack.org/developer
On 10/16/2015 01:46 PM, Neil Jerram wrote: > I'd be happy to submit a fix for this, but I haven't yet found which > project generates this URL. Can someone advise? The developer documentations use the oslosphinx theme.(http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslosphinx). The mentioned URL is generated in https://github.com/openstack/oslosphinx/blob/master/oslosphinx/__init__.py#L20-L36. Probably there is something wrong. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] naming N and O releases nowish
On 10/07/2015 02:57 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > ...which if I read it correctly means we could pick N now, but not O. We > might want to change that (again) first. Is this list correct? M = Tokyo N = Atlanta O = Barcelona P = ? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] perfomance benchmark metrics of heat-api
On 10/06/2015 05:20 AM, ESWAR RAO wrote: Has anyone done any performance tests on heat-api servers on any standard setup so as to know how many stack requests it can handle before it can stumble so that we can deploy scaling of heat-servers ?? It depends on your environment and you should run your own tests. Have a look at https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/samples/tasks/scenarios/heat for a lot of prepared scenarios for Heat. HTH, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [docs][ptl] Docs PTL Candidacy
On 09/14/2015 04:31 AM, Lana Brindley wrote: I'd love to have your support for the PTL role for Mitaka, and I'm looking forward to continuing to grow the documentation team. You have my support. Thanks for your great work during the current cycle. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [keystone] creating new users with invalid mail addresses possible
At the moment it is possible to create new users with invalid mail addresses. I pasted the output of my test at http://paste.openstack.org/show/456642/. (the listing of invalid mail addresses is available at http://codefool.tumblr.com/post/15288874550/list-of-valid-and-invalid-email-addresses). Is it intended that addresses are not be validated? Does it makes sense to validate addresses (e.g. with https://github.com/mailgun/flanker)? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [nova] installation of requirements not possible because of wrong pip version
According to requirements.txt we require pip=6.0. Trying to install the requirements for nova with pip 6.1.1 is not possible at the moment because of the following issue: $ virtualenv .venv $ source .venv/bin/activate $ pip install -r requirements.txt You are using pip version 6.1.1, however version 7.1.0 is available. You should consider upgrading via the 'pip install --upgrade pip' command. Double requirement given: Routes!=2.0,=1.12.3 (from -r requirements.txt (line 14)) (already in Routes!=2.0,!=2.1,=1.12.3 (from -r requirements.txt (line 13)), name='Routes') It looks like pip 6.1.1 cannot handle the following 2 lines in requirements.txt: Routes=1.12.3,!=2.0,!=2.1;python_version=='2.7' Routes=1.12.3,!=2.0;python_version!='2.7' After upgrading pip to the latest available version (7.1.0) with pip install --upgrade pip everything is working like expected. Does this mean that we have to require at least pip=7.1.0 in the global requirements? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] installation of requirements not possible because of wrong pip version
On 08/07/2015 10:52 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I don't know why Nova has a requirement expressed on pip, since requirements.txt is evaluated by pip its too late. Does Nova actually consume pip itself? pip is not listed in the requirements.txt file of nova. pip is listed in the global requirements: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L112 My understanding is that it is possible to use pip=6.0. Is that wrong? Is there an other place where we documented which version of pip can be used with the requirement.txt files (based on global-requirements.txt)? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ
Hello Michael. Just moving your thread to the correct mailling list. Christian. On 04/28/2015 02:58 PM, Michael Klishin wrote: Hi, I'm a RabbitMQ engineering team member and we'd like to help improve OpenStack docs around it. I've been reading the docs and making notes of what can be improved. We'd be happy to contribute the changes. However, we're not very familiar with the OpenStack development process and have a few questions before we start. As far as I understand, OpenStack Kilo is about to ship. Does this mean we can only contribute documentation improvements for the release after it? Are there maintenance releases that doc improvements could go into? If so, how is this reflected in repository branches? Should the changes we propose be discussed on this list or in GitHub issues [1]? Finally, we are considering adding a doc guide dedicated to OpenStack on rabbitmq.com (we have one for EC2, for instance). Note that we are not looking to replace what's on docs.openstack.org, only provide a guide that can go into more details. Does this sound like a good idea to the OpenStack community? Should we keep everything on docs.openstack.org? Would it be OK if we link to rabbitmq.com guides in any changes we contribute? I don't think OpenStack Juno docs have a lot of external links: is that by design? Thanks. 1. https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals -- MK Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ
Hello Michael. Just moving your thread to the correct mailling list. Sorry for my previous mail. Thunderbird autocompletion used the unsubscribe alias and not the correct mailinglist :( Christian. On 04/28/2015 02:58 PM, Michael Klishin wrote: Hi, I'm a RabbitMQ engineering team member and we'd like to help improve OpenStack docs around it. I've been reading the docs and making notes of what can be improved. We'd be happy to contribute the changes. However, we're not very familiar with the OpenStack development process and have a few questions before we start. As far as I understand, OpenStack Kilo is about to ship. Does this mean we can only contribute documentation improvements for the release after it? Are there maintenance releases that doc improvements could go into? If so, how is this reflected in repository branches? Should the changes we propose be discussed on this list or in GitHub issues [1]? Finally, we are considering adding a doc guide dedicated to OpenStack on rabbitmq.com (we have one for EC2, for instance). Note that we are not looking to replace what's on docs.openstack.org, only provide a guide that can go into more details. Does this sound like a good idea to the OpenStack community? Should we keep everything on docs.openstack.org? Would it be OK if we link to rabbitmq.com guides in any changes we contribute? I don't think OpenStack Juno docs have a lot of external links: is that by design? Thanks. 1. https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals -- MK Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] nominating Nathaniel Dillon for security-doc core
On 03/05/2015 10:14 PM, Bryan D. Payne wrote: I'd like to bring him on as a core member of security-doc so that he can help with the review and approval process for new changes to the book. Please chime in with your agreement or concerns. +1. Christian. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Removal of copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license header
Is it safe to remove copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license headers stated in a lot of files? We recenctly removed all @author tags and added a hacking check to not longer add @author tags in the future. Can we do the same for the copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license headers? Christian. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Removal of copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license header
On 02/17/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: In section 4.(c) the LICENSE text says (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and So based on that, I think it would be a violation to remove any of the Copyright acmeco lines in the file header. Section 4 is about the redistribution of the code. In my understanding this means that I am not allowed to remove the license header if I redistribute a source file (e.g. in a package or in my own software). If I add code to OpenStack I have to sign the CLA. The CLA includes: 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. Does this not mean that it is not necessary to explicitly add a copyright statement above the license headers? According to http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#contributor-copyright and http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html copyright statements should not be added to the headers in source files. Christian. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Missing column in Gerrit overview page showing a -1 review after/with a +2 review
On 02/14/2015 04:46 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: Using gerrit queries might come in handy here. https://review.openstack.org/Documentation/user-search.html For a start, this gets me all reviews that are open for which I am not the author, where I voted +1 (or better) and someone else voted -1 (or lower). I just gave it a quick test to try it out, it might need refining. NOT owner:self status:open label:Code-Review=+1,self label:Code-Review=-1 This way I can display review requests with -1 reviews, yes. On the overview page a +2 review will still hide any -1 reviews. But a -1 review will hide all +1 reviews. I think -1 reviews should be visible regardless of +2 reviews. Christian. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] rethinking docs jobs in the gate
On 02/16/2015 04:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: For documentation projects we should discuss this separately as well, Is it possible to keep all environments like they are and to add a meta environment (called docs) calling the existing environments? This way we can reduce the number of jobs on the gates (entry point for the gates is the meta environment) but can keep the existing environments for local tests. Christian. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Missing column in Gerrit overview page showing a -1 review after/with a +2 review
At the moment there are three columns in the Gerrit overiew page showing the status of a review request: * CR (Code-Review) * V (Verified) * Workflow (WF). After a core reviewer +2 (CR) a review request there will be a green hook in the CR column in the overview page, regardless of -1 reviews. Sometimes I do not have the time to have a look in my Gerrit mail folder. Sometimes I do not have the time to manually monitor pending review requests. This is why I sometimes miss a new -1 of a reviewer because it is not shown in the Gerrit overview page when there is already a +2 of a core reviewer. Also a +2 of a core reviewer will overwrite an existing -1 in the Gerrit overview page. Sometimes I do not have the time to remove my +2 after a new -1 (at the moment it is necessary to remove a +2 after a new -1 to be able to see the new -1 on the Gerrit overview page). I would really like to have a fourth column in the Gerrit overview page showing a -1 on a review request even if there is already a +2 of a core reviewer. What do you think about this? And if this idea is appreciated how can this fourth column be added to the Gerrit overview page? Christian. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [bashate] towards inbox zero on bashate changes, release?
On 10/14/2014 07:03 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: 1) changes for auto-detection. IMO, we should drop all these and just leave bashate as taking a list of files to check, and let test-harnesses fix it. Everyone using it at the moment seems fine without them I am fine with this and abandoned the Introduce directories as possible arguements review request. This way we can use already exisiting tools like find and do not have to re-implement this. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] RSS feeds for gerrit projects
Is it possible to directly access RSS feeds for gerrit projects or is the only way to do this to use a wrapper like openstackwatch in jeepyb? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Usage of @author tags in the header of Python files
After proposing a change to Horizon to remove the @author tags from the header of Python files (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126656/) Matthias Runge proposed to discuss this first on the mailing list. Is it necessary to track the authorship of a file inside the file using @author tags? The copyright statement itself is unchanged and intact after the removal of the @author tags. The copyright statement is not addicted to the authorship of a file so it should be safe to remove the @author tags. The @author tag is not used in other projects. Neutron removed all @author tags some time ago and there are no @author tags e.g. in Nova, or Cinder. There are even local hacking checks in Nova, and Neutron to not use @author tags. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Add a hacking check to not use Python Source Code Encodings (PEP0263)
Hello. There are some files using the Python source code encodings as the first line. That's normally not necessary and I want propose to introduce a hacking check to check for the absence of the source code encodings. Best, Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] mocking policy
On 06/04/2014 02:56 PM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: +1 for adding Mock to the requirements (test-requirements.txt rather than requirements.txt, right?) and using it in newly written tests. +1 for the usage of mock. Also the use of mox3 should be preferred. mox is not compatible with Python3 and it's not under an active development. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] A proposal for code reduction
On 05/21/2014 01:34 PM, Clark, Robert Graham wrote: If you weren’t already aware of it there’s some great content here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo https://github.com/openstack/oslo.test -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Logging exceptions and Python 3
On 05/15/2014 11:20 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: Example: LOG.error(e.message) According to http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0352/ the message attribute of BaseException is deprecated since Python 2.6 and was dropped in Python 3.0. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Horizon] pre-running lesscpy
Hi. Is it possible to pre-run lesscpy? When accessing Horizon in my devstack environment the first time lesscpy is always running several seconds in the background. Tried to run python manage.py compress (setting COMPRESS_OFFLINE=True in the settings.py), but afterwards lesscpy is still running in the background when accessing Horizon the first time. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer tempest testing in gate
On 03/20/2014 01:27 PM, Nadya Privalova wrote: Tim, yep. If you use one db for Ceilometer and Nova then nova's performance may be affected. If I understood it correctly the problem is not the higher load produced directly by Ceilometer on the database. The problem is that the Ceilometer compute agent sends a lot of Nova API calls and this results in a higher load on the nova-api services. Tim mentioned a factor of 16. Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Ceilometer visualization in Horizon
Hello folks. I started playing with Horizon and Ceilometer. I already added the client to openstack_dashboard/api/ and added some pure data tables (cpu/network/storage utilization) to the instance detail panel. Now I want to have some nice graphs there, but at the moment I'm not sure about the graphing library I should use. I gave http://www.chartjs.org/ a try and it's working fine. But I'm not sure about the license (MIT license). Is it possible to add Chart.js to the horizon repository? Or are there any other suggestions? Christian. -- Christian Berendt Cloud Computing Solution Architect Mail: bere...@b1-systems.de B1 Systems GmbH Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev