Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [UX] Infrastructure Management UI - Icehouse scoped wireframes

2014-01-16 Thread Steve Doll
Looking good, let me know if I can be of help to make some high-fidelity
mockups.


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com wrote:

 This is a really good evolution. I'm glad the wireframes are getting
 closer to what we're doing for Icehouse.

 A few notes...

 On page 6, what does the Provisioning Status chart reflect? The math
 doesn't add up if that's supposed to reflect the free v. deployed. That
 might just be a sample data thing, but the term Provisioning Status makes
 it sound like this could be tracking some sort of ongoing provisioning
 operation.

 What's the distinction between the config shown on the first deployment
 page and the ones under more options? Is the idea that the ones on the
 overview page must be specified before the first deployment but the rest
 can be left to the defaults?

 The Roles (Resource Category) subtab disappeared but the edit role dialog
 is still there. How do you get to it?

 Super happy to see the progress stuff represented. I think it's a good
 first start towards handling the long running changes.

 I like the addition of the Undeploy button, but since it's largely a dev
 utility it feels a bit weird being so prominent. Perhaps consider moving it
 under scale deployment; it's a variation of scaling, just scaling back to
 nothing  :)

 You locked the controller count to 1 (good call for Icehouse) but still
 have incrementers on the scale page. That should also be disabled and
 hardcoded to 1, right?




 On 01/16/2014 08:41 AM, Hugh O. Brock wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Jaromir Coufal wrote:

 Hi folks,

 thanks everybody for feedback. Based on that I updated wireframes
 and tried to provide a minimum scope for Icehouse timeframe.

 http://people.redhat.com/~jcoufal/openstack/tripleo/
 2014-01-16_tripleo-ui-icehouse.pdf

 Hopefully we are able to deliver described set of features. But if
 you find something what is missing which is critical for the first
 release (or that we are implementing a feature which should not have
 such high priority), please speak up now.

 The wireframes are very close to implementation. In time, there will
 appear more views and we will see if we can get them in as well.

 Thanks all for participation
 -- Jarda


 These look great Jarda, I feel like things are coming together here.

 --Hugh


 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 

*Steve Doll*
Art Director, Mirantis Inc.
sd...@mirantis.com
Mobile: +1-408-893-0525
Skype: sdoll-mirantis
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] UI Wireframes - close to implementation start (Jaromir Coufal)

2013-12-06 Thread Steve Doll
Let me know if I can be of assistance in the visual design of this.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev