Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-dev-tools repo

[Roman Prykhodchenko]

IIRC in this thread we agreed to use separate core groups for different 
repositories 
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/055111.html 

Why not follow that approach in this case?

> 27 бер. 2015 о 09:01 Przemyslaw Kaminski  написав(ла):
> 
> Sorry, I meant
> 
> [2] https://github.com/CGenie/fuel-utils/
> 
> P.
> 
> On 03/27/2015 08:34 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> In accordance with the consensus that was reached on the ML I've set up
>> the fuel-dev-tools repository [1]. It will be the target repo to merge
>> my 2 private repos [2] and [3] (I don't think it's necessary to set up 2
>> different repos for this now). The core reviewers are the fuel-core
>> group. I needed core permissions to set things up and merged a
>> Cookiecutter patchset [4] to test things. After that I revoked my core
>> permissions leaving only the fuel-core team.
>> 
>> P.
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-dev-tools
>> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-dev-tools
>> [3] https://github.com/CGenie/vagrant-fuel-dev
>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167968/
>> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-dev-tools repo

[Przemyslaw Kaminski]

Sorry, I meant

[2] https://github.com/CGenie/fuel-utils/

P.

On 03/27/2015 08:34 AM, Przemyslaw Kaminski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> In accordance with the consensus that was reached on the ML I've set up
> the fuel-dev-tools repository [1]. It will be the target repo to merge
> my 2 private repos [2] and [3] (I don't think it's necessary to set up 2
> different repos for this now). The core reviewers are the fuel-core
> group. I needed core permissions to set things up and merged a
> Cookiecutter patchset [4] to test things. After that I revoked my core
> permissions leaving only the fuel-core team.
> 
> P.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-dev-tools
> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-dev-tools
> [3] https://github.com/CGenie/vagrant-fuel-dev
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167968/
> 

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] fuel-dev-tools repo

[Przemyslaw Kaminski]

Hello,

In accordance with the consensus that was reached on the ML I've set up
the fuel-dev-tools repository [1]. It will be the target repo to merge
my 2 private repos [2] and [3] (I don't think it's necessary to set up 2
different repos for this now). The core reviewers are the fuel-core
group. I needed core permissions to set things up and merged a
Cookiecutter patchset [4] to test things. After that I revoked my core
permissions leaving only the fuel-core team.

P.

[1] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-dev-tools
[2] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-dev-tools
[3] https://github.com/CGenie/vagrant-fuel-dev
[4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167968/

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev