[openstack-dev] DNS and Designate mid-cycle meet-up - August in Austin
Hello, The Designate team will hold it's mid-cycle meet-up in August, details below. - Dates: August 17 to 20, 2015 - Location: Austin TX - Registration/agenda: http://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/openstack-designate-2015-summer-mid-cycle-meetup-tickets-17833181526 - Remote attendees are welcome and will be accommodated via Google Hangout. Learn more about Designate: - Docs: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/designate/getting-started.html - Wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Designate - IRC: #openstack-dns (everyday) and Wednesday @17:00UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Joining the team - interested in a Debian Developer and experienced Python and Network programmer?
My apologies to the list. This was not intended to be broadcast. From: Joe Mcbride Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 12:42 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Joining the team - interested in a Debian Developer and experienced Python and Network programmer? Hi Matt, Our team at Rackspace is looking to add a developer, focused on building out and deploying Designate (DNSaaS for Openstack). When we go live, we expect to have the largest public deployment, so scaling and migration challenges will be particularly interesting technical problems to solve. Best of luck on getting into the Neutron fun. __ Joe McBride Rackspace Cloud DNS I’m hiring a software developer https://gist.github.com/joeracker/d49030cef6001a8f94d0 From: Matt Grant m...@mattgrant.net.nz Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 2:13 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Joining the team - interested in a Debian Developer and experienced Python and Network programmer? Hi! I am just wondering what the story is about joining the neutron team. Could you tell me if you are looking for new contributors? Previously I have programmed OSPFv2 in Zebra/Quagga, and worked as a router developer for Allied Telesyn. I also have extensive Python programming experience, having worked on the DNS Management System. I have been experimenting with IPv6 since 2008 on my own home network, and I am currently installing a Juno Openstack cluster to learn ho things tick. Have you guys ever figured out how to do a hybrid L3 North/South Neutron router that propagates tenant routes and networks into OSPF/BGP via a routing daemon, and uses floating MAC addresses/costed flow rules via OVS to fail over to a hot standby router? There are practical use cases for such a thing in smaller deployments. I have a single stand alone example working by turning off neutron-l3-agent network name space support, and importing the connected interface and static routes into Bird and Birdv6. The AMPQ connection back to the neutron-server is via the upstream interface and is secured via transport mode IPSEC (just easier than bothering with https/SSL). Bird looks easier to run from neutron as they are single process than a multi process Quagga implementation. Incidentally, I am running this in an LXC container. Could some one please point me in the right direction. I would love to be in Vancouver :-) Best Regards, -- Matt Grant, Debian and Linux Systems Administration and Consulting Mobile: 021 0267 0578 Email: m...@mattgrant.net.nz __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Joining the team - interested in a Debian Developer and experienced Python and Network programmer?
Hi Matt, Our team at Rackspace is looking to add a developer, focused on building out and deploying Designate (DNSaaS for Openstack). When we go live, we expect to have the largest public deployment, so scaling and migration challenges will be particularly interesting technical problems to solve. Best of luck on getting into the Neutron fun. __ Joe McBride Rackspace Cloud DNS I’m hiring a software developer https://gist.github.com/joeracker/d49030cef6001a8f94d0 From: Matt Grant m...@mattgrant.net.nz Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2015 2:13 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Joining the team - interested in a Debian Developer and experienced Python and Network programmer? Hi! I am just wondering what the story is about joining the neutron team. Could you tell me if you are looking for new contributors? Previously I have programmed OSPFv2 in Zebra/Quagga, and worked as a router developer for Allied Telesyn. I also have extensive Python programming experience, having worked on the DNS Management System. I have been experimenting with IPv6 since 2008 on my own home network, and I am currently installing a Juno Openstack cluster to learn ho things tick. Have you guys ever figured out how to do a hybrid L3 North/South Neutron router that propagates tenant routes and networks into OSPF/BGP via a routing daemon, and uses floating MAC addresses/costed flow rules via OVS to fail over to a hot standby router? There are practical use cases for such a thing in smaller deployments. I have a single stand alone example working by turning off neutron-l3-agent network name space support, and importing the connected interface and static routes into Bird and Birdv6. The AMPQ connection back to the neutron-server is via the upstream interface and is secured via transport mode IPSEC (just easier than bothering with https/SSL). Bird looks easier to run from neutron as they are single process than a multi process Quagga implementation. Incidentally, I am running this in an LXC container. Could some one please point me in the right direction. I would love to be in Vancouver :-) Best Regards, -- Matt Grant, Debian and Linux Systems Administration and Consulting Mobile: 021 0267 0578 Email: m...@mattgrant.net.nz __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Designate DNSaaS
Brad, It seems to me you have a classic migration problem on your hands. Assuming your ideal end state is to completely migrate to Designate and minimize customizations (which is definitely preferable for the long term), your strategy is the real challenge. One approach is to deploy Designate and put all new domains and or tenants there. Over time, migrate domains and tenants over. Your consumers will naturally want the new benefits and hopefully facilitate the changes. Another is to have an old fashioned ³cut over². There is considerable risk which can be mitigated by if your domains don¹t change often and your consumer base is aligned. Alternatively, you can run both in parallel and sink between them at the database layer until you can ultimately switch users over. This approach is only recommended if you have to support an older API on the previous system. You can also synchronize to the same set of name servers if you can not change them. The problem with this approach is you will write a lot of throw-a-way code. SOME QUESTIONS: - Is there an API available to your current system for your consumers? If no, that greatly simplifies things. - Can you easily change your name servers with your registrars? - Why bother keeping the old system around? On 6/17/14, 4:38 PM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: Unfortunately #1 is not a real option - designate needs the storage layer to operate. I would guess #2 or #3 would be the more feasible options. Graham MIDGLEY, BRAD bm9...@att.com wrote: PK, I¹d agree with pursuing #1 or with a simple reference implementation like minidns if ripping it out is disruptive. Brad _ From: ESWARAN, PK Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:26 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Graham Hayes (graham.ha...@hp.com); Kiall Mac Innes (ki...@hp.com) Cc: PACHECO, RODOLFO J; JALLI, RANDEEP; O'CONNELL, MATT; MICHALEK, KEN; MIDGLEY, BRAD; BISHOP, JAMES; 'raymond.h...@accenture.com' (raymond.h...@accenture.com); BOEHMER, JEFF; SCOLLARD, JAMES; SHANGHAVI, PRAFUL B Subject: OpenStack Designate DNSaaS Dear OpenStack Dev Team: I exchanged a few thoughts on Designate DNSaaS with Graham Hayes of HP and he advised me to send this out to a larger DEV audience. Your feedback will help the Designte DNSaaS project and also the ATT Cloud group. ATT Cloud group is investigating ³Designate DNSaaS² and we would like to indulge in this emerging technology. We could embrace and also participate into this new OpenStack technology. I am also copying a few of the ATT team members. In ATT in the near term, we would like to use Designate DNSaaS as a frontend while retaining the current ATT backend DNS infrastructure in place. The main issue in this is the role of ³Designate Database² as MASTER database of record for all Designate DNS provisioning. This Designate role is useful when there is a deployment of new DNS system and auth servers. But Š. In ATT, we already have a ³DNS bind provisioner and a database of record² that keeps our DNS authoritative servers updated. Having a dual DNS Master Databases of record will be a synchronizing nightmare and it will be a difficult, time consuming process to reposition our existing BIND auth servers DIRECTLY under Designate. Please also note that the exisitng ATT ³DNS bind provisioner and a database of record² handles multiple services and multiple customers within each service while validating the rightful ownership prior to any DNS manipulations. In the near term we would like to engage in a LESS-THAN-fork-lift effort so that we can enjoy the major functions of ³Designate API², ³Designate Central² and ³Designate Sink². So the question is what are our alternatives without a fork-lift effort? Knowing that the Designate storage layer is pluggable, I was looking at the following possibilities and your feedback could help us. Thank you in advance. 1. Disable the storage layer entirely while keeping it for minimal essential Designate functions. 2. Writing a storage plugin to our existing DB may be one consideration, but this would require a fork-lift effort since the current system supports multiple services and customers. This would take a longer timeframe than what we want to ensure that things are OK. 3. Writing a storage-plugin-backend to a system-process that in turn will manage our existing DB, seems to be a good possibility but this is not yet clear. 4. ?? Possibly other with your feedback. Thanks. P.K. Eswaran ATT Information Technology Operations Middletown, NJ Room C1-2B06 pk.eswa...@att.commailto:pk.eswa...@att.com pe3...@att.commailto:pe3...@att.com (732) 420-2175 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list
Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Designate DNSaaS
On 6/18/14, 12:51 PM, O'CONNELL, MATT mo1...@att.com wrote: I think the thinking was the ATT DNS backend was more desirable (hardened, load balanced, global, configurable, non-prototype, 30 second updates), so the idea was to go around the Designate DNS function and call the ATT DNS API and use the Designate for customer and other non DNS function points. I think that is the plan for CORA. I definitely agree that is a plausible approach and Designate should be able to accommodate customers with a running set of authoritative name servers (assuming supported makes/versions of name servers) as you describe. OP’s challenge is greater than keeping their current backend, they have a database of record” to manage. In ATT, we already have a ³DNS bind provisioner and a database of record² that keeps our DNS authoritative servers updated. My feeling is that eliminating that database would be a better long term solution as it minimizes upgrade complexity. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [designate] FW: The Decline and Fall of Bind 10
On 5/14/14, 1:33 PM, Mike Sisk mike.s...@rackspace.com wrote: https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/208-The_Decline_and_Fall_of_BIND_10. pdf ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [designate] meeting in room 203 for more design work
Sorry, I misspelled ³designate² (again) last time I sent this. On 5/14/14, 4:21 PM, Joe Mcbride jmcbr...@rackspace.com wrote: Hello all, If you are still at the conference today (May 14), we invite you to join us in room 203 at the Openstack conference. We will be working through the following: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-design-summit-designate-session-3 Cheers, joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [desigante] meeting in room 203 for more design work
Hello all, If you are still at the conference today (May 14), we invite you to join us in room 203 at the Openstack conference. We will be working through the following: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-design-summit-designate-session-3 Cheers, joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [designate] Windows problem with install workshop VM
The following command created a virtual box compatible files:
tar xopft designate-workshop_virtualbox.box
I was then able to import the box.ovf file and run it in VirtualBox
('vagrant/vagrant' for user/pass). Can someone with access to a windows
machine give it a run? We can consider this for those running windows.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit
Hi all, Members of the Designate project are in room 203 at the Neutron pod. Look forward to meeting you all. On 5/9/14, 9:17 AM, Hayes, Graham graham.ha...@hp.com wrote: Hi, It looks like us 'none ATC' folk will have access to the project pods - so should we nail down a time on Monday? It looks like the 16:30 onwards is the most popular choice - will we say 16:30 on Monday in the Neutron pod? Thanks, Graham On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 17:45 +, Veiga, Anthony wrote: Hi, The only issue I would see with the pod is that not all of us are ATCs, so we may or may not have access to that area (I am open to correction on that point - in fact I hope someone does ;) ) I¹ll second this. I have an interest in attending and assisting here, but I don¹t have ATC status yet (though I¹m an active contributor technically, just not via code.) I could see it fitting in with our design session, but maybe if we meet on the Monday to do some initial hashing out as well, I think that would be good. I am around for the morning, and later on in the afternoon on Monday, if that suits. Graham On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 11:21 -0600, Carl Baldwin wrote: I have just updated my etherpad [1] with some proposed times. Not knowing much about the venue, I could only propose the pod area as a the location. I also updated the designate session etherpad [2] per your suggestion. If there is time during the Designate sessions to include this in the discussion then that may work out well. Thanks, Carl [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-dns-neutron-nova-designate [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DesignateAtlantaDesignSession On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Joe Mcbride jmcbr...@rackspace.commailto:jmcbr...@rackspace.com wrote: On 4/29/14, 3:09 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.netmailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:I feel this is an important subject to discuss because the end resultwill be a better cloud user experience overall. The design summitcould be a great time to bring together interested parties fromNeutron, Nova, and Designate to discuss the integration that I proposein these blueprints. Do you have a time/location planned for these discussions? If not, we may have some time in one of the Designate sessions. The priorities and details for our design session will be pulled from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DesignateAtlantaDesignSession. If you are interested in joining us, can you add your proposed blueprints in the format noted there? Thanks, joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.o rg http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit
On 4/29/14, 3:09 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: I feel this is an important subject to discuss because the end result will be a better cloud user experience overall. The design summit could be a great time to bring together interested parties from Neutron, Nova, and Designate to discuss the integration that I propose in these blueprints. Do you have a time/location planned for these discussions? If not, we may have some time in one of the Designate sessions. The priorities and details for our design session will be pulled from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DesignateAtlantaDesignSession. If you are interested in joining us, can you add your proposed blueprints in the format noted there? Thanks, joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [designate] Summit Design Session Agenda
I started an etherpad to collect agenda items: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DesignateAtlantaDesignSession Please add your topics in the described format (requires a blueprint). Thanks! Joe McBride Rackspace ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [designate] FW: Open Source @ OpenStack Submission
Good news, team. I’m waiting to hear back on how much time we will be given. On 4/24/14, 8:58 PM, Chris Hoge chris.h...@puppetlabs.commailto:chris.h...@puppetlabs.com wrote: Dear Graham and Joe, Thank you for you submission for Designate to the new Open Source @ OpenStack program. We're happy to inform you that your developer session was accepted and is scheduled for the afternoon of Wednesday, May 14 in room B308. If this time works for you, please respond to this e-mail as soon as possible so that we can add your session to the official schedule. Once you're confirmed, we will follow up with additional resource and session information. Thanks for your contributions to OpenStack and open source software in general, and we look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! -Chris ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [designate] Workshop dependencies bundled with VM
Hi guys, To ensure our workshop is totally untethered and independent of the interwebs, the VM we plan to distribute should include '.deb' and any other software dependencies on the VM itself. Can you be sure to keep that in mind when creating the VM/presentations? An exception can be any docs or configuration, which can be included on the USB keys. Thanks, joe ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] Designate (DNSaaS) design workshop in Austin, TX
Greetings, The Designate project (DNS as a service designed for Openstack) is holding a design workshop in Austin TX. REGISTER AT: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/designate-development-workshop-january-2014-tickets-10180041779 WHO SHOULD ATTEND? - Developers interested in contributing code - Operators concerned with providing feedback and input into the design process DATES TIMES: All times are Central Standard Time (CST). - Monday, January 27 from 9:30AM to 5PM - Tuesday, January 28 from 9:30AM to 5PM - Wednesday, January 29 from 9:30AM to 2PM LOCATION: - The Capital Factory - 701 Brazos St #1601, Austin, TX 78701 - A Google Hangout will also be provided (please register) AGENDA: Actual agenda details will be posted later this week. Our workshop priorities are: - Optimize the project software development process - Blueprint review - Design sessions - Team building MORE WORKSHOP DETAILS: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DesignateAustinWorkshop2014-01 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
