Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

[Ian Cordasco]

 

-Original Message-
From: Erno Kuvaja <ekuv...@redhat.com>
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Date: October 10, 2016 at 10:32:46
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to backport this bug -
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556
> > but review for master is stuck since August -
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/
> >
>  
> My stand on backporting this as I commented to the bug as well:
> """By the looks of it this really isn't a bug but a feature request
> and as such we should not backport it."""

Andrey,

My impression of that review is much the same as Erno's. That said, it seems 
folks want Tomoki's opinion. Could you get their review on that patch so we can 
get it merged for Ocata. It does seem to be a valuable and desirable option 
for glance_store.

Cheers,
--  
Ian Cordasco


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

[Brian Rosmaita]

On 10/10/16, 11:31 AM, "Erno Kuvaja"  wrote:

>On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov 
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to backport this bug -
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556
>> but review for master is stuck since August -
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/
>>
>
>My stand on backporting this as I commented to the bug as well:
>"""By the looks of it this really isn't a bug but a feature request
>and as such we should not backport it."""
>
>Thanks,
>Erno

The patch for master needs a bit of work.  After that's completed, we can
discuss a backport.  I'm inclined to agree with Erno, but am open to other
opinions.  It would help your case to enlist the opinion of the cinder
driver maintainer.

cheers,
brian

>
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Ian Cordasco 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Ian Cordasco 
>>> Reply: Ian Cordasco 
>>> Date: October 7, 2016 at 08:47:19
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> 
>>> Subject:  [Glance] [stable] Bug backports
>>>
>>> > Hi Glancers!
>>> >
>>> > After the news that we all released Newton yesterday, it's time to
>>>start
>>> > thinking about
>>> > backports the future of our Mitaka and Liberty branches.
>>> >
>>> > I expect that Mitaka will start to enter Phase II [1] and Liberty's
>>> > end-of-life is right
>>> > around the corner [2] (2016-11-17). If there are bugs that are
>>>affecting
>>> > those branches
>>> > that need to be backported before their status changes, they should
>>>be
>>> > proposed immediately
>>> > and brought up at the Glance team meeting [3].
>>> >
>>> > [1]: 
>>>http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html
>>> > [2]: https://releases.openstack.org/
>>> > [3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Glance_Team_Meeting
>>>
>>>
>>> In case you missed it, Friday the 14th (October 2016) the stable team
>>> is moving Mitaka to Phase II and Liberty to Phase III [1].
>>>
>>> Please respond to this message with bugs and backport reviews that
>>> should land prior to Mitaka entering Phase II.
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> 
>>>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105302.h
>>>tml
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> --
>>> Ian Cordasco
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>__
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: 
>>>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind regards,
>> Andrey Pavlov.
>>
>> 
>>_
>>_
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: 
>>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>__
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

[Erno Kuvaja]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Andrey Pavlov  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to backport this bug -
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556
> but review for master is stuck since August -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/
>

My stand on backporting this as I commented to the bug as well:
"""By the looks of it this really isn't a bug but a feature request
and as such we should not backport it."""

Thanks,
Erno

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Ian Cordasco 
> wrote:
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ian Cordasco 
>> Reply: Ian Cordasco 
>> Date: October 7, 2016 at 08:47:19
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> 
>> Subject:  [Glance] [stable] Bug backports
>>
>> > Hi Glancers!
>> >
>> > After the news that we all released Newton yesterday, it's time to start
>> > thinking about
>> > backports the future of our Mitaka and Liberty branches.
>> >
>> > I expect that Mitaka will start to enter Phase II [1] and Liberty's
>> > end-of-life is right
>> > around the corner [2] (2016-11-17). If there are bugs that are affecting
>> > those branches
>> > that need to be backported before their status changes, they should be
>> > proposed immediately
>> > and brought up at the Glance team meeting [3].
>> >
>> > [1]: http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html
>> > [2]: https://releases.openstack.org/
>> > [3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Glance_Team_Meeting
>>
>>
>> In case you missed it, Friday the 14th (October 2016) the stable team
>> is moving Mitaka to Phase II and Liberty to Phase III [1].
>>
>> Please respond to this message with bugs and backport reviews that
>> should land prior to Mitaka entering Phase II.
>>
>> [1]:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105302.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Ian Cordasco
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Andrey Pavlov.
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

[Andrey Pavlov]

Hi,

I want to backport this bug -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bug/1616556
but review for master is stuck since August -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357827/

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Ian Cordasco 
wrote:

> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Cordasco 
> Reply: Ian Cordasco 
> Date: October 7, 2016 at 08:47:19
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> 
> Subject:  [Glance] [stable] Bug backports
>
> > Hi Glancers!
> >
> > After the news that we all released Newton yesterday, it's time to start
> thinking about
> > backports the future of our Mitaka and Liberty branches.
> >
> > I expect that Mitaka will start to enter Phase II [1] and Liberty's
> end-of-life is right
> > around the corner [2] (2016-11-17). If there are bugs that are affecting
> those branches
> > that need to be backported before their status changes, they should be
> proposed immediately
> > and brought up at the Glance team meeting [3].
> >
> > [1]: http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html
> > [2]: https://releases.openstack.org/
> > [3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Glance_Team_Meeting
>
>
> In case you missed it, Friday the 14th (October 2016) the stable team
> is moving Mitaka to Phase II and Liberty to Phase III [1].
>
> Please respond to this message with bugs and backport reviews that
> should land prior to Mitaka entering Phase II.
>
> [1]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/
> 2016-October/105302.html
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Ian Cordasco
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Andrey Pavlov.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

[Ian Cordasco]

-Original Message-
From: Ian Cordasco 
Reply: Ian Cordasco 
Date: October 7, 2016 at 08:47:19
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Subject:  [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

> Hi Glancers!
>
> After the news that we all released Newton yesterday, it's time to start 
> thinking about
> backports the future of our Mitaka and Liberty branches.
>
> I expect that Mitaka will start to enter Phase II [1] and Liberty's 
> end-of-life is right
> around the corner [2] (2016-11-17). If there are bugs that are affecting 
> those branches
> that need to be backported before their status changes, they should be 
> proposed immediately
> and brought up at the Glance team meeting [3].
>
> [1]: http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html
> [2]: https://releases.openstack.org/
> [3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Glance_Team_Meeting


In case you missed it, Friday the 14th (October 2016) the stable team
is moving Mitaka to Phase II and Liberty to Phase III [1].

Please respond to this message with bugs and backport reviews that
should land prior to Mitaka entering Phase II.

[1]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-October/105302.html

Cheers,
--
Ian Cordasco

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [stable] Bug backports

[Ian Cordasco]

Hi Glancers!

After the news that we all released Newton yesterday, it's time to
start thinking about backports the future of our Mitaka and Liberty
branches.

I expect that Mitaka will start to enter Phase II [1] and Liberty's
end-of-life is right around the corner [2] (2016-11-17). If there are
bugs that are affecting those branches that need to be backported
before their status changes, they should be proposed immediately and
brought up at the Glance team meeting [3].

[1]: http://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html
[2]: https://releases.openstack.org/
[3]: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Glance_Team_Meeting

Cheers!
--
Ian Cordasco

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev