Hi,
I would like to talk about modifying the chain to include port pair group (#1537023<https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+bug/1537023>) and about effects of having port security disabled. Cheers Prithiv From: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com<mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com>> Date: Thursday 31 March 2016 at 00:42 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: meeting topics for 3/31/2016 networking-sfc project IRC meeting Hi everyone, First thanks to Louis Fourie and Paul Carver for chairing the project IRC meetings while I was on business trip. Here are some topics I have in mind for tomorrow’s meeting discussion. Feel free to add more. 1. ODL SFC Driver to networking-sfc 2. Networking-sfc driver to Tacker 3. “Symmetric” parameter in the chain_param and let the underlying driver handle creating a reverse chain 4. “SFC path-ID” parameter in the chain_param for supporting the wireless Gi-Lan scenario 5. Source port specification in the FC Thanks, Cathy -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev